Film review

  • Kes

    Ken Loach (1969)

    Barry Hines’ novel A Kestrel for a Knave, first published in 1968, is well named.  It picks up two meanings of ‘knave’ – a rascal or a man of low social standing.  The title derives from the fifteenth-century Book of St Albans, a kind of contemporary gentleman’s handbook, which includes a detailed hierarchy of falconry, pairing social ranks and particular birds of prey.  The hierarchy comprises no less than fifteen levels, from emperor down (a king is only second class).  The lowest rank is knave or servant, the only bird such a person might legally own a kestrel.

    Hines’ protagonist, fifteen-year-old Billy Casper, answers to both definitions of knave.  From a working-class family in South Yorkshire, Billy already has juvenile delinquent form; he says his petty criminal days are behind him though he still swipes sweets from the newsagent’s where he has a paper round, and milk from a milk float when the milkman’s back is turned.  Billy’s mother is a single parent; his father is long gone; his elder brother, Jud, with whom Billy shares a bed, is really his half-brother.  Billy will soon leave school, at the earliest possible opportunity, with no qualifications.  He hasn’t a clue what he wants to do but is sure he’s not going to follow Jud down the pit, where so many local men work.  Billy is interested in the natural world, though, and often goes for solitary walks in woodland or farmland.  One day, he steals a young bird from a kestrel nest and decides to train it.  He calls the bird Kes.

    Barry Hines shared the screenplay credit on Kes with the film’s producer, Tony Garnett, and director, Kenneth (as he was known on credits then) Loach.  I don’t think I’d seen Kes since I was a teenager:  it’s being shown at BFI currently (in the ‘Big Screen Classics’ slot), presumably to coincide with the UK release of Philippa Lowthorpe’s H is for Hawk (2025).  Kes is a fine film, perhaps Ken Loach’s best.   It’s certainly political, in its indictment of the bleak prospects faced by unqualified and unskilled working-class boys.  It isn’t narrowly polemical, though, in the manner of late-Loach films like Jimmy’s Hall (2014) and I, Daniel Blake (2016).

    Loach is unsentimentally partial to the social routines of the local community in Kes, which was shot in and around Barnsley.  This comes through most strongly in a sequence in the working men’s club, which cuts between Jud (Freddie Fletcher) and his pals chatting up girls, Billy’s mother (Lynne Perrie) and her latest bloke at a nearby table, and the musical entertainment on stage (a group covering Bobby Goldsboro’s ‘Honey’, a comic singing ‘Oh! What a Beauty!’).  The WMC audience is clearly made up of real locals enjoying what for them is normal Saturday night entertainment (except for the cameras).  Meanwhile, Billy (David Bradley) is at home, reading the book on falconry he nicked from a bookshop because he’s not a member of the public library.

    There are moments in Kes when you wonder if Loach has become so absorbed in the rituals of the lives described that there’s not enough of the title character, but the rationing of sequences showing Billy training the bird proves very effective.  If there were more of them earlier, the classroom scene where English teacher Mr Farthing (Colin Welland), the one sympathetic member of school staff in the story, gets Billy up at the front to talk about training the kestrel, might not have such impact.  Billy starts reluctantly and haltingly but soon can hardly contain his enthusiasm.  For the film’s audience, the enthusiasm is infectious – and Billy’s classmates’ more varied reactions are very credibly observed.  A few kids look interested, a few bored, while others seem relieved that, for as long as someone else is the focus of attention, they’ll be safely ignored.  Farthing is full of praise for what he hears.  Talking with Billy afterwards, he says he’ll come along to watch him training Kes during the school lunch hour and is as good as his word.  Because Loach hasn’t shown much of the training up to this point, we, like Farthing, can enjoy it as revelatory.

    Some accounts of the film describe Billy as virtually illiterate but that’s just not the case – and not only because, early on, he reads aloud cartoon captions in The Dandy.  There’s no suggestion that he struggles to read the stolen book or relies on its illustrations to teach himself falconry.  After using the words ‘jesses’ and ‘swivel’ and ‘leash’ in what he tells the class, Billy is asked by Farthing to write the words on the blackboard, and he does, spelling them correctly.  It’s true that, later on, in a careers interview, Billy claims that he can hardly read or write, but that’s partly because he wants out of the interview as quickly as possible and says things to try and convince the ‘youth employment officer’ (Bernard Atha) that their conversation is a waste of time.  Loach’s point that Billy’s life is circumscribed by preconceived attitudes, including his own, is more strongly made by illustrating his potential and aptitudes, literacy among them.

