Old Yorker

  • All About Eve (theatre)

    Ivo van Hove (2019)

    At nearly seventy years of age, Joseph Mankiewicz’s All About Eve (1950) has been adapted for the stage, which could be considered its natural home.   Its people are theatre people whose characters are developed and expressed in action but more noticeably in talk – lots of it:  Mankiewicz’s script is one of the most self-confidently voluble in Hollywood history.   All About Eve was the basis for the stage musical Applause half a century ago but that inevitably meant paring away dialogue to make way for songs.  Ivo van Hove’s new adaptation, which opened at the Noel Coward Theatre in early February for a three-month run, might be expected to restore the primacy of the spoken word in the material – and so it does, technically.  Yet it comes as no surprise to anyone familiar with van Hove as a theatre director that the verbal doesn’t dominate the visual in his interpretation of Mankiewicz’s story.

    All About Eve was broadcast live from the West End in cinemas on 11 April.  (The ‘National Theatre Live’ programme of live broadcasts includes plays staged at other theatres, as well as NT fare.)  Curzon Richmond screened a recording of the broadcast later in the month and it was this that Sally and I saw, though we hadn’t planned to.  We’d seen van Hove’s production of A View from the Bridge at Wyndham’s Theatre in 2015, mainly to take the opportunity of seeing on stage two screen actors whom we both like, Mark Strong and Nicola Walker.  Both were very good (and true to their screen selves) but the experience didn’t make us eager for more of van Hove’s work.  Besides, All About Eve is a favourite film; however ‘theatrical’, it may be, a version of it in another medium is surplus to (my) requirements.  It was only when I found out that another favourite, Monica Dolan, was in the cast that I changed my mind.

    The broadcast preamble included a few, fascinating minutes of Ivo van Hove describing how he got into theatre while at boarding school in his native Belgium and what drives him as a director.  He pointed out that he was keen to work on All About Eve as a result not of seeing the film but of reading Mankiewicz’s screenplay (as part of van Hove’s preparations for adapting another film for the stage – John Cassavetes’s Opening Night, which itself draws upon All About Eve).  Van Hove described its theme as an ‘existential’ one – the subject is ‘growing old’.  He drew attention to features of his production like the repeated use of video.  Although it would be an overstatement to praise his introduction as more engrossing than what it introduced, van Hove’s combination of quiet charisma and clarity was impressive.  What he had to say also provided a foretaste of what is unsatisfactory in the play that followed.

    As was evident from A View from the Bridge, van Hove has a conceptual sense that can overwhelm a production.  In All About Eve, this has both a limiting and a tautologous effect.   The specially commissioned music by P J Harvey reinforces the prevailing bleak mood.  The set designed by van Hove’s longstanding professional (and life) partner Jan Versweyveld and the director’s preferred placing of the actors within it give the impression of people adrift in a space too big for them and which they can’t control.  Van Hove may see that as existentially right but it’s dramatically monotonous.  We can infer the ageing theme without the assistance of the technology van Hove deploys:  as Margo Channing (Gillian Anderson) sits at her dressing-room mirror, her face appears on a large screen above the stage and turns gradually into that of a wizened crone.

    Video can certainly be used fruitfully in the theatre to reveal something not taking place on stage.  In Robert Icke’s production of Hamlet, which we saw in June 2017, Gertrude and Claudius sat in the front row of the stalls of the Harold Pinter Theatre to watch ‘The Murder of Gonzago’; CCTV revealed, to gripping effect, their facial reactions.  All About Eve gets closest to this kind of impact when it presents on screen only the confrontation between Eve Harrington (Lily James) and Karen Richards (Monica Dolan) in the ladies’ at the Cub Room, while Margo, Bill Sampson (Julian Ovenden) and Lloyd Richards (Rhashan Stone) remain on stage, at their table in the adjoining restaurant.  The effect is very different when van Hove uses the screen to show greatly magnified images of what a performer is doing before our eyes, though at a distance away from us.  This strikes me as an admission of the limitations of what actors in the theatre can achieve – or, at least, of how a camera can help them achieve more.

