Monthly Archives: August 2026

  • Privilege

    Peter Watkins (1967)

    As a standalone picture, Privilege is a shambles.  In the context of Peter Watkins’ filmmaking career and political outlook, it can’t fail to be interesting, but is dismaying, too.  A voiceover explains at the start that Privilege is set in England ‘in the near future’, where a coalition government ‘has recently asked all entertainment agencies to usefully divert the violence of youth – keep them happy, off the streets and out of politics’.  Promoting the celebrity of the country’s favourite pop star, Steven Shorter, is central to this bread-and-circuses strategy.  The film’s first big set piece features Steve’s stage show.  He’s handcuffed and in a prison cell.  The cell is then unlocked; two uniformed policemen drag Steve out and beat him up.  He sings to the auditorium (and to camera) of his pain [1].  At the show’s climax, Steve, assisted by rioting fans who invade the stage, fights back against his assailants, before order is restored and he’s re-incarcerated.

    Watkins devotes the next part of the narrative to showing how Steve, even when uncaged, is trapped, and miserable.  Everything he does and says is controlled by his managers within the music industry.  Press and TV cameras are on him relentlessly.  Yet he’s completely isolated in his private life – as Vanessa Ritchie, a young artist commissioned to paint Steve’s portrait, soon perceives.  Privilege then switches to a more ambitious and sinister phase of Steve’s exploitation by the government, now in cahoots with not only his management but also representatives of the moribund Church of England.  (It’s also revealed at this point by the narrative voiceover that the coalition partners are Labour and the Conservatives, that monolithic government makes sense because the policies of the two parties have become indistinguishable.  This got a knowing laugh from the NFT2 audience, though the gibe is as untrue today as it was in 1967.)  Steven Shorter’s image will no longer be that of rebel whose (vague) non-conformism must be punished.  Instead, he’ll publicly repent and perform songs with religious lyrics.  He will thereby encourage many of his generation to follow suit, massively increase churchgoing across the land, and inspire both conformity and flag-waving national unity.  (The flag is the Union Jack rather than the Cross of St George, although the other home nations never get a mention in the film.)

    The crusade is launched in ‘the national stadium’ at a huge rally where 49,000 people are converted to Steve’s new outlook; they line up, vowing to conform.  Steve, unhappier than ever, confides in and sleeps with Vanessa, but she tells him they can’t have a future together and he doesn’t argue.  He saves that for a music industry ceremony where he’s presented with a prestigious award.  He tells the gathering what he thinks of them, his other exploiters and their attempts to turn him into a false messiah.  As a result of this outburst, Steve’s public immediately turns against him, and his investors instantly withdraw their support.  His punishment is to be silenced.  The voiceover postscript informs us that some archival footage of Steven Shorter remains, but ‘with the soundtrack removed’.  The voiceover, spoken by Peter Watkins himself, adds that, ‘It is going to be a happy time in England this year, in the future’.

    The film involved an odd assortment of talents.  In the lead role, Paul Jones, who had just left Manfred Mann to embark on a solo singing career but had never acted professionally.  As Vanessa, the 1960s supermodel Jean Shrimpton, another acting newcomer.  The original screenplay was by Johnny Speight, who’d recently become well known as the creator of the TV sitcom Till Death Us Do Part; Watkins developed Speight’s screenplay with the New York writer Norman Bogner.  The script is, to put it kindly, light on important detail.  At the start, Steve’s audience in the theatre looks to be entirely female:  you immediately wonder what’s happening to divert the presumably larger problem of male youth violence, and Watkins gives no indication that anyone other than Steve is being actively used as an instrument of political policy.  At the end, you’ve no idea what effect the award ceremony debacle has had on the government’s appetite for brainwashing, or if they’ve someone lined up to replace Steve as a popular idol.  In the interim, it’s unclear whether the repent-to-conform drive is designed to build on the fruits of the violence-diversion campaign or simply to replace it.

