Old Yorker

  • Big Eyes

    Tim Burton (2014)

    Portraits of children with disproportionately large, round eyes, signed ‘Keane’, were mass produced and became a huge money-spinner in America during the 1950s and early 1960s.  Walter Keane, as well as masterminding this commercial enterprise, claimed the paintings as his own work; in fact, they were all created by his wife, Margaret.  The fraud – although it was never admitted by Walter – was exposed after the couple divorced:  Margaret publicly announced that she was the artist and sued her husband for slander (sic).  The court hearing culminated in the judge’s directing Walter and Margaret each to create a big-eyed drawing on the spot.  The Keanes’ partnership – matrimonial and ‘artistic’ – sounds promising material for a drama but Tim Burton’s Big Eyes is disappointing.  The director’s tone is uncertain (Danny Elfman’s score reflects that uncertainty); the script by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski is weak; and Christoph Waltz’s Walter is very wrong.  The good ended happily, and the bad happily – this is what real life means, in this case.  At the close of the film, legends on the screen explain that Walter Keane died in 2000, ‘penniless and embittered’’; and that Margaret ‘found happiness’ in a new marriage (her third) and, now in her late eighties, still paints every day.  The latter legend is accompanied by a photograph of the real Margaret with Amy Adams, who plays her in the film.  This increasingly various actress is likeable and sensitive but the photograph, dominated by the broadly-smiling older woman, crystallises one’s suspicion that Adams’s characterisation is constrained by her respect for Margaret Keane.

    The voiceover narration of Big Eyes is supplied by a character called Dick Nolan (Danny Huston) who also appears intermittently.  Nolan is a journalist in San Francisco, where much of the film’s action takes place.  At the start, he summarises the lack of recognition of female artists (Georgia O’Keeffe, as Margaret reminds Walter at one point, was a notable exception) and hints at the larger subservience of women in the 1950s.  (I was puzzled as to why the film-makers shifted events back by a few years.  In reality, Walter Keane met Margaret Ulbrich in 1953 and their ten-year marriage ended in 1964.  The film starts in 1958, when Margaret leaves her first husband and moves, with her young daughter Jane, to San Francisco, where she meets Walter.)  Margaret Keane is presented by Tim Burton as an example, albeit an extraordinary and extreme example, of a woman of her time who was exploited by her husband.  Amy Adams speaks most of her lines quietly – although she’s audible (and although the real Margaret may be softly spoken too), this seems an almost literal expression of Margaret’s artistic voice not being heard.  Burton appears to think that, because Walter is an egomaniacal fraud, the wronged Margaret must be contrastingly intelligent and tasteful, and this is what Adams conveys.  She has a lovely delicacy and vulnerability.  She’s less convincing as a woman who, as the film also makes clear, was a keen numerologist and whose life was turned around – and whose fortunes improved – once she became a Jehovah’s Witness.

    This de-emphasising of the less discriminating side of Margaret Keane’s personality links to Tim Burton’s skirting round the kitschiness of her work – this too is unhelpful to Amy Adams.  Burton, according to Wikipedia, is a collector of Keane artwork; it’s no surprise that he doesn’t wish to write her off as an artist any more than he wanted, in Ed Wood (1994), to pander to the received wisdom that the title character was the worst film director of all time.  Burton concentrates on Walter Keane’s egregious exploitation of his wife and, not unreasonably, takes the view that it hardly matters whether Walter was appropriating base metal or pure gold:  her husband, through his own, vain ambition, denied Margaret a great deal of money and celebrity of her own.  But the script nevertheless hints that she believes passionately in her work and is therefore doubly frustrated – by her husband’s theft of it and the critical establishment’s contempt for it.  There’s just one moment when Amy Adams is able to get something of this across:  at a posh reception, Walter confronts the severely scornful critic John Canaday (amusingly played by Terence Stamp), and is humiliated.  You feel both Margaret’s schadenfreude at the tongue-lashing Walter receives and her irritation with Canaday, and that she can’t herself take him on.  When Margaret eventually claims the work as hers, there’s a montage of reactions from other, minor characters in the story, including a San Francisco gallery owner (Jason Schwartzman), who mutters, ‘But who’d want to claim responsibility for this stuff?’  It’s striking that Big Eyes, although categorised on both IMDB and Wikipedia as a ‘biographical drama’, has earned its stars Golden Globe nominations for performance in a comedy or musical.  Would that be the case if Margaret Keane’s output were not still regarded as a laughing matter?

    Directors will surely think twice, after this film, before again casting Christoph Waltz as an American.  After Waltz’s impressive performance as the Nazi officer Landa in Inglourious Basterds, Quentin Tarantino shrewdly wrote for him, in Django Unchained, the part of a German immigrant in America. As Dr King Schultz, Waltz was even better than in his previous outing for Tarantino; in the meantime, however, he’d been charmless and awkward as a New York lawyer in Polanski’s Carnage.  Waltz is more exuberant but no more charming as Walter Keane.  He’s creepy from the start – it’s hard to see what attracts Margaret to Walter (and she is attracted to him – even before he proposes marriage as a means of ensuring that she’ll retain custody of her daughter, which Margaret’s first husband threatens to contest).  Waltz isn’t remotely convincing as the Midwestern realtor Walter is meant to be.  It’s not only a problem of accent – although this is never convincing, even to these English ears, and tends to disappear somewhere in the mid-Atlantic whenever Walter gets angry.  Waltz also has a strong sardonic streak which he evidently finds hard to suppress:  he lacks the wholehearted insincerity that one associates with American hucksters.  In the climactic courtroom sequence (which fizzles out:  Burton appears to realise that and ends it abruptly), Margaret acknowledges that Walter is a charmer and a genius at PR.  As Christoph Waltz plays him, Walter is not even that – he’s an obvious, slimily ingratiating fraud who would fool no one.   Margaret’s daughter Jane, the original model for her mother’s work, is played, as a young girl, by Delaney Raye (who’s particularly good) and, as a teenager, by Madeleine Arthur.   As Jane ages, her eyes seem to get bigger.

