Monthly Archives: July 2026

  • Fiddler on the Roof

    Norman Jewison (1971)

    I’d seen Norman Jewison’s film once before but not in the cinema.  (I’d also seen Fiddler on the Roof twice on stage – amateur productions, about forty years apart.)  Although there were more than a few empty seats in NFT1, watching the film on BFI’s largest screen conjured up a sense of what was once a regular event for mainstream cinema audiences – seeing a ‘big’ musical adaptation, with plenty of incident, dancing and songs already familiar, thanks to the musical’s long theatrical run or being played on the radio.  Or familiar even as hit singles:  Fiddler on the Roof‘s best-known number, ‘If I Were a Rich Man’, sung by Topol, reached number nine in the UK singles chart in 1967 – ‘Ya ba dibba dibba dibba dibba dibba dibba dum’, and all that.  I was eleven at the time and the song got on my nerves; I’d no idea there was more to the show than roguish humour.

    Fiddler on the Roof – book by Joseph Stein (who also did the film‘s screenplay), songs by Jerry Bock (music) and Sheldon Harnick (lyrics) – is often humorous, but it’s also tragic.  The source material is ‘Tevye the Dairyman’ and other short stories by Sholem Aleichem.  Born in Imperial Russia in 1859, Aleichem, who wrote in Yiddish, died in New York City in 1916.  He emigrated to the US in the light of the pogroms rife across the Russian Empire in the early years of the twentieth century.  Although ‘Tevye the Dairyman’ was first published in 1894, Fiddler on the Roof is set in around 1905 (in what is now Ukraine).  It ends with the eviction from the (fictional) village of Anatevka of Tevye, his family and the village’s Jewish community as a whole, and the start of their journey to new homes, often in America.

    Chaim Topol, who died in 2023 at the age of eighty-seven, will be remembered as the-man-who-played-Tevye – a poor milkman with an increasingly lame horse to pull his cart round Anatevka, a couple of cows to supply the milk, a few chickens, a wife, five daughters and no sons.  According to Wikipedia, Topol estimated that, by the time he retired, he’d played the role around 3,500 times on stage, as well as in Jewison’s film.  He wasn’t the original Tevye:  Zero Mostel starred in the original Broadway production of Fiddler on the Roof in 1964.  Topol’s debut as Tevye was in Tel Aviv; he then starred in Fiddler‘s first London West End production in 1967.  Mostel was a much bigger screen name than Topol in the late 1960s, especially after the success of Mel Brooks’ The Producers (1967); and Topol’s casting in Jewison’s film was quite controversial.  It now seems inconceivable with anyone else as Tevye.  Topol is tremendous.

    One of the most striking things about the performance is how young Topol was at the time.  Not only Zero Mostel but also the actor who eventually took over the role from him on Broadway, as well as both the actors who followed Topol in the show’s original London run, were born in the 1910s.  Topol was born in 1935:  he was only thirty-one when he first played Tevye in his native Israel, only thirty-five when the film wrapped.  Three of Tevye’s daughters are already of marriageable age and he’s been married to Golde for twenty-five years:  he could be as young as mid-forties but his attitudes and grizzled appearance hint strongly at someone senior.  Topol embodies a man much older than himself with what seems the greatest of ease and fully:  this is ageing way beyond a bit of padding and grey hairspray.

    Topol had appeared in films occasionally through the 1960s, in Israel and Hollywood.  It’s amazing, even so, that he’s thoroughly comfortable on screen in a role he’d already played many times on stage:  his movement and delivery are perfectly scaled to the camera.  Topol’s voice – spoken or singing – is musical but he never luxuriates in its richness:  he varies tone and tempo very dexterously.  He handles Tevye’s talk to God as naturally as talking to his horse and livestock, and his conversations with family and neighbours.  His short bursts of dance, in the opening number, ‘Tradition’, and ‘If I Were a Rich Man’, are wonderfully dynamic.  I could have done without the lengthy visualisation of the nightmare that Tevye invents to persuade Golde whom their eldest daughter should marry; but it’s nearly redeemed by Topol’s comedy beside his wife in bed.  His Tevye tends to be described as a force of nature, a great bear of a man, and so on.  You can see why but it’s worth pointing out that this is entirely due to the strength of Topol’s screen presence.  He wasn’t very tall – just 5’ 10”.  It was only seeing him the other year in Carol Reed’s Follow Me! (1972) that I realised he wasn’t heavy-set either in the 1970s.