    In the sixties (and long after), pop was widely considered a liberating force for British youth – a means of self-expression, an area of relative autonomy.  This may have been simplistic (the degree of freedom probably depended a bit on social class and economic means, for example), but it wasn’t groundless.  Watkins is so determined to subvert this view that he refuses to give pop and pop singers their due.  He so hates pop’s commercial possibilities that he won’t show what’s being done to, and through, Steven Shorter as the corruption of something positive.  As a result, it’s very hard to see why Steve appealed to people in the first place.  You hope against hope that Paul Jones, his face a mask of suffering, might be allowed to give hints of what made him popular and attractive.  ‘Go on, Paul,’ you keep wanting to say, ‘Sing “Do Wah Diddy Diddy”.  Sing “Pretty Flamingo”.  Sing “High Time”.’  (That was Jones’ first solo single and reached number 4 in autumn 1966.)  There’s not a chance, because Watkins controls everything that his leading man does.

    This is more than just the impression you get from watching Privilege.  In a 1993 piece for Sight and Sound, Paul Jones recalled making the film.  Before Watkins approached him, he had no acting ambitions.  He’d appeared in one school play (and not for long in that:  it was Macbeth and he was Duncan).  Jones remembers that:

    ‘… I thought of movies as the work of the director rather than the cast.  So I was ready to do as I was told, within reason, by a man who was highly regarded in a profession where I was an absolute beginner.  In a newspaper interview I was asked how I went about a task for which I was so untrained; I replied that Peter Watkins showed me what he wanted for each scene before we shot it, and I merely mimicked him.  This upset Peter, I think because of the implication (unintended) that he was dictatorial; and in any case, he said, he was already mimicking me when he went through the scenes, so my performance was my imitation of his imitation of me …’

    For a story set in the more-or-less contemporary pop world, Privilege doesn’t have much of a soundtrack.  At the national stadium rally and subsequently, there are upbeat arrangements of ‘Onward, Christian Soldiers’ and ‘Jerusalem’; these are presumably meant to be satirical, though (as I recall) the C of E’s awkward efforts to get on the younger generation’s wavelength were already a joke by the late 1960s.  (You’d have thought, incidentally, that a conformism drive might have looked for hymns with less activist, more lulling words and tunes than ‘Onward, Christian Soldiers’ and ‘Jerusalem’.)  There’s some instrumental music, as well as the dire ‘Free Me’, reprised at the rally with different, government-sanctioned lyrics.  Mike Leander, a successful record producer and arranger, as well as composer or co-composer of plenty of hits in the 1960s and beyond[2], is officially responsible for this soundtrack, but you wonder if he too was only following instructions.  Leander’s other original composition for the film isn’t just much better than the rest of the music.  It’s also the number which is most revealing of Watkins’ attitude to pop.

    Mike Leander’s ‘I’ve Been a Bad Bad Boy’ was released as a single in early 1967, shortly before Privilege arrived in British cinemas, and gave Paul Jones another top ten hit.  It’s a nice tune with neat lyrics; Jones (as you can see on YouTube) sang it with a good deal of pretend-rueful charm.  In the film, however, he doesn’t perform it at all on screen; ‘I’ve Been a Bad Bad Boy’ is used instead to typify disposable pop pap.  The first time it’s heard, it’s merely background and virtually irrelevant to the images it accompanies.  The next time, the song is used more pointedly, playing on a transistor radio in Vanessa’s studio.  Steve turns the dial to another radio station and the song’s playing there, too; then to another station, where …  Yet ‘I’m a Bad Bad Boy’, whose words are all about (romantic) contrition, doesn’t feature in relation to Steve’s conversion to faux-religious penitence.  In other words, Watkins ignores a clear opportunity to show how pop might be used as a cunning, seductive weapon to manipulate public opinion.

    The start of Privilege – mock newsreel plus authoritative voiceover – primes the film’s audience for a quasi-documentary framework, which naturally brings the narrative structure of Watkins’ The War Game (1966) to mind.  Not for long, though.  Actual footage of 1960s teenage-girl pop fans screaming and weeping is so familiar (and was when Privilege was made) that the audience for Steve’s stage show – with a collection of film extras acting hysterical – verges on embarrassing.  It’s hard to believe the director responsible for these shots is the same man who put alarmingly convincing pseudo-documentary personnel on camera in The War GamePrivilege soon degenerates into bitter but crude lampoon.  Mixed up in its heavy-handed condemnation of ‘national states, working via religion, the mass media, sports, popular culture, etc, [to] divert a potential political challenge by young people’ (to quote Peter Watkins) is a more familiar parable about short-lived celebrity.  The music business types pulling Steven Shorter’s strings – a slimy PR man (Mark London), a Jewish record company executive (Max Bacon), a suave financial backer (William Job) – are cartoons much inferior to their counterparts in, say, Val Guest’s Expresso Bongo (1959).