    There’s a particular significance to this when the play is an adaptation of a classic movie.  When a theatre director uses big-screen close-ups – or, in the extreme case of the time-lapse withering of Margo’s face, close-ups plus special visual effects – it’s hard to avoid wondering what’s been gained by adapting the source material for the stage.  When he shows Margo grow old in a matter of seconds, it’s tantamount to Ivo van Hove’s saying:  ‘I’m doing this because I think it’s crucial to the play and it’s physically impossible for Gillian Anderson to achieve the same effect’.

    I’m probably in a small minority in thinking stage acting a less evolved form of the art than screen acting.  I know very many actors think ‘real’ acting happens in the theatre.  That’s not surprising:  it’s hard work learning lines and repeating a performance that needs to be right first time every time.   But the effort involved in delivering that performance is often very evident.  Because voice training isn’t what it was, lack of vocal colour and agility is an increasing issue – even with the also increasing use of mics for actors.  These concerns also register especially strongly when you’re watching about All About Eve as theatre.  It’s an obvious, unfortunate irony that a brilliantly talky motion picture has become a play much of whose dialogue isn’t delivered with the dexterity and variety needed to do it justice.

    Although I’ve not seen enough of his work to be sure, I wonder too if van Hove’s preoccupation with conceiving a production in strong visual terms doesn’t tend to be at the expense of attention to detailed characterisation through line readings.  As Margo, Gillian Anderson is a vibrant image of vulnerable beauty and authority but seems to be interpreting an idea rather than portraying a woman or, at least, acting at one remove – as if playing an actress playing an actress.  Anderson overdoes the inebriated rants – this Margo doesn’t hold her alcohol at all well – although she does bring off one spectacular dead-drunk plummet from vertical to horizontal.  She’s vocally too relentless, though, and, to be honest, rather humourless.  I laughed at her only a couple of times – and only because, after she’d spoken the line, I then heard Bette Davis saying it in my head.  I’m afraid I preferred the later stages of the play because Margo featured less in them.

    Anne Baxter’s Eve isn’t a hard act to follow to anything like the same degree as Bette Davis’s Margo and Lily James, whom I’ve enjoyed on stage-via­-screen before (in Kenneth Branagh’s Romeo and Juliet), gives an original and, for a while, plausible account of the character.  When Karen first brings her to Margo’s dressing-room and she gushes gratitude and praise for the star and for Lloyd, James makes Eve surprisingly appealing.  She and van Hove interestingly suggest that Eve is so thoroughly egotistical that even she can’t see her campaign to depose Margo for what it is.  Eve here is less a transparently calculating fraud than someone compelled to get what she wants.  Things go wrong, though, with her hardening into an overtly self-serving bitch.  In this case too, it’s partly a voice problem:  James’s vocal transition is almost comically abrupt.  And she’s weak – prematurely vanquished – in the scene in which Addison DeWitt (Stanley Townsend) cuts Eve mercilessly down to size.

    Except for Addison, you think of All About Eve as a piece with great roles for women rather than for men:  I found myself surprised that Bill and Lloyd featured in van Hove’s version as much as they do.  Neither character is a success, though – partly because they look wrong.  The costume designer An D’Huys has cleverly dressed the women in clothes that, if not timeless, succeed in blurring the issue of when the story is meant to be taking place.  In contrast, Bill and Lloyd’s outfits, facial hair (designer stubble and beard respectively), and gym-toned look make them more obstinately de nos jours.  (As a result, the script’s retention of references to Broadway and Hollywood names of a bygone era – Jeanne Eagels, Helen Hayes, Zanuck, DeMille – are puzzling in a way they needn’t be.)  It’s hard to accept Rhashan Stone’s Lloyd and Monica Dolan’s Karen as a married couple and that Lloyd is used to calling the shots in their relationship. Van Hove has allowed or encouraged Julian Ovenden to try to make Bill dramatically forceful.   Ovenden lacks the weight and dynamism to succeed but this reading of the character wouldn’t make much sense if the actor brought it off.   In Mankiewicz’s film, Bill is exercised more by precious conceptions of ‘Theatuh’ than in exchanges with Margo, whose demands and insecurities exasperate him but whom he loves.  There are plenty of times in van Hove’s production when you wish Bill would deliver a rejoinder to her other than by shouting back.

