Old Yorker

  • Face to Face (TV)

    Ansikte mot ansikte

    Ingmar Bergman (1976)

    Cries and Whispers (1972) was the last famous Bergman work to appear exclusively in cinemas.  Over the next decade or so, his four best-known pieces – Scenes from a Marriage (1973), The Magic Flute (1975), Face to Face (1976) and Fanny and Alexander (1982) – were all made either for television or in dual film and TV versions.  Face to Face, released in cinemas in April 1976 as a two-hour feature, was shown on Swedish television in May and June of the same year as a four-part mini-series, running just under three hours in total.  It was this version that BFI screened in their current Bergman retrospective.  Both the film and the television series cover a short period but a major crisis in the life of Jenny Isaksson (Liv Ullmann), a psychiatrist at a Stockholm hospital.  Her husband, also a psychiatrist, is attending conferences in America; their daughter and only child is away at summer camp.  The family is soon to move to a new house, which is not yet ready.  In the meantime, Jenny goes to stay with her grandmother (Aino Taube) and ailing grandfather (Gunnar Björnstrand) in their apartment on Strandvägen.  Her professional responsibilities are greater than ever – she’s currently deputising for the absent chief psychiatrist – but it’s soon clear that Jenny’s own mental health is precarious.

    In the first shot of the first scene of the first episode (‘The Separation’), Liv Ullmann looks into the camera; her face is that of a woman who sees the void.  The camera pulls back to reveal a room in the house that Jenny’s family is about to vacate – empty but for a plant and a telephone on the floor.  Jenny bends down to make a phone call to her grandmother, to confirm her arrival later in the day, and instantly switches into bright sociability.  At work, she retains a cheerful mask virtually throughout an interview with a demented patient:  disturbed as she is, Maria (Kari Sylwan) sees through the mask but, except when she’s briefly violent towards Jenny, fails to dislodge it.  Her grandparents’ home is close to a church whose bells ring as Jenny enters the apartment building.  An elderly, veiled woman in black comes down the stairs and acknowledges her.  Jenny is immediately disconcerted but reverts to determined cheerfulness when her grandmother opens the front door.

    The remainder of this episode and the second one (‘The Border’) build up a picture of Jenny’s troubled mind and unhappy marriage – chiefly through her dreams and visions, and her conversations with Tomas Jacobi (Erland Josephson).  She first meets Tomas, a gynaecologist, at a party; they subsequently go out for dinner and back to his house.  When she returns to her grandparents’ apartment that night, Jenny watches unseen as her grandfather, wandering about the place in his nightshirt, becomes terrified that the clocks in the apartment are telling the wrong time, and her grandmother comforts him.  Jenny then receives a phone call that sends her hurrying to the family home she’s recently left.  There, she finds Maria lying unconscious and is confronted by two men (Birger Malmsten and Göran Stangertz), the younger of whom tries to rape Jenny.   Shortly afterwards, she and Tomas attend a piano recital together; again, she accompanies him back home.  Lying in bed beside him, Jenny quietly describes to Tomas the attempted assault on her.  She then suffers rapidly consecutive panic attacks (impressively realised by Liv Ullmann). Next day, back at her grandparents, she sleeps continuously for many hours.  She’s woken by her grandmother, who’s about to leave for a short trip away with her husband.  Jenny insists she’ll be fine on her own.  She gets up, showers and dresses.  In the empty apartment, she records a message for her husband – an oral suicide note.

