Old Yorker

  • U-Turn

    Oliver Stone (1997)

    We turned off before the end but Wikipedia’s account of the plot suggests that we missed no great surprises.  (We’d have turned off sooner but for a misunderstanding.  When I asked Sally if she’d had enough, she said she didn’t mind seeing what happened.  It turned out she said this only because she assumed I was keen to carry on – in fact, I’d given up on the film after half an hour.)

    The fact that all three of the main characters end up dead is an indication of the jocose heartlessness of U-Turn, which Oliver Stone adapted from a novel (Stray Dogs) with its author John Ridley.   Sally said at one point that this was Oliver Stone trying to make a David Lynch film.  The stupefied but sinister, middle-of-nowhere setting – the small town of Superior, Arizona, where the protagonist Bobby Cooper finds himself trapped after his car breaks down – and its population of variously discomfiting oddballs sound like Lynch; but Stone’s signature crudeness turns anything he tries his hand at into what can only be an Oliver Stone picture.  He’s an auteur, no denying it.  U-Turn is frequently violent and the violence is oppressively stupid but Stone’s lack of artistry makes it quickly forgettable too.    Whereas David Lynch might have made the town’s malignity insinuating and polymorphous, Stone establishes it obviously, without resonance or implication.   Just in the course of the opening titles, with Cooper driving along the freeway, there’s a cut to vultures picking at the corpse of what looks like a coyote; another snarling animal rears up in front of Cooper’s car and he runs it over.  In this part of the world, all the wild life has baleful potential – even the victims – and the human beings are part of the wild life.  Later on, there are shots of rattlesnakes and of stuffed animal heads mounted on walls.  They’re not integrated with the action, never things you happen to glimpse momentarily or unsettlingly:  alive or dead, they’re all on display.  They might as well be still photographs (although Robert Richardson’s camerawork can be hyperactive too), each one labelled ‘Symbolic specimen of menacing local fauna’.

    The film could work only as a triumph of style and Oliver Stone has no style.   I don’t like his more ambitious pictures but that ambition seems cherishable while you’re watching U-Turn:  when Stone applies his undeniable brutal energy to material as thin as this, the results are cloddishly grotesque (and dull).  His infection of the more talented people involved in the film is evident in the jaunty nihilism of Ennio Morricone’s score and the self-indulgent, overemphatic caricatures supplied by Billy Bob Thornton (as a leering, malignant garage mechanic), Jon Voight (a relentlessly philosophical blind man) and Claire Danes (an all-stops-out airhead, who can’t understand why Patsy Cline stopped making records).  In spite of the way she does the part (or the way she’s been encouraged to do it), Danes has a lovely vivacity that makes the character she’s playing less intolerable than she ought to be.  As her pathologically possessive boyfriend Tony N Tucker (TNT), Joaquin Phoenix’s looks make him almost comically distinguished in this setting.  Phoenix is pretty average when he’s playing angry here but he’s funny in the moments when TNT crumbles into cravenness.  Nick Nolte has dynamic wit to spare as the psychotic Jake, who asks Cooper to kill his wife, but Nolte is particularly disadvantaged by Stone’s literal-minded approach:  this actor is menacing enough without Stone’s shooting him in bellowing, glaring close-up to establish menace.  As the wife, Jennifer Lopez has more presence than I expected.

    The script’s few attempts at verbal humour are hopeless. Billy Cooper arrives on the scene with a bandaged left hand and everyone he meets asks what happened to it.  He says, ‘I had an accident’, and they reply, ‘You wanna be more careful’.   This running joke isn’t much good on the first repetition (because it’s played purely as a gag – without threat) and it’s desperate the fourth or fifth time.  Unless I was paying even less attention than I realised, Stone and Ridley reach the same conclusion and drop it eventually.

    Most of the interest in U-Turn comes from Sean Penn as Billy Cooper.  Early on, his transitions from cocky to vulnerable, from sullen to soulful, are impressively effortless and get you wondering about the character and his past.   Unfortunately, Stone inserts splinters of flashback into Cooper’s mind – to the physically gruelling experiences that have sent him on his interrupted journey to California – so often that it soon becomes clear that Penn will never get through a scene without these interruptions and you start to lose interest.  Penn has a tendency to overdo anguished aggression if the director isn’t careful (as in Mystic River); Oliver Stone, of course, can’t get enough of this.  There are moments when Cooper’s cursing reaction to yet one more thing going wrong for him in this hellhole are amusing; but there are times too when Sean Penn seems to going through the motions.   Yet in one sequence Cooper’s desperate need to escape the place and Penn’s explosive, yelling frustration are fused and transmitted – in a way that’s shocking and which registers more strongly than any of the actual physical violence – to a woman in the ticket office of the local bus station, well played by Laurie Metcalf.  It’s the best scene in (what I saw of) the picture.  It would be better still if Stone hadn’t shot and scored it in a style that underlines, quite unnecessarily, what the actors are already, fully communicating.

