Film review

  • The Wild Pear Tree

    Ahlat Ağacı

    Nuri Bilge Ceylan (2018)

    At 188 minutes, The Wild Pear Tree is slightly shorter than Winter Sleep, Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s previous marathon, but doesn’t come nearly as close to justifying its extraordinary length.  Ceylan’s protagonist is a young Turkish man called Sinan (Aydın Doğu Demirkol).  At the start of the film, he returns, after graduating college, to his home town of Çan, a rural backwater.  Ceylan obviously didn’t intend the link but the town’s name is apt:  Sinan feels locked up there.  He prepares for a teaching qualification exam but without enthusiasm.  What he wants is a writing career:  he’s already produced a collection of pieces about his native heath.  Although he sees a few school contemporaries in Çan, doing so fails to rekindle friendships (and there’s no evidence that he made any friends at college, in the seaport city of Çanakkale)His mother Asuman (Bennu Yıldırımlar) considers book learning a waste of time – a view shaped by her marriage to Sinan’s father Idris (Murat Cemcir).  An educated man and a schoolteacher, Idris is addicted to betting on horses.  His gambling debts have reduced his family to virtual poverty.   After flunking his teaching exam, Sinan turns his attention to trying to get his work published.

    The screenplay is by Ceylan, his wife Ebru and Akın Aksu (a new collaborator, who also appears in the film).  As in Winter Sleep, the script includes some unusually lengthy dialogues.  On a trip back to Çanakkale, Sinan tracks down Süleyman (Serkan Keskin), a successful writer, to seek his help.  They talk in a bookshop for well over ten screen minutes though Sinan shows no talent for ingratiating himself.  Not much shorter and similarly abortive is an interview with a Çan businessman keen to promote local talent but less keen on the sound of what Sinan has written.  Later, Sinan comes across two youngish imams (Akın Aksu and Öner Erkan) helping themselves to apples from a tree in the countryside above Çan.   A (rare) light-hearted remark from Sinan about forbidden fruit is the start of a theological debate among the trio as they walk back into town.  (Sinan seems not to be religious; one of the imams is more progressive than the other.)  Each of these three exchanges is engaging while it’s happening; Ceylan’s long shot of Sinan and the imams walking downhill is eyecatching.  But the conversations count for little once they’re over.  Not only are these interlocutors never seen again (except for Süleyman, in an image advertising his latest book); the impact on Sinan of all they say is, as far as we can tell, negligible.

    The same applies, and more’s the pity, to his meeting with Hatice (Hazar Ergüçlü).  Sinan runs into this young woman, whom he knows from schooldays, at an early stage of the film, during one of his aimless country walks.  In her brief time on screen, Hatice comes across as The Wild Pear Tree’s most vivid and confounding character.  At first, she’s wearing a headscarf and tells Sinan she’s soon to be wed, to an older man – indications that she’s settling down into a traditional existence in the place where she’s always lived.  On the other hand, Hatice has recently started smoking; kisses Sinan with a mixture of passion, humour and aggression (the kiss includes a bite); and, when he asks her what her heart says about her forthcoming marriage, replies, ‘When did my heart say anything?’  Much later on, when his mother remarks, in a slightly puzzled tone, on Sinan’s lack of girlfriends, she’s voicing what this viewer had been wondering for some time.  The scene with Hatice is unique in hinting at any kind of sexual or romantic feeling on Sinan’s part.

    He eventually gets enough money together (how is less clear) to have his collection of sketches, entitled ‘The Wild Pear Tree’, privately printed.  He hands his mother a copy of the book, with an inscription dedicating it to her.  She tearfully tells Sinan she always knew he’d amount to something but she never gets round to reading the book:  that earlier dismissal of things cultural tells us more about Asuman than her weeping does.  Sinan’s younger sister Yasemin (Asena Kescinki) doesn’t read the book either and she’s far from alone.  There’s a break in the narrative while Sinan does his national service (which lasts up to twelve months in Turkey).  He subsequently returns to a bookshop where he lodged copies of ‘The Wild Pear Tree’ before conscription and the bookseller reports no sales.  The volume’s sole reader and enthusiast turns out to be, to Sinan’s astonishment, Idris.  That astonishment reflects an important but unsatisfactory element of Ceylan’s film.