    Unlike some later Loach works, Kes doesn’t insist that characters can be only one thing; nor does it whitewash cruelty.  Jud isn’t a hero because he’s a coal miner and isn’t, because he bullies Billy, incapable of appealing humour, joking in the club that his mother’s companion is so tight-fisted that when he married, he got the confetti on elastic.  It’s the same Jud who delivers the story’s nasty coup de grâce by killing Kes – because Billy failed to carry out instructions to put Jud’s bet on and both horses won.  The famous episode on the school football field and in the changing rooms afterwards is a very striking juxtaposition of comedy and viciousness.  Even allowing that Billy’s small for fifteen, it’s hard to believe that he and the other boys in his class are the same age.  (The girls in the class, as well as an apparent minority, play a very minor role.)  But the collection of different shapes and sizes in the football match is very comical.  On the field, sports master Mr Sugden (Brian Glover), wearing Man Utd strip, is an entertaining autocrat and showoff – would-be star striker as well as referee.  In the changing rooms, Sugden is a more offensive martinet, continuing to pick on Billy and making him stand under a freezing cold shower.  (This working-class tyrant in a northern secondary modern school subjects his victim to the same punishment endured by privately educated Mick Travis at the hands of a vile prefect in Lindsay Anderson’s If…, released the year before Kes.)

    The short sequences at the newsagent’s and the bookie’s, in the public library and a fish and chip shop, all enrich the film’s social texture.  The BFI handout’s claim that Colin Welland ‘was the only professional actor in the cast’ isn’t quite accurate.  Bill Dean, as the man at the chippie, had had several small roles on TV and in cinema – ditto Harry Markham, who plays the newsagent.  But the main cast other than Welland were all first-time actors.  Among the adults, vividly believable Lynne Perrie is outstanding, and it’s no surprise that her future screen career would be the most sustained.  Perrie first appeared in Coronation Street in 1971 and played Ivy Tilsley well into the 1990s; she also had a lead role in Leeds United!, a 1974 Play for Today, written by Colin Welland.

    The least successful casting in Kes is Bob Bowes.  He’s the school headmaster, Mr Gryce, as inept as he is abusive.  Bowes looks the part, as well he might:  he really was a secondary modern head in the area.  With scripted lines to deliver, he’s not convincing, though.  He’s monotonously shouty, so it doesn’t help that Gryce has perhaps the film’s longest monologue – even though the reactions of Billy and other boys, as Gryce inveighs against them and metes out corporal punishment, come close to saving the scene.  Alone in Kes, Gryce is a one-dimensional figure because he’s conceived and played as the representative of a bad system (and is thus a forerunner of other Loach characters in more recent years).

    David Bradley gives what must be one of the finest teenage performances in British cinema history.  As skinny, canny Billy, Bradley is thoroughly authentic yet he’s also an instinctive actor, with a precocious understanding of the camera and ability to shape and vary his line readings.  Loach directs him very skilfully.  A few years later, he would (as Dai Bradley) play Alan Strang in Equus on stage, on both sides of the Atlantic; it’s a pity that Bradley’s acting career didn’t develop much beyond that.

    The cinematography by Chris Menges achieves strong spatial contrasts throughout yet never stresses too much the transforming freedom experienced by Billy as he trains the bird in the great outdoors.  Although John Cameron’s pleasant music is a bit too sensitive, Ken Loach uses it sparingly, and effectively.  The film’s closing scene, in which Billy buries Kes, is admirably understated, which makes it even more tragic.

