Film review

  • Grand Hotel

    Edmund Goulding (1932)

    In the opening shot, the camera moves across a bank of busy switchboard operators.  The shot introduces a succession of telephone calls made either by or about characters staying at the Grand Hotel in Berlin who will be important in the story.   All human life is supposedly there.  Senf (Jean Hersholt), a porter, is desperate to know from a hospital maternity ward if his wife has given birth yet.  Otto Krengelein (Lionel Barrymore) came to Berlin for a medical opinion on ‘that old trouble of mine’.  The news wasn’t good and Krengelein asks the man he’s calling to destroy his will, having decided, in the short time left to him, to spend his life’s savings staying in the metropolis’s most expensive hotel.   Krengelein is a lowly accountant in a firm owned by the industrialist Preysing (Wallace Beery), another guest at the Grand.  He phones home with an anxious update on the precarious international business deal he’s looking to close in Berlin.  Suzette (Rafaela Ottiano), maid to the ballerina Grusinskaya, calls the theatre to explain that her mistress won’t be at rehearsal today – ‘She didn’t sleep all night – there is something preying on her mind’.  The impecunious Baron Felix von Geigern (John Barrymore) furtively reports the progress of a plot in which he’s involved.  His mention of befriending ‘her ballet master’ makes it clear enough who the plot’s target is.

    These little monologues – an efficient exposition of the principals’ various predicaments – are cut short by a terse remark, virtually an aside, from permanent resident Dr Otternschlag (Lewis Stone):  ‘Grand Hotel … people coming, going – nothing ever happens’.  The accumulating phone calls amount to an intriguing set-up.  Otternschlag’s deflating observation already seems comically wide of the mark.  It’s no surprise – but no less funny for that – when the doctor repeats the same words at the end of the flamboyantly eventful story.  Lavish, antique melodrama and showcasing of the cast’s big names dominate but the above isn’t the only instance of Edmund Goulding’s film being effective in more surprising and economical ways.  The switchboard operators reappear:  first, as a simple breathing space between episodes; then, more imaginatively, at dead of night.  Nothing’s doing on the switchboard until a call comes through to report a murder in one of the hotel rooms.  Goulding also returns occasionally, at different times of the working day, to the staff on the hotel reception desk.  The Baron’s pet dachshund is sometimes obvious light relief, but not always.  Lying on his slain master’s bed, the dog pricks his ears as the bedside telephone rings unanswered.  (A phone in another room in the hotel has just served as a murder weapon.)  The following morning, as a member of staff pulls him on a lead towards the hotel exit, the dog has to scurry to avoid a broom sweeping clean just behind him.

    The stars are the thing, though.  Greta Garbo is the legendary Russian ballerina Grusinskaya and Grand Hotel is the film in which she says (more than once) ‘I want to be alone’.  Now in the twilight of her career, Grusinskaya is fathomlessly world-weary and romantic.  Garbo engages with the preposterous character so passionately that she makes her compelling.  In different registers, the other leading lights follow suit – some more successfully than others.  Lionel Barrymore’s histrionics as Krengelein are inventive and hugely entertaining.  His brother John has a fine doomed suavity as the melancholy Baron, who steals Grusinskaya’s jewellery before returning it when she declares her love for him.  The magnate Preysing’s business negotiations are a relatively less colourful part of the plot and Wallace Beery’s unvarying performance makes matters worse.  The Baron is killed by Preysing in a fit of rage:  the way Beery plays him, bludgeoning is an all too apt cause of death (it’s a relief when he’s carted off by the police).  This one-note cartoon German comes complete with mittel-European accent – which the Barrymores and Joan Crawford, as the gold-digging stenographer Flaemmchen, don’t attempt.   Crawford’s reactions tend to arrive before completion of others’ lines meant to provoke them but she’s remarkably vivid and free-moving – very different from the stiff, oppressively magnetic actress she later became.  Sequences are often extended purely to display the talent and charisma of the effulgent leading players:  a fervent heart-to-heart between Garbo and John Barrymore; a drunk solo scene for his brother; a high-stakes card game starring both the Barrymores.