    As she makes this recording, there’s a striking convergence between Jenny’s calmness and clarity and the narrative mood of Face to Face.  Just as Jenny’s long sleep seems to have soothed her nerves and cleared her mind, Bergman now feels able to jettison the Freudian paraphernalia of nightmares and flashbacks to childhood trauma, the knelling bells, the ticking clocks.  Jenny addresses her husband in a voice mildly affectionate and apologetic but quietly purposeful too.  She describes her life as ‘a process of suffocation’; the widening gap between her ‘external behaviour and internal impoverishment’; the ‘vast sense of dread’ that alone remains.  The ringing telephone that ends the second episode sounds like a summons back to life but isn’t.  The next episode (‘The Twilight Land’) starts with her sealing the envelope containing the cassette recording and resuming her suicide preparations.  Liv Ullmann’s movement expresses the fine line between Jenny’s single-mindedness and apprehension – the latter isn’t fear so much as awareness of the momentousness of what she’s about to do.  She sits on her bed, taking handfuls of Nembutal, washing each helping down with water until she’s emptied the bottle of tablets.  She lies down on the bed.  Her fingers move up and down the patterned wallpaper as she loses consciousness.  Though the image isn’t especially original, it evokes, for Bergman followers, the wallpaper in Through a Glass Darkly (with which, of course, Face to Face is also connected by title).

    The Nembutals obviously – one’s tempted to say unfortunately, as far as the rest of this third part is concerned – don’t signal the end of Jenny or of Face to Face.  The unanswered call came from Tomas; concerned that Jenny had suddenly broken off their previous phone conversation and now wasn’t picking up, he came round to the apartment and (don’t ask how exactly) got her to hospital just in time.   As she drifts in and out of consciousness, Jenny, clad in scarlet, moves through a dream world that is less than startling:  ’The Twilight Land’ proves to be over-familiar Bergman terrain, full of just the kind of imagery he seemed to have sloughed off when Jenny made her tape-recording.  A shot of dark waters accompanies the start of the opening credits of each episode of Face to Face; this, on its own, is more powerfully suggestive than most of the oneiric stuff that follows.  Though there are strong moments in the fourth and last part (‘The Return’), nothing emulates, in terms of visual and verbal drama, the prelude to and execution of the suicide attempt.

    It was almost a relief to read in Images: My Life in Film that Bergman regarded the piece, or at least its second half, as a failure.  He intended:

    ‘… a film about dreams and reality.  The dreams were to become tangible reality.  Reality would dissolve and become dream.  I have occasionally managed to move unhindered between dream and reality:  Wild Strawberries, Persona, The Silence, Cries and Whispers.  This time it was more difficult.  … The dream sequences became synthetic, the reality blurred.’

    As usual, Bergman is hard on himself.  There are passages in Face to Face where the distinction between dream and reality is virtually imperceptible – for example, between Jenny’s grandfather’s semi-sleepwalking preoccupation with time and the following sequence in the empty house.  (I was never sure whether Jenny imagined the attempted rape and whether her hysterical panic in Tomas’s bed was a reaction solely to the assault or signalled a larger mental disintegration.)  Bergman’s self-criticism is essentially right, though – so too his comment that Liv Ullmann’s ‘strength and talent held the film together’.  He must have realised he was unable to achieve the effect he was after not just in retrospect but while he was making Face to Face.   The momentum of the piece is increasingly to do with Ullmann’s acting – the performer, rather than the character she’s playing, becomes the focus of attention.  Bergman seems impelled principally by the exciting uncertainty of how much he can keep asking of his lead and whether she can keep delivering.  She can and she does:  it’s a magnificent performance (an Oscar-nominated one that should have been Oscar-winning:  the Best Actress award that year went instead to Faye Dunaway in Network!).

    Tomas Jacobi’s role in the story doesn’t make complete sense.  His medical specialty may be meant to have a quasi-symbolic meaning (as with, in a more light-hearted vein, Gunnar Björnstrand’s gynaecologist in A Lesson in Love) – but it’s not clear why, once Jenny is recovering in hospital, Tomas should be the doctor in charge of her.   Erland Josephson is very good, though, especially at listening to Jenny and when, in a surprising monologue, Tomas tells her about his love for one of the young men at the party where he and Jenny first met.   The weaker ‘reality’ sequences in the third and fourth episodes include Jenny’s encounters with her husband Erik (Sven Lindberg) and daughter Anna (Helene Friberg).  Erik, who briefly interrupts his American tour to visit Jenny in hospital, seems merely dull:  one expects a marriage in a Bergman film to have failed for more dramatic reasons.  Helene Friberg is the same girl to whom Bergman’s camera devoted too much attention in the theatre audience of The Magic Flute.  Friberg’s face in that film didn’t reveal as much as Bergman must have seen in it:  in Face to Face, she’s required to act too and the result is worse.  Friberg has a look but it’s mostly the same look; she also anticipates the dejection and hostility which Jenny’s words are meant to induce in Anna.

