Old Yorker

  • My Cousin Rachel (2017)

    Roger Michell (2017)

    The storyline is (according to Wikipedia) faithful to Daphne du Maurier’s novel, except that the title character now meets her death more spectacularly.  In the book and the film that quickly followed its publication in 1951, a footbridge over the sunken garden in construction on the Cornish estate that Rachel now owns gives way[1].  In Roger Michell’s adaptation, Rachel (Rachel Weisz), wearing a brilliant blue gown and riding a white horse, plunges with her mount from a dodgy cliff path to the seashore far below.  Not unexpectedly, this new film differs from its predecessor by including a bit of sex and exposed flesh, and a few swear words but Michell, who also wrote the screenplay, shows little interest in reworking du Maurier’s romantic melodrama more thoroughly than that.  He relies on visual clichés when it suits:  the pearls of a necklace scattering and skittering down a wooden staircase; chaotic rifling through a chest of drawers in a desperate search for incriminating evidence.  The mood of the film isn’t greatly varied; occasionally, this results in a pivotal moment  lacking the impact you feel it should have – for example, when Rachel reveals to the hero Philip Ashley (Sam Claflin) that his cousin Ambrose left a will, bequeathing everything to her but crucially unsigned).  The perils of the cliff path are prefigured in a sequence that is both clumsily placed and makes you wonder why the route isn’t more locally notorious than it turns out be.  It’s not clear why My Cousin Rachel has been remade at all, except that it’s sixty-five years now since the Hollywood version.  (There’ve been television, radio and stage adaptations in between.)  Roger Michell’s film lacks excitement as well as imaginative purpose but it is entertaining and well acted.

    Although Daphne du Maurier’s plot seems designed to ensure that Rachel’s every action has both a malicious and an innocent explanation so that the truth about her is finally elusive, I was, as with Henry Koster’s movie, left unconvinced by one or two aspects of this.  One theme that comes through more strongly in Michell’s version is the significance of the age difference between Rachel and Philip, who is besotted with her.  The casting helps for a start:  Rachel Weisz is sixteen years older than Sam Claflin whereas Richard Burton was only nine years Olivia de Havilland’s junior.  Here, Rachel gives the disparity of their ages as a reason she can’t marry Philip.  The Oedipal implication of their relationship comes through interestingly in Philip’s impatient determination for Rachel to inherit the family jewels, in particular the pearls last worn by his mother on her wedding day.  Philip was so young when his mother died that he has no memory of her.  In that sense, he’s in a wholly different position from du Maurier’s Max de Winter yet, when Rachel first wears the pearls, the appropriation of costume belonging to a dead woman who exerts influence beyond the grave echoes Rebecca.

    Rachel Weisz’s impenetrability (I sometimes think watching her:  this woman is evidently feeling something but what?) serves her very well here.   Weisz is convincingly ambiguous and enigmatic, as well as very beautiful.  Her portrait of Rachel is as successful as Olivia de Havilland’s was not.   Philip Ashley’s complete sexual inexperience is one of the more contrived features of Daphne du Maurier’s set-up but Sam Claflin does a good job of making Philip plausibly naïve.  Claflin isn’t the most fluid of actors but his hard work pays off.  His playing is always committed rather than compelling but he persuades you that Philip is in the grip of an obsession.  Holliday Grainger does well in the thankless role of Louise, the daughter of Philip’s godfather-guardian.  Louise’s love for the hero is unreciprocated for as long as Rachel lives:  even at the end, when she’s dead, an uneasy shadow of second-bestness hangs over Louise.  (She’s now Philip’s first bride yet she’s the second Mrs Ashley.)   Iain Glen is Louise’s father and Pierfranceso Favino is Rainaldi, Rachel’s hard-to-read Italian friend.  Given what he has to work with, Simon Russell Beale plays the Ashley family solicitor with an emotional precision and incision that are quite amazing.

    14 June 2017

    [1] See note on the 1952 film for further plot details.

