Monthly Archives: January 2026

  • Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

    David Lynch (1992)

    David Lynch followed his brilliant film Blue Velvet (1986) with an exceptionally original television series, Twin Peaks, which Lynch created with Mark Frost.  Blue Velvet, beginning on a sunny day in a middle-class suburb in Lumberton, North Carolina, takes the audience on a fascinating, often frightening journey to the dark side of town, and the dark side of the psyche of the film’s young hero (Kyle MacLachlan).  The first series of Twin Peaks took familiar TV genres – crime procedural, continuing drama (everyday life department) – and infused them with qualities unusual for those genres:  visual flair, thoroughly eccentric wit, surreality.  Set in a fictional town in Washington State, the story centres on a murder investigation:  Special FBI Agent Dale Cooper (again MacLachlan) arrives in Twin Peaks to work with the local sheriff’s office on solving the killing of teenager Laura Palmer.  Here too, Lynch contrasts the conventional surfaces of a place with its dangerous underbelly, again explores his characters’ public and private worlds.  Laura Palmer (Sheryl Lee), high-school homecoming queen, is also a cocaine addict and victim of sexual abuse.  Clean-cut Agent Cooper, enduring fan of a Twin Peaks eatery’s ‘damn fine coffee’ and cherry pie, dreams weird, troubling dreams.

    First shown in the US in the spring of 1990, the eight-episode series was an unexpected piece of TV scheduling – ABC boldly gave it a primetime slot – and an even more unexpected ratings success:  who killed Laura Palmer soon turned into a widespread cultural obsession.  (Before the year was out, on both sides of the Atlantic; over here, Twin Peaks first aired on BBC2 in autumn 1990.)  The fusion of, and tension between, the series’ format and David Lynch’s imagination made Twin Peaks exhilarating television, but these two elements also sowed the seed for greater tension and problems not far down the line.  Lynch was eager for more self-expression, happy for Laura’s murder to remain unsolved while he kept expressing himself.  ABC didn’t want to lose viewers, and Mark Frost agreed with the channel’s view that the killer’s identity needed to be revealed.  That happened in the sixth episode of the second series, which was much longer than the first (twenty-two episodes).  After that, although Lynch and Frost were still, technically, showrunners, their involvement in and control of Twin Peaks declined, and so did its ratings.  ABC cancelled the show in 1991 by which time a feature film was already being developed.  The result, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, premiered at Cannes in 1992.

    Lynch and Frost disagreed about whether this should be a prequel or a sequel.  Frost wanted a sequel because he ‘felt very strongly that our audience wanted to see the story go forward’.  Lynch wanted a prequel and this time won the argument.  What’s more, Fire Walk with Me is a prequel with a prologue.  In Deer Meadow, Washington, police discover the corpse of a young woman called Teresa Banks.  FBI Regional Bureau Chief Gordon Cole (Lynch) assigns Agents Chester Desmond (Chris Isaak) and Sam Stanley (Kiefer Sutherland) to the case.  The pair head to Deer Meadow, whose unfriendly citizens and unhelpful law officers are negative reflections of their Twin Peaks counterparts.  After touching a ring in Teresa Banks’ room, Desmond unaccountably disappears.  Back at FBI HQ, Cole dispatches Special Agent Cooper to take over the investigation.  The action then switches to Twin Peaks and ‘The Last Seven Days of Laura Palmer’, which occupy the film’s remaining two hours.

    Fire Walk with Me fared quite well in France and Japan but badly, with critics and the public, in North America.  I must have seen it in the aftermath of that mauling, which I’ve a feeling I thought undeserved.  I could barely remember the film, though, and hadn’t watched it since, until now.   Things have changed considerably.  Not too unusually for a high-profile movie that bombed on its first appearance, there’s been a ‘critical reappraisal’ over the course of the last thirty-five years:  this culminated in Fire Walk with Me’s earning a place in the foothills of the top 250 list in Sight and Sound‘s latest decennial poll of critics et al in 2022.  This viewer, on the other hand, is sorry to say he now finds the film not just disappointing but dire.