    In his 1972 book Ingmar Bergman Directs, John Simon quotes Bergman as follows:

    ‘I want very much to tell, to talk about, the wholeness inside every human being.   It’s a strange thing that every human being has a sort of dignity or wholeness in him, and out of that develops relationships to other human beings, tensions, misunderstandings, tenderness, coming in contact, touching and being touched, the cutting off of a contact and what happens then.’

    There are more than a few characters in Bergman films whose ‘dignity or wholeness’ is so deeply hidden that it might as well not be there.  One of the most appealing things about Face to Face is that, although this is far from the dream-reality scheme he says he had in mind, Bergman comes closer than usual to substantiating his humanist creed – thanks to his writing and to what some of his actors make of it.  Jenny talks at one point about children who, frightened of the dark, don’t cry out – for fear that, if they do and no one replies, it will make matters worse.  It follows that her suicide attempt is not a cry for help but the need for another human voice emerges in a lower-key request, when Tomas first comes to see her in hospital.  She asks him to talk – about, say, a film he’s seen or a piece of music he’s heard; some kind of anecdote that will engage Jenny and confirm her in the land of the living.  This chimes with Tomas’s later summary of what he describes as, ‘for us non-believers’, an incantation: ‘I wish that someone or something would affect me so that I can become real’.

    Discharged from hospital, Jenny soon returns to work.  (In what’s an odd postscript to a piece about a fictional character, a closing legend explains that she subsequently divorced and went to America to do research.)  Before she resumes her professional life, she witnesses a scene in her grandparents’ bedroom that is the culmination of the benign, humanist aspect of Face to Face.  Her grandfather has taken a turn for the worse and lies on what her grandmother fears will be his deathbed.   As she watches the old couple – the wife sitting on the bed, holding her husband’s hand – Jenny sees ‘for a moment that love embraces everything, even death’.  Her voiceover jars (it’s not been heard hitherto) and Jenny withdraws quickly:  both she and Bergman are prudent enough not to linger, in case the epiphany – and the viewer’s belief in it – can’t be sustained.   While it lasts, though, this scene is marvellous.  Although Gunnar Björnstrand wasn’t himself in good health by the time Face to Face was made, it hardly impairs his acting.  While the camera’s on him, Björnstrand’s look and attitude validate Jenny’s and Bergman’s wishful thinking.

    24 February 2018

  • Lady Bird

    Greta Gerwig (2017)

    Christmases in the place we grew up stay with most of us – certainly with Greta Gerwig.  In Frances Ha (2012), which she co-wrote with Noah Baumbach and starred in, the eponymous Frances briefly returns from New York City to her family home in Sacramento to spend Christmas with her parents – who are played by Gerwig’s own parents.  Their daughter’s debut as a solo writer-director[1] includes a family scene around the Christmas tree.  Gerwig uses as an epigraph a quote from another Sacramento native, Joan Didion:  ‘Anyone who talks about California hedonism has never spent a Christmas in Sacramento’.  Lady Bird – the most thoroughly enjoyable American film of 2017 – explores Christine McPherson (Saoirse Ronan)’s relationships with classmates, boyfriends, her adopted brother Miguel (Jordan Rodrigues), her father Larry (Tracy Letts) and, especially, her mother Marion (Laurie Metcalf).  Greta Gerwig has said that nothing in Lady Bird ‘literally happened in my life, but it has a core of truth that resonates with what I know’.  The story, set in 2002-03, spans Christine’s final year in Catholic high school in Sacramento and ends with her arrival in NYC to start college there.  Gerwig, born in 1983, followed a similar educational path, to Barnard College.

