TV review

  • Christine (TV)

    Christine (1987) + Road (1987)

    (Alan Clarke)

    A double bill in BFI’s Alan Clarke season, Christine and Road were both originally screened in 1987 in the BBC’s Screenplay slot.  The two pieces are different in many ways but a shared feature and strength of them is the dynamism of sequences in which people walk across the screen with a handheld camera in close attendance.  The walking looks purposeful even though, in most cases, the character’s destination hardly vindicates that sense of purpose.

    This is the only strong element of Christine, in which the thirteen-year-old title character (Vicky Murdock) tramps round a suburban estate, like a kid district nurse, dispensing and partaking of heroin.  (The street signs feature the names of Lake Poets, which connects the estate rather strangely with the one on which Reggie Perrin lived.)  Christine’s main port of call is the house where her friend Eddie (Kelly George) is staying with his married brother and sister-in-law, both of whom are out at work.  The youngsters exchange small talk before injecting themselves, which they do with a mixture of concentration and indifference.  The play, written by Clarke and Arthur Ellis, doesn’t build, except in the sense that Christine’s routine may alarm the viewer and that routine is repeated.  The adolescents on the screen aren’t actors to any noticeable degree.  They’re cast for a particular look – just the one.  When they speak, the surface realness of the film is undermined by their clumsy readings:  they sound like actual people only to the extent that they’re actual teenagers trying and failing to act naturally.  We soon get the point that the kids’ lives are meagre, the kids are affectless and Alan Clarke is eschewing dramatic incident.  Christine lasts only fifty-two minutes but that’s a long enough time in which to convey and achieve boringness.

    Road is something else, a sixty-two minute adaptation of Jim Cartwright’s stage play, which started life at the Royal Court Theatre Upstairs in 1986.  The actors are drawn from the first two Royal Court casts:  not the least interest of the piece comes from seeing in their early or mid-twenties people who’ve since gone on to lasting screen careers – David Thewlis, Jane Horrocks, Neil Dudgeon, Lesley Sharp.  The contemporary political context is sharper in Road than in Christine.  The working-class characters in Jim Cartwright’s play live in a deprived area of Lancashire, in the heart of Thatcher’s Britain. (The kids on heroin in Christine are not poor:  we’re meant to assume they get hold of drugs using their own pocket money.)  Alan Clarke doesn’t attempt to disguise Road’s theatre origins and substance.  These are increasingly salient in the physical arrangement of characters on the screen, the audience-confronting monologues, the choruses.  But the piece is powerfully – and humorously – kinetic:  when the suited-up Brink (Dudgeon) and Eddie (William Armstrong) march out at the start of their evening; when a desperate-for-sex middle-aged woman (Susan Brown) totters down the street in pursuit of a young soldier (Tim Dantay) even drunker than she is; when Brink and Eddie head back with the girls they’ve paired up with – Louise (Horrocks) and Carol (Mossie Smith) seem to take a half-dozen steps for every one taken by the men.

    The first of these sequences is scored to the Nolans’ ‘I’m in the Mood for Dancing’ and sets the pattern for the imaginative soundtrack.  Song lyrics are matched, with a measure of irony, to the images on the screen but the numbers aren’t only apt in this way:  the music in them also fits with the emotional energy (and sometimes conflict) of the scene in which they feature.  This is especially true of Clarke’s bravura staging of a down-the-pub ensemble, accompanied by Mel and Kim’s ‘Respectable’, and of the Otis Redding cover of ‘Try a Little Tenderness’, which Eddie puts on a cassette player, when Louise and Carol have gone back with him and Brink to a derelict house.  The use of noise in competition with music – a vacuum cleaner versus a transistor radio, and so on – is effective too.  Road was shot on location, in and around the former coal-mining town of Easington in County Durham, but Alan Clarke and Stuart Walker, his gifted designer, poise the look of the piece between realism and expressionism.

