Old Yorker

  • Martyr

    Žrtva

    Mazen Khaled (2017)

    ‘Pushing the boundaries of what is conventionally understood as LGBTQ+ cinema, this is not a gay film in the traditional sense.  Instead, this hypnotic and beautifully filmed study of homosocial behaviours and societal ritual is a bold and quietly erotic meditation on the male body, shot with a distinctly queer gaze.’  [Note on Martyr by Michael Blyth, BFI Flare Festival 2018 brochure]

    My Days of Mercy, which I saw immediately after the Lebanese film Martyr at the Flare Festival, contains several sex scenes with the actresses who play the two main characters undressed.  No one is likely to object to the ‘objectification’ of Ellen Page and Kate Mara in these scenes because the film was made by a woman; that Tali Shalom Ezer is (Wikipedia implies) a gay woman is evidently beside the point.  As Michael Blyth’s programme note above suggests, exposed male bodies are central to the writer-director Mazen Khaled’s Martyr but the ‘distinctly queer gaze’ exempts his film from criticism as voyeuristic or exploitative – unlike other major gay-themed films of recent years like Blue is the Warmest Colour (2013) and The Handmaiden (2016).  When is the contemplation of human bodies in cinema potentially (or even inevitably) offensive?   The answer seems to be when the film-maker is male and straight.  The self-righteous application of this double standard is vexing.

    The better news is that Martyr (unlike My Days of Mercy) is a fine piece of work.   The story, set in present-day Beirut, is, in plot terms, very simple.  Hassane (Hamza Mekdad) is a young man living at home with his parents (Carol Abboud and Rabi el Zaher).  The family isn’t well off, the parents are pushing their son to get a job but Hassane is oppressed by what he sees as the very limited prospects for work and his future.  He tells his mother he’ll look for employment tomorrow, preferring to spend today sunbathing and swimming with his friends – male contemporaries from the neighbourhood.  A high balustrade divides the rocky shore of the Beirut waterfront from the promenade above.  Diving from the balustrade is a popular pastime and spectator sport.  Hassane dives there and, in a freak accident, drowns.  His friends recover his body and take it back to his home.  As his mother and other women gather there to mourn, Hassane’s three friends (Mostafa Fahs, Hady Bou Ayash and Rachad Nassereddine) prepare his corpse for burial.  The ritual is dictated, and the film’s title explained, by Islamic law, according to which a person who dies by drowning is a martyr.

    The principal focus throughout is Hassane’s body and its interactions with water.  Mazen Khaled gives these undivided attention in sequences both imaginary and actual.  In a surrealistic prologue and postscript, Hassane’s naked body is viewed underwater from various angles.  When he takes a shower at home, his father’s voice interrupts, as well as Hassane’s masturbation, the camera’s concentration on it.  As his corpse is washed in the purification ritual before being placed in a white burial shroud, Khaled closes in, as he often did in the prologue, on particular areas of Hassane’s body but more discreetly now, as the dead man’s friends take care to keep his private parts covered.  The earlier scenes involving Hassane and one or more of these friends develop a leitmotif of physical proximity and easy intimacy, in which the homosocial verges on the homoerotic – when two of the young men are together on a motor cycle, in the group’s horseplay in the sea, as they sit talking in the sun together.  These contacts acquire a tragic resonance in the painfully strenuous efforts of his companions to retrieve Hassane’s body from the sea and carry it back up over the balustrade.

