Daily Archives: Wednesday, October 14, 2015

  • Mia Madre

    Nanni Moretti (2015)

    The main character in Mia Madre (My Mother) is Margherita (Margherita Buy), a film director.  At a press conference, a journalist suggests that Margherita has, unlike many of her contemporaries, continued to make films about social issues rather than with more personal themes.  The movie she is currently shooting is no exception:  it’s about an Italian factory and the impact on its workforce of an American entrepreneur, who takes the business over.  But while the subject of Margherita’s latest picture is socio-political, she is preoccupied on the shoot by what’s going on in her own life.   Her elderly mother Ada (Giulia Lazzarini), a retired classical scholar, is in hospital, and dying.  The tone of Mia Madre is gently elegiac as Nanni Moretti, who co-wrote the screenplay with Francesco Piccolo and Valia Santella, alternates scenes on the set of Margherita’s film with exchanges between her and other family members, at the hospital and in each other’s homes.  Moretti’s film is smooth, elegant, even-paced and unimaginative.   The profession of the protagonist naturally makes you wonder if Mia Madre is autobiographical; if it is, that may partly explain the piece’s restraint.  The parent-at-death’s-door storyline speaks to the personal experience of many of us:  since that personal experience is likely to be enduringly powerful it may, for some people, add emotional meaning and turbulence to what’s on screen.   But, without this fortifying element supplied by the viewer’s own autobiography, Mia Madre is undernourished.  It brings to mind the title of Simone de Beauvoir’s memoir of her mother’s death, Une mort très douce – but de Beauvoir’s use of the word ‘gentle’ in the title was ironic.

    In the course of the story, Margherita learns from others some uncomfortable truths (or, at least, firmly held opinions) about the way she treats people and causes them to behave.  This beautiful, soft-featured woman is accused – chiefly by Vittorio (Enrico Ianniello), a man with whom she’s recently ended a relationship – of being cold and ungenerous.  She has a teenage daughter, Livia (Beatrice Mancini), from a marriage that failed.  The conversations in the film certainly suggest that Margherita lacks the humour of her shrewd, witty mother and her wry, defeated brother Giovanni (Moretti).  But there’s no real exploration of these family relationships and it’s less than clear why Margherita seems so lacking in confidence on the film shoot.  If this uncertainty as a director is meant to express the off-set tensions she’s struggling with, it’s both an obvious and an unpersuasive way of doing so.  Margherita wants her actors to inhabit the characters they’re playing but also to see them ‘standing beside’ their character.  This puzzles the actors but you want to hear more of what Margherita means, and it’s a letdown when she says she doesn’t really know.  Otherwise, the film-within-the-film sequences suggest that Margherita’s movie-making sensibility is uninterestingly conventional, except in one bizarre piece of casting.

    The role of the hard-nosed American boss is being played by Barry Huggins (John Turturro) – a caricature of an arrogant Hollywood star.  It’s surprising that Barry would be keen to work with Margherita unless he needed the work more badly than is suggested; it’s even more surprising that the supposedly sensitive, tasteful film-maker she’s meant to be would want this reliably unreliable egomaniac in her movie.  Mia Madre is such a civilised affair that Barry Huggins seems a gatecrasher but Nanni Moretti may have figured – not without reason – that he needed an injection of vulgar energy.  There were only a couple of bits of John Turturro’s performance as Barry that I liked.  The first was his baffled reaction when Margherita momentarily confides in this outsider about what’s happening in her personal life:  she asks – almost imploring him for an answer – what will happen to her mother’s volumes of Lucretius and Tacitus when she’s dead.  The second was Turturro’s dance at a celebration of Barry’s birthday that Margherita’s film crew arrange.  Plenty of other people in Curzon Richmond, however, sounded as if they were enjoying Turturro’s turn more continuously – they were probably relieved by its crude vitality, just as Moretti intended.

    Most of the playing in Mia Madre is a good deal subtler than this:  Giulia Lazzarini and Moretti himself are particularly good.  There are some acutely observed moments.  Margherita buys food for Ada before visiting her in hospital but puts this special treat back in her bag as soon as Giovanni, who’s also visiting, automatically takes the lead in deciding their mother’s menu for the evening.   Staying in Ada’s apartment, Margherita opens the door to a young salesman from an electricity company.  He’s pushy enough to insist that Margherita find one of her mother’s electricity bills as evidence of how much less she’d pay if she changed suppliers; in the process of searching for a bill, Margherita becomes so upset that the salesman is soon anxious to escape.  Margherita’s rueful but conscientious selection of the right dress for Ada to wear in her coffin is touching and convincing.  But the calmly melancholy rhythm of the film’s movement mutes the distressing substance of Mia Madre.  Even Margherita’s anxious daydreams and nightmares seem to be integrated into the thin, decorous texture.

