Film review

  • A White, White Day

    Hvítur, Hvítur Dagur

    Hlynur Pálmason (2019)

    A White, White Day would have screened at the Edinburgh International Film Festival and is one of several offerings from the Festival line-up (Young Ahmed was another) that EIFF, in partnership with Curzon, has made available for streaming, for a few days only, on Curzon Home Cinema.  This unusual drama develops in ways to suggest the principal character – a recently widowed police chief in a small Icelandic town – is driven to distraction by grief and a need for revenge.  The film’s complex visuals are interpretable as expressions of a disturbed mind and the protagonist, Ingimundur (Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson), resorts to alarmingly extreme action.  But it turns out he wasn’t imagining things.

    Hlynur Pálmason’s second feature opens with the epigraph that explains its title.  According to this, ‘a white, white day’ is a day when ‘you can no longer tell the difference between the earth and the sky’ and the dead can talk to the living.  (The source of these words, the screen says, is unknown.)   We’re watching a car, from behind, moving along an otherwise empty road suffused in foggy whiteness.  After a while, the car crashes off the road to the left.  It’s a good few minutes later that the first human voice in A White, White Day is heard, and some way further into the story we infer that Ingimundur’s wife died in the opening car crash.  The crash is immediately followed by a montage which proceeds by jump cuts to show a house in a rural landscape that changes over the course of the montage.  Seasons pass; snow and horses come and go.  The appearance of the house changes too.  It’s not explicit how much time has elapsed between the car crash and the start of the narrative proper (though Rotten Tomatoes reckons two years).  It is made clear that Ingimundur, who’s in late middle age, is rebuilding the house as a home to share with his daughter and her family.

    In working on the house, the taciturn, unsmiling Ingimundur perhaps has ‘to construct something/Upon which to rejoice’ but there’s no doubt that he does take pleasure in the company of his elder grandchild, eight-year-old Salka (Ída Mekkin Hlynsdóttir).  He can supervise the renovations and is available to provide regular childcare to Salka because he’s on what appears to be indefinite leave from police duties.  Traumatised by his wife’s death, Ingimundur is seeing a psychotherapist, Georg (Þór Hrafnsson Tulinius).  It’s not clear whether police authorities require this; I assumed so because it seemed unimaginable someone with Ingimundur’s personality would choose to undergo therapy.  Especially with Georg, who’s as voluble as his interlocutor is laconic.  In their first session in the film, Georg’s questions come thick and fast.  Three of the terse replies stand out.  Asked what he wants, Ingimundur says, ‘To build a house’.  Asked what he doesn’t want, he says, ‘To stop building it’.  Asked if he’s ever lonely, Ingimundur replies, ‘I’m never lonely around my granddaughter’.

    Ingimundur’s quiet bereavement mutates through his discovery of a library book and photographs raising suspicions that his schoolteacher wife was having an affair with another man, Olgeir (Hilmir Snær Guðnason).  Ingimundur starts stalking him in an initially low-key way – turning up for a kickabout among middle-aged locals that Olgeir regularly attends.  The first time, Ingimundur gives him a couple of sideways looks.  The second time, he crashes into Olgeir, accidentally-on-purpose, on the field of play.  In the showers afterwards, Ingimundur’s friend Trausti (Björn Ingi Hilmarsson) humorously asks, ‘Have you got something against Olgeir?’  There’s no reply from Ingimundur or any evidence of Olgeir’s response to the collision.  By this stage of A White, White Day, this lack of reaction is unsurprising.

    With one crucial exception, the narrative is propelled not through human interactions or dialogue but by the remarkable images created by the writer-director and his cinematographer, Maria von Hausswolff.  There are various screens within the screen, showing, inter alia, police surveillance footage of local roads, kids’ TV and a recurring surreal product of the main character’s mind:  the cumulative effect of these is to suggest a world both out of joint and imprisoning – and thus aligned with Ingimundur’s increasingly irrational perspective.  The visual highlight of the film occurs after Ingimundur, driving along the same stretch of road where the car crashed at the start and with Salka his passenger, comes to a sudden halt.  His vehicle has run into a rock fallen onto the road.  Ingimundur gets rid of the rock, pushing it off the edge of the road and Hlynur Pálmason shows its journey from there – down a steep hillside, onto and over a cliff edge, into the sea, down to a final soft landing on the sea bed.  A reading of this sequence of shots is bound to be subjective:  one possibility is that it represents the extent of Ingimundur’s separation from his wife, her utter inaccessibility.