    The twofold reasons for disappointment are, to different degrees, inherent in this being a prequel.  First, the thriller and suspense aspects are much reduced:  anyone familiar with the TV Twin Peaks knows how Laura Palmer ends up, and who’s responsible.  Second, there are many characters and performances you got to know and enjoy watching each week, who are absent from Fire Walk with Me:  Sheriff Harry S Truman (Michael Ontkean) and his variously surprising colleagues (Eric Goaz, Kimmy Robertson and Michael Horse); magnate Ben Horne (Richard Beymer) and his wilful daughter Audrey (Sherilyn Fenn); businesswoman Catherine Martell (Piper Laurie) and her husband Pete (Jack Nance); Dr Lawrence Jacoby (Russ Tamblyn), the singular town psychiatrist.  To name just a few.  And, of course, Dale Cooper himself isn’t much in evidence – he’s marking time in Deer Meadow because his services aren’t yet needed in Twin Peaks.  Most of Cooper’s appearances in Fire Walk with Me are in the notorious, extra-dimensional Red Room.

    Much of what’s dire about the film is essentially what’s also dire about Lynch’s Wild at Heart, which won the 1990 Cannes Palme d’Or, a few weeks after the first Twin Peaks series began airing in America.  As in Wild at Heart, the synergy of daytime and nighttime worlds, so potent in Blue Velvet and the TV Twin Peaks, is almost entirely missingInstead, Laura Palmer’s shadow side and the horrors this entails are relentless and protracted.  Lynch’s bravura quite overshadows the interest of the story he’s telling and the people in it.  Which relates to another problem – with the performances.  That might seem astonishing, given the all-round quality of the acting on the TV show.  Yet it may well relate, in some cases, to the material’s television origins.

    The TV cast did include some actors who’d made their mark in significant cinema roles – Laurie, Beymer, Tamblyn, Ontkean and Nance, as well as MacLachlan.  Near-contemporaries like Ray Wise and Grace Zabriskie – who played Laura’s parents, Leland and Sarah – were more familiar to television audiences.  The young cast members, for obvious reasons, were relative unknowns and, as far as cinema’s concerned, have stayed that way.  The TV Twin Peaks, while it didn’t lampoon TV soaps, did make use of soap tropes, and comfortably accommodated acting styles often associated with soap melodrama.  It’s just not the same once the material is translated into cinema – especially when the main characters in Fire Walk with Me are played by some of those young actors and by Ray Wise.

    On TV, Sheryl Lee was chiefly – and memorably – a framed photograph of Laura Palmer, the beautiful homecoming queen.  In Fire Walk with Me, Lee is playing the lead.  She proves herself capable of more than one great look:  her face certainly draws and holds the camera.  But she lacks the resources and range to carry the human side of the film, which she’s virtually expected to do.  Ray Wise is at a particular disadvantage.  Since we know that Leland Palmer killed his daughter – or, at least, was possessed by the mortiferous evil spirit Killer Bob to do so – there’s probably not much point in Lynch and Wise’s concealing what lies beneath Leland’s regular-guy, white-collar exterior.  Even so, Wise telegraphs the devil-inside signals, to hyper-intense and tedious effect.  What’s wrong with the film is epitomised by Killer Bob himself.  On television, Bob (Frank Silva) appeared and disappeared so rapidly he was a nearly subliminal image, and his rationed brief appearances were terrifyingly effective.  In Fire Walk with Me, when this incubus is on Laura’s bed, repeatedly pawing at her exposed flesh, it soon gets boring.

    Fire Walk with Me begins with a shimmering blue screen that naturally calls to mind the Blue Velvet intro.  The camera eventually pulls back to reveal this as a ‘snowstorm’ on a television set (the way screens used to look outside transmission hours in the days before 24/7 broadcasting).  The sequence ends abruptly with someone smashing the TV set and a woman’s scream.  It’s a promising start, and strong memories of the original, many-splendoured Twin Peaks keep you hoping that Fire Walk with Me will improve – each time there’s a burst of Angelo Badalamenti’s wonderful music, for example, or when the Log Lady (Catherine E Coulson) momentarily arrives on the scene.  Things don’t look up, though.  Decades before David Lynch and Mark Frost collaborated again on a third TV season of Twin Peaks (in 2017), their creation had acquired an insatiable and knowledgeable fan base that the term ‘cult following’ hardly begins to describe.  I can see why those aficionados regard this movie as an invaluable contribution to Twin Peaks studies.  For those who cherish the original merely as terrifically inventive, exuberantly entertaining TV drama, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is painful.

