Paper Tiger
James Gray (2026)
In Paper Tiger, showing at the London Film Festival, things happen quickly – too quickly for James Gray’s family-tragedy-cum-crime-drama to be credible, even if the tempo helps make the film absorbing. The time is 1986, the place is New York City and the family in question are the Pearls, resident in Queens, although Hester Pearl (Scarlett Johansson) is being encouraged by her mother Iris (Cindy Katz) to move out of the city – and way upmarket – to Great Neck on Long Island. That is where Iris lives and where, she says, there’s next to no pollution. In contrast to NYC, and particularly a notoriously contaminated Brooklyn canal. The canal will be a key location in Gray’s story (he wrote the original screenplay). Pollution, physical and moral, will be a central theme of Paper Tiger.
Hester’s husband Irwin (Miles Teller) and his elder brother Gary (Adam Driver) are Queens born and raised. Irwin runs his own small engineering business in the area. He makes a decent living but the imminent extra costs of putting their elder son Scott (Gavin Goudey) through college are weighing on Irwin and Hester’s minds, especially since their younger boy, Ben (Roman Engel), will likely need the same help in the foreseeable future. Irwin has always been less driven and less conspicuously successful than Gary, a former high-ranking police officer who, since retiring from NYPD, has been doing lucrative work as a private security consultant. Gary also needs extra cash, though, to afford the divorce settlement he’s currently negotiating and maintain his expensive lifestyle (driving a Mercedes, wining and dining at high-end restaurants, etc). One evening, he arrives at Irwin’s home with a proposition. The Brooklyn docks area, controlled by local mafia groups for years, is now attracting a new breed of business investor: Russian immigrants, entering mid-1980s America in rapidly increasing numbers, plan to clean up and develop the area to make big money. Gary reckons he and Irwin can get a piece of the action – setting up Pearl brothers as an environmental consultancy, synergising Gary’s fixer skills and savvy, and Irwin’s technical know-how.
Although supposedly cautious by nature, Irwin says yes to Gary’s proposal within a couple of screen minutes. As soon as he does so, the brothers head for the canal site. Next morning, Irwin returns there, taking measurements and photos and attracting the suspicion of a security guard. That night, he drives Scott and Ben to the site, even though Hester protests that it’s late and the boys have school tomorrow. This impulsive (and improbable) outing has disastrous consequences. Irwin and his sons witness oil and toxic waste being dumped in the canal. Those responsible then abduct and assault Irwin, and – in a very frightening sequence – threaten his terrified children at gunpoint. One kind of mafia in the Brooklyn docks has been replaced by another. The canal clean-up project – recruiting engineers to help comply with NYC authority regulations, and so on – is a front for the Russian mobsters now running the show. Irwin and his sons get back home later that night in one piece, but this is far from the end of their trauma – or of Gary’s, once he tries to sort things out with his Russian clients, and their sinister boss man (Victor Ptak).
It was also on the morning after Gary’s fateful visit to their home that Hester and the two boys had a car accident. She was driving them to school when she suddenly couldn’t see where she was going and veered off the road. No one was hurt and the temporary blindness might have been caused by dazzling sunlight, but the film’s audience can confidently guess there’s more to it than that. It’s not long before Hester visits a doctor, gets a scan, learns she has terminal brain cancer. Her plight, on the one hand, compounds a viewer’s increasing sense that James Gray is overworking the Pearls’ ordeal, and in double-quick time. On the other hand, Hester’s decision not to tell her husband or sons about her condition (although increasingly hard to credit) articulates interestingly with the film’s mafia theme. In The Godfather (1972), Francis Ford Coppola and his cinematographer, Gordon Willis, contrasted the predominantly shadowed world where the Corleone men did their business with sunny scenes of the domestic life they shared with wives and children: throughout the film, and into The Godfather: Part II (1974), Coppola developed as a tantalising theme how much the women knew or didn’t know (or didn’t want to know) about the extent of the family’s criminal operations. In Paper Tiger, the main female character operates in secret from the men but communicates with other women. Hester confides solely in her mother about her illness. After gangsters get into their house one night and Irwin tells his wife what’s going on, Hester independently reports this to the FBI: her interviewer there is also female.
As this fiercely protective Jewish mother, Scarlett Johansson gives a fine performance – never more so than in Hester’s outburst when Irwin confesses to her. Johansson’s powerful combination of anger and disbelief is very badly needed by this stage of the narrative. The film’s opening scenes build a succinct, convincing picture of the Pearls’ family life – which has its difficulties and tensions but is fundamentally happy and responsibly organised. The sudden, astonishing overturning of this life demands the level of reaction that Johansson supplies. Paper Tiger is well acted throughout but the writing of the main male roles is frustrating. Gray doesn’t give Miles Teller the opportunities he needs to bring out Irwin’s horror at what he’s let happen, while Adam Driver is playing a character that doesn’t add up. He’s clearly meant to have sold his soul to the devil, but Gary often seems naïve rather than corrupt. If he’s as well connected as he claims to be, it’s surprising that he needs to involve unambitious Irwin in the first place. It doesn’t help that Gary’s NYPD standing is hard to get a handle on. One minute, he’s the invited speaker at a retirement ceremony for a high-ranking ex-colleague; the next, he’s told by former workmates that he can no longer expect favours from them.
Gray probably means to illustrate the dreadful power of a fraternal bond – in the closing scene, as Irwin tells his sons how much he loves them, the camera pauses on Scott and Ben as if to underline that they’re the next generation of indissoluble brotherhood. Plenty of other movies (not least the Godfather films!) have done a better job of that, though. Gray also pushes the toxic pollution theme too hard (Hester’s doctor even suggests it’s a possible cause of her brain cancer) and, almost to the end, keeps compressing the action, presumably for dramatic impact but to implausibly melodramatic effect: Scott’s eighteenth birthday party is the occasion for Irwin and Gary to reconcile, for Hester to tell her mother she’s dying, and more – before Gary leaves the party to meet his fate. (Predictable as that is, the sequences ending in his death are very well put together.) The film’s on-screen epigraph is from Aeschylus’ Agamemnon – ‘Let there be wealth without tears; enough for the wise man who will ask no further’. This is a precept that Gary would obviously have done well to heed, though it’s a stretch to suggest it applies equally to Irwin. In retrospect, that Aeschylus quote feels tragically portentous but at least James Gray’s use of Christopher Spelman’s tragic score is rationed by comparison with the music in Elsinore.
11 October 2026