Film review

  • Wildlife

    Paul Dano (2018)

    The happy-family veneer of the post-World War II American household has rarely been thinner than in Paul Dano’s directing debut Wildlife, adapted by him and Zoe Kazan from a 1990 novel of the same name by Richard Ford.  In the opening scene, Jeanette Brinson (Carey Mulligan) calls brightly from the kitchen that dinner’s ready.  Her husband Jerry (Jake Gyllenhaal) and their teenage son Joe (Ed Oxenbould) come in from playing football together in the back garden.  The well groomed Jeanette and Jack radiate wholesomeness.  Their mealtime conversation is affable.   Yet the air crackles with unspoken tensions.  The Brinsons’ son already looks sad and desperate to please.

    The family are newcomers to Great Falls, Montana, which goes some way to explaining Joe’s lack of social contact with other kids in the neighbourhood.  Jerry has taken on a golf pro job at a local club but it doesn’t last long; we learn that he’s had and lost jobs, and the family has therefore had to move home, before.  After firing him for his too familiar manner with club members, the management thinks again and offers to reinstate Jerry but he’s too proud to agree.  While he languishes at home, Jeanette gets work as a swimming instructor.  By now, it’s quite evident that the Brinsons’ marriage is in trouble and that their earlier cheerful manner was a facade.  How much the problems are the result of incompatibility, how much a consequence of Jerry’s erratic employment record is less clear.  He now decides to work, for peanuts, in a team of men fighting forest fires in the mountains above Great Falls, and disappears there for a large part of Wildlife.  (With Gyllenhaal in the part, it’s occasionally hard to keep Brokeback Mountain out of your mind.)   One of Jeanette’s swimming students is Warren Miller (Bill Camp), a middle-aged widower and local car dealer.  Jeanette stops teaching and gets a job with Miller instead.  What her role actually involves becomes a matter of increasing anxiety to her son, especially in light of the evening he and his mother spend at Miller’s and what Joe subsequently discovers when he returns home one day.

    As you’d expect, Wildlife is very ably acted by its two more experienced leads but that’s part of what’s wrong with it:  Carey Mulligan and Jake Gyllenhaal nail their characters in short order.  This doesn’t mean that either actor becomes uninteresting.  You miss Gyllenhaal when he’s gone and welcome his return.  The contrast between Mulligan’s crisp exterior and underlying despair is vividly sharp.  She makes Jeanette’s eagerness to flaunt her affair with Miller to Joe both dislikeable and sad.  Once the miserablist die is cast, though, there’s only so much that Mulligan and Gyllenhaal can do:  there are few surprises in store and the situation doesn’t develop much further depth.  (The film sometimes suggests a stretched-thin adaptation of a short story.)  Ed Oxenbould is problematic.  Although I don’t know the Ford original, I came out of the film feeling sure Joe must be the novel’s first-person narrator (and he is).  Dano and Kazan bravely eschew voiceover narration but the result is that Joe is stuck with suffering in silence.  Both parents, at different times and at some length, tell their troubles to their son:  Oxenbould’s face is unusual but not expressive enough to show us more than that Joe is understandably unhappy.    His isolation at school and muted response to Ruth-Ann (Zoe Margaret Colletti), a classmate who obviously likes him, are puzzling – other than as a reflection of his situation at home.

    There’s symbolism at work in the story – the out-of-the-way forest fire, the information that Jerry’s work in the mountains will end when the snows arrive.  He duly returns home in winter and the Brinsons’ marriage goes up in flames (so too, nearly, does Warren Miller’s home, when Jerry sets it alight).  The date is 1960.  The decade just ended was remarkable for, inter alia, the widespread growth of economic prosperity (in which the Brinsons can only superficially pretend to share); medical confirmation of the dangers of smoking; and increasing fears of nuclear war.  The years immediately ahead will reinforce all three of these trends.  Before Jerry thinks of taking to firefighting, a ranger gives a talk at Joe’s school, explaining the benefits to nature of the forest blazes but the health risks to people of inhaling smoke.  Ruth-Ann tells Joe not to bother taking notes of the ranger’s talk.  With a forest fire as with an atomic bomb, she says, if you know it’s coming it’s already too late.