    23 July 2009

  • A Hijacking

    Kapringen

    Tobias Lindholm (2012)

    As in the writer-director Tobias Lindholm’s latest film A War, the main character is a man in charge who’s not prepared to delegate and whose second-in-command who may resent this hands-on approach.  The right-hand man is played, in both movies, by the expertly non-committal Dar Salim.  While the two movies have different lead actors – Søren Malling in A Hijacking, Pilou Asbæk in A War – each has a key supporting role in the film in which they don’t play the main part.   Lindholm evidently has, along with his interest in the psychology of leading from the front, a liking for simple, what-it-says-on-the-can titles.  In A Hijacking, a Danish cargo ship, the ‘Rosen’, is hijacked in the Indian Ocean by Somali pirates.  Peter Ludvigsen (Malling), CEO of the company that owns the ship, leads negotiations for the release of the crew.   The action switches back and forth between the shipping company offices and the ‘Rosen’, where the seven-strong crew are separated by the pirates into two groups.   One group, of four men, remains unseen for most of the film.  The three on screen are the physically ailing captain (Keith Pearson), the engineer Jan Sørensen (Roland Møller) and, especially, the ship’s cook Mikkel Hartmann (Asbæk).

    The company brings in a professional adviser on hostage situations.   Connor Julian (Gary Skjoldmose Porter) immediately recommends the appointment of a neutral third party to handle negotiations on the company’s behalf and warns against acceding to the initial ransom demand because, he says, the pirates will then up the ante.  Peter rejects the idea of a go-between.  He insists that he will personally conduct negotiations.  Tobias Lindholm doesn’t explain what motivates Peter in taking this position – or whether he is acting independently, or on behalf of the board of the shipping company, in gradually increasing the ransom offer as the days and weeks pass.  (Representatives of the board put in an appearance only to indicate growing disquiet that the negotiations are distracting Peter from his other responsibilities as chief executive.)  Peter’s main contact on the ship is Omar (Abdihakin Asgar), the negotiator-interpreter for the pirates though not himself one of them; but Mikkel, on the orders of his captors, occasionally speaks direct to Peter and the latter becomes increasingly concerned for Mikkel’s safety, above that of the other crew.  There’s no explanation of this either.   Lindholm seems less interested in Peter as a personality than as a dramatic device.  His misgivings about the months-long duration of the hijacking aren’t enough for Peter to accelerate the incremental increases in what the company is prepared to pay the pirates:  after all, Tobias Lindholm has a hundred minutes of screen time to fill.

    The direction gives A Hijacking a good, documentary-like feel.  The spatial and atmospheric contrasts between the ship and the company offices are effective enough – so too the set pieces that describe edgy camaraderie between captors and captives.  But the dominant focus on one character in each of the key locations feels forced.  The pirates keep four of the crew hidden only so that Lindholm can devote attention to Mikkel (and, to a much lesser extent, Jan: the captain’s ill health renders him semi-conscious and largely silent until he quickly perks up when needed in the closing stages).  When he first hears the news of what’s happened on the ‘Rosen’, Peter has just sealed a deal with a group of Japanese businessmen – a deal that his colleague Lars Vestergaard (Salim) was unable to close without Peter’s help.  The maximum that Peter is prepared to pay the Japanese is $15m (and he eventually beats them down to $14.5m); the pirates’ opening ransom demand is $15m.  The juxtaposition between Peter’s swift, successful completion of the deal with the Japanese and the long drawn out, compromised nature of negotiations with the pirates is too pat.  The drama also depends on some familiar details – such as the recently married Mikkel’s wedding ring, which he wears on a string round his neck, hides when the hijacking begins and eventually retrieves only when he thinks (mistakenly, of course) that it’s safe  to do so.

    Søren Malling’s blend of reserve and control is particularly effective at the start of A Hijacking.  The continuing mystery of what makes Peter Ludvigsen tick means that the character becomes less intriguing than frustrating as the film goes on.  (Peter’s outburst at his wife (Linda Laursen), who turns up a couple of times at the office where he now virtually lives, to bring her husband clean shirts, is baffling.)  Gary Skjoldmose Porter gives Connor Julian a very believable professional fluency.  (There’s nothing on his IMDB entry to suggest that Porter has acted before or since.)  One of the film’s best moments comes when the watchful Lars Vestergaard opens his mouth with a suggestion that not only proves crucial in leading to a deal with the pirates but also amounts to a quiet revenge for being put in his place by Peter in the negotiations with the Japanese.  Lars suggests that Peter up the offer, indicating that he’s prepared to go beyond the company’s maximum by putting his own money in:  the eye contact  between Søren Malling and Dar Salim at this point is terrific.

    On board the ship, the effects of captivity stretching over three months are less than fully realistic but Pilou Asbæk’s gradual loss of energy and amiability is impressive and he’s given strong support by Roland Møller.  The tensions between the crew and their kidnappers are expressed explosively and persuasively through verbal outbursts in which neither party understands the language of the other.  One of the pirates is shown from an early stage to be a loose cannon (and proves it, shockingly, in the closing stages).  Otherwise, the hijackers are not sharply characterised – this is effective in making them more dangerously unpredictable.  A Hijacking is worth seeing but Lindholm’s A War is a better piece of work.  So too, on balance, is Paul Greengrass’s Captain Phillips.

    9 July 2016

Posts navigation