    There’s one other magical performance in the film, from Leonard Frey, as Motel, the poor tailor who loves Tevye’s eldest daughter, Tzeitel.  Only three years younger than Topol, Frey projects a boyish innocence that feels very authentic.  Rosalind Harris’ face sometimes suggests an introverted Barbra Streisand (never mind that’s a contradiction in terms!):  her gentle Tzeitel and the awkward, diffident Motel are right for each other; but it’s Frey who elevates the romance into a match made in heaven.  His solo, ‘Miracle of Miracles’, is far from the best song on offer yet Leonard Frey works his own small miracle with it:  Motel thoroughly believes what he’s singing; his wonderment carries all the way through to his wedding to Tzeitel, until a pogrom brutally cuts short the celebrations.

    The rest of the supporting cast are a very mixed bag.  On the plus side, Neva Small gives the third daughter, Chava, more individuality than the part as written probably deserves; Paul Mann, as the wealthy, widowed butcher Lazar Wolf, who thinks he’s going to marry Tzeitel until she marries Motel, has a great face and a winning blustering pathos.  Michael Glaser (soon to add Paul to his professional name and be famous as the first half of Starsky and Hutch) does well in a difficult role – Perchik, suitor of the second daughter, Hodel, is a juvenile lead who’s also a political revolutionary.  On the negative side, Norma Crane, although she looks right enough as the matriarch Golde, is not, to put it kindly, an emotionally deft performer.  Michele Marsh is very pretty but so much a movie-musical ingénue type – her every facial expression and line reading just what you expect them to be – that she makes Hodel seem generic too.  Molly Picon is hard to take as the matchmaker, Yente.  Picon was a star of New York’s Yiddish Theater as far back as the 1920s, but her mannerisms are so practised and stagy that she bizarrely gives the impression of a Gentile actor trying to persuade you she’s Jewish.  At the other extreme, Raymond Lovelock – as Chava’s sweetheart, the young Christian farmer Fyedka – hardly seems there at all.  Louis Zorich is stiff and dull as the village constable who warns Tevye which way the wind is blowing.

    Norman Jewison, despite his name, wasn’t Jewish.  There had already been clues to his film-making range, but he hadn’t tried his hand at a movie musical before and he’s sometimes outside his comfort zone.  During ‘Tradition’, when he shows the villagers going about their daily routines in rhythm to the beat of the music, Jewison is a man straining to do the musically right thing but it’s a bit primitive.  A bigger problem that develops is his handling of the choreography (adapted by Tom Abbott from Jerome Robbins’ choreography for the original Broadway show):  the camera is repeatedly too close to the action, stifling a viewer’s sense of the dancers’ movement.  A fortunate exception is the terrific sequence, during the wedding celebrations, in which four men dance, each balancing a bottle on his head throughout.  (The routine draws on both traditional Ashkenazi folk dance and Robbins’ theatrical ingenuity.)  It’s understandable that a director of recent action-thriller hits (In the Heat of the Night (1967), The Thomas Crown Affair (1968)) should succumb to the temptation (and perhaps studio pressure) to introduce a set piece like the Kyiv street demonstration in which Tsarist forces kill several demonstrators and Perchik is arrested.  This jolts the narrative out of its formal frame, though, and isn’t even very satisfying as an action sequence.  It’s a safe bet that in the theatre the characters’ reactions to what happens in Kyiv will have more dramatic power than its realisation on screen.

    These add up to serious defects yet Jewison, in many other respects, does a characteristically good job.  His skill and empathy with actors ensure that spoken sequences – and some musical numbers, especially if Topol is involved – are often fluently effective.  Jewison’s flair for making a movie move does come through when Tzeitel and Motel joyfully run and tumble about the place in ‘Miracle of Miracles’.  His comic touch is seen to advantage, too.  There’s plenty of broad playing in minor roles and crowd scenes where rhubarb-rhubarbing is plain to see, but Jewison manages to make some obvious bits of crossed-wires conversation surprisingly funny – Topol thinking that Lazar Wolf is wanting to buy his cow when the butcher is asking to marry Tzeitel, everyone thinking that the exciting news of a ‘new arrival’ is Tzeitel’s second child when it’s actually her husband’s sewing machine.  For all his sustained success as a Hollywood director, Norman Jewison wasn’t renowned as a creator of memorable imagery.  Thanks in large part of Oswald Morris’s eloquent lighting, this may be Jewison’s visually most impressive film.