    Joe works at weekends and sometimes after school at the studio of a local photographer (Darryl Cox).  The choice of job seems designed purely to bring about the final scene of Wildlife, in which the boy takes his now estranged parents into the studio, sets up the equipment and takes a photograph of the three of them seated together. This is the film’s closing shot, one that confirms the prevailing constriction of the whole piece.  It would be unfair, however, to dismiss Paul Dano’s first feature as a typical actor’s debut behind the camera.  He shows a strong and mature visual sense.  The images, finely lit by Diego García, are sometimes obviously controlled but those of the Montana landscape are consistently impressive.   In the manmade world, a shot of a petrol station and a melancholy human scene glimpsed through plate glass windows evoke Edward Hopper paintings.  The sensitive score is by David Lang.

    15 November 2018

  • Bohemian Rhapsody

    Bryan Singer (2018)

    This Freddie Mercury biopic has been in the works since 2010.  Neither casting the leading role nor shooting the film turned out to be easy.   First up to play Mercury was Sacha Baron Cohen, who might have managed the protagonist’s onstage showman side but struggled with his private vulnerability.  Next was polar opposite Ben Whishaw:  his emotional range certainly extends to mercurial though it’s harder to imagine him strutting his stuff at Wembley Stadium for the 1985 Live Aid concert that forms the prologue and climax to Bohemian Rhapsody.  The final choice, Rami Malek, was cast as Freddie in late 2016 (presumably on the back of his success in the American TV drama Mr Robot).  Filming got underway in autumn 2017:  before it was completed, problems between the director Bryan Singer and members of the cast and crew led to Singer’s being fired and replaced by Dexter Fletcher, the original choice for the job, who had quit the project after falling out with the producers.  (According to Directors Guild of America guidelines, Singer retains the director credit on the finished film.  Fletcher is named as one of the executive producers.)   Peter Morgan was hired to write the script but eventually forsook Queen for The Crown and Anthony McCarten (The Theory of Everything, Darkest Hour) took over.   (Both get a screenplay credit.)  The upshot of all this?  The main man on camera does a better job than the main men behind it but you can’t help thinking the story of its gestation might have made a more gripping screen drama than Bohemian Rhapsody is.

    It may or may not be as a result of the directing reins changing hands that some parts appear over-directed and others hardly directed at all.   Singer-Fletcher (I’ll use the double-barrelled form for convenience) has a mania for reaction shots, particularly in scenes describing differences of opinion within Queen or between the foursome and record company management.  The relentless switching from one face in close-up to another deprives these sequences of any rhythm.  Rather than conducting conversations or discussions, the band members deliver statements (and speak in cliches).  Much of what happens happens because it’s a requirement of the musical biopic form – for example, Freddie’s first meeting with Brian May (Gwilym Lee) and Roger Taylor (Ben Hardy) on the very night that a vacancy for lead singer in their group comes up.  Singer-Fletcher’s staging of Queen-specific moments is just as perfunctory.  The invention of the ‘We Will Rock You’ beat – two stamps, one clap, one beat of silence – is presented so mechanically that you can’t believe this is really how it happened, even if it really was.

    Opting for a Live Aid finale is doubly welcome – it avoids a description of Freddie’s physical decline and means that Rami Malek ends on a high – but the cross-cutting between the Wembley stage and minor characters watching in the stadium or on television is biopic boilerplate.  The viewers include Freddie’s ex-fiancee Mary Austin (Lucy Boynton); his conservative but now tearfully proud parents (Ace Bhatti and Meneka Das); and the long-lost Jim Hutton (Aaron McCusker), whom Freddie took a liking to at a party years previously and whom he apparently tracks down again on the morning of the Live Aid concert.  Even Ray Foster (Mike Myers), the cartoon EMI executive who parts company with Queen early in the film, reappears now to register how wrong he was to let them go.

