Old Yorker

  • La guerre est finie

    Alain Resnais (1966)

    The title is ironic.  The protagonist Diego (Yves Montand) is a stalwart of the communist party, commuting between France and Spain to work for the overthrow of the Franco regime, more than a quarter of a century after the end of the Spanish Civil War.  Diego reflects on his motives for continuing with a project so dangerous and, in terms of bringing about political change in Spain, still fruitless.  His recognition of that and his realisation that the appeal of this way of life is largely nostalgic do nothing to weaken its hold on him.  The false names and passports that Diego uses in his line of work have the effect of reinforcing the finally unyielding core of his identity.  Since Alain Resnais’s film was made a decade before Franco’s death and Spain’s subsequent transition to democracy, the material had an intrinsic urgency and poignancy that can’t easily be reproduced for an audience coming to it over thirty years later.  Those qualities certainly don’t emerge from the film as a piece of cinema tout court.   La guerre est finie is often absorbing but thanks more to its meticulous composition (the movement of Sacha Vierny’s camera, the editing by Eric Pluet and Ziva Mostec) than to the themes and the characters which Resnais, working from a screenplay by Jorge Semprún, presents.  What’s on the screen and the soundtrack are parallel experiences:  there’s a disjunction between the fluid images and the spoken word, especially Diego’s mainly explicative voiceover.  (The mixture of dubbing and subtitling – the film is mostly in French with a few exchanges in Spanish – may have contributed to the stiffness of the dialogue and narration.)   The luscious score by Giovanni Fusco, with its obvious Hispanic details, doesn’t seem to fit with what we see and the rest of what we hear.  The music has a trivialising effect.

    The progress of the story is occasionally interrupted by what I took to be a mixture of flashbacks and Diego’s anticipation of what lies in store for him (and sometimes the collision of these two mental processes).  Overall, though, the narrative is linear, more so than in other Resnais films made around the same time.  I still found the film fairly hard to follow – or perhaps hard to engage with enough to want to follow.  Although Diego’s weary nobility becomes tedious, Yves Montand has authority and credibility.  His acting looks very simple so that it rarely seems like acting.  He conveys a strong and continuing sense of a self-questioning mind at work.  The two main female characters are Diego’s mistress of several years, Marianne, and Nadine, a young girl whose father’s identity he borrows at one point.  Ingrid Thulin makes Marianne’s attachment to Diego affecting in a physically convincing way, although a few of her reactions come across as over-prepared.  As Nadine, Geneviève Bujold is perhaps too aware of the camera and occasionally overdoes gamine inscrutability but she’s a vivid, striking presence.  The characters of the women are neatly designed to reflect Diego’s conflicting feelings:  Marianne belongs to his longstanding way of life and incarnates the doomed loyalty which that way of life connotes; Nadine, with whom he sleeps only once, reflects the tension between Diego’s yearning for the ardent self-confidence and political enthusiasms of youth and his dislike (maybe envy) of new forms of revolutionary activism.  Yet the conception of all main three characters is so finished that the actors, good as they are, find it hard to bring them fully to life.  Michel Piccoli, as usual, comes through strongly – in a brief appearance as a customs officer, one of the many document-checkers we meet in the course of La guerre est finie.

    29 June 2009

     

  • La grande illusion

    Jean Renoir (1937)

    I’m always apprehensive about seeing an officially great film for the first time.  Time was I didn’t dare say what I really thought.  Although that’s no longer the case, I often think I’ll be unworthy of the classic – in the case of this one, I’m sure I am.  To be honest, I sat stupid through much of La grande illusion and was relieved when it was over.  This wasn’t a question of saying to myself, ‘I don’t really think this is all it’s cracked up to be’.  It was a matter of not really thinking at all:  I couldn’t get what I was watching to mean anything to me.  I realise it makes things worse, in writing this note, to major on how I felt – especially when the problem was that I didn’t feel – but the note will be pointless if I don’t admit its context.  I wonder if the prisoner of war setting, and recoiling from it, is to do with my father’s having been a POW – or whether (more likely) I loathe the whole idea of being in the armed forces and the male camaraderie essential to them.  (I’m so grateful that I’ve never had to do any kind of national service and never will now.)  The humorous concert party sequence in La grande illusion is especially resistible to me.  Whatever the reasons, I clearly have a strong aversion to warfare and companies of men involved with it.  It’s the prospect of the war parts that always puts me off reading War and Peace.

    Once the Great War lieutenants Maréchal (Jean Gabin) and Rosenthal (Marcel Dalio) eventually escape, make their way through the German countryside towards Switzerland, and find themselves taking refuge in the shed of a German farmer’s widow (Dita Parlo) whose husband was killed at Verdun, my feelings about La grande illusion were transformed.  The relationships between the woman and her child (Little Peters) and the two soldiers are wonderfully described.  I think I’ll remember for a long time the way that the woman, now in love with Maréchal and deeply upset after he and Rosenthal have gone on their way, clears from the table the plates they’ve just eaten from.   I can see throughout the film the evidence of Renoir’s ability to dramatise universal human themes through utterly natural means and individual characters.  The very last shot of a snowy landscape, empty of people except for the tiny and receding figures of Maréchal and Rosenthal, now safely over the Swiss border, is beautiful.

    The film’s title echoes that of a 1909 book by the British economist Norman Angell:  his thesis was that European war was futile because of the shared economic interests of the continent’s nations.   In Renoir’s film, which he co-wrote with Charles Spaak, the title refers to what is, in the last analysis, the illusion of human beings’ difference as a result of class as well as of nationality.  At the same time, the particular social status of each of the major characters – the aristocrat Boeldieu (Pierre Fresnay), the lower class Maréchal, the nouveau riche Jew Rosenthal, and the German officer Rauffenstein (Eric von Stroheim), also an aristocrat – is crucial to the drama’s complexity.  All the actors are very fine, especially Gabin.  Eric von Stroheim’s physique is extraordinary:  he wears his tight uniform like a skin.  The supporting players include Gaston Modot and Jean Dasté (although I somehow missed him).

    17 April 2012

Posts navigation