Film review

  • Silence

    Martin Scorsese  (2016)

    In his last movie, The Wolf of Wall Street, Martin Scorsese took an insubstantial subject and gave it a dazzling treatment.  His new one is the exact reverse, an uninspired exploration of weighty matters.  Ryan Gilbey in the New Statesman is unfortunately right:  ‘If ever there was a film that was both thought-provoking and deathly dull, it is this one’.  Silence is adapted (by Jay Cocks and Scorsese) from a 1966 novel of the same name by Shūsaku Endō, based on historical events from the mid-seventeenth century.  It tells the story of two young Portuguese Jesuits, Sebastião Rodrigues (Andrew Garfield) and Francisco Garrpe (Adam Driver), who travel to Japan in search of a third priest, Father Cristóvão Ferreira (Liam Neeson).  Formerly Rodrigues’s and Garrpe’s mentor, Ferreira went to Japan as a missionary but is reported to have apostatised and gone native.  There are echoes of Heart of Darkness here but Scorsese makes immediately clear, in a prologue, the extreme pressure under which the priest renounced his faith.  Ferreira witnesses the torture and crucifixion of fellow Christians by the Japanese authorities.  He knows there’s only one way of avoiding the same fate.

    Scorsese wastes no time either in sending Rodrigues and Garrpe, after a brief exchange with a senior member (Ciarán Hinds) of their Jesuit college in the Portuguese colony of Macau, on their voyage.  This may have been a mistake:  showing a bit more of the two priests on their home patch might have strengthened the presentation of Japan as traumatising terra incognita.  But if Scorsese rushes the embarkation – Rodrigues and Garrpe are smuggled into Japan on a Chinese boat – it’s the last thing in Silence that does happen too quickly, at least until the last quarter-hour of this 161-minute marathon.  The Japanese odyssey is hard going for the viewer, not just because of the priests’ gruelling experiences but also because it’s boring.  It’s difficult enough for a film-maker nowadays to engage an audience’s sympathies with devout Christians, let alone representatives of religious imperialism.  Scorsese makes matters worse for himself by putting his protagonists – who are underdeveloped as characters – in what is to them a foreign country but to experienced moviegoers a not in familiar locale.

    Rodrigo Prieto’s cinematography often gives the landscape (actually Taiwan) a desert pallor that expresses well the place’s inhospitableness to the alien culture of Christianity – this point is made repeatedly in dialogue – but the people the priests encounter are less extraordinary than the terrain.  The hunter-persecutors of Christians in seventeenth-century Japan aren’t so different, when it comes to cackling malignancy, from the denizens of bandit or Injun country in plenty of Westerns.  The serial apostate-survivor Kichijiro (Yôsuke Kubozuka), who keeps turning up and routinely begs Rodrigues to hear his confession, may be meant to have a peculiarly Christian significance but comes over as a stereotypical fawning sniveller.  The Inquisitor Inoue (Issey Ogata is theatrically charismatic in the role) has the controlled, sneering articulacy of many a Nazi officer or Bond villain.  There are moments in Silence that verge on up-against-it-heroism genre parody – as when Rodrigues, confronted by a row of hostile interrogators, demands to meet the Inquisitor (in other words, ‘Take me to your leader’).  The Japanese laugh derisively; when Rodrigues asks why they’re laughing, Inoue, in the middle of the row, introduces himself as the Inquisitor.  (Who did Rodrigues think he was talking to?)