    I’d never realised before that Freddie Mercury wasn’t tall (1.77m):  he’s such a powerful performer that he always seems big on a television screen.  Rami Malek isn’t much shorter (1.75m) but he doesn’t, until Live Aid, transform on stage into a more imposing and invulnerable figure.  Although Malek’s interpretation is never merely an impersonation of Mercury’s voice, movement and mannerisms, you rarely lose a sense of how hard he’s working to achieve these or that he seems uncomfortable with his prosthetic dentures.  At Wembley, it’s different.  The clever camera angles (the DP is Newton Thomas Sigel) enlarge Malek, who finally gets the chance here to perform more sizeable parts of the famous numbers.   (He’s lip-syncing throughout to a vocal track that, according to NME, mixes Malek’s own voice with that of Marc Matel, ‘who has previously won huge plaudits for his inimitable takes of Queen on YouTube’.)  Even though the huge crowd in the stadium is some way away, we also get our strongest impression at Wembley of Mercury’s appetite for engaging with a live audience.  Malek’s stage strut is first rate and the fragility that he often suggests works for him in the closing stages.  Freddie performs at Live Aid knowing that he is HIV-positive, although the Wikipedia entry for the film notes this as one of its several departures from the facts.

    Bohemian Rhapsody is remarkably timid about Freddie Mercury’s sex life.  On the evidence of what’s on screen, it’s hard to understand how he contracted AIDS as a result of promiscuity.  Though Freddie lives with Mary Austin for a time, there’s not much evidence of their sleeping together.  When his manager Paul Prenter (Allen Leech) first makes a pass at him, he resists.  He pinches a male waiter’s bottom.  At a petrol station, a truck driver en route to the gents gives him a funny (in both senses) look.  That’s about it:  you sometimes wonder if ‘Bohemian Celibacy’ wouldn’t be a better title for the movie.  Mary is an assistant in a Biba shop, where she first meets Freddie.  His personal and insouciant interest in the women’s clothes on sale is part of what intrigues her about him.  But it seems they never get round even to discussing sexual unconventionality until he comes out to her as bisexual:  Mary’s shocked reaction might be that of a chartered accountant’s wife in the 1970s – though she then tells Freddie he’s 100% gay.

    The narrative blurs, to rather exasperating effect, distinctions between the hero’s private unease about his sexuality and the historically interesting pressure on a phenomenally successful rock band like Queen to avoid such a question.  There’s little illustration of how the group’s other members reacted to Freddie’s sexual orientation.  Paul Prenter has a monologue describing (credibly) how hard it was for him growing up gay in Northern Ireland.  After granting him this favour, the script presents him as a merely nasty traitor:  when he goes public on Freddie’s voracious sexual behaviour, there seems no good reason for the film’s audience to assume, as the 1980s tabloid press was eager to do, that Prenter is telling the truth.

    Rami Malek is virtually the whole show but one watches Gwilym Lee sensing the presence of a good actor (as one also did in Midsomer Murders!).  He’s the only cast member to suggest someone who exists beyond the moments when the camera is on him.  Lee’s massive hairdo is more successful than the coiffure for Ben Hardy, stuck in a bad wig for the second film running (after Mary Shelley).  The cast also includes Joe Mazzello as the other Queen member John Deacon and Tom Hollander as Jim Beach, the band’s lawyer-turned-manager.  At the sound controls behind the Wembley stage, he still looks like a lawyer, in weekend casuals.  Freddie’s cats are nice but there are too many reaction shots even of them.

    The kid gloves attitude to the protagonist’s sexuality may be an expression of respect for his memory but is more obviously a commercial precaution.  This has helped Bohemian Rhapsody to obtain a 12A BBFC certificate and a PG-13 MPAA rating:  it’s thus a ‘family picture’ and already the highest-grossing musical biopic of all time, with worldwide box-office takings of around $541m (from a $50-55m budget) little more than a month after release.  This only moderately entertaining movie vindicates the confidence of the people who made it in the vast size of the global Queen market.  That confidence allows Singer-Fletcher to ride roughshod over considerations of storytelling clarity.  Indications of the year in which events are occurring come and go inconsistently.  The group are thrilled and astonished to get their first Top of the Pops slot but the ToTP bit that follows indicates that ‘Killer Queen’ is at number 2 so why the surprise?  If you didn’t know beforehand, you might not even get from Bohemian Rhapsody whether the title track proved to be a hit or the commercial non-starter dismissed by Ray Foster.  But everyone does know beforehand and those responsible for the film – including Brian May and Roger Taylor, who served as ‘creative and musical consultants’ – know that we know.

    14 November 2018

     

Posts navigation