    The source material is a 1929 novel, Menschen im Hotel, by the Austrian Vicki Baum.  William A Drake, who adapted Baum’s novel for the stage in 1930, also did the film’s screenplay.  The over-the-top characters and plot twists don’t disguise the fact that Drake’s screenplay is a very competent construction job.  All that happens[1] points to a larger metaphorical meaning, hinted at heavily in another aperçu from the disfigured Great War veteran Dr Otternschlag.  Unlike his opening and parting shots, this one is meant to be incisive:  ‘When you leave, someone occupies your room, lies in your bed … that’s the end’.  The film’s finale sees the surviving guests check out as new arrivals check in (and Senf receives the long-awaited good news that he’s a father:  mother and baby doing fine).  Grusinskaya, unaware of the Baron’s fate though morbidly suspicious that something is wrong, is hurried off by her retinue to catch a transcontinental train.  Krengelein, financial circumstances transformed by the card game, and Flaemmchen join forces and head to France in search of a cure for his medical condition.  Their destination, says Krengelein, is ‘the Grand Hotel Paris’.  His new companion asks how he knows there is a Grand Hotel there.  He assures her ‘there are Grand Hotels everywhere in the world’.

     4 August 2018

    [1]  More plot details at, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Hotel_(1932_film).

     

  • My Brilliant Career

    Gillian Armstrong (1979)

    Set in late-nineteenth-century Australia, My Brilliant Career is the coming-of-age story of Sybylla Melvyn (Judy Davis).  Throughout her adolescence and into young womanhood, she rebels against a succession of different circumstances in order to assert the independence that she believes is rightfully hers.  The daughter of a frequently impoverished smallholder, Sybylla is suffocated by a drudging present that offers no future.  Her parents (Alan Hopgood and Julia Blake), concerned by their daughter’s wilfulness, send her to board with her better-off and well-named Grandma Bossier (Aileen Britton, who’s made up to look like Queen Victoria).  In her grandmother’s home, Sybylla finds her restlessness sharpened by her female relatives’ understanding and acceptance of their pre-ordained, subservient stations in life.  A rich and handsome landowner Harry Beecham (Sam Neill) courts Sybylla, who is eager to get her man but equally reluctant to sink into the restrictive institution of marriage.

    Suddenly dispatched from her grandmother’s into a social and cultural wilderness, as governess to the illiterate brood of Mr McSwatt (Max Cullen), one of her father’s creditors, Sybylla is a study of furiously repressed resentment and frustration.  To make matters worse, her younger sister, in the meantime, is initiated into the higher family society that includes the company of Harry.   An implausible misunderstanding – her dim employer believes Sybylla is infatuated with one of his labourers – gets her the sack and out of jail.  She returns to her parents’ farm.  Having earlier postponed a definite answer to Harry’s marriage proposal, she now decides to turn him down for good.  In the opening sequence of Gillian Armstrong’s film, Sybylla starts determinedly to write.  In the final sequence, she dispatches the finished manuscript of My Brilliant Career, a book that a closing legend on the screen explains was first published in Edinburgh in 1901[1].  Sybylla’s story seems to belong to the tradition of nineteenth-century novels that chart the growth of a materially disadvantaged protagonist, overcoming vicissitudes and eventually accessing a world in which she or he (the reader believes) will both flourish and retain their individuality.  But Gillian Armstrong and her scenarist Eleanor Witcombe have shaped the material in ways that make it opaque.

    Regardless of her changing surroundings and obligations, Sybylla’s ambition remains constant but, until nearly the end of the film, only vaguely defined.  She is egotistical (her self-description) and convinced that her destiny lies in the world of art – in literature or music or, as she pertly and nonchalantly suggests to her grandmother, opera:  Sybylla hasn’t yet decided which.  My Brilliant Career would be richer and more satisfying if the protagonist’s aspirations seemed to evolve through a combination of nature and nurture.  Instead, her appetite for success and independence, rather than deriving from events in the story, seems entirely preformed.  Armstrong and Witcombe evidently want to present Sybylla as a proto-feminist, without it mattering how she assesses or tests her potential to escape her environment.  The first-person narrative used at the start is quickly dropped and it’s not clear when the protagonist decides she’s going to be a writer.  We know only that she’s decided this by the time she finally turns Harry down.