  • Rattle of a Simple Man

    Muriel Box (1964)

    Thirty-five years after his death, Harry H Corbett has the reputation of a major stage actor whose talents went largely to waste in screen work – thanks to the huge success he enjoyed in Steptoe and Son and the typecasting that followed.  This thesis was successfully dramatised in the 2008 BBC4 TV film The Curse of Steptoe (directed by Michael Samuels from a screenplay by Brian Fillis).  At the start of the film, Corbett (Jason Isaacs) is Shakespeare’s Richard II in a Theatre Workshop production at Stratford East:  Joan Littlewood looks forward, once ‘you’ve got the histories under your belt’, to his Macbeth and, after that, ‘the Danish ditherer’.  In January 1962, Corbett was playing Henry V at the Bristol Old Vic.  He took a few days off to appear in ‘The Offer’, the prophetically named BBC Comedy Playhouse pilot that led to the commissioning of the first series of Steptoe and Son.  It’s plain to see from Steptoe that Harry H Corbett was very gifted (he won the 1963 equivalent of a BAFTA for Best TV Actor for playing Harold Steptoe).  Because of this and because of Corbett’s legend, I always keep an eye open for further evidence of how good he was.  It’s a wild goose chase – the whole point of the legend is that such evidence doesn’t exist – but I keep hoping otherwise.  So I recorded Rattle of a Simple Man when it was shown on ‘Talking Pictures’ the other day.  Sad to say, Harry H Corbett’s performance in the lead is awful.

    Muriel Box’s film is an adaptation, by Charles Dyer, of his theatre play of the same name, first staged in 1963.  Except for the brief appearance of a third character, the play is a two-hander and takes place on a single set.  Percy Winthram, a nearly forty-year-old virgin, has come down to London from Manchester with his pals to watch their football team play at Wembley.  As the result of a bet with his mates, Percy ends up spending the evening with Cyrenne, a prostitute.  Dyer’s screenplay expands the material by including multiple characters and settings, and a subplot involving Percy’s friend, the cocksure skirt-chaser Ginger.  I don’t know the original in detail; perhaps it takes time on stage for the protagonists to show their true colours.  But one of the film’s several disappointments is how little is revealed about either Percy (Harry H Corbett) or Cyrenne (Diane Cilento) in the course of the story.  Box and Dyer begin with the football fans about to set off from a Manchester coach station.  Percy’s mother (Thora Hird), with whom he still lives, appears on the scene and demands to see her son:  he’s forgotten his scarf and she’s worried he’ll catch cold.  Enough said.  Cyrenne is a more complicated figure only in comparison with Percy.  She’s introduced as a prostitute and Percy goes back with her to her rented room on that understanding.  For much of the film, she shoots a line about her aristocratic connections and Oxford education.  Percy eventually discovers that her Italian immigrant family runs a greasy spoon but the viewer is shown at a much earlier stage that Cyrenne’s social pretensions are a fiction.

    An oddity of Rattle of a Simple Man, in view of when it was written, is that Charles Dyer makes Cyrenne’s background rather than her line of work the awful truth that must, in due course, be exposed.  In the showdown argument between her and Percy that follows, he claims to be angry because she lied to him yet it’s the facts of Cyrenne’s family life that come across as her shaming secret.  Dyer reworks the well-worn set-up of a lonely, sexually naïve man thinking he’s found the girl of his dreams only to discover she sells her body to other men:  the heroine’s sex work and wrong-side-of-the-tracks upbringing in effect swap places in Rattle of a Simple Man.  A corny, melodramatic scene in the kitchen behind her family’s caff announces that Cyrenne grew up being sexually abused by her stepfather.  When, seeking to justify the untruths she’s told, she mentions this to Percy, he doesn’t show much sympathy.  This isn’t a surprise:  Percy is so narrowly written that any reaction at all to such shocking news would be outside the range Charles Dyer has given him.  The revelation doesn’t shock the viewer much either because Muriel Box’s direction renders everyone in the film eccentrically innocuous – the crude lech Ginger (Michael Medwin), the minor criminals he gets briefly entangled with, and the cartoon Italian sexual abuser (George Roderick).