    Watkins also relies on the same here-today-gone-tomorrow formula to bring the story to a conclusion, never mind that he cloaks it in politically ominous disguise.  Given the Triumph of the Will-style rally that’s gone before, Steve’s supposedly stunning act of self-assertion at a mere record industry lunch is a bit of an anti-climax.  What happens at the lunch also contradicts the film’s premise that the powers-that-be keep him on a tight leash:  it makes no sense that, as he carries on biting the hand that feeds him, no one intervenes to shut Steve up – explaining that he’s not himself, has been working too hard, or something – but that, of course, wouldn’t suit Watkins’ purpose.  Clutching his award, Steve is lost for words to begin with.  Once he finds his voice, everyone else in the room is struck dumb until he has said his piece, which it takes ages for him to do.

    A few good actors, including James Cossins and Doreen Mantle, pop up in bit parts.  Jeremy Child makes Steve’s choleric manager somewhat more individual than the role deserves.  Jean Shrimpton is limited, to say the least, but the quiet scenes between Vanessa and Steve come as a relief – a change from the film’s prevailing hectic overstatement.  Whereas Shrimpton never acted again, Paul Jones went on to enjoy sustained success performing in better-known musicals.  In 1976 he was Juan Peron on the original concept album of Evita.  During the 1980s, he took over from Ian Charleson as Sky Masterson in Richard Eyre’s famous production of Guys and Dolls at the National Theatre, where Jones also played Macheath for Eyre in The Beggar’s Opera; and was Fred/Petruchio opposite Nichola McAuliffe’s Lilli/Kate in an RSC production of Kiss Me Kate that transferred to the West End.  Also in the 1980s, Paul Jones converted (from atheism) to Christianity, after accepting an invitation from Cliff Richard to attend a Luis Palau rally at White City.  Heaven only knows what Peter Watkins made of that turn of events.

    What Watkins made of the negative reception of Privilege, though, is a matter of public record:  BFI’s handout for this screening comprised the director’s recollections of the film, as well as Paul Jones’, for Sight and Sound in May 1993.  Watkins’ comments in this piece reinforce the impression given by the extract from a 2002 filmed interview with him that was shown as part of the introduction to the BFI screening of The War Game less than a week before this Privilege screening.  In Watkins’ view, Privilege:

    … was prescient of the way that popular culture and the media in the US commercialised the anti-war and counter-culture movement in that country … also ominously predicted what was to happen in Margaret Thatcher’s Britain of the 1980s – especially during the period of the Falkland Islands War … was heavily attacked for being ‘hysterical’ when it first appeared in Britain … The fact that everything which was shown or implied in the film came about in Britain in subsequent years – especially during the nationalistic period of Margaret Thatcher – has done nothing to change the status of Privilege as another marginalised film.’

    Watkins goes on to allege, inter alia, that ‘one scene from Privilege appears to have been directly copied and used in Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange’ (it’s implied without acknowledgement of the source).  On the evidence of what Watkins told S&S, there’s nothing about Privilege that he considers defective, nothing that, on reflection, he feels he might have done differently.  Peter Watkins’ political convictions act as their own justification and evidently blind him to the merits or otherwise of the films through which he expresses those convictions.  Any adverse criticism is proof that the establishment doesn’t want people to hear the truth.  The truth in this case, alas, is that Privilege is a lousy film.

    8 August 2026

    [1] ‘My body all aching/My hands are tied/I need my freedom/Not your sympathy/Look, you needn’t love me/Just set me free/Come on, come on/Set me free/Set me free …’

    [2] Just a few examples.  Mike Leander co-wrote Paul Jones’ ‘High Time’.  In the year that Privilege appeared, Leander became ‘the only orchestral arranger other than [George] Martin to work on the recording of a Beatles basic track’ (Wikipedia):  at Paul McCartney’s request, Leander arranged ‘She’s Leaving Home’ on Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band because George Martin ‘was unavailable at the time’.  Leander also executive-produced the 1970 concept album of Jesus Christ Superstar.  It’s worth noting in that connection that the character of Steven Shorter, at least in Paul Jones’ benumbed playing of him, rather anticipates the Andrew Lloyd Webber-Tim Rice idea of Jesus as ‘just a man’, overwhelmed by the pressures of fame and messianic expectation.