    The suicide of Joey (Thewlis) and his woebegone girlfriend Clare (Moya Brady) is presented as a natural conclusion to the poverty and ill health in which they’re trapped.   A more interesting convergence of the characters’ sexual needs and anger with the larger indigence of their lives is expressed in the succession of monologues, from Eddie, Brink, Louise and Carol, which form the climax to Road.  All four actors are impressive here – although he’s now less well known than the other three, William Armstrong more than holds his own.

    Another remarkable monologue is the one spoken by Lesley Sharp’s character Valerie, who makes a single appearance in the film and – always on the move – talks bitterly about her miserable marriage.  Sharp’s delivery of the monologue is a determined tour de force, although it has the effect of drawing attention to the rhythms of Jim Cartwright’s writing and away from the character.  In spite of the fact that Valerie is always looking down, Sharp is also one of the more camera-conscious performers in Road.  The most camera-conscious, and intentionally so, is Andrew Wilde, in the small but memorable role of Louise’s grease-monkey brother.  He appears at the very start, daubing his sister’s face with motor oil when she’s finished doing her make-up and is all ready to go out.   As she runs upstairs to start all over again, the (unnamed) brother looks straight at the viewer and bellows.  There are no words, only a noise, but the message is clear.  Pretending to startle us – for a laugh – but at the same time meaning to, he wants to know ‘What you staring at??’

    30 April 2016

  • Mrs Silly (TV)

    James Cellan Jones (1983)

    This television film, part of ITV’s All For Love series and based on a William Trevor short story, has a sad and terrible subject:  how children become (or at any rate used to become) embarrassed by their parents in public, especially by the mothers who are our first world.  The difference between these two planes of existence is thrown into relief in Mrs Silly by the fact that Michael’s parents are divorced and his thrusting executive father John has set up home with a new, younger wife, Gillian.  They have twin daughters, large dogs, a big house, a car which impresses Michael’s contemporaries at the prep school to which his father has insisted on sending him (John went to the same school).  That’s a wrench not just for Michael himself but for his mother Florence, with whom he lives in a poky flat.  Florence – who calls herself Mrs Silly because she keeps getting things wrong – is hard up after her divorce.  She has a part-time office job for a small local business.  When Michael, back from school for the Christmas holidays, is alone at home with his mother he loves it and her.  (He doesn’t look forward to spending time with his father and John’s new family.)  But when his mother visits him at school and Michael shows her round and she keeps saying the wrong thing too loudly and rattles on to the headmaster about people in her life back home whom the head doesn’t know from Adam.  Michael is mortified.

    His shame is burningly intensified at the climax to the story.  Florence, John and Gillian all turn out for the confirmation of Michael and some other boys in the school chapel.  At the reception that follows in the Great Hall, his mother slips on the parquet floor – thanks to some sticky remnant of the afternoon tea that’s lubricated the sole of her shoe.  She falls flat on her back in front of the many assembled guests – the bishop who’s conducted the confirmation service, the headmaster and other staff, Michael’s school friends and their families.  Afterwards, his father and Gillian take Michael to dinner at a posh local hotel.  His mother has returned to the bleakly inexpensive bed and breakfast she always stays at when she visits (cruelly named ‘Sans Souci’).   John asks his son if he wants to pop in and say goodbye to Florence.  Michael, who can’t bear to face (or be faced by) his mother, replies that he’s already said goodbye.   That night in the dorm, he sobs.  When his friend in the bed next to him asks if he’s crying, Michael says no – that he’s got a cold.  (We saw him making desperate attempts to convince matron the night before that he had a temperature and wasn’t well enough to attend the church service.)    The other boy reflects on what a splendid day it’s been and how funny it was when that old woman fell over – was she related to Michael?   ‘Some kind of aunt, I think,’ he answers.  Although it’s hours still to cockcrow, he’s already denied her twice.