    The twists and turns of the last twenty minutes are bewildering – they make no sense in relation to what’s meant to be happening in the relationship between Percy and Cyrenne.  The coach back to Manchester is due to leave Victoria at midnight.  There’s a train to Brighton at the same time and Cyrenne persuades Percy that they should go there together for a few days.  As she’s looking for a suitcase, Percy takes the phone call from her stepfather that demolishes Cyrenne’s tall tale about her distinguished parentage.  They have their row then are reconciled.  Cyrenne invites Percy to come to bed.  He agrees then, as he prepares to undress, takes off his watch, looks at it and exclaims in a panic, ‘I’ll miss me coach!’  He hotfoots it to Victoria.  The coach is pulling out but Cinderella Percy gets the driver’s attention and is hauled on board by his mates.  The coach goes past a hoarding on which the face of a beautiful girl is advertising cosmetics:  her face turns in Percy’s imagination into Cyrenne’s.  The same thing happens when he looks at a perfume advert in a magazine he’s reading.  He realises his mistake, yells at the driver to stop the coach, jumps off and races back to Cyrenne.  (The London of the film is remarkably easy to get across in no time.)  He bursts into her room and exclaims, ‘I forgot me rattle!’ (His rattle is a comedy phallic symbol).  Cyrenne smiles exultantly and the film ends.  But why did he dash for the coach when they’d just made up and he’d already decided not to return to Manchester because they were going to Brighton together?  The frenetic finale reeks of a clumsy attempt to introduce ‘action’ into Rattle of a Simple Man to prove it’s a motion picture.

    Muriel Box and her sister Betty are among the subjects of Rebecca Cooke’s very interesting and enjoyable book Her Brilliant Career: Ten Extraordinary Women of the Fifties (2013).  Cooke mentions Rattle of a Simple Man (‘a second-rate comedy’) only in passing but something else she writes about Muriel and her producer husband Sydney rings particularly true after you’ve watched this film:

    ‘The Boxes’ time had passed.  They were middle-aged people at a moment when middle-aged people suddenly seemed very old indeed – a trend that the movies, as ever, ruthlessly exaggerated.’

    Whereas Muriel Box was approaching sixty when she made Rattle, Charles Dyer was only in his mid-thirties but they combine, in opening out the play for the screen, to make the material stupidly condescending – especially in the soccer supporter element.  Box inserts – for ‘realism’ – shots of an FA Cup Final crowd yet there’s not a hint of anyone in Percy’s party caring in the least what happens to their team at Wembley.  Unless I missed it, we never know what does happen – though much of the film’s audience in 1964 would have been well aware that Manchester United had won the Cup the previous year.  The northerners’ day trip to London is presented as an only-here-for-the-beer works outing.

    According to Wikipedia, Sydney Box, having bought the rights to Dyer’s play in 1963, wanted Peter Sellers to play Percy but couldn’t afford him.  It seems the Boxes saw the role as one designed for not merely an actor with comic skills but a comedy genius – and that may go some way to explaining Harry H Corbett’s playing of Percy.  He’s all predetermined facial and vocal tics, and hyper-conscious of the camera – or the upper circle.  It’s hard to tell what acting medium he thinks he’s in.  He’s often stagy, though he hadn’t played Percy in the original theatre production (Edward Woodward did); some of his mannerisms channel Harold Steptoe as if this is what Corbett thinks is expected of him (it probably was, of course).  You’d never guess from his exaggerated funny-Northern accent that Corbett was actually brought up in Manchester.  Just occasionally, he’s quiet and you hope for something different.  These moments, as well as being few, really are momentary.

    Diane Cilento is miscast – she’s too upmarket and assured – yet her glamour and vitality make Rattle of a Simple Man easier to bear than it would have been with a transparently vulnerable Cyrenne.  (Sheila Hancock originated the role on stage.)  It’s a relief too that Cilento’s speaking voice doesn’t, of itself, make Cyrenne’s humble origins obvious albeit that Dyer’s words quickly give the game away. With Harry H Corbett in a performing world of his own, Cilento has an impossible task but at least she’s doing film acting – so too are Michael Medwin as Ginger and the strong-featured John Ronane, in his couple of scenes as Cyrenne’s genially permissive landlord.  The three other members of Percy’s group are Hugh Futcher, Brian Wilde and Charles Dyer himself.  He slows down each bit he features in; like Harry H Corbett, he’s elaborately unfunny.

    11 June 2017

Posts navigation