    On its original release, Fiddler on the Roof ran three hours plus intermission, which this BFI screening also included.  The break in proceedings has the effect of reinforcing what happens to the story in its second half.  The narrative becomes a matter of working out the main themes as necessary – the erosion of tradition, the precarity of the Jewish community of Anatevka (and neighbouring villages).  Once Tevye’s eldest daughter has married a poor man, the next two sisters must violate expectations in more serious and upsetting ways.  The second daughter’s politically radical husband (also poor) is imprisoned in Siberia, and she goes there to be nearer to him.  The third daughter’s marriage to a Gentile crosses a line that Tevye can’t accept, and he disowns Chava.  Once the central family unit has fractured, the whole community is soon given notice to quit their homes and the village.  The later stages include occasional strong moments.  For example, Tevye and Hodel’s farewell scene on a bleak station platform is well staged and Michele Marsh gives Hodel’s solo, ‘Far from the Home I Love’, more feeling than comes through in the rest of her performance.  There are fewer musical numbers in Act II, though, and they mostly lack the impact of the earlier ones.  The narrative’s loss of vibrancy goes beyond the demands of a darkening storyline.

    Jewison’s next film would be another musical.  Like Fiddler on the Roof, Jesus Christ Superstar (1973) turned a handsome box-office profit but enjoyed much less critical and awards success.  (Barry Dennen, who played Pontius Pilate in Jesus Christ Superstar, has a minor role in the earlier film as the village rabbi’s son.)  Jewison didn’t return to the genre a third time.  Perhaps he’d had enough; even if he hadn’t, there wasn’t much film-musical fare on offer later in the 1970s.  In the closing stages of Fiddler on the Roof, Jewison’s aptitude as a director of straight drama – in combination with evident respect for the ethnopolitical nature of his material – proves invaluable.  After ‘Anatevka’, the villagers’ mournful farewell to their home, the songs dry up entirely.  That could be seen as a weakness in the piece as a whole – an admission that its solemn themes outgrow its musical form – but Jewison makes a virtue of the silence.  A line of evicted Jews crosses a bridge, carrying whatever possessions they can carry, before crowding onto a raft, the first stage en route to life elsewhere.  These are very powerful images (not least because they can’t fail to evoke images of real Jewish transports in Europe a few decades later).

    The songless climax can be read in another important way – though it won’t be obvious to everyone who watches and is held by the story of Tevye and his family.   It’s a moot point as to whether, strictly speaking, Fiddler on the Roof, is a musical comedy.  (It clearly draws extensively on the musical-comedy form but so does West Side Story, which also draws on Shakespearean tragic drama and which few would consider musical comedy.)  What’s unarguable is that the musical comedy, as a form of American theatre that flourished throughout the mid-twentieth century, was created and sustained almost entirely by Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe, or by their children – Irving Berlin, the Gershwin brothers, Lorenz Hart and Jerome Kern (as well as Leonard Bernstein, Jerome Robbins and Stephen Sondheim) all come into this category.  It’s fair to say that Cole Porter was the only major Gentile musical composer of the period.  The rhythms of the words and music in Fiddler on the Roof (Joseph Stein’s parents were also Polish Jews) express a link between Central-Eastern European roots and New World destinations.  Seeing the finale in this context, you can interpret the lack of songs not as a cessation but as an interruption – normal service to be resumed once the exiles reach Ellis Island.