    The same is true, though for different reasons, of Stanley Townsend’s Addison DeWitt.  Along with Gillian Anderson, Townsend has the hardest job in the production for anyone who knows the film, in which George Sanders, a limited actor, triumphed as the sharp-eyed and-tongued, conscienceless theatre critic.   The heavily-built Townsend is naturally very different from the tall, slim figure of the film.  He also takes understandable steps to distance himself vocally from Sanders’s dry-as-a-bone delivery but you miss the verbal coups de grâce that Sanders made so calmly devastating.  Townsend creates a more brutish figure, which probably links to van Hove’s description of Addison, in the interview at the start of the broadcast, as a sexual predator.   It’s become unacceptable to present a man who exploits his position of power as this one does as outrageously entertaining.  Like Bill and Lloyd at a more superficial level, the production’s Addison DeWitt is updated.  Stanley Townsend is physically more substantial than George Sanders but the character has shrunk.

    That’s more literally the case too with the casting of the role of producer Max Fabian:  Ian Drysdale is a shadow of the comically grotesque figure that Gregory Ratoff cut on screen.   In the smaller female parts, Jessie Mei Li, as the young actress Marilyn Monroe played in the movie, and Tsion Habte, as Eve’s uninvited wannabe guest in the final scene, are both OK.  As Margo’s dresser Birdie, little Sheila Reid makes sense of the character’s nickname but doesn’t get much of the ornery, plain-speaking loyalty that Thelma Ritter conveyed so strongly.  In the film, Birdie, the Fool to Margo’s Lear, disappears from the action as suddenly and completely as her Shakespearean forebear.  Van Hove’s attempt to keep her involved in the story is commendable but, in the event, perfunctory:  Birdie reappears a couple of times but with nothing more to say.

    My reason for wanting to see All About Eve turns out to be the best reason any theatregoer has to buy a ticket for it.  On television, Monica Dolan is such a reliably great character actress that I was apprehensive about seeing her in a stage play:  would she be anywhere near as good?  I was uneasy at the start, when Karen Richards came downstage to take over narrator duties from Addison DeWitt:  it took a while to get used to the artificiality of what Dolan was required to do.   Once she has the chance to interact with other people on stage, however, she’s marvellous.  Karen (the Celeste Holm role in the original) does plenty of listening, as well as talking; and Dolan builds a personality through both.  Her unobtrusive but telling gestures and facial expressions suggest a continuous emotional life to a degree that no one else in this production comes close to matching.  Karen’s tearful remorse after tricking Margo into missing the show that gives Eve her big chance is a particular highlight; an even brighter one is Karen’s outburst of laughter – barely suppressed hysteria – in the Cub Room restaurant, after the showdown with Eve in the ladies’.  Monica Dolan has recently won the Olivier for Best Supporting Actress for this performance.  I didn’t see any of the other nominated work but I’d be surprised if the award wasn’t very well deserved.

    28 April 2019

  • Fargo

    Joel Coen (1996)

    Fargo is one of Joel and Ethan Coen’s most celebrated films.  (It dates from the period when they split the directing and producing credits between them rather than sharing both, as they now do.)  I took against it strongly when I first saw it, not long after its initial release, but the Coen brothers have made plenty more movies since and I’ve even liked one or two.  I thought it was time to give Fargo another try but to no avail:  it’s still infuriating.  Not for the first or last time, what’s objectionable (and dispiriting) is the supercilious relish with which the Coens demonstrate how nasty and/or ridiculous people are.  Wikipedia describes this story of a kidnap that goes lethally wrong as a ‘black comedy thriller’; it does, for the most part, treat grim events with levity and includes some tense, suspenseful moments.  There are also two departures from the prevailing tone.  These occur at the very start and close to the end of the film.  Both are particularly revealing of the Coens’ approach.