    7 February 2026

  • No Other Choice

    Eojjeolsuga eobsda

    Park Chan-wook (2025)

    Yoo Man-su, long-standing employee of a South Korean paper manufacturer, loses his middle-management job after an American outfit takes over the firm.  The loss of earnings jeopardises his comfortable home life with his wife, daughter, stepson, and their two golden retrievers, but he vows to get back into the paper-making industry within three months.  Thirteen months later[1], he’s in relatively very lowly employment.  He can’t keep up the mortgage payments on the family’s house or afford the expensive cello lessons recommended for his little daughter, Ri-one.  Even the dogs have had to be rehomed with his in-laws.  Man-su’s wife, Lee Mi-ri, gets a part-time job at a dental practice to help keep their heads above water but Man-su’s latest attempt to return to a management role ends in humiliation.  He feels like killing Choi Seon-chul, the executive responsible for that humiliation; on the point of doing so, Man-su thinks again, reckoning murder will be worthwhile only if he can take over the dead man’s job.  So he fakes an advertisement for a high-powered position and receives applications to identify his best-qualified competitors in the field.  There are three, including the man he nearly murdered.  Man-su embarks on a mission to kill each one in turn, using the gun his father once used in the Vietnam War.

    No Other Choice is very different from the other Park Chan-wook films I’ve seen – Stoker (2013), The Handmaiden (2016) and Decision to Leave (2022) – and inferior to all three.  Even in the opening sequence, as Man-su presides over a family barbecue and tells himself, ‘I’ve got it all’, the tone verges on mocking.  The film soon turns into black comedy and stays that way.  Park has directed comedy before:  if this new work is typical of his comic style, I’m relieved not to have seen the movies in question (Trio (1997), I’m a Cyborg, But That’s OK (2006)).  To assert its comedy credentials, No Other Choice includes a good deal of people tripping and slipping, banging their heads, farting loudly, and so on.  Although the plot becomes convoluted, the style is consistent enough, but the result is laborious right to the end, which takes an unbelievably long time coming.  At 139 minutes, the film is just the same length as Decision to Leave and only a few minutes shorter than The Handmaiden, both infinitely richer pieces.

    The action is often extravagantly violent as Man-su dispatches his rivals and buries their bodies, in both cases clumsily.  It’s no surprise that the film has attracted mostly excellent reviews from critics (at the time of writing, it’s 97% fresh from 215 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes).  Park’s reputation ensures that more than a few members of the press will genuflect automatically.  More remarkable is No Other Choice’s commercial success – in South Korea and North America, where its takings have already tripled its production budget.  Maybe it’s the garish, plentiful mayhem and bloodshed, along with regular dollops of broad comedy, that have helped Park to the biggest box-office hit of his career.

    Despite praise for the film as a ‘sensational state-of-the-nation satire’ (Guardian), Park’s target in No Other Choice seems less the capitalist rat race as such than the outlook of Man-su and those on his hit list.  The paper-making industry is, of course, a line of work that guarantees an ecological subtext throughout.  But Park’s words about his protagonist in an online interview[2] are instructive too:

    ‘Man-su has lived a foolish life where he believes that making money at his job equates to his entire existence, and that to make money equates to being a father and a husband.  So, to him, losing his job means he’s become worthless as a man.  He’s a very pitiful person who is stuck in a small box where he believes that a husband or father has to act a certain way.’

    The idea that a man is defined by his work has a long and not ignoble cinema history, though the man (it usually has been a man) needs to have the right kind of job.  No Other Choice is a clear case in point.  Few of its admirers would enjoy a film about a dedicated teacher who lost their job, let alone blue-collar workers on a factory production line, even in a paper mill.  Man-su is fired from Solar Papers after voicing opposition to the new owners’ downsizing plans that will make junior colleagues redundant, but Park gives him no credit for that.  As his words above suggest, he’s highly unsympathetic to his anti-hero’s plight, never mind that Man-su does need to ‘make money’ to support his family.  When he describes Man-su as ‘pitiful’, Park means inadequate rather than deserving of pity.  An internationally successful film artist is showing his contempt for a confirmed, seemingly conscientious white-collar worker.  It doesn’t make for edifying viewing.