    The two elements that make Silence substantially distinctive are its unresolved ambivalence towards the priests – Rodrigues in particular – and a succession of torture and execution scenes, which are often impressive.   A sequence in which three Japanese Christians are crucified at sea is a troubling combination of grim, mad and beautiful, centred as it is on Mokichi (Shinya Tsukamoto), who takes several days to die for his faith and always remains ready to do so.  In an unequivocally shocking bit, a man’s decapitation is made horrifying less by a shot of his severed head than by the long bloodstain that runs across the screen when his body is dragged away for burial.   Startling too is the contrast between these brutal acts and the smallness of what the authorities require as a sign of apostasy (and which they frequently insist to their prisoners is ‘only a formality’):  although this is at first described as ‘trampling’ on an image of Christ, it’s enough for the Christians to step on the metal portrait of Jesus.  Yet visually powerful moments are, until the closing stages, relatively rare.  The exposition of the core themes of Silence is achieved mostly through the spoken word – in Rodrigues’s showdowns first with Inoue and then, at greater length, with Ferreira, when the two priests are eventually reunited (Garrpe has been murdered by this point).  An over-reliance on words is confirmed near the end of the movie with the sudden, clumsy introduction of a new narrative voice – a Dutch trader called Dieter Albrecht (Béla Baptiste) whizzes through what happened to Ferreira and Rodrigues in the decades that follow the bulk of the action.

    This voiceover also serves another and more interesting purpose, though.  As Albrecht recounts the developments he observes on his occasional visits to Japan over the years, Scorsese supplies mainly visual indicators that what’s apparent may not be the whole story.   This idea has been anticipated in the debate between Rodrigues and Ferreira.  The latter gets the better of the argument as a verbal exchange, insisting that even when Christianity flourished in Japan it did so only through being distorted into something the Japanese, who ‘can’t conceive of anything beyond the world of nature’, could believe in.  (Ferreira points to the sky and tells Rodrigues that, to the Japanese, the son of God was never more than the sun of God.)  Ferreira’s thesis doesn’t square, however, with the emotional effect the viewer experiences during Mokichi’s crucifixion.   Eventually, Rodrigues seems to follow the example of Ferreira – in apostatising, in observing Buddhist ritual, in inheriting a Japanese widow (Asuka Kurosawa) and her children as his wife and family.   The silence of the film is, for the most part, the silence of God, which Rodrigues experiences, at different times, as merely an absence and as an expression of divine sympathy with men who suffer in God’s name.  In the final scenes, however, we get an increasing sense that the silence is Rodrigues’s too – that his conforming words and behaviour doesn’t reflect his private thoughts.

    Although Rodrigues is presented in the eleventh-hour narration as virtually the last Catholic priest left in the country, the faith was never entirely extirpated.  The legends at the end of Silence comprise the Society of Jesus motto ‘Ad maiorem Dei gloriam’ and a dedication of the film to ‘the Japanese Catholics and their pastors’.  (According to Wikipedia, there are today around half a million Catholics in Japan, representing just under 0.5% of the total population.)   Shūsaku Endō (1923-1996) was baptised a Catholic at the age of eleven or twelve, after his parents divorced and his mother converted to Catholicism.  He remained a Christian for the rest of his life and Christian belief was a consistent theme of his novels.  Martin Scorsese was raised in a strongly Catholic family.  Although he’s not been a practising Catholic for many years, his cinema reveals a recurring fascination with faith:  Silence is (like The Last Temptation of Christ) a project which he’s proved tenaciously determined to bring to fruition, even though the gestation period has been extremely long.  The end product is given substance more by one’s awareness of Scorsese’s abiding, unquiet interest in religious belief and imagery than by what he has put on the screen.  It’s a regrettable fact that, when Scorsese aims for an explicitly ‘religious’ effect, the result tends to be anti-climactic at best – when, for example, Rodrigues sees his reflection in a pool of water turn into the face of Christ, or the voice(over) of God speaks to the young priest.

    There are times when the earnestness in evidence seems to reflect the main actors’ reverence for the major film artist they’re working with as much as it does the piety of the people they’re playing.  Andrew Garfield gives a conscientious performance in a tough role but his Rodrigues never quite sparks to individual (as distinct from representative) life.   Adam Driver, in spite of the brevity of the sequences in Macau, immediately suggests a young man more cut out for the classroom or the cloisters than for adventures further afield.  Garfield and Driver speak in accented English, presumably as a Portuguese might.  I’m not sure why Scorsese encouraged this (assuming that he did) – possibly as a means of acknowledging historical distance between the actors and their characters, their cultural ‘foreignness’ to each other?  Whatever the reason, neither Garfield nor Driver sounds entirely comfortable with the accent.  But they both become convincingly emaciated in the course of their arduous travels.

