Old Yorker

  • Flowers from Another World

    Flores de otro mundo

    Icíar Bollaín (1999)

    The ‘Once Upon a Time in Spain’ strand at this year’s Edinburgh International Film Festival (EIFF) included films by Icíar Bollaín, whose best-known work is Take My Eyes (2003).  Her surprise appearance at the screening of Flowers from Another World was a real bonus.  In a Q&A with the exceedingly enthusiastic Niall Greig Fulton (an EIFF programmer as well as a familiar acting face), Bollaín summarised the dual real-life inspiration for her film.  First, an article she read about a community in rural Spain whose marriageable females were so few that the locals organised a ‘bachelor festival’ – a group of urban women were bussed in for a kind of speed-dating holiday.  Second, a photo Bollaín saw in a magazine of a South American immigrant woman, standing alone, and as if lost, in the Spanish countryside:  how did she get there?  Bollaín also mentioned that the depopulation of rural Spain, especially through migration of women to cities, has continued apace since she made Flowers from Another World.  We often hear that the issues treated in a film of yesteryear are-just-as-relevant-today.  In this case, it seems to be true; but Bollaín uses an important socio-economic phenomenon as the basis for exploring particular (though illustrative) human relationships, rather than in order to make obvious political points.

    She sets her story in Santa Eulalia, a small town in the northern Spanish province of Guadalajara, and focuses on three pairings there.  Marirossi (Elena Irureta) is a nurse in Bilbao, in her forties, divorced with an adult son.  She embarks on a relationship with Alfonso (Chete Lera), a mildly eccentric country mouse who runs a plant nursery.  They start seeing each other at weekends but both are reluctant to abandon the place and lifestyle they’re accustomed to.  Patricia (Lissete Mejía), an illegal immigrant from the Dominican Republic who’s struggling to find steady employment in Madrid, needs stability and immigration papers for herself and her two young children.  Damián (Luis Tosar), a hardworking young farmer who lives with his widowed mother Gregoria (Amparo Valle), is just what Patricia is looking for.  She and Marirossi are among the coach party of women that arrives in Santa Eulalia at the start of the film.  The third featured relationship is rather different.   Local builder Carmelo (José Sancho) regularly spends time in Cuba.  He brings Milady (Marilyn Torres) from there as a kind of trophy fiancée.  Milady is keen to experience life in Europe, less keen on sharing it with the distinctly senior Carmelo, in spite of the all-mod-cons house on offer.

    The film gets off to an excellent start.  As the women’s coach heads to its destination, the conversation and arrangement of the passengers neatly introduce social differences within the group and ethnic hierarchy, with the Dominican women in the back seats.  It’s high summer and the people of Santa Eulalia are out in force:  their exuberant, jubilant reaction to the coach’s arrival is amusingly mystifying unless you know in advance (I didn’t) why the women have come.  The following sequence – a welcoming reception, followed by music and dancing – makes things clearer.  It also includes the first exchanges between Marirossi and Alfonso, and Patricia and Damián.  After a short scene in the Dominican women’s bedroom, which tells us there’s already another man in Patricia’s life, Bollaín moves on at rather startling speed.  In the next scene, Patricia and her two children are living at the farmhouse with Damián and his grimly possessive, distinctly inhospitable mother.

    Agile, economical storytelling is one of the sustained strengths of Flowers from Another World.  The screenplay – by Bollaín and Julio Llamazares, a poet, novelist and essayist whose persisting concerns include the gradual decline of Spain’s rural cultural heritage – is simply and efficiently structured.  The action covers a year, moving through the various seasons and ending with the arrival of the next summer’s coachload of women.   Thanks largely to fine, naturalistic ensemble acting, the film is never less than engaging.  Even so, the episodic narrative is a little underpowered until each of the three central relationships is in crisis.  And because so much here is thoroughly believable, the engineered parts of the plot stick out more.  They accumulate in the tale of Patricia and Damián.

    When her Dominican friends arrive from Madrid for the weekend, their visit brings to a head the increasing tensions between Patricia and her de facto mother-in-law.   It’s hard to believe that Gregoria, well aware of the impending visit, wouldn’t have raised objections beforehand.  After the friends have left, there’s a showdown; from this point on, the older woman starts gradually to warm to the younger.  There’s no stopping this process once it’s begun – even when Patricia is forced eventually to confess to Damián that she’s already married (to a fellow Dominican, the father of her children, who turns up again and demands hush money).  This revelation would have provoked the Gregoria of the film’s first half to vindictive schadenfreude.  But the plot requires that she comes to accept Patricia and her children – so much so that when the understandably aggrieved Damián tells them to leave, it’s his mother who persuades him to change his mind in the nick of time.  The moment when he stops her friend’s car just as Patricia is about to leave, is affecting because the characters have come to matter to us.  But it belongs in a more familiar and formulaic type of screen love story.