     

  • Hôtel du Nord

    Marcel Carné (1938)

    The names on the screenplay don’t include Marcel Carné’s usual film-making partner of the time, the poet and scenarist Jacques Prévert.  The two of them are seen by some as virtual co-auteurs of classics of ‘poetic realism’ in French cinema.  Does Prévert’s absence from the credits explain why Hôtel du Nord is rather less well known than other Carné films of the late 1930s – Drôle de drame, Le quai des brumes, Le jour se lève?  Whatever the reason(s) for this, I preferred Hôtel du Nord to Drôle de drame – maybe even to Le quai des brumes, impressive though the latter often is.  Carné was remarkably productive in the years up to and including 1939; the four films mentioned were released in France in the space of less than two years, Le quai des brumes and Hôtel du Nord only a few months apart in 1938 – a reflection not just of their director’s creativity and industry, but also of a widespread expectation that war in Europe was imminent.  There was no movie-making time to lose.

    Le quai des brumes (English title Port of Shadows) is steeped in fatalism about impending conflict and catastrophe.  The Wikipedia page on Hôtel du Nord explains that ‘After the controversy over the army deserter in Port of Shadows, Carné wanted to steer clear of anything with political implications for his next film. With Hôtel du Nord, Carné reduced any politics to that of the romantic relationships’.  That’s a bit misleading.  At the start, Carné introduces his dramatis personae, and the Paris title location they share; we learn that the Hôtel du Nord’s proprietors, a married couple, have recently adopted a young Spanish boy, a traumatised orphan refugee from the Civil War taking place in his own country.  The film’s climax is set amid Bastille Day celebrations in the street outside the hotel.  I don’t think it’s only hindsight – the knowledge that Paris street-parties wouldn’t be happening for much longer – that gives this episode a carpe diem quality.

    The ‘romantic relationships’ involve three pairings and one temporary rearrangement among them.  The hotel proprietors, Louise and Émile Lecouvreur (Jeanne Marken and André Brunot), are simply described – happily married and good-hearted.  One of their resident guests, prostitute Raymonde (Arletty), has a room upstairs where her pimp, Edmond (Louis Jouvet), is also a frequent visitor.  A young couple, Renée (Annabella) and Pierre (Jean-Pierre Aumont), engaged to each other, are new arrivals in the room next door.  They’re in love but despairing that they can’t afford to marry, so much so that they’ve decided to end their lives without further delay.  Pierre makes a hash of this, shooting Renée before failing to kill himself.  By now, Raymonde has gone out to work for the evening; hearing the gunshot, Edmond enters the next-door room; after telling Pierre to flee, Edmond picks up the pistol used to shoot Renée.  She’s rushed to hospital and, after emergency surgery, recovers.  Although Edmond holds on to the pistol, Pierre is arrested for attempted murder.  His fiancée tells the police, but in vain, that this was a botched suicide pact.

    Renée returns to the hotel, where the Lecouvreurs offer her bed, board and work as a chambermaid.  As well as proving good for business – her pretty face has appeared in all the newspapers – she attracts the attentions of Edmond.  Two criminals he’s mixed up with are, as Edmond knows from Raymonde, on his trail and planning to kill him.  He confides in Renée, who agrees to run away with him to Marseille, from where they’ll board a ship bound for Egypt.  Renée then changes her mind.  She feels compelled to return to Paris and the Hôtel du Nord, where she learns that the charges against Pierre have been dropped and he’ll soon be a free man.  As the locals enjoy Bastille Day, Renée spots Edmond near the hotel and warns him that his would-be assassins are waiting for him upstairs.  Confronting one of the pair, Edmond presents him with Pierre’s pistol.  Another gunshot is heard, though not in the noisy street outside.