    13 January 2026

  • Hamnet

    Chloé Zhao (2025)

    What’s in a name?  In this case, a bit more than Juliet thought.  The premise of Chloé Zhao’s screen version of Hamnet, as of the 2020 Maggie O’Farrell novel from which it’s adapted (Zhao and O’Farrell share the screenplay credit), is that the death of his only son in 1596 strongly influenced Shakespeare’s writing of Hamlet a few years later.  Zhao wastes no time justifying the premise:  a title card announces at the start that the names Hamnet and Hamlet were virtually interchangeable in Stratford-upon-Avon records during the late-sixteenth and early-seventeenth centuries.  The film’s heroine, Mrs Shakespeare, is Agnes rather than Anne Hathaway.  Those forenames may have been interchangeable, too (Anne was Agnes in her father’s will), but Zhao doesn’t mention that.  You can’t help wondering if this renaming serves another purpose:  to avoid confusion with the twenty-first century’s best-known Anne Hathaway – never mind that she (says Wikipedia) is forenamed for Shakespeare’s wife.  If this was a factor, it might not be the daftest instance in Zhao’s film (I haven’t read O’Farrell’s book) of how Hamnet has been shaped to appeal to present-day audiences.

    Chloé Zhao clearly means the opening title card to settle the argument, begging the question of what the argument is.  Plenty of Shakespearean scholars had remarked on the similarity of the names Hamlet and Hamnet before Maggie O’Farrell wrote her novel.  It’s hard to believe the similarity wasn’t in Shakespeare’s mind as he wrote Hamlet, but that obviously doesn’t mean his protagonist’s name originated in his son’s, or that Hamlet more largely is ‘about’ the loss of eleven-year-old Hamnet.  Zhao is eager from an early stage to show Shakespeare’s life explaining his art, to crass effect.  Will (Paul Mescal) is introduced as a tutor teaching Latin to local boys, when he catches sight through the window of a woman outside, using a falconry glove to hold a hawk.  This is Agnes (Jessie Buckley):  they get into conversation, even share a kiss before parting.  Next thing, love-at-first-sight-smitten Will is scribbling away, and murmuring ‘It is the east, and Juliet is the sun’, which will come in handy when he eventually gets round to writing R&J.  The climax to Hamnet is a performance of Hamlet at the Globe (more of that below).  Here, Zhao chooses bits of the play’s text that, she thinks, suit her purpose, ignoring the elephant in the room, that Hamlet centres on a bereaved son rather than a bereaved father.

    After that first meeting, Shakespeare learns from his mother, Mary (Emily Watson), that Agnes (pronounced the French way), although brought up by Joan Hathaway (Justine Mitchell), with Joan’s other children, is rumoured to be the daughter of a forest witch, hence her knowledge of herbal lore and remedies.  (Agnes uses a herbal concoction to heal a cut on Will’s forehead.)  Agnes and Will are only ‘hand-fasted’ during much of her first pregnancy but marry shortly before she gives birth.  To do so, Agnes takes herself off alone to woodland, and sits at the roots of a significant tree – an expression of her maternal heritage, her own quasi-mystical bond with nature, her determined self-reliance.  By the time Will and Agnes’ stepbrother, Bartholomew (Joe Alwyn), arrive at the tree, she’s already holding a baby daughter.  The next time Agnes goes into labour, Mary Shakespeare insists that she give birth indoors – in the room, Mary says, in which Will himself was born – where she can be assisted by her mother-in-law and a midwife (Laura Guest).  Agnes protests furiously, claiming that such confinement bodes ill for the baby’s future.  It’s striking that she doesn’t remember this when Hamnet dies.  Chloé Zhao probably hasn’t forgotten but by this stage, she’s ready to put a different spin on Agnes’ feminist credentials.