    The title character (Tutte Lemkow) appears at both ends of the story.   He never speaks or sings.  His precarious position reflects that of Anatevka’s Jews more generally:  Tevye explains at the start that ‘every one of us is a fiddler on the roof, trying to scratch out a simple, pleasant tune without breaking his neck’.  It’s ‘Tradition’ that enables them to keep their balance and which is in various ways destroyed.  The fiddler must finally come down from the roof to follow the rest of the community out of the village.  Acknowledging him, Tevye beckons to the fiddler to do just that:  there’ll be other roofs in other places.  John Williams won’t be best remembered for Fiddler on the Roof but his adaptation of the Jerry Bock-Sheldon Harnick song score won Williams his first Oscar, and he composed the violin cadenza performed on the soundtrack by Isaac Stern (born in Ukraine, brought to America by his parents as a baby).  To describe Jerry Bock’s melody for the fiddler as a simple, pleasant tune is much too modest.  It’s played by Stern with thrilling brio.

    5 July 2026

  • Breaking Away

    Peter Yates (1979)

    A third viewing of Peter Yates’ comedy-drama, several decades on from the second.  Breaking Away, one of my favourite films of the late 1970s, has aged well.  These days, I seem always to be saying that a Hollywood hit of the past couldn’t be made now.  That thought did occur to me re-watching this one, but not for the usual reasons of political (in)correctness.  It’s true that the population of Bloomington, Indiana, where Breaking Away is set, doesn’t feature a single non-white face (that I noticed); that all the principals are decidedly straight; that the male characters’ attitudes towards the female ones are hardly enlightened.  But Yates’ film, written by Steve Tesich, wouldn’t work well today chiefly because other elements that made it fresh and funny forty-plus years ago have since been drained of charm – for this viewer anyway.

    Cycling fanatic Dave Stohler (Dennis Christopher) is a regular sight speeding around the streets of Bloomington on his Masi bike and does long rides on the roads beyond the city.  When he’s at home, only child Dave brings the precious bike indoors.  This doesn’t exasperate his father Ray (Paul Dooley) as much as his son’s mania for all things Italian, which is part and parcel of Dave’s cyclophilia.  His road-racing heroes are the pro Cinzano team.  There are Cinzano posters on his bedroom wall.  He uses a Cinzano ashtray as a food bowl for the family cat – renamed Fellini by Dave, though his father insists the cat is still Jake.  Dave plays and sings along to opera; ‘Eyetie music’, Ray complains.  Much of Dave’s conversation at home is peppered with (basic) Italian phrases; even speaking English to his parents, he puts on a cod Italian accent.  His mother Evelyn (Barbara Barrie) finds it a bit wearying, but she’s calmer than her husband and son – she’s an experienced peacemaker as well as homemaker.  Evelyn reminds Ray that, before Dave started riding, he was ‘a very sickly kid’ but is now in great physical shape.

    The interweave of Dave’s obsessions in Breaking Away is completely engaging and enjoyable.  When this film was made, keeping fit wasn’t the cultural obsession that it now is, and the wellness industry wasn’t big business.  Gung-ho amateur cyclists weren’t a widespread menace on suburban streets (including pavements).  TV shows extolling Italian food, family, fiamma, etc, were few and far between.  (In Britain at least, there are now even more of these than when I moaned about them in the note on Il Postino.)

    Ray Stohler is unimpressed by his son’s hard work in the saddle.  He thinks Dave, who finished high school a year ago, should get a job – if anyone will have him, which Ray doubts.  When he’s not on his bike or at home, Dave is usually in the company of three friends from school – Cyril (Daniel Stern), Mike (Dennis Quaid) and Moocher (Jackie Earle Haley).  They joke, bicker, swim in waters on the site of what was once a limestone quarry, and resent their more privileged contemporaries in Bloomington – the out-of-town students at Indiana University.  Dave and his mates aren’t sure what to do next with their lives.  Mike and Moocher aren’t college material; Cyril, despite a witty way with words, is no academic high-flyer either.  It seems Dave was the best high-school student among them but, affable as he is with people he knows, his animus towards ‘college boys’ is as strong as short-fused Mike’s.