    A White, White Day is more impressive in developing a minatory, unstable atmosphere than in its more realistic aspects (despite Pálmason’s blurring, through the potency of the atmosphere, what’s real and what isn’t).  His eschewal of flashback makes it inevitable we don’t get much sense of Ingimundur’s relationship with his wife.  Even when this is the subject of conversation, he keeps his feelings under wraps.  Talking at home with Trausti, Ingimundur asks his friend if he has ever cheated on his wife of many years (Laufey Elíasdóttir).  When Trausti replies that he has a few times, and sees doing so as an occupational hazard, Ingimundur doesn’t appear shocked.  He just says of his own wife, ‘For some reason, she was always enough for me’.  Salka enters the room and plays an excerpt from one of Robert Schumann’s Kinderszenen on a portable keyboard.  Trausti asks her questions about the composer and Salka chatters about Clara Schumann’s romance with Brahms – a bit of ‘ironic’ dialogue that feels incongruous in a visually-driven film like this.  Ingimundur looks uncomfortable but says nothing.

    The crucial exception mentioned above is the interaction of Ingimundur and Salka.   Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson (whose hewn features recall Harry Andrews’) is an imposing figure and always commands attention but Ingimundur’s emotional reticence seems more fully realised in the company of his openly expressive grandchild.  (His daughter (Elma Stefania Agustsdottir) and her partner (Haraldur Stefansson), as well as the younger grandchild, are only minor characters in the story.)  Ída Mekkin Hlynsdóttir is Hlynur Pálmason’s daughter.  She may well be an extraordinary acting talent in the making but her father directs her superbly.  It’s Salka who supplies an unequivocal reality in the film; her distress at her grandfather’s behaviour registers like nothing else.  Salka asks Ingimundur to tell her a ‘scary’ bedtime story.  He certainly obliges, with a tale of grave-robbing and cannibalism that climaxes in his holding Salka’s head down under the duvet as if to suffocate her.  This is the film’s most disturbing and upsetting scene.  The strongest suggestion up to this point that Ingimundur is becoming deranged, it makes the viewer concerned for him, as well as for the frightened child.

    For these reasons, the bedtime story eclipses the protracted, multi-stage explosion of Ingimundur’s violent torment.  When bad weather prevents Georg attending their therapy session, his volley of questions comes remotely, via a(nother) screen.  The connection is dodgy and Georg doesn’t receive the answers to his questions.  This Zoom-laden failure of communication triggers Ingimundur’s climactic loss of control.  He smashes the computer and much else in the room.  His former work colleagues, Bjössi (Sigurður Sigurjónsson) and Hrafn (Arnmundur Ernst Björnsson), reprimand him for this (Georg has been in touch with them); Hrafn demands that Ingimundur hand over his keys to the police station.  (It seems that in smalltown rural Iceland, as in Ebbing, Missouri, discharged cops can still access the workplace as before.)   Ingimundur beats up both Bjössi and Hrafn, and locks them in the station cells.  He then goes to Olgeir’s home, drives him out to an isolated place and holds him at gunpoint, forcing Olgeir to confess that he did indeed sleep several times with Ingimundur’s wife.

    It’s conceivable this isn’t true – that Olgeir, to save his own skin, tells Ingimundur what he thinks he wants to hear – but there’s nothing in either the manner of the confession or subsequently to suggest that.  The following morning, Ingimundur and Salka are driving along the usual stretch of road when Olgeir waves down the car:  it was his wife, he insists to Ingimundur, who contacted the police about his disappearance the night before.  The explanation seems redundant as there’s no indication of any follow-up action being taken against Ingimundur, either for Olgeir’s abduction or for what he did at the police station.  Olgeir then abruptly changes tack and, through the open car window, stabs Ingimundur in the upper arm.  The latter manages to drive off.  Salka, who had been sulking because of things her grandfather said to her the previous day and refused to make up by touching hands, is now understandably distraught.  She takes Ingimundur’s bloody hand in hers.