    This intolerable finale is emotionally powerful but there are fundamental errors in Bob Larbey’s adaptation and James Cellan Jones’s direction.  William Trevor’s story really does dramatise the trauma of a child-becoming-adolescent’s separation from the safe, interior world of his mother.  It’s a third-person narrative but Trevor tells the story through Michael’s consciousness:  although we realise how shaming the growing boy finds his mother in public, we can’t be sure how much his sensitivity and anxiety to protect her from the outside world she’s strayed into are colouring his view.  Larbey and Cellan Jones (the latter, now in his eightieth year, introduced the screening of Mrs Silly at BFI) don’t replicate this ambiguity.  We watch and listen to Florence’s gaffes and her interlocutors’ disdainful or squirming reactions and it leaves nothing to the imagination:  she is unarguably embarrassing.  As a result, what happens at the school reception isn’t the new and indelibly shocking realisation – validation – of Michael’s fears that it is in the short story.  (Surely there’s a pun in the fact that this happens on the day that the boy is confirmed.)  The film’s climax is both weaker than it should be and upsetting in the wrong way:  because Florence has been shown as so insistently ridiculous, visiting this culminating humiliation on her comes over as unkindly excessive.

    This heavy-handed approach is epitomised by the hat which Florence wears to the confirmation day events in the film.   In Trevor’s version, she’s hatless – to Michael she seems shamefully dowdy (and poor) in view of the headgear around her but she’s still, until the tea, publicly inconspicuous.  Cellan Jones has her in a bright red hat with a large red feather:  every other woman there is bare-headed so that Florence is a focal point even in the chapel.  It makes no sense at all:  this pathologically flustered woman, desperately lacking in self-confidence, wouldn’t be seen dead trying to make a spectacle of herself.  The hat could have worked only if she’d consciously decided to throw caution to the winds:  as it is, Cellan Jones keeps in a scene when Florence tries it on for her boss and the younger woman she works with and seeks their assurance that it looks all right.  It’s patently ridiculous but they don’t tell her that – even when she expresses her anxiety to do things right, not to be Mrs Silly on this very special occasion, on this day she wants to be perfect.  Thin-as-a-rail, highly-strung Maggie Smith is texturally very different from the plump, fluffy woman of the short story but in the early scenes her vital eccentricity is subdued:  knowing what was coming, I was fearful that she would be convincing and too upsetting.   But this doesn’t last long:  Maggie Smith isn’t ordinary – even without that wrong-headed hat she would be noticeable.  This came as a relief:  the histrionics made Florence’s tragedy less raw.  (There wouldn’t have been this distancing effect with, say, Judi Dench in the part.)  Smith plays Florence with great skill and sympathy – but sympathy is what it is:  she feels sorry for Mrs Silly.

    One of the strengths of the film, however, is that other characters do the same – and that Cellan Jones presents them sympathetically:  John and Gillian are much more interesting as a consequence.   In his opening scene with Maggie Smith, Michael Culver as John looks as if he might be shaping up for a predictable caricature but he resists the temptation and ends up giving a very good performance.  He’s physically convincing, especially in the way he wears his clothes (like a tailored, close-fitting overcoat as he chats confidently outside the chapel).   It’s not easy to see how the socially alert and ambitious John ever got together with the accident-prone Florence, a vicar’s daughter from out in the sticks.  (It would help if you could believe that she’d once been conventionally very pretty but you can’t.)  Even so, at home with Gillian (well played by Deborah Grant), Culver’s John is surprisingly affecting as he talks about how things have gone wrong for Florence.    The NFT2 audience lapped up James Villiers as the headmaster because, on the surface, he suggests a familiar type – but this character (we notice, for example, that the head recognises each boy in the school) and Villiers’s playing of it are more thoughtful than you might expect.  The same goes for Cyril Luckham as the bishop.  Best of all (and a triumph of sensitive direction) is the dark-haired, dark-toned Adrian Ross Magenty as Michael.  He beautifully expresses the torture of the boy’s confused loyalties and is able to seem both childish and spiritually older than either of his parents.   Michael’s final disowning of his mother is extremely moving because we can see how much he loves her.

    1 October 2010

Posts navigation