     

    3 January 2017

  • Blue Collar

    Paul Schrader (1978)

    The crucial influence of Rust Belt voters on the outcome of this year’s presidential election gives Blue Collar a resonance beyond its original intentions – at least for a viewer seeing Paul Schrader’s debut feature for the first time in December 2016, as I did.  The setting is the automobile industry in Detroit, Michigan in the mid-1970s, the very early years of the motor city’s protracted economic decline.  Schrader and his brother Leonard, with whom he wrote the screenplay, deliver a twofold political message:  (1) the capitalist industrial system subjugates and screws the workers; (2) in the US, labour unions are part of this corrupt system.  Paul Schrader is belt-and-braces, to put it mildly, about conveying the message, which comes across loud and clear, in dialogue and incident.  In case anyone has missed it, Schrader ends the film by repeating words spoken by Smokey James, one of the three main characters.  Smokey has died in the meantime but his posthumous voiceover confirms that:

    ‘They pit the lifers against the new boys, the young against the old, the black against the white.  Everything they do is to keep us in our place.’

    The three auto workers at the centre of Blue Collar are two African Americans and one white man, from a Polish immigrant background.  Smokey (Yaphet Kotto), Zeke Brown (Richard Pryor) and Jerry Bartowski (Harvey Keitel) are workmates and best mates.  Zeke and Jerry have wives and kids; all three are struggling to make ends meet (Smokey is in debt to a loan shark).  They therefore plan to rob a safe at the headquarters of their labour union.  The theft yields slim cash pickings but the men discover a ledger containing evidence of the union’s links to organised crime and illegal loan operations.  The trio’s attempt to blackmail the union has disastrous consequences.  Smokey dies in a suspicious incident at the factory.  The integrity of both Zeke and Jerry is seriously challenged and their friendship destroyed.

    Every so often during the opening titles the frame freezes on an image of hard labour at the auto plant.  It’s immediately clear that Paul Schrader means business, and to do it in bold face with double underlining (and I didn’t even recognise the song accompanying the titles:  Captain Beefheart’s ‘Hard Workin’ Man’). Schrader’s orchestration of the various elements of the dehumanising working conditions – the massive machinery, the deafening noise – is impressive for a first-time director.  But there’s a lack of fluidity in his handling of scenes that describe the principals’ lives outside work, in each other’s company and with their families, even though, at the start anyway, these seem meant to be relatively loose and natural.   As might be expected from the screenplay credits, there’s some fine writing.  (The lesser-known Leonard Schrader subsequently worked with his brother on the script for Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters.  That film was released in the same year as Héctor Babenco’s Kiss of the Spider Woman, with a screenplay by Leonard adapted from Manuel Puig’s novel.)  The dialogue is especially good when the Schraders blend political insight and humour – as, for example, when Zeke says of his place of work that ‘plant is short for plantation’.  We get a good sense too of the men’s ambiguous attitude towards their labour union, which they treat as they might a close family member:  they frequently slag the union off but bridle at an outsider’s doing so.

    The sequence in which Smokey is asphyxiated in the paint shop at the plant is terrifyingly claustrophobic:  convincingly realistic and eloquent as metaphor, this is the high point of Blue Collar.  Unfortunately, it also turns out to be a point of no return:  from this stage onwards, the moral conflicts and compromises forced on Zeke and Jerry are overblown in the manner of a wrestling-with-conscience 1950s melodrama.  (Compared with the closing stages of Blue Collar, On the Waterfront is understated, as well as much more powerful.)   Richard Pryor is imaginatively cast as Zeke; he and Yaphet Kotto both give interesting performances.  Harvey Keitel the actor works almost as hard as the character he’s playing yet Keitel never seems to get inside Jerry or to bring him fully to life.  Among the supporting cast, Harry Bellaver, playing a union boss, is particularly convincing – until the Schraders start using him as an ironic mouthpiece.

    21 December 2016

Posts navigation