    Things seem bound to end badly on this fateful road but no.  Ingimundur, by going crazy and confirming his worst fears, gets it all out of his system.  He stops his car, lifts Salka onto his shoulders and, though he tells her he’s tired, starts to retrace his steps in the direction whence the car came, carrying the girl, through a dark, empty tunnel below the road.  Here too, Pálmason achieves great impact in a sequence that works on a symbolic rather than a realistic level.  Ingimundur admits to Salka that ‘I’m sometimes a monster’ and makes a bellowing sound that echoes colossally in the tunnel.  Because A White, White Day has been almost unremittingly grim, viewers, like the hero, may experience the closing stages as cathartic.   In the very last sequence, seemingly a fantasy rather than a flashback, we see Ingimundur and his (unnamed) wife (Sara Dögg Ásgeirsdóttir) in the same room together, where he watches her do a seductive striptease to the accompaniment of ‘Memories’, a Leonard Cohen song.  The expression on Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson’s face is impressively beatific.  You don’t really believe it, or the whole conclusion to this singular film, but you feel grateful to Hlynur Pálmason that he too has finally put the bleak brakes on and turned around.

    29 June 2020

  • The Girl with a Bracelet

    La fille au bracelet

    Stéphane Demoustier (2019)

    The bracelet isn’t a piece of jewellery but an electronic tagging device on the ankle of seventeen-year-old Lise Bataille (Melissa Guers).  She’s been charged with the murder of her best friend, Flora Dufour, and two years after the killing, is about to face trial.  Most of Stéphane Demoustier’s tightly controlled drama takes place in a courtroom, a smaller number of scenes in and around the house in Nantes where Lise lives with her father Bruno (Roschdy Zem), mother Céline (Chiara Mastroianni) and younger brother Jules (Paul Aïssaoui-Cuvelier).  The opening sequence, accompanied by the film’s titles, is on a beach close to the Batailles’ holiday home.  Uniformed police officers approach the family.  There’s a brief conversation.  Lise puts some clothes over her bikini and departs with the two officers.  The sequence is shot from some distance away.  You can’t hear the conversation or see the expressions on the characters’ faces but Lise’s reaction isn’t obviously demonstrative.  That’s a sign of things to come.

    Lise pleads not guilty though the word ‘plead’ and this particular defendant hardly go together[1].  Her lack of affect is remarkable.  Under examination in court, Lise seldom evinces more than impatience at a question put to her, and her face rarely cracks.  Even the calm, determined defence counsel (Annie Mercier) occasionally seems exasperated by her client’s impassivity.   Lise’s demeanour gives off a whiff of Lindy Chamberlain syndrome but goes beyond refusing to conform to expectations of how a grief-stricken female should behave in public.  At home, Lise is routinely irritated by her (relatively) exuberant brother and sometimes irked by her father’s solicitude though never, in spite of her situation, to the point of a sustained outburst.  When she guiltily tells her daughter she won’t be attending the trial because of work commitments, Céline Bataille pushes for an emotional reaction that she doesn’t get.

    You naturally wonder if the accused’s stolid manner will prejudice the jury against her; it’s certainly something to which Anaïs Demoustier’s prosecution counsel, herself the most animated presence in the court, draws attention.  From Stéphane Demoustier’s point of view, Lise’s seeming indifference is also a means of sustaining the mystery of Flora’s violent death.  (She was found in her bed, stabbed seven times.  The evidence against Lise, the last person known to have seen Flora alive, is purely circumstantial.)  Like its title character, The Girl with a Bracelet has a distinctive, consistent tone – one that makes you suspect, from an early stage, that Demoustier won’t ‘solve’ the crime, and which heightens awareness of your own expectations of a crime/courtroom drama.