    Just as the film is and isn’t autobiographical, so ‘Lady Bird’ is and isn’t Christine’s given name.  (I’ll alternate between these two names throughout.)  ‘Why is it in quotes?’ asks Father Leviatch (Stephen McKinlay Henderson), looking at the list of students auditioning for the autumn musical (which involves the boys’ Catholic high school as well as the girls’).  ‘I gave it to myself’, explains Lady Bird, ‘it’s given to me by me’.  She expects her parents, as well as her friends, to respect her choice.  The adopted name functions as an expression of Christine’s desire to put distance between herself and her roots.  She’s so dissatisfied with her lot that she complains even about the year she’s living in:  the only decent thing about 2002 ‘is that it’s a palindrome’.  She wants to go east, to an Ivy League institution ‘in a city with culture’, but she’s an erratic student who’ll struggle to get scholarship funding and her family isn’t well off.   Marion works long hours as a psychiatric nurse at the local hospital.  Larry’s IT firm is laying people off.  Miguel graduated from Berkeley but he and his girlfriend Shelly (Marielle Scott), who’s also part of the McPherson household, are stuck in supermarket jobs.

    Lady Bird’s ideas above her station extend to coveting a blue mansion that she sees every day on her school journey but is alluringly inaccessible.  The house turns out to be owned by the grandmother of Danny O’Neill (Lucas Hedges); he’s the main reason why Lady Bird stays in the cast for the musical , even though she’s only in the chorus.   She and Danny start going out together.  To her delight and her mother’s acute disappointment, Lady Bird spends her last Thanksgiving before college as a dinner guest at the blue mansion.  Though they chastely kiss and lie side by side on the grass, gazing up at a starry sky, the relationship between Lady Bird and the charming, well-mannered Danny doesn’t get seriously physical.  ‘I respect you too much for that’, he assures her.  She believes it until she catches him in a clinch with another boy.  She then switches her attention to Kyle Scheible (Timothée Chalamet):  he’s at the same school as Danny but plays in a rock band and, darkly laconic, looks and sounds vaguely dangerous to know.  Kyle nevertheless tells Christine that he is, like her, a virgin.   When they’ve had sex for the first time, he denies he said this:  he’s even lost exact count of his previous partners.  Lady Bird is upset and complains that she wanted their mutual deflowering to be ‘special’.   ‘Why?’ asks Kyle, ‘You’re going to have so much unspecial sex in your life’.

    There’s also a sharp contrast between the two girls Lady Bird is special friends with in the course of the story – overweight, ungainly Julianne ‘Julie’ Steffans (Beanie Feldstein) and the very pretty, popular Jenna Walton (Odeya Rush).  These two – Julie particularly – are good examples of how far down the cast Gerwig has written substantial characters.   Julie is never as dumb as she looks, from the moment that Christine objects she’s written ‘Julie’ in inverted commas on the auditions list, just as Christine has written ‘Lady Bird’, when ‘it’s not the same’.   ‘I think it is,’ her friend murmurs.   Julie is also an A-grade maths student and gets the lead female role opposite Danny in the musical (Sondheim’s Merrily We Roll Along).  Neither of those things makes it any less painful for her after the show is over.  The maths teacher (Jake McDorman) she has a crush on, and who singles her out for special sotto voce praise in the classroom, congratulates Julie on her performance but his baffled voice gives away his surprise (‘You were so good …’)   He then quickly takes his leave:  he and his pregnant wife (Rebecca Light) must be getting home.  Jenna replaces Julie as Lady Bird’s best friend:  she already knows Kyle, is reprimanded by Sister Sarah (Lois Smith), the school principal, for wearing too short a skirt, and appeals to Lady Bird as a glamorous subversive.  The pair decorate Sister Sarah’s car with a ‘Just Married to Jesus’ notice.  Yet Jenna disappoints Lady Bird by being content to stay in Sacramento.