    College girls are another matter.  Moocher is the only one of the four boys with a steady girlfriend – his high-school sweetheart Nancy (Amy Wright) will soon become his wife – but as soon as Dave claps eyes on Katherine (Robyn Douglass), he’s smitten.  He pretends to her that he’s an Italian exchange student, and she believes him (none too believably).  Dave even turns up outside her sorority house to serenade ‘Caterina’, accompanied by Cyril on guitar.  When Katherine’s jock boyfriend Rod (Hart Bochner) gets wind of this, he and his friends arrive and rough up Cyril.  After a fight in the student canteen – on which Mike, Moocher and Dave descend with Cyril to avenge his black eye – the Indiana University president (John W Ryan) decides to take the matter in hand.  The university’s long-established annual cycling race, the ‘Little 500’, is normally restricted to student teams.  The president announces that this year the town will also be invited to put forward a team of cyclists.  This, as well as paving the way for Breaking Away’s exciting climax, brings the story’s tensions into sharper focus.

    Limestone quarries were the foundation of Bloomington’s economy and the townspeople style themselves ‘cutters’; the same term is used by the college kids to disparage the locals.  Dave’s father, though he now runs a used car business (‘Cutter Cars’), was once a stonecutter in the quarries, alongside Cyril’s, Mike’s and Moocher’s fathers.  We start to see in a different light Dave’s and Ray’s shared dislike of the university, what Dave’s Italian pretensions mean to him, and why they so infuriate his father.  The very idea of becoming a college boy in Bloomington seems to Dave an act of treachery; but that Italian persona, comical as it is, is also a kind of denial of his Midwest blue-collar background.  Ahead of the Little 500 race, events start to shift Dave’s and Ray’s attitudes and relationship.  Dave takes the university entrance exam just to prove that he can pass it – which he does.  Ray, after a brief spell in hospital with heart trouble, confides in his son that he helped build the university campus but never felt comfortable on the premises.  To his great excitement, Dave’s Italian idols come to town to take part in a specially organised exhibition road race, in which local cyclists can also participate.  Dave does too well for the Cinzano team’s liking, and they force him off the road, leaving him with a bloody leg and a shattered fantasy.

    When I first saw Breaking Away, it appealed to me as something of a one-off.  In retrospect, it’s more comparable than I’d realised with George Lucas’s American Graffiti (1973).  Four boys who became friends at school, now about to go their different ways; one a more developed character than the other three (Richard Dreyfuss’s Curt is Dave’s equivalent in Lucas’s film), and doubtful about going on to tertiary education.  (There are big differences between the films, too:  American Graffiti’s timeframe is only a few hours, from early one evening to next morning; the girls – ironically, given the conception – register as strongly as the boys, which doesn’t happen in Breaking Away.)   Like American Graffiti, set in George Lucas’s hometown (Modesto, California), Steve Tesich’s story is semi-autobiographical:  Tesich was a student at Indiana University, where he was part of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity cycle team in the Little 500 race.  A main reason why I still much prefer Breaking Away to American Graffiti is that, while both mine personal experience from the early 1960s (Tesich and Lucas were near contemporaries), Peter Yates’ film is set in the present and feels that way.  Lucas views 1962 through a prematurely nostalgic lens.  This approach paid handsome commercial dividends – made for less than a million dollars, American Graffiti took $140m – but the nostalgia is cannily imposed.

    It’s one of the added charms of Breaking Away that those of us who saw the film on its original release can, returning to it getting on for a half-century later, feel genuinely nostalgic – not least for the clear storytelling and a collection of well-written characters.  In the early stages, Dave’s parents have a mainly (and quite broadly) comic purpose.  It’s impressive that the father-son relationship gradually develops into something richer, and crucial to the story’s town-versus-gown dynamic.  What happened to the chief contributors to Breaking Away, after the success they enjoyed with it, prompts other kinds of regret.  Peter Yates’ early cinema showed striking range – he moved from One Way Pendulum (1964) to Bullitt (1968) with only one picture in between.  Yates did have another hit after Breaking Away with The Dresser (1983), though that screen version of Ronald Harwood’s fine stage play is no great shakes.  None of Yates’ several subsequent films achieved both commercial and critical success.  One of them, Eleni (1985), had a screenplay by Steve Tesich, and this was his third collaboration with Yates in six years (the 1981 thriller Eyewitness was the second).  Breaking Away was playwright Tesich’s first screenplay and won him a well-deserved Oscar.  He wrote only five more films thereafter (his adaptation of John Irving’s The World According to Garp in 1982 is the best-known) and returned to writing for the stage for the rest of his short life.  Steve Tesich died suddenly in 1996.