    Those expectations never disappear.  For example, one of a set of kitchen knives in the Batailles’ holiday cottage is missing.  The prosecution contends that this knife was the murder weapon.  It turns up when the family return to the cottage, on the mid-trial weekend, to clear the place out.  You’re primed to think the find will be critically important, in further implicating Lise or even pointing to the involvement of another family member.  The long lost knife does help Lise’s cause – but only because it’s established that it couldn’t, after all, have been used to kill Flora.  We don’t find out any more about the weapon actually used, or who committed the murder.

    Based on the 2018 Argentine film Acusada (The Accused), Demoustier’s screenplay may be deliberately short on dramatic events but is still somewhat dependent on them.  After a couple of days of the trial, Lise’s mother decides to come to court, and takes the stand to testify on her daughter’s behalf.  Before the jury retires to consider a verdict, taciturn Lise is asked if she has anything to add and, to everyone’s surprise, replies yes.  She makes a tearful apology to Flora’s mother (Anne Paulicevich), for breaking off contact with her in the light of Flora’s death.  Both changes of heart make for instantly compelling moments though neither seems particularly well motivated.  Why would Mme Dufour want or expect the person accused of her daughter’s murder to stay in touch?  In Céline’s case, the U-turn is more a matter of underlining the improbability of her not attending the trial in the first place.  The jury finds Lise not guilty and she’s free to go.  We don’t see her face as she removes the electronic bracelet and replaces it with a more conventional anklet – a too neat touch.

    As can be guessed from the above, Demoustier doesn’t indulge in explanatory flashback – except in the form of two phone video recordings, played to the court.  The first of these is crucial and particularly effective.  The recording, by Flora, shows Lise giving a blowjob to Nathan (Mikaël Halimi), Flora’s boyfriend at the time (and an uncomfortable witness at the trial).  This video matters in several ways.  Flora shared it online, which caused a rift between the two longstanding friends; the prosecution suggests that Lise never forgave Flora and killed her in revenge.  Bruno Bataille, more often stoically composed in court, can’t watch as his young daughter’s sex life becomes a matter of public record.  The video is evidence of what Lise and Flora would do for a laugh – and Lise is indeed laughing.  She is too in the second clip, which shows her and Flora (Émilie Lehuraux) dancing at a party the night before the murder.   The Lise of these videos is unrecognisable from the unsmiling, oddly detached figure she’s become.  It makes you wonder how much her parents (and even her little brother) have also changed in the long interval between her arrest and trial – a period of limbo for the family but, for Bruno and Céline, a time too of recurring fears that their daughter might be guilty.  Stéphane Demoustier does a skilful job of conveying the emotionally erosive effects of the allegations made against Lise on her and those close to her.

    Measured, limited but absorbing, The Girl with a Bracelet is well acted throughout.  The cast includes some high-profile players:  in the latest César awards, Roschdy Zem and Anaïs Demoustier (the director’s sister) were named Best Actor and Best Actress for performances in other films in the same year as this one[2].  Zem and Chiara Mastroianni (who was also César-nominated this year[3]) do particularly good work as Lise’s parents.  As Jules, Paul Aïssaoui-Cuvelier is a credible mixture of sparky inquisitiveness and suppressed anxiety.  Like him, Melissa Guers is (according to IMDb) making her screen acting debut here.  In order for the film to work at all, the actress playing Lise must be willing to be dislikable.  Guers commits to this fearlessly and with fine control.

    27 June 2020

    [1] For simplicity’s sake, I’m using English court terms despite the many evident differences in the French legal system.  For example, the trial features two prosecution barristers – an avocat des parties civiles (Carlo Ferrante) and an avocat général (Anaïs Demoustier).  The former’s role seems to be virtually administrative; the latter does most of the prosecuting.   The proceedings are chaired by a president du tribunal (Pascal Garbarini), one of several judges.  There seem to be six jury members.

    [2] Roschdy Zem won for Roubaix, une lumière and Anaïs Demoustier for Alice et le maire.

    [3] For Chambre 212.

Posts navigation