    It’s understandable that Sinan despises the father who has brought his family into debt and disrepute (and who, at one point, steals money that Sinan has saved to get his work published).  The son’s assumption that Idris has no pride or interest in him or his writing is harder to fathom:  though not implausible, it isn’t backed up by other revealed aspects of Sinan’s nature.  You get the sense he needs to suppose what he does in order to deliver a relatively dramatic climax to The Wild Pear Tree.   After taking so much time to tell Sinan’s story, Ceylan seems suddenly anxious to resolve matters although he goes about it selectively.

    By the time Sinan comes back from national service, Idris has retired from teaching and moved out of the family home to work as a shepherd; it isn’t clear whether and, if so, how he beat his gambling addiction.  (Putting a bit of physical distance between himself and the betting shop in Çan isn’t a wholly convincing explanation.)  Looking round his father’s hillside shack, Sinan finds Idris’s wallet and, tucked inside it, a newspaper cutting – an article about the publication of ‘The Wild Pear Tree’.  For the first time in the film, the young man is moved to tears.  In the conversation that follows, Idris says how important the book has become to him; his quotes from it prove to Sinan that his father knows the text well.  Idris also observes that his son’s portrait of him pulls no punches and that this is as it should be.  The same conversation spells out too the metaphorical meaning of the film’s (and presumably of Sinan’s book’s) title.  People like us, Idris tells his son, are like the fruit of the wild pear tree – ‘misfits, solitary, misshapen’.  Even so, he adds, wild pears taste good.

    Murat Cemcir plays this crucially revealing scene very well and his scapegrace charm repeatedly enlivens proceedings.  Bennu Yıldırımlar’s lower-key naturalistic style complements Cemcir’s effectively.   In the smaller roles, Hazar Ergüçlü and Tamer Levent stand out.  (Levent, so good in Winter Sleep, is Sinan’s grandfather, a retired imam.)  But The Wild Pear Tree depends heavily on the lead actor and Ceylan sets Aydın Doğu Demirkol an impossible task.  The script keeps opaque what makes the main character tick; and the heavy-featured, saturnine Demirkol rarely goes beyond describing Sinan’s behaviour.  Worse, he makes his salient qualities – his discontent, impatience and self-absorption – dull.

    Ceylan prioritises words to perhaps a greater extent than any other auteur currently at work, leading critics such as Adam Mars-Jones and Jonathan Romney, in reviewing The Wild Pear Tree, to question the strength of his commitment to cinematic language.  That seems harsh insofar as Ceylan, with his cinematographer Gökhan Tiryaki, is still creating beguiling visuals.  There’s one at the very start of this film, as Sinan sits in a Çanakkale café, shortly before his journey home to Çan:  the camera watches him through the café’s plate glass window in which the movement of nearby waters is reflected.  Although it’s lovely, the image stands out as a composition for the sake of it (compare the striking opening images in Roma, which are integrated with other aspects of what follows).  The same goes for that long shot of Sinan and the two imams strolling downhill, even for the beautiful moment when a breeze stirs first leaves on a tree, then Hatice’s long hair.  Ceylan frames a four-way family argument – Sinan, Idris, Asuman and Yasemin – in the doorway of their home.  He holds the shot well beyond the point at which the viewer perceives how ‘imprisoned’ the family are.

    A recurring image of flies crawling over faces – first of Idris as he dozes in the heat, later of a baby in a dream sequence – is arresting.  Ceylan repeatedly destabilises reality and the effect, at first anyway, is startling, especially when Sinan finds himself trapped in a building from which he can’t escape, in what proves to be a daymare of claustrophobia.  Mars-Jones and Romney have a point nevertheless.  The long passages of dialogue and the comparatively rationed visual highlights make you wonder if Ceylan includes the latter because he thinks that, as a film-maker, he should, rather than because he wants to.  And Mars-Jones’s familiar adverse comments on the use of music in a film are right in this instance:

    ‘Ceylan uses the first few variations of Bach’s organ Passacaglia, arranged for piano on its first appearance and subsequently for orchestra, sensibly taking its stately sorrow out of church to fit a new cultural context.  Even so, he seems to pour Bach’s music over his narrative like a sort of luxury gravy, hoping that its expressive restraint will stick.’

    In the land outside Idris’s shack there’s a deep pit.  For years, Idris has been spending part of his weekends trying to dig a well there.  Close to the end of the film, he looks down into the pit and is horrified to see that Sinan has hanged himself.  The audience isn’t likely to share this horror because we know Idris must be dreaming.  This is partly because Ceylan pulled a similar trick when Sinan was trapped in the building but also because we can’t believe this protagonist would summon up the emotional energy to commit suicide.  Perhaps he’s meant to be representative and Nuri Bilge Ceylan is using a creatively ambitious member of Sinan’s generation to paint a larger picture of present-day Turkey.  But The Wild Pear Tree doesn’t play out as any kind of national epic.  It seems a major undertaking only in terms of its length.  Its (anti-)hero isn’t so much an angry young man as a grumpy one.