    In other respects, though, the relationship is convincing.  Damián is smitten with Patricia from the start.  When she confesses that she’s married, she admits too that she’s been living with him for reasons of practical necessity rather than love, which of course offends Damián all the more.  His rejection of her is upsetting both because his sense of being betrayed is justified and because we believe that, as Patricia insists, she has gradually fallen in love with him.  Bollaín’s judicious treatment of the material’s racial aspect pays off too.  The friendship between Patricia and Milady – women of colour in a white community, one more experienced in Europe than the other – is credible; so too the casual racism directed at Milady in a local bar.  We can speculate that Gregoria’s hostility towards Patricia also has a racist element but Bollaín does well not to make this explicit.  If she’d done so, the mother’s transformation would have been even more implausible.  Patricia and Damián are the only one of the three couples still together at the end of the story.  Patricia’s daughter is seen taking her first communion – with her younger brother, mother, Damián and his mother in the congregation.  They all pose together for a family photograph.

    Rangy Marilyn Torres has an amazing figure and Milady would cut a spectacular one in metropolitan Spain, let alone a rural backwater:  her trademark outfit is a stars-and-stripes Lycra number (one long leg of the pants is all stars, the other all stripes).  College-educated and relatively liberated, Milady spends plenty of time on the phone, talking tearfully to her mother in Cuba and hopefully to a boyfriend in Italy, which is where she wants to get to.  Anywhere outside the small town will do in the meantime.  She hitches a lift to Valencia with a lorry driver (Antonio de la Torre) and stays there overnight.  When she returns to Santa Eulalia, Carmelo beats her up.  She eventually escapes the place thanks to an adoring young admirer (Rubén Ochandiano) but she has no intention of staying with him either, though she flees their hotel room rather guiltily.  That’s the last see of Milady:  she disappears to somewhere in Europe, which makes sense. The Marirossi-Alfonso thread is relatively slender and undramatic but it complements the other two effectively.  They eventually break off contact much more in sorrow than in anger.  The break is inevitable and Bollaín doesn’t try to make it anything else.  As a result, it’s dramatically satisfying too.

    The cast are a mix of professional and non-professional actors – and Bollaín, in what was only her second feature, orchestrates them admirably.  Despite the patchy writing of the Patricia-Damián element, the performances in it are outstanding.  It’s incredible that Lissete Mejía had never acted before; the child who plays her daughter is equally expressive[1].  Bollaín had a good story about the casting of this little girl.  The main child’s part was to be a boy’s but the kid playing him decided after the first day of shooting that was enough so the girl was promoted – a great piece of luck.  In what was his first significant cinema role, you can’t take your eyes off Luis Tosar:  the combination of the actor’s powerful presence and his character’s modesty and shyness, which Tosar plays beautifully, makes you understand Patricia’s deepening fascination with and attachment to Damián.  This film marked the start of Tosar’s rapid progress to becoming one of Spain’s leading actors (he worked again with Bollaín on both Take My Eyes and Even the Rain (2010)).  He’s been joined in that category by Antonio de la Torre who, as the lorry driver that gives Milady a lift, has only a couple of minutes on screen here but still registers strongly.  Pascal Gaigne’s excellent score captures the considerable range of moods and Icíar Bollaín’s enriching sympathy for the people whose lives she describes.

    22 June 2019

    [1] She’s probably not uncredited but I’ve tried and failed to work out from the IMDb cast list her character’s name.  The same goes for Patricia’s friends and husband.

  • Cronofobia

    Francesco Rizzi (2018)

    The woman introducing the Swiss film Cronofobia at the Edinburgh International Film Festival (EIFF) welcomed the director (and co-writer) Francesco Rizzi to the stage, then reminded us to be ready with questions for him in the Q&A session after the screening.  At the end, more people seemed to be leaving than staying to hear more.  The man in the late-middle-aged couple I followed out said to his female companion, ‘I’ve got a question – what the fuck was that about?’  (You need to hear this in a Scottish accent to get the full effect.)  This may read as a typical philistine judgment on a complex, challenging arthouse piece but Cronofobia deserves the putdown.