    As for the cast, it’s a great shame (a pity and a disgrace) that Dennis Christopher didn’t enjoy the career that his talents deserved[1].  He’s just delightful in Breaking Away – funny, intensely likeable, as emotionally supple as he is physically athletic.  Although he was twenty-seven when he made the film, Christopher is completely convincing as a late teenager.  (He was over a decade older than Jackie Earle Haley; Daniel Stern was twenty and Dennis Quaid twenty-four.)  Christopher never had another film role to compare with this one.  His last noteworthy appearance in a cinema film was in a small part that Quentin Tarantino (a fan) wrote for him in Django Unchained (2012). Dennis Christopher hasn’t acted even on television since 2016 and, according to Wikipedia, is now retired.  That he was subsequently less successful than all three other main young actors in Breaking Away is compelling evidence that there’s little or no justice in Hollywood.  Dennis Quaid has had the biggest screen career of the four but his playing in Breaking Away foreshadows his persisting limitations.  As Mike, Quaid (whose best performance would come in The Right Stuff (1983)) is an undeniably strong presence but on top of the character rather than inside it.  While neither Barbara Barrie nor Paul Dooley may have had another part as good as the one they played in Breaking Away, both continued to work regularly for many years afterwards.  It seems that Barrie, who’s now ninety-five, retired a few years ago, but Dooley is still working – at the age of ninety-eight!

    Peter Yates’ Bullitt features a famous car chase.  A decade on in Breaking Away, Yates directs a variety of transport pursuits with flair and humour.  Dave, out riding on a highway, pedals furiously to keep up with a Cinzano lorry.  He succeeds so the amused lorry driver puts his foot down to up the competitive ante; a police car joins the chase, to pull the driver over for speeding.  (Breaking Away has a splendid soundtrack of classical music favourites.  Mostly by Italians, of course – Verdi, Rossini, Donizetti – but Mendelssohn’s ‘Italian Symphony’, which accompanies the highway chase, is the musical highlight.)  And Yates’ handling of the climactic cycle race is wonderful:  he and his editor, Cynthia Scheider, turn Breaking Away into one of the most thrilling sports films I’ve seen.  The Little 500, comprising 200 laps of the Indiana University course (fifty miles), involves teams of four riders, though there are no rules as to how they divide the laps among them.  Dave’s teammates are, needless to say, Cyril, Mike and Moocher, though they expect Dave to ride the whole thing.  Also needless to say, the race doesn’t turn out quite like that, so that all four must have a go taking on the might of the Phi Kappa Psi quartet and other student teams – but it’s Dave, injured and strapped onto his bike, who finally wins the race for the Cutters team.  The inevitability of all this doesn’t matter a bit – it makes the outcome more elating, for the viewer, as well as for Dave, his friends and his proud parents.

    Steve Tesich’s script is a shade over-explanatory at the start, and it’s a stretch to believe, at the other end of the story, that the Stohler family’s new lease of life will include a new baby for Evelyn and Ray, twenty years after Dave’s arrival.  But nearly everything else in between works, and Breaking Away’s happy ending is a rare triumph – a feelgood finale where the good feeling is fully earned and credible.  Paul Dooley’s remarkable longevity is a nice irony.  For most of Breaking Away, Ray Stohler is presented as a model of unhealthy living – he likes to eat the wrong things, is seriously overweight and even more stressed out.  In the film’s postscript, though, Ray is evidently changing for the better: he’s heading home from work on a bicycle, though he nearly falls off it when greeted by his son, on the opposite side of the road.  Still a cyclist, Dave is now a freshman at Indiana University.  He’s riding alongside a good-looking French girl student (Lisa Shure), waxing lyrical about French cyclists and the Tour de France.  As he spots his father, Dave calls out, ‘Bonjour, papa!’

    28 June 2026

    [1] Maybe I was already fearing this when, just a couple of years after Breaking Away, I wrote about Chariots of Fire, where Christopher had a minor role as the American Olympic sprinter Charley Paddock, ‘Christopher makes Paddock enjoyably eccentric; it’s to be hoped he’ll get better roles than this in future’.

     

Posts navigation