    5 December 2018

  • Hell Is a City

    Val Guest (1960)

    This British crime thriller is an interesting hybrid and, at this distance in time, period piece.  It’s a Hammer Films production whose style and content are far removed from gothic horror.  The title isn’t the only hint of Hollywood-derived noir aspiration.  Val Guest’s film has a flavour too of the nascent British New Wave (Look Back in Anger and Room at the Top had appeared the previous year).  The titular city is Manchester, the film was shot on location there and the police investigation occasionally takes the action up into the moors above the metropolis.   It’s startling to see this landscape a few years before the Moors Murders made it notorious and familiar on television news.  (Guest’s film is in black-and-white, which reinforces the link with one’s memory of that TV footage.)  The year of Hell Is a City’s release also saw the passing of the Betting and Gambling Act that legalised off-course bookmakers, and gambling, on the cusp of that change, features strongly in the story.  The two elements combine in a remarkable scene, out on moorland, where a traditional reguonal form of gaming takes place.  This ‘tossing school’, in which money from the street robbery that sets the film’s main plot in motion changes hands, brings to mind the gambling episode in Ted Kotcheff’s later Wake in Fright (1971).  Val Guest’s is visually more powerful, though, not least because groups of figures in this particular terrain evoke police teams combing Saddleworth Moor.

    The source material is a 1954 novel by Maurice Procter, one of a series of police procedurals he wrote featuring the detective Harry Martineau.  (Procter was himself a serving police officer when he started his writing career.)  Val Guest did the adaptation and it’s a neatly constructed screenplay.   After escaping from prison, recidivist criminal Don Starling (John Crawford), with the help of his sidekicks (Joby Blanshard and Charles Morgan), robs a bookmaker (Donald Pleasence) by ambushing two of his employees en route to the bank with the bookie’s winnings.  The gang abducts the girl employee (Lois Daine); in the getaway car, Starling hits her with a cosh to keep her quiet and inadvertently kills her.  The highly experienced Martineau (Stanley Baker) makes use of his various local contacts to help track the gang down.  Starling is eventually arrested, after a climactic showdown between him and Martineau.  In a virtual postscript to the main action, the latter watches people gathered outside the prison where Starling is hanged for murder – another reminder of exactly when this film was made (a few years before the suspension of capital punishment that preceded its formal abolition with effect from 1970).

    Compact and well paced, Hell Is a City has good cops-and-robbers action sequences supplemented by scenes that offer a sometimes strikingly frank illustration of relations between police and those on the wrong side of the law – eapecially an interview between Martineau and a dodgy publican (George A Cooper).  The edgy, jazzy music by Stanley Black is a creditable attempt to import music typical of contemporary American urban dramas.  The personnel, for the most part, impart a more homely quality to proceedings:  the film is stocked with character actors familiar from British films and television of the era.  They include, as well as some of those already mentioned, Vanda Godsell, Peter Madden and Russell Napier.  Doris Speed pops up briefly as a hospital sister – perhaps the last time she appeared on screen before she became Annie Walker (Coronation Street started in December 1960).  Billie Whitelaw, in an early role as the bookie’s wife, hardly comes into this category of actor but she makes a strong impression.  The villain of the piece is a different matter and unsatisfactory.  As Starling, John Crawford gives a wooden performance.  His accent is stuck somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean.

    Stanley Baker, charismatic but always credible, holds everything together.  The cynical but still committed Harry Martineau makes a better job of his professional life than his private one.  Although Val Guest’s direction is less assured in the marital misery bits and Maxine Audley awkwardly overwrought as Martineau’s wife, Baker is so thoroughly inside his character that he seems to carry the residue of domestic rows into the office with him.  The spectacular but protracted rooftop climax reminded me of the church steeple finale of John Guillermin’s Town on Trial (1957), another film that strained for Hollywood dynamism.  But Stanley Baker makes it matter that Martineau comes out on top.  In the closing sequences, he walks through Manchester streets at night and exchanges a few words with the prostitute who approaches him.  It’s a nicely diminuendo ending – one that returns Martineau and his heroism to a convincing reality.

    2 December 2018

Posts navigation