    Understandable secrets and lies – some bigger and more hurtful than others – accumulate.  To impress Jenna, Lady Bird pretends she lives in the blue mansion.  Danny hasn’t come out yet to his parents.  Christine asks her father to sign a financial-aid application for her college studies and not to tell her mother about this, or that she’s applying to out-of-state universities.  He acquiesces:  trying to keep the peace between his wife and daughter is Larry McPherson’s main domestic role (Marion does all the housework).  His lifelong battle with depression is a secret too, until he loses his job and Marion reveals both things to Lady Bird at once; a shock for a teenage girl who saw her father as both a soft touch and a tower of strength.   The combative mother-daughter relationship at the heart of the film is wholly persuasive.  Christine and Marion McPherson usually argue but you never doubt how important they are to each other (just like the outstanding family disputants of 2016, Lee and Patrick Chandler in Manchester by the Sea).  Greta Gerwig’s dialogue is sustainedly witty and acute but her largest achievement in Lady Bird may be her writing of Marion, whose prickly, well-meaning honesty means she’ll almost always say the wrong thing to her daughter.

    The cast includes more big names than it did when filming began in the late summer of 2016.  Greta Gerwig had seen Lucas Hedges in Manchester by the Sea but the film wasn’t yet in cinemas.  Timothée Chalamet had completed work on Call Me by Your Name but its theatrical release was more than a year away.  Hedges and Chalamet were nineteen and twenty respectively at the time they made Lady Bird.  Saoirse Ronan, although relatively well established, was still only twenty-two (pale and slender, and skilfully dressed, she passes easily for the seventeen-year-old she’s meant to be).  Ronan is so reliably good that you already take her command for granted.  The role of headstrong, impulsive Christine doesn’t allow her the emotional and expressive range that Eilis in Brooklyn did – the character here is smaller scale and predominantly verbal – but she’s completely convincing in it.  Though the supporting players are exceptional, Ronan holds the film together.  Laurie Metcalf is admirable as the oppressed, tenacious Marion.   Her daughter asks, ‘When do you think is a good time to have sex?’; Marion instantly and quietly says, half to herself, ‘You’re having sex’.  This is part of a bathroom conversation that begins when Marion demands to be let in; Lady Bird opens the door with one towel covering her body and another as a turban; her mother asks if she really needs both towels.  Complaining about that while containing her feelings about her daughter’s sex life is typical of Marion.  Laurie Metcalf captures beautifully throughout how much she feels and thinks beyond what she says.   Jordan Rodrigues can’t do a lot with the thin role of Miguel but Tracy Letts has never been as warm and natural as he is as Larry.

    Those adjectives apply even more to Lucas Hedges, which makes the revelation that Danny has been playing a part offstage as well as in the school drama society more poignant.  Much as I love Manchester by the Sea, it’s good after that film and Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri to see this terrific young actor getting the chance to smile as much as he does here, even if Danny is concealing anxieties.  Hedges is set to appear in lead roles before the end of 2018 (and this viewer can hardly wait); Timothée Chalamet, of course, has already graduated to them.  He’s drily amusing as Kyle, though it’s often hard to make out what he’s saying.  Beanie Feldstein, emotionally fine-tuned as Julie, shows that she also shares her elder brother Jonah Hill’s comic flair.  At the veteran end of the cast, Lois Smith and Stephen McKinlay Henderson are excellent value.  Smith (for whom it’s been quite a year, with Marjorie Prime too) does full justice to Sister Sarah, another character with more facets than you might expect.  Henderson registers strongly as Father Leviatch, which makes his absence in the film’s later stages more noticeable.   The genially, apparently confident director of the musical, Leviatch is one of several male characters in Lady Bird with a troubled mind.   In an acting class, he asks the students to feel themselves into authentic crying but beats them all to tears.  At the end of the well-received performance of Merrily We Roll Along, he laments that the audience ‘didn’t understand it’.  The last we see of Leviatch, he’s one of Marion’s patients at the hospital.