    No Other Choice is dedicated to Costa-Gavras (now in his nineties), best known for Z but who also directed the French-made Le couperet (2005).  This was the first screen adaptation of Park’s source material – Donald E Westlake’s 1997 horror-thriller novel The Ax.  Westlake’s title, hinting at what the paper industry does to both the trees it needs and the workers it doesn’t need, is neater but Park is at pains to justify his.  (He shares the screenplay credit with Lee Kyoung-mi, Don McKellar and Lee Ja-hye.)  Solar Paper’s new management, without justifying the laying off of staff, insist they have ‘no other choice’.  Man-su’s first victim is Goo Beom-mo (although it’s actually Goo’s drama-queen wife A-ra who, in a three-way stuggle with her husband and Man-su, fires the fatal shot).  Another veteran of the paper industry and a hopeless alcoholic since he lost his job, Goo laments that he has ‘no other choice’ but paper when it comes to how he makes a living.  Unless I missed it, the second victim, amiable Ko Si-jo, a sales assistant in a shoe store since he lost his paper-work, doesn’t say ‘no other choice’, but Man-su mutters the phrase to himself repeatedly.  In his case, its meaning is a bit more ambiguous.  Man-su could simply be echoing Goo’s sentiments.  He could also be referring to the homicidal journey on which he’s embarked.

    Almost throughout the film, Man-su has bad toothache.  He refuses treatment offered by his wife’s boss, Oh Jin-ho, partly because Man-su suspects the dentist of having designs on Mi-ri but chiefly because the toothache is symbolic.  It represents Man-su’s guilty conscience about what he’s doing or, to put it more positively, nagging vestiges of humanity.  This is the closest that Park comes to sympathy with Man-su.  Abstinent for most of the story, he’s obliged to drink with Seon-chul, to get him drunk and ripe for killing.  Alcohol helps Man-su withstand the pain of yanking out his decayed tooth with pliers, before dispatching his third and last victim.  Once Man-su’s troublesome tooth is out, the film’s normal sardonic service is fully resumed

    No Other Choice‘s best bits are the scenes between Man-su and Mi-ri – though they’re also frustrating since they give a flavour of what Lee Byung-hun and Son Ye-jin, who play the pair, might be capable of in a suppler Park film.  As Man-su, Lee is committed and necessarily energetic throughout but the husband-and-wife exchanges allow him to be more nuanced.  A highlight is a fancy dress party and its aftermath, where dental envy and marital tension collide, and the result is funny and sad.  Delayed on nefarious business, Man-su arrives late to the party to see his wife and Oh, both dressed as Native Americans, dancing together.  He feels a fool in his military uniform, gold braid and bicorne hat.  Back home with Mi-ri, he demands an explanation – ‘What were you thinking?  Matching your costume with Dr Ouch – dressing me up as a goddamn Nutcracker?’  His exasperated wife enlightens Man-su – he was meant to be John Smith, and she was Pocahontas:  ‘Ri-one’s favorite cartoon!  You forgot?  We watched it a million times with her!  When I told Dr Oh I’d be Pocahontas, the whole clinic decided to be Native Americans! … You and I were meant to be a pair!’

    And that’s what they are, even when Mi-ri finds out what Man-su has been up to.  Lee Byung-hun and Son Ye-jin convey so well what attracted the couple (and still attracts them) to each other that their relationship is more interesting than anything else in No Other Choice – whether the botched serial killings, the neurodivergent cello prodigy Ri-one, or a subplot involving Si-one, Mi-ri’s son from her first marriage, who, with a schoolfriend, steals iPhones from a store owned by the friend’s father.  The latter is also the offensively arrogant would-be buyer of Man-su and Mi-ri’s property when they’re struggling to keep it.  You can’t help but be pleased when they get the better of him.

    Man-su is appointed by Moon Paper to the post vacated by Seon-chul.  His family can afford to keep their house and Ri-one’s cello lessons.  The little girl’s anti-social behaviour is also improved by the return of the golden retrievers, though they’ll need to stop scrabbling around the apple tree under which the bodies of Si-jo and Cheon-sul are buried.  Man-su has less to fear from the dumb police detective duo who decide that Goo Beom-mo may have murdered Si-jo before being killed by A-ra in self-defence.  At Moon Paper, Man-su finds himself the company’s sole human employee, supervising the machines that have taken over all other jobs.  Straight-faced closing images show a forest of trees being felled.  I guess that will enable some viewers to come out of No Other Choice satisfied they’ve been watching a politically serious and responsible parable for our times.

    4 February 2026

    [1]  A time interval that must have some special significance for Park Chan-wook:  the two main parts of the narrative in Decision to Leave are also separated by thirteen months.

    [2]  https://letterboxd.com/journal/park-chan-wook-no-other-choice-interview/

     

Posts navigation