    31 December 2014

  • Beyond the Hills

    După dealuri

    Cristian Mungiu (2012)

    A confrontation between a crazy individual and a crazy collective – hard to say which of them is the irresistible force and which the immoveable object.  Alina, the young woman who plays havoc with the severe and secure routines of an Orthodox convent in rural Romania, is more the latter when she’s tied down by the nuns and living on nothing but holy water; but her violent volatility has already threatened the physical safety of some in the community, as well as its modus vivendi.  The nuns’ beliefs may seem benighted.  Their treatment of Alina – as ‘Papa’, the male priest who’s the spiritual leader of an otherwise female group, tries to exorcise the demons in her – is brutal and eventually lethal.  Yet the nuns don’t mean to kill her; they think what they’re doing is for Alina’s own good.  And her behaviour is extravagantly unreasonable.  Alina arrives at the convent to be reunited with Voichita, her best friend and her lover in their days together in an orphanage, before Voichita joined the religious order.  The priority for Alina is to be with Voichita, preferably in Germany, from where Alina has recently returned, but within the confines of the convent if that’s the only possibility.

    This is Cristian Mungiu’s first feature since 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (he directed one of the segments of Tales from the Golden Age in between).  His screenplay is based on non-fiction novels by Tatiana Niculescu Bran.   Beyond the Hills is intelligent and scrupulously put together but also formidably monotonous.  Many people in the audience will probably be satisfied by the movie simply because it provides a lengthy condemnation (the film runs 155 minutes) of a religious set-up that’s hysterically superstitious and repressive but I’m not among them – and Mungiu is clearly aiming for something more complex than this.  He, in effect, presents two case studies – Alina and the convent community – and poses the question:  who is the more dysfunctional and/or reprehensible?  He suggests that neither of them can help themselves:  certainly, the callous attitude of a doctor in the hospital to which Alina is taken (too late) is presented as worse than either party.   Yet, except for Alina and Voichita, the characters in the story remain largely under wraps (Black Narcissus it isn’t).  Because the people aren’t involving, the film’s themes are more salient and its limitations as a drama, as distinct from a description of events, become more of a problem.  This isn’t the fault of the excellent actors:  Cosmina Stratan (Voichita) and Cristina Flutur (Alina) shared the Best Actress prize at Cannes in 2012; Valeriu Andriuta makes a strong impression as the priest; and the supporting cast includes Luminita Gheorghiu in the small part of a school teacher.   Stratan is especially convincing, perhaps because Voichita is the human focus of the story, caught as she is between a rock and a hard place – between the tyranny of the Orthodox religious order and the personal tyranny of Alina.

    There were things I didn’t understand in the plot.  I wasn’t sure, for a start, why the convent was so prepared to accommodate a lay person like Alina for so long.  Perhaps the idea is that this aberrant community feels compelled to take care of her in a way the ‘normal’ world isn’t prepared to do.  An attempt is made at one point for Alina to return to the foster family she hasn’t seen for some time.  I didn’t get this bit at all.  The foster mother seems to expect her to stay and Alina goes to what used to be her room in the house but it’s then revealed that the family have already rented it to someone else.  The last scene of the film is its best.   After Alina’s death, Papa and the nuns – including Voichita (who’s by now in civvies:  I assumed this meant she was so appalled by what had happened to Alina she was going to leave the convent) – are taken in for police questioning.   The camera focuses on the profiles of Voichita and Papa in the back of the police van and on the backs of the heads of the two policemen in the driver and passenger seats, who are having a conversation about a terrible murder that’s just been reported.   The implication, as the film returns from beyond the hills to the city, is that life there is no less alarmingly loco than life in the convent.  The faces of Viochita and Papa disappear from the frame.  The backs of the two heads remain as the policemen grumble on.  The van windscreen is splashed.  A windscreen wiper does its work in a perfunctory, rather hopeless way.

    The physical landscape of the film, finely lit by Oleg Mutu, has been bleak throughout.  (The story takes place during winter:  the weather, like our own this year, seems to get worse as Easter approaches.)  Yet that bleary view out of the police van window still provides a climactic miserable outlook.    When he made 4 Months, Cristian Mungiu had the idea of a ‘Memories from the Golden Age’ project.  I assume this was overtaken by the portmanteau Tales from the Golden Age, all of which tell stories of Romanian life under the Communist regime.  Perhaps the gloomiest aspect of Beyond the Hills is that it takes place in a Romania nearly two decades on from Ceaușescu but the place seems as glum and poverty-stricken as before.  Although Beyond the Hills is heavy going and I think only partly successful, I hope Mungiu won’t take so long before he makes another feature.  His grim sense of humour is still evidently intact.  At one point, the nuns try to instruct Alina in Orthodox catechism, specifically the sins she should take care not to commit.  ‘How many are there?’ asks one nun.  ‘Four hundred and forty-one [or thereabouts]’, replies another, who begins to recite them.  For an astonishing moment, you think you’re going to get the full list but Mungiu cuts away after a dozen or so.

    18 March 2013

Posts navigation