    ‘Grand Hotel – people coming, going – nothing ever happens’, says a character, most inaccurately, at the start of Edmund Goulding’s all-star melodrama Grand Hotel (1932).  At the other end of the film, someone else says, ‘There are Grand Hotels everywhere in the world’.  The Hôtel du Nord is far from grand – a small, downmarket place, in a working-class district of Paris – but it’s no less microcosmic than its Hollywood predecessor, and its characters’ stories are more involving.  Hôtel du Nord’s screenplay, by Jean Aurenche and Henri Jeanson, is adapted from a popular 1929 novel of the same name by Eugène Dabit, who was, according to Wikipedia, a ‘socialist writer’ (a friend and political associate of André Gide).  Carné’s treatment of Dabit’s material is suitably democratic:  nearly everyone in the film is worthy of audience interest and sympathy, regardless of their flaws or foibles.  There are startling tonal changes as the narrative switches between romantic agonies and existential acts, but Carné handles these adroitly.  The film’s mood is coherent.  BFI’s handout for this screening comprised a Sight and Sound (March 1999) piece on Hôtel du Nord by Ginette Vincendeau, who does well to quote Graham Greene on the film:

    ‘… we believe in the desperate lovers and the suicide pact on the brass bed in the shabby room, just because of the bicyclists on the quay, the pimp quarrelling with his woman in another room, and the First-Communion party [for a young girl, which takes place in the Lecouvreurs’ quarters downstairs].’

    The ‘filmmakers wanted to shoot quickly to avoid any delays that could be caused by the outbreak of war … Carné and his producer Joseph Lucachevitch thought that it would be too difficult to shoot the film … on the Canal Saint-Martin [location of the actual Hôtel du Nord].  Instead, they reconstructed the hotel and canal at the Billancourt Studios. …’  (Wikipedia again).  The art director, Alexandre Trauner, did a great job.  The main setting is so intensely convincing that the short Marseille interlude feels almost dislocating.

    A terrific cast features actors already familiar from other Carné films, like Jean-Pierre Aumont and Louis Jouvet.  They’re among the best things in Drôle de drame, and standouts in Hôtel du Nord too, as two men – in different ways and at different stages of the story – at the end of their tether.  There are others here best remembered for their appearance in the film generally considered the apotheosis of Carné and Prévert’s poetic realism – Les enfants du paradis (1945).  Marcel Pérès, a chauffeur in Le quai des brumes and a restaurant customer here, would go on to play the anxiously irritable manager of the Funambules theatre in the later film; Jeanne Marken would be Madame Hermine, Frédéric Lemaître’s comically flirtatious landlady, in Les enfants.

    And then there’s Arletty, the star performer in Hôtel du Nord and whose Garance is perhaps the most memorable of all characters in Les enfants du paradis.  The contrasts between the roles of Garance and Raymonde, and Arletty’s performances in them, are fascinating.  Both women can be termed sex workers, but Garance has evolved from streetwalker into high-society courtesan.  She’s solemnly worldly-wise, calmly cynical, whereas Arletty’s volatile, coarsely vivid Raymonde has a harsh voice, often raised.  One of her angriest utterances – ‘Atmosphère!  Atmosphère! Est-ce que j’ai une gueule d’atmosphère?!’  (‘Atmosphere!  Atmosphere!  Do I look like an atmosphere?!’) – rather mystifyingly became one of French cinema’s most celebrated one-liners, much more famous than the film in which it’s delivered.

    Hôtel du Nord’s Bastille Day climax, with a busy street oblivious to Edmond’s death in the nearby hotel room, also anticipates Les enfants du paradis, whose tragic romantic finale takes place on the ‘Boulevard du Crime’:  the street is swarming with people enjoying the Paris carnival, unaware of Baptiste Deburau’s heartbreak as he tries and fails to attract Garance’s attention in the crowd before her carriage drives away.  Those street celebrations in Les enfants du paradis are, in cinema mythology, linked to the recent liberation of Paris following the Nazi Occupation (though in fact they were shot in Nice, on a huge outdoor set that Carné had constructed).  In Hôtel du Nord’s quieter closing sequence, it’s early next morning, and a fine day.  Pierre has been released from custody and is reunited with Renée; they sit on the same canal-side bench by the hotel where they sat in their opening scene.  He remarks that ‘Le jour se lève’ .  The words are doubly resonant, as the title of the next entry in Marcel Carné’s filmography and because, only a few weeks after Le jour se lève arrived in cinemas, World War II began.

    4 August 2026

     

     

     

Posts navigation