    In some ways, this debut feature feels antique.  It’s as if Rizzi (who did the screenplay with Daniela Gambaro) has just discovered Antonioni and the Resnais of Last Year at Marienbad.  The style might be described as obvious crypticism.  Each carefully composed image (the DP is Simon Guy Fässler) proclaims its ingenuity and withholds its deeper meaning.  Even so, and pace the disgruntled punter quoted above, familiar themes do come through.  Halting dialogue, for example, signals how hard it is for two people really-to-communicate.  Rizzi is chiefly interested in the uncertainty of personal identity.  The lead male character Michael Suter (Vinicio Marchioni) puts on false moustaches and beards.  He shares his forename with an elder brother who died in infancy.  As the relationship between them develops, Michael’s female counterpart Anna Martini (Sabine Timoteo) engages him in conversations that she also recorded with her recently deceased husband Manuel (Alberto Ruano, glimpsed in the video recordings).  Michael eventually takes his leave of Anna by imitating Manuel’s appearance and putting other clothes from the latter’s wardrobe in a suitcase, before driving away.  By demonstrating to Anna that her husband has left her, Michael is, I suppose, enabling her to ‘move on’.

    The most striking element of Cronofobia concerns Michael’s job, which is the main thing he wears disguises for and which involves leading people in a variety of occupations to reveal that they are, or are prepared to be, on the fiddle.   These start with an assistant in a jeweller’s shop (Adele Raes) and end with a worker in a motorway services eatery (Jasmin Mattei).  As well as the others in between, it emerges that a previous assignment centred on Manuel Martini, a financier who committed suicide thanks to Michael’s exposure of his malpractice.  Until he becomes increasingly uncomfortable with his work, Michael is having an affair with his line manager (Giorgia Salari).  The sinister agency that employs them, and which appears to operate across Switzerland, gives a Big Brother-ish charge to what looks to be Rizzi’s other main purpose:  to show the individual’s alienation from a society at best depersonalising and at worst threatening.

    You watch Cronofobia with a feeling of surprise that this kind of stuff is still considered worth dramatising on a cinema screen.  Perhaps Rizzi feels it’s time to update what Pauline Kael disparaged in a 1963 article as ‘Come-Dressed-as-the-Sick-Soul-of-Europe parties’.  Whatever his intentions, the director relies on strong details from other famous movies to help him on his way.  In her first scene, Anna takes a shower, then (puzzlingly) puts on jogging gear and makes her way to a railway line near her home.  She waits for a train to roar by and yells, rather as Sally Bowles did in Cabaret, except that the noise Anna makes is decidedly tortured.  When she first suggests a relationship to Michael, she stipulates no names, no pasts – like the rules of engagement declared in Last Tango in Paris.  Other echoes have a more generic feel, such as a scene in which Michael visits his aging, seemingly demented mother (Carla Cassola) in a nursing home – the mother’s only appearance.  There are plenty of shots from within Michael’s camper van that show ominous empty roads ahead.

    Both main female parts seemed to me overplayed, though Sabine Timoteo is much more technically accomplished than Giorgia Salari.  Vinicio Marchioni is considerably better.  Immediately before seeing Cronofobia, I went to a highly entertaining and informative EIFF interview, conducted by the journalist Siobhan Synnot, with the fine young actor Jack Lowden (a member of this year’s festival jury).  Lowden was funny talking about his first film job after working exclusively in theatre in his early years.  He followed an experienced screen performer’s advice to ‘do nothing and you’ll do everything’.  When Lowden saw the rushes, he realised, to his dismay, ‘I really was doing nothing’.  In his best moments here, Vinicio Marchioni gives seeming to do nothing a relatively good name.  If Rizzi means to create a sense of mystery, Marchioni is his chief asset in that department.

    The film is mostly in Italian, though at one point a rough, expressive voice reads Charles Bukowski’s poem ‘Nirvana’ in its entirety and in English.  (Is it Tom Waits’s voice?  The YouTube clip of Waits reading ‘Nirvana’ certainly sounds very similar.)   Francesco Rizzi’s title means ‘fear of the passage of time’.  To end on a cheap shot, fear that time has come to a standstill is likely to be a bigger concern to viewers of Cronofobia.

    21 June 2019

Posts navigation