    In the last shot of the film, Sybylla, after posting her manuscript, gazes into a sunrise.  She may be convinced of her golden future but the viewer struggles to accept this heroine, who has thrived on dissatisfaction, suddenly tranquillised into a state of happy-ever-after because the life she wants could be about to begin.  The sunrise shot is altogether too pacific:  Sybylla, walking nervously away from the post-box with the sunrise behind her, as her parcel starts its journey to the other side of the world, would make more sense.  It’s a tribute to Judy Davis’s performance, however, that this ending is so unsatisfactory.  Her characterisation of Sybylla is convincing enough to make it jarring when the film suddenly undermines what the actress has achieved.

    Sybylla dominates the film – she must be in more than ninety per cent of the frames – and there’s never any question of not identifying with her.  Equally, it’s difficult not to react against her hard-nosed self-centredness, confirmed in the dedication that ends her manuscript – a profession of love for all those with whom she has lived her ‘brilliant career’ and a sentimental ‘goodbye, God bless’ to the past.  If she is grateful to her relatives it’s chiefly because they’ve been grist to her literary mill and thereby a route to success and independence for Sybylla – just as they supplied her with the means to live and to rebel during her formative years.  Gillian Armstrong understates this.

    The director’s view of Sybylla is political and limited but Judy Davis, full of athletic energy and with her big, combative eyes, makes her a powerful screen heroine.  Davis throws caution to the winds, either unconcerned about or sublimely confident of a brilliant career ahead of her in cinema.  Her strength and consistency of presence gives the impression of a character much more rounded than the one the script provides.  Davis gets inside Sybylla.  When the heroine’s frustrations compel her to slap a suitor or cane a child, Davis daringly suggests that Sybylla feels better for it (even excited by it).  Her high-necked governess costume may conceal the fact but the early scenes with the noisy McSwatt children make you realise how young and immature Sybylla herself still is.   (Davis is actually in her early twenties.)  Although her behaviour with Harry continues to be almost intolerably fierce, Davis also strikes notes of petulance and resilience in their courtship scenes.  There are moments – for example, during Sybylla’s introduction to Harry at her grandmother’s, after a mutually incognito meeting earlier in the day – when Davis’s moods change so rapidly it’s hard to keep up with her.

    Sam Neill is essentially a phlegmatic foil to Judy Davis’s dynamo but his quiet performance builds intelligently, enabling us to realise eventually that Harry, never mind his wealth, looks and access to exalted social circles, is emotionally more vulnerable than Sybylla.  In spite of his privileged position, he is floundering beside the single-minded heroine.  It’s a pleasing subtlety of My Brilliant Career that Harry has his life mapped out for him by convention no less than the women in his family.  A man who is entitled to womanise, he sees marriage to Sybylla as a refreshing escape from the life of a young rake that he led before meeting her.  Sam Neill suggests a guarded compliance with social convention that masks Harry’s neediness:  there are occasional flashes of that neediness in the momentary anger in his eyes.  An extended pillow fight between Sybylla and Harry works well as a metaphor for his desire for sex, hers for the upper hand and the social and moral contexts that thwart them both.  Their desires, through the expectations of family and society, are temporarily reduced to this childish, apparently innocent interaction.  Sybylla’s determined view of matrimony as an arrangement designed to suit men, imprison women and thwart the possibility of a dignified, loving relationship between them guarantees the longer-term outcome.

    Gillian Armstrong doesn’t always resist a temptation to which male Australian directors have recently succumbed:  to beautify their films as if hellbent on refuting received ideas about Aussie philistinism.  My Brilliant Career, photographed by Donald McAlpine, is sometimes artificially pictorial.   In the early stages, Sybylla has two suitors:  as well as Harry, there’s Frank Hawdon (Robert Grubb), a jackaroo.  Hawdon strides into then out of a wood with a bunch of marigolds behind his back, ready to present these to Sybylla; she is surrounded by a large red umbrella; your main thought is how vibrantly coloured the brolly and flowers are.  This is one in a (too long) series of illustrations of Hawdon’s pompous foolishness – yet Armstrong still wants Donald McAlpine to create a still-of-the-month effect.  But at least Australia is exceptionally well equipped to make a fantastic landscape everyday.  Sybylla’s conviction that the other man’s grass is always greener is made literally credible by the wonderfully lucent variety of greens McAlpine gives her to contemplate.

    [1980]

    [1]  Afternote:  Its author was ‘Miles Franklin’ – the pen name of Stella Maria Sarah Miles Franklin (1879–1954).

Posts navigation