    Hamnet (Jacobi Jupe) has a twin sister, Judith (Olivia Lynes).  It’s she who’s first struck down by ‘the pestilence’ (bubonic plague?); her twin brother says he wants to take her place and lies down beside Judith in her bed; she promptly recovers and he promptly dies.  Their father is away in London on theatre business.  Hearing of his daughter’s grave condition, he gallops (on horseback) home to Stratford, to discover that Hamnet has indeed taken Judith’s place.  The instant transfer of mortal illness from one twin to the other seems supernatural yet their mother, despite her occult heritage, doesn’t remark on this either.  Instead, when Will tries to assure Agnes that ‘You did all you could’, she angrily reminds him ‘You weren’t there!’ – the starting point of a tirade that boils down to … typical man … married to his job … leaves me with all the child care … does he realise we’re living in not quite the seventeenth century?  It’s a wonder that, when she eventually sees Hamlet, Agnes doesn’t complain that Ophelia and Gertrude are played by male actors (El Simons and Matthew Tennyson).  The staff member checking tickets at Curzon Richmond for our show of Hamnet informed each female viewer on entry to the screen that the ladies’ loos weren’t flushing properly, adding every time ‘No problem with the gents – isn’t it always the way!’  She was probably keen to put the audience in the mood for what they were about to see.

    It’s just as well the women in Chloé Zhao’s cast really do outshine the men, and remarkable how deft and purely passionate an actor Jessie Buckley has become.  Agnes’ connection to the earth is made outwardly clear in the reddish-brown frock she mostly wears (Malgosia Turzanska designed the film’s costumes) – and Buckley’s portrait enriches the connection.  Her voice is often, at first surprisingly, quite deep and guttural.  In the courtship scenes, she seems earthy in both literal and metaphorical senses of the word; you see why Agnes fascinates Will.  As the narrative progresses, with her character almost continuously in extremis, Buckley expresses anguish with complete commitment and considerable power – a real feat, when so much of the film is ridiculous.  A further strength of Agnes’ close-to-nature look is the make-up by Nicole Stafford and her team:  Buckley’s tawny face colouring not only complements her brunette hair but gives her a primitive quality.  In her small role, Emily Watson is excellent as Shakespeare’s mother.  Mary’s sadly resigned description of the children she lost, at birth or in infancy, gives us a sense of how common child mortality was at the time (and way beyond it).  This obviously doesn’t diminish the tragedy of Hamnet’s death but does serve as a reminder that it’s far from extraordinary.

    The make-up for Shakespeare is also good, but Paul Mescal’s performance is disappointing.  In a film that rides roughshod over credibility, Mescal seems pointlessly anxious not to go wrong.  Whenever Will isn’t raising his voice in anger, Mescal tends to neutralise his lines.  He also comes across (Jessie Buckley doesn’t) as prematurely melancholy.  You get the impression of a fine actor cautiously suppressing his acting instincts.  You see those instincts at work on the few occasions that Mescal lightens up – and is transformed – as when Will, in the garden of the family’s home, teaches his son theatrical swordplay.  Twelve-year-old Jacobi Jupe does very well as Hamnet – considerably better than his elder brother Noah, who is Hamlet in the Globe production.  Those playing the other menfolk in the Shakespeare and Hathaway families either overact (David Wilmot as Will’s father) or are rather dull (Joe Alwyn).

    Agnes and Will’s marriage doesn’t improve until the very end of Hamnet.  Agnes mentions to her stepmother that her husband’s in London again, preparing his new comedy.  Not a comedy but a tragedy, explains Joan, helpfully producing a playbill for Hamlet to prove it.  Agnes, accompanied by Bartholomew, heads for London.  She thinks better of Will when she discovers that he lives not in high style, as she’d supposed, but in a humble attic room.  It’s back to square one, though, once Hamlet gets underway at the Globe theatre.  Agnes is horrified to hear the name ‘Hamlet’, which she takes as desecration of her dead son’s name – never mind that she’s already seen it on the playbill.  (If the idea is that Agnes is illiterate, as Anne Hathaway may well have been, why did her stepmother show her the playbill?)  Her fellow audience members shush Agnes as she voices her outrage:  the Globe crowd in the early 1600s was evidently as reverently quiet as the packed house in Curzon Richmond watching Hamnet in 2026.