    Mazen Khaled and his cinematographers, Rachelle Noja and Talal Khoury, have created an impressive collection of images – imaginatively composed and textured, in some cases synergistic.  The moments in which bodies meet water, or are submerged in it, are, by turns, contemplative, ecstatic and explosive.  Although Khaled is working out of a different cultural tradition, the shots of Hassane being taken from the waterfront and, on his return home, embraced by his mother naturally suggest to European eyes paintings of Christ’s descent from the Cross and the pieta.  What makes Martyr more than a visual essay, and charges the film dramatically, is the sense that Hassane’s death, as well as being a shocking mishap, makes psychological sense.  Although it’s not definitely an act of suicide, Hassane can see no future for himself.  As Khaled explains in the ‘Director’s notes’ included in the BFI handout:

    ‘[On the waterfront balustrade in Beirut], two young men died performing trying to please a crowd.  … It hit me that the balustrade is the borderline of the city.  Those young divers are literally jumping out of society into their freedom.  From talking with some of them, I understood that they all come from underprivileged communities in poor neighbourhoods … It struck me that the sea is their liberty, their escape. …’

    Khaled gives this idea individual force in a speech, passionately delivered by Hamza Mekdad, in which Hassane laments – to Mhammad, the closest of his friends – his feelings of hopeless suffocation.   This is just before the fatal dive.

    Hassane drowns about halfway through the film (which runs only 84 minutes).   The startling complexity of his death overshadows most of what comes next.  This, in combination with the primacy of images in Martyr, tends to overshadow the other characters’ reactions to the accident – even though Mostafa Fahs does an excellent job of showing Mhammad’s earlier divided feelings coalescing into bereft guilt.   Khaled may go too far in  aestheticisation when, shortly after the drowning, he flashes on screen a montage of stills summarising what will follow in the narrative and in incorporating sequences that are like stage re-enactments of Hassane’s relationship with his mother and with Mhammad (although the latter – a virtual pas de deux – is particularly lovely).  Even so, Martyr is intriguing and persuasive – the best film I can remember seeing at recent Flare (or forerunner) festivals.

    22 March 2018

  • My Days of Mercy

    Tali Shalom Ezer (2017)

    My Days of Mercy, which opened this year’s LGBTQ+ festival at BFI, is an attraction-of-opposites love story.  The opposites are morose, awkward, lank-haired Lucy (Ellen Page) and fragrant, blonde, self-assured Mercy (Kate Mara).  Lucy, from a working-class family in small-town Ohio, is out of work.  Mercy is a lawyer in Chicago.  They first see each other on literally opposing sides of an argument:  both are among demonstrators outside a Kentucky prison where an execution is shortly to take place.  Lucy Moro, her elder sister Martha (Amy Seimetz) and younger brother Benjamin (Charlie Shotwell) are there as part of the anti-capital punishment lobby.  Mercy is accompanying her mother (Denise Dal Vara) and father (Kevin Crowley) – a senior police officer and leading light in a survivors-of-homicide group for whom the death sentence means necessary justice.  Every so often in the film, a plate of food, representing the last meal of a condemned man (it is always a man), appears on the right-hand side of the screen.  On the left-hand side, text summarises the prisoner’s crime and Death Row location.  The quasi-documentary flavour of this motif is misleading.  In spite of My Days of Mercy’s purportedly ‘challenging’ themes, it uses the death penalty debate in America as no more than grist to the (melo)dramatic mill.

    Whereas legal execution still operates today in thirty-one US states, the film’s director Tali Shalom Ezer is from Israel, which, since the founding of the modern state, has never had a system of capital punishment[1].  The screenwriter Joe Barton is a Londoner, born (from the look of his photograph and CV online) well after the abolition of the death penalty in Britain.  People of Shalom Ezer’s and Barton’s age and background can hardly be blamed for viewing Death Row America as a remote, antique land of barbarism but it’s objectionable that they assume that, in order fully to engage the audience, the main characters in My Days of Mercy must have a strong personal investment in capital punishment.  The man about to die in Kentucky is the killer of Mercy’s father’s former partner in crime prevention.  (The guilty man, we’re told, has some kind of learning disability:  a bizarrely anxious detail – the film-makers seem worried we might think it was OK for a non-disabled person to be executed.)  It soon emerges too that the Moro siblings’ father Simon (Elias Koteas) is himself on Death Row, for the murder eight years ago of his wife and their mother.