    Jerry Lundegaard (William H Macy) is sales manager for an Oldsmobile dealership in Minneapolis.  In dire financial straits, he hires – on the advice of an ex-con mechanic (Steve Reevis) at his workplace – two small-time crooks, Carl Showalter (Steve Buscemi) and Gaear Grimsrud (Peter Stormare), to abduct his wife Jean (Kristin Rudrüd).  The idea is that Jerry’s wealthy father-in-law Wade Gustafson (Herve Presnell), the dealership boss, will pay a hefty ransom for his daughter’s release – hefty enough for Jerry to pay the kidnappers their fee and for all his money troubles to be over.  It’s unnecessary to detail how the plan misfires:  the ingenuity of the Coens’ (Oscar-winning) screenplay consists in interweaving the various vices and shortcomings of their characters to ensure that everything that can go wrong, does.  On his first entrance, to the bar in Fargo, North Dakota where he’s arranged to meet Carl and Gaear, William H Macy makes clear that Jerry is an anxious loser and that’s the way he stays throughout, regardless of the increasingly bizarre circumstances in which he’s entangled.   This is more or less true of everyone else too, with the exception of Brainerd, Minnesota police chief Marge Gunderson (Frances McDormand), who appears on the scene around halfway through and becomes an increasingly welcome presence in the film.

    It may console the Coens that the bad guys are as inept as they’re malicious.  Their derision for the relatively blameless is harder to understand, and to take.  The hapless kidnap victim is the chief example.  Jean has been presented as a joke even before the sequence in which, as she sits knitting and grinning at daytime TV, masked intruders interrupt her mindless routine.  She puts up more of a fight than might be expected but that allows plenty of time for the camera to observe her kitsch ornaments and pink telephone.  Her resistance ends when, swathed in a shower curtain, she can’t see where she’s going and falls downstairs, knocking herself out.  Comparatively very minor characters are a laughing matter too – a succession of hookers (Larissa Kokernot, Melissa Peterman, Michelle Hutchinson) who talk funny, a cashier (Petra Boden) who’s not a pretty face.   As will be clear from some of the names above, a good few people in Fargo belong to a Scandinavian immigrant community – are their speech rhythms and idiosyncratic dialect comical!   The same goes for Mike Yanagita (Steve Park), a genial Japanese-American eventually revealed to be a pathetic, delusional weirdo.  Marge was in high school with Mike, who gets in touch again after seeing her interviewed on television about the police investigation that follows the discovery of three dead bodies outside Brainerd.  Even the town itself (like Fargo, a real place) is worth a snigger or two – after all, its name sounds a bit like ‘brain dead’.

    The Coens’ tactic for making the audience think twice about what they’re seeing is to trash figures of fun or hate to a point that wipes the smile off your face (if it ever got there).  Hostage Jean is eventually finished off by Gaear.  This happens off-screen; her killer reports that she ‘started shrieking, you know’.  The viewer’s natural reaction – oh no, how terrible – needs a bit of unpacking.  It amounts to a feeling that Jean didn’t deserve to be kidnapped and murdered even though she was a laughable ninny.   Essentially similar considerations apply to her loathsome father – who thinks the ransom asked for his daughter is steep and takes a lot of persuading to cough up the money.  Wade Gustafson is an arrogant, mercenary bastard but it’s still a bit much when Carl Showalter shoots him dead.  And Carl himself, for all his faults, doesn’t really deserve to be on the receiving end of a fatal axe blow from Gaear, who then feeds his dismembered body into a woodchipper:  the last seen of Carl is one white-socked foot sticking out of the machine that consumes him.