    1 October 2015

  • The Invisible Woman

    Ralph Fiennes (2013)

    The first half is excellent, thanks to the freedom of the camera movement and the fluid naturalism of the acting, which is well orchestrated by Ralph Fiennes.  His own playing of Charles Dickens is a particular highlight, as are the descriptions of Victorian theatre.  For as long as the developing relationship between Dickens and the eighteen-year-old actress Ellen (Nelly) Ternan is conveyed in hints and moments – a look between them that’s held a fraction too long, Dickens’s wife’s expressions of unease – the tension is absorbing.  But two things combine to make The Invisible Woman increasingly hard work.  The first is purely visual – the natural light interiors (and much of the action takes place indoors) become punitive.  The reliance on natural light made dramatic sense in Cary Fukunaga’s Jane Eyre (2011) – the dark spaces of Thornfield expressed the house’s secrets – but it’s just an eye strain here.  It’s frustrating too because the DoP Rob Hardy’s composition and colouring of the outdoor sequences often have the quality of period paintings come to life – Doncaster races, a London hill where Dickens and his young mistress bump into his son Charley (who is older than Nelly), the beach at Margate.  A greater problem is the shape of Abi Morgan’s script, based on Claire Tomalin’s 1991 biography of Ellen Ternan.  We know from the start of the film that Nelly, now a  headmaster’s wife and a mother, lives in Margate and her seemingly daily routine there is too striking not to be noticed:  Nelly paces along the shore in such agitation that she must be as locally conspicuous as the French lieutenant’s woman was on the Cobb at Lyme Regis.   There’s no real traction between the present (the 1880s) and the flashbacks to Nelly’s life with Dickens (in the late 1850s and early 1860s), which form the major part of the story.  And Nelly’s unhappiness is eventually resolved in a too easy and mechanical way.  She tells a local clergyman about her past, although he’d already worked out who she once was, and, in so doing, gets it out of her system.

    At the start, we watch Nelly and this clergyman, the Reverend Benham, rehearsing a group of schoolboys (at Nelly’s husband’s school) in a play – No Thoroughfare, co-written by Dickens and his friend Wilkie Collins.  (The acting in the school play is at just the right level.)  Benham is a Dickens enthusiast; it’s a conversation with him that triggers Nelly’s memories.   The first flashback features another Dickens-Collins collaboration:  the former is directing, and appearing in, the latter’s play The Frozen Deep in Manchester.  The Ternans, mother and three daughters, are touring actresses, also appearing in the production.  Nelly is the youngest and regarded as a minor talent within the family but she soon catches the director’s attention.  Dickens chooses her to speak the play’s epilogue over the dead body of the character he’s playing.  The juxtaposition of the two plays, and especially the deferral of Nelly’s delivery of the epilogue until the very end of the film are obvious but effective enough; and Fiennes’s dramatisation of Dickens as the centre of attention, on and off stage, is very well done.  You see not only how exhausting this is for his wife Catherine but also how Dickens needs to perform to keep more troubling thoughts and feelings at bay.

    In his playing of Dickens, Fiennes shows more vitality and greater emotional precision than I’ve seen from him since the 1990s roles that launched his film acting career.   Without any harsh words between them, he and Joanna Scanlan, in a fine performance as Catherine, describe a marriage that’s died inside:  the couple are miles away from each other.  Catherine’s physical heaviness is important – it expresses how his wife has become an implacable problem for Dickens:  a dead weight.  For her part, she seems self-conscious about her plumpness (there’s a confounding moment when he interrupts her getting ready for bed and she’s unclothed:  he apologises for his mistake) – yet there’s a slight suggestion too that Catherine Dickens understands that her bulk is a reminder to her husband that she’s there.  When Dickens’s affair with Nelly has become the subject of public rumour and he writes to The Times denying it, Charley (well played by Michael Marcus) reads the letter out to his mother, and she breaks down.  Joanna Scanlan is very moving in this moment, which also gets across a good sense of Catherine’s being the heart of the family.  One of the younger children, playing in an adjoining room, listens curiously to her sobs.  Compared with his wife, Dickens, for all his taking the lead in boisterous games with the children when he’s at home, is a celebrity who belongs to others.

    Kristin Scott Thomas has threatened in a recent interview to give up film acting because it’s too boring:  if she really is bored, it’s beginning to show on screen.   She has very little characterisation as Mrs Ternan and is too languid for a hard-working theatrical mother:  you can’t believe she ever had the energy for either histrionics or childbirth.  I’m not sure why Ralph Fiennes cast her unless for old times’ (English Patient) sake.  Both the older Ternan daughters (Perdita Weeks and Amanda Hale) seem right, though, and Tom Hollander is convincingly eccentric as Wilkie Collins.  In the Margate part of the story, John Kavanagh is properly shrewd and watchful as Benham and Tom Burke plays the difficult part of Nelly’s husband, George, intelligently – although some of the difficulty of the role exposes the weakness of Abi Morgan’s script.  There’s a suggestion late on that George, as well as Benham, may be aware of his wife’s past – but it’s not at all clear when he cottoned on or, if he did, why he said nothing.  If he’s just learned the truth, how has he absorbed it so easily?  There’s a similar lack of clarity in the earlier part of the story, with little indication of what Nelly’s family thought of her going off to France with Dickens (to have a baby, which is stillborn) or if this caused a rift with them.

    The Staplehurst train crash in 1865 is very well staged and upsetting in its traumatic effect on Nelly.  The accident is terrifying in itself but Dickens’s behaviour in the immediate aftermath shows his young mistress that he means to keep her a secret, whatever the circumstances.  Felicity Jones’s looking much younger than her thirty years works for her in this part.  She’s believable as the teenage Nelly; the fact that she retains an immature, though careworn, look in early middle age is an effective way of implying that Nelly hasn’t got beyond her youthful relationship with Dickens.  This is the second film running in which Jones’s character flirts with an older man but the interactions between her and Ralph Fiennes are more persuasive than those between Jones and Guy Pearce in Breathe In:  Fiennes is very good at registering Dickens’s shock at the extent to which he reciprocates.  The bits between them that don’t work so well are, unfortunately, the illustrations of the supposed climax of the relationship and the film’s rather forced linking of this to the plot of Great Expectations.

    10 February 2014

Posts navigation