    As well as the autumn musical, the Catholic schools join forces for a spring play – on this occasion, The Tempest.  Danny is Prospero but Lady Bird has dropped out of the group.  Julie’s assurance that Miss Patty (Marietta DePrima), the assistant director, had assigned Christine a role triggers a bizarrely wide-ranging spat:

    Christine: What role?

    Julie: The Tempest.

    Christine: There is no role of the Tempest!

    Julie: It is the titular role!

    Christine: No!  It’s a made-up thing so we all can participate.

    Julie: You can’t do anything unless you’re the centre of attention, can you?

    Christine: Yeah, well you know, your mom’s tits, they’re fake!  Totally fake!

    Julie: She made one bad decision at nineteen!

    Christine: Two bad decisions!

    One of the other priests, Father Walther (Bob Stephenson), replaces Father Leviatch to take charge of The Tempest.  Walther is usually a sports coach and directs for the stage accordingly.  The broad comedy of this, though I enjoyed it, is out of kilter with most of Lady Bird – so is a bit where Miguel and the now-unemployed Larry find themselves in competition for the same job.  Gerwig is much more herself in the sequence in which Lady Bird’s class gets a talk on abortion from a woman (Bayne Gibby) who reveals that her own mother was a teenage unmarried mother.  The exchange that follows culminates in Christine’s truly shocking ‘Listen, if your mother had had the abortion, we wouldn’t have to sit through this stupid assembly!’ – an expression of her desire to shock and her genuine frustration.   This whole scene is grippingly unpredictable.

    Lady Bird is episodic but Mark Cousins is right to say that ‘lots of small, conversational, mostly static scenes combine into something with richness and insight’.  (Cousins compares this effect with that of Ozu films.)  Although she concentrates on well-realised individuals, Gerwig, in dramedising high-school rituals and recognisable family conflicts, creates a larger cultural picture.  The meaning of the heroine’s self-given name is never explained but the direction the story takes evokes the possibly oxymoronic injunction to the nursery rhyme ladybird to ‘fly away home’.  Spreading her wings and going to New York completes Christine’s realisation there’s no place like home (and she reverts to the name her parents gave her).  Perhaps inevitably, in view of the style of what’s gone before, Gerwig strains to reach this conclusion.  You first sense the strain when Lady Bird, driving with Kyle, Jenna and Jenna’s boyfriend to the senior prom, asks to get out of the car after learning the other three are heading for a party elsewhere.  She goes to Julie’s home instead; the two ex-friends are swiftly reconciled and go together to the prom.

    When she learns that Christine, with Larry’s help, has gone behind her back and is off to New York, Marion is distraught and angry.   She tries writing a letter to Christine to express her true feelings but her several attempts turn into scrunched-up balls of paper.  On arrival in New York, Christine opens an envelope from her father, containing these drafts (straightened out).  When Larry asks his daughter not to let her mother know about these, it’s a lovely culmination of the keeping-secrets motif (and, as Sally said, a refreshingly imaginative twist on the law of television drama that any secret note thrown in the waste bin is bound to be retrieved).  Otherwise, Lady Bird’s last section in New York is wobbly.  A sequence in which Christine gets drunk and is hospitalised is, uniquely in this film, overlong.  The next morning it’s Sunday; discharged from hospital, Christine hears bells and heads to a Catholic church, where she listens affectionately to the service.  Back outside, she phones home and leaves a voicemail for her parents – but ‘mostly for Mom’.  It’s quite a long message:  this ending might have rung truer to what’s gone before if the answerphone tape had run out just as Christine delivered her concluding ‘I love you’.   In the cinema, I cursed under my breath that, right at the end, Greta Gerwig had succumbed to feelgood imperative and forced things.  In retrospect, the finale of Lady Bird matters much less.  You remember all the good things about the film and they are legion.

    23 February 2018

    [1] She co-directed Nights and Weekends (2008) with Joe Swanberg.

Posts navigation