    The objection that this is a wholly subjective reaction to the moral universe of Fargo is answered by my getting to know the Coens better than I did when I first watched the film.  Once you’ve seen a movie like A Serious Man (2009), you know you’re not imagining smug misanthropy on the brothers’ part – that Fargo reflects a modus operandi that’s been repeated over the yearsWhat’s remarkable is that, when they suddenly change tack in the course of a film, their admirers accept this so readily.  The second of the tone shifts mentioned in the first paragraph of this note happens when Marge, after arresting Gaear, drives him back to Brainerd and has a one-way conversation with her backseat passenger:

    ‘So that was Mrs Lundegaard in there? … I guess that was your accomplice in the wood chipper. … And those three people in Brainerd. … And for what?  For a little bit of money. …  There’s more to life than money, you know. …  Don’t you know that?…  And here ya are, and it’s a beautiful day…’

    Marge’s Scandiwegian verbal mannerisms, so conspicuous at first, have been toned down by the time she gets to deliver this key speech.  Frances McDormand invests the lines with authentic feeling but Joel Coen is using his wife’s gifts to pull a fast one on the audience:  it suits his and his brother’s purpose to turn briefly solemn.   They evidently succeeded in taking in, for example, the critic Kim Newman, who concluded his Sight & Sound (June 1996) review as follows:

    ‘Here, with chilling but touching directness, Coen cuts his amusing but distanced comic approach and shows a heart that matches his undoubted skill.’

    Perhaps viewers like Newman suddenly feel guilty that they’ve been laughing and have to tell themselves it’s OK, the Coens are humane really – though such reactions probably give Joel and Ethan an extra laugh.

    Frances McDormand does show a heart that matches her undoubted skill.   The early scenes describing Marge’s home life with her husband Norm (John Carroll Lynch), although distinctive because they’re sweet rather than sour, are  a condescending cartoon.  But McDormand’s radiant decency soon has an elevating effect.  Once Marge, heavily pregnant with her and Norm’s first child, turns out to be not just appealingly eccentric but a canny sleuth too, there’s traction between her good nature and the violent crimes she’s trying both to solve and to fathom.  If only there were more people like Marge in the world – Coenworld, that is.  Fargo is not a long film – 98 minutes – and its heroine must feature in less than half of them.  (In terms of screen time, this must be one of the shortest performances ever to have won the Academy Award for Best Actress.)  It’s all the more of a relief when McDormand’s Marge does takes charge.

    Roger Deakins’s cinematography and Carter Burwell’s score also play a part in giving proceedings depth on the surface.  Deakins’s snowy landscapes convey, as well as an unsurprising bleakness, a beauty lacking in the human beings they contain.  Burwell’s music occasionally has the quality of a lament.  But these elements and even Frances McDormand’s contribution aren’t enough to upstage the controlling sensibility of Fargo.  Its first tonal surprise arrives in text on the screen before the action is underway:

    ‘This is a true story.  The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987.  At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed.  Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred.’

    Sharp-eyed viewers noted, however, that the closing credits included a standard ‘all characters fictitious’ disclaimer and the seeming contradiction naturally prompted questions.  There’s been continuing discussion of the issue over the years; various elements of the plot and locale have been linked to more than one real-life crime.  Joel Coen’s quoted responses (in the Wikipedia article on the film) include the following:

    ‘The basic events are the same as in the real case, but the characterizations are fully imagined … If an audience believes that something’s based on a real event, it gives you permission to do things they might otherwise not accept’

    and, more recently,

    ‘[The story was] completely made up.  Or, as we like to say, the only thing true about it is that it’s a story.’

    Their admirers probably find these remarks priceless examples of the Coens’ prankish, breathtaking cool – probably don’t mind a bit that they were taken in – cowed into wow-this-actually-happened respect – when they first saw Fargo.  It’s telling that Joel and Ethan Coen’s afterthoughts are – perhaps – more genuine than most of what they put on the screen.

    26 April 2019

Posts navigation