    The lifestyle of Lucy, Martha and Benjamin – driving long journeys to protest impending executions in different states – piques your interest at first because it’s so unusual.  Not for long, though:  it’s soon obviously just a means of ensuring that Lucy and Mercy can-go-on-meeting-like-this.  Although their difference of opinion about capital punishment is set up as a chasm between the protagonists, it doesn’t stop Mercy from promptly making moves to start a relationship between them or Lucy from responding tentatively but positively.  As the film dribbles on, they exchange a few cross words about Death Row issues but these don’t amount to much and the divide seems geographical as much as political.  While Lucy, fourteen when their mother was murdered, has continued to harbour doubts as to their father’s innocence of the crime, her big sister. has always been sure that Simon was wrongly convicted.  Since Martha is also the driving force behind the family’s appearance at Death Row demos, the implication is that the Moro siblings wouldn’t have become involved in this if they’d thought their father had committed murder.  When new DNA tests arranged by their lawyer (Brian Geraghty) point conclusively to Simon’s guilt, Martha’s world falls apart for a couple of screen minutes but she soon gets over it.  By the time Simon is executed, Martha, as well as Laura, behaves as if they’ve always opposed capital punishment in principle and regardless of whether their father is a killer.  By this stage, of course, it’s safe for Shalom Ezer and Barton also to give the impression that they’ve been making a straightforward political statement throughout:  they needn’t worry about the audience getting bored during the grim sequence of Simon’s execution.

    Mercy also attends Simon’s execution to give Lucy moral support but it’s the first time they’ve seen each other in a while.  They break up after Lucy arrives unannounced at Mercy’s parents’ home and interrupts a family dinner where everyone round the table keeps giving the unexpected caller uncomfortable sideways looks:  the diners include Ian (Jake Robinson), the boyfriend that Lucy didn’t know that Mercy had.   Their reunion at Simon Moro’s execution isn’t the reconciliation scene.  That has to wait until the very end of My Days of Mercy, when Mercy turns up in Ohio, at a diner where Lucy has resumed working.  Even someone with as little interest in personal appearance as Lucy must be struck by the red dress that Mercy is now wearing (she’s favoured black or white outfits until now).  Mercy tells Lucy that she’s given up (a) her job and (b) Ian:  (b) means more than (a) because Mercy had one of those screen jobs that don’t appear to involve actually going to work.  At first, Lucy is characteristically annoyed by Mercy’s sudden reappearance but then says they could meet after she’s finished at the diner.  This is the end of the story – or, rather, its stopping point:  there’s nothing to suggest how the central relationship might continue or develop.

    Once it’s clear the Moros’ Death Row travels are no more than a plot device, you occasionally wonder if this thin and shallow film might be more interesting if Mercy, rather than Lucy, were the main character – even though you know from the weakly punning title that won’t be the case.  Mercy has no real substance as an independent character:  she exists purely as a series of contrasts – physical, social, political – to Lucy.  This is a pity because Kate Mara is the more emotionally alert and flexible of the two leads.  Ellen Page’s acting is as preconceived and monotonous as it was in Freeheld (2015).  Page was enjoyable as the title character in Juno (2007), her deserved breakthrough role, but she has turned into one of those performers who wears a fixed abandon-all-hope look that’s meant to demonstrate the moral seriousness of what she’s doing on screen.  At thirty-one, she is now remarkable to watch only in the sense that she’s physically convincing as women much younger than herself (Lucy is meant to be twenty-two).  Very occasionally in My Days of Mercy, Ellen Page’s face and intonations bring to mind the young Jane Fonda but this really makes matters worse.  As soon as you note the slight resemblance, you realise the expressive gulf between them.

    22 March 2018

    [1] To be more precise, ‘Capital punishment in Israel has only been imposed two times in the history of the state and is only to be handed out for crimes committed during war time, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, crimes against the Jewish people, treason and certain crimes under military law’ (Wikipedia).

Posts navigation