    This silly anachronism is eclipsed, though, by a kind of audience-participation conclusion to the Globe Hamlet, and the film.  Agnes has pushed her way to the front row and the edge of the stage.  She’s mollified when she catches sight of her husband playing the ghost of Hamlet’s father, and realises his play is a tribute to their son.  In its final scene, as the protagonist is about to die, Agnes reaches out her hand to touch Hamlet’s.  Others in the front row follow suit, but Hamlet addresses ‘The rest is silence’ as if to Agnes alone – a whisper rather than a stage whisper but this audience is too polite for anyone to complain.  The soundtrack is filled instead with the swelling chords of Max Richter’s Barber Adagio-like ‘On the Nature of Daylight’.  (Richter also wrote the original music for Hamnet.)  As Hamnet lay dying, Zhao cut between his deathbed and shots of the boy wandering worriedly somewhere else, as if between two worlds.  It’s rather baffling at the time.  Zhao now virtually reprises the sequence, to show what his mother sees at the Globe – her son, after he has turned to give her a smile, disappearing offstage through an exit that recalls the woodland cave in which Agnes appeared at the start of the story.  Consoled by this, she smiles too.

    Yes, I get that Chloé Zhao is putting on screen what’s in Agnes’ mind’s eye, that Zhao didn’t intend a work of thoroughgoing naturalism and historical accuracy, that her film is meant to be poetically imaginative.  But only when it suits:  the director’s style in Hamnet is maddeningly (self-servingly) inconsistent.  The twins’ arrival in the world is physically realistic because Zhao wants to get across the pains of childbirth (and Jessie Buckley does her director proud).  Hamnet arrives before Judith, who’s apparently stillborn.  When the midwife takes her and Mary says the baby ‘has gone to Heaven’, Agnes angrily denies this, and reminds her mother-in-law that, while pressured by her in-laws to attend a Christian church, she doesn’t share their beliefs.  Fair enough, given Agnes’ paganism, but Zhao doesn’t even let the camera show the effect on Mary or the midwife of remarks they’d likely find hurtful as well as blasphemous – because her target audience doesn’t want a whiff of sincere Christian piety.  Supernaturalism is OK, though.  Agnes insists on holding Judith again and, in her mother’s arms, the baby comes to life.

    Just before Hamnet dies, his father, in London, watches a piece of shadow puppet theatre, which depicts the plague carrying off its victims.  This is one of Hamnet’s most visually compelling moments.  The other London episodes are, for the most part, terrible.  Before the climactic theatre performance, there’s a bit where Will rehearses his Hamlet and Ophelia in the ‘Get thee to a nunnery scene’.  The playwright-director gets increasingly agitated, as he repeatedly instructs Hamlet ‘Again!’  You can understand why he thinks Hamlet is NBG, but why is demanding Will so imprecise about the point from which he’s instructing the actor to go ‘again’?   Presumably because Will is distracted by grief at his son’s death, but you see why poor Hamlet gets confused.  Zhao keeps the camera close in on Paul Mescal as he paces back and forth, yelling at Hamlet.  The scene is somewhat redeemed when exasperated Will takes over speaking the lines – which Mescal does naturally yet commandingly (reminding you what you’re missing in most of the film).  Zhao detracts even from this, though, by making Will’s reading so visually in-your-face.

    Next, Will contemplates suicide, leaning on a bridge over the dark Thames and whispering, ‘To be, or not to be …’  Zhao’s sequencing here turns the rehearsal and his Hamlet’s effect on Will into an early example of watching-him-act-I-lost-the-will-to-live syndrome.  Hamlet has hardly improved when the play’s on at the Globe.  For a moment, you’re not sure if this is why Will starts crying, as he waits in the wings before his entrance as the Ghost.  To be fair to Noah Jupe, nearly everyone else in the production is just as ropy – but ropy in a modern way:  Zhao doesn’t seem to be trying to present an antiquated style of performance.  And Hamlet’s sword fight with Laertes (Clay Milner Russell) is very convincing, almost incongruously so.

    Łukasz Żal’s cinematography relies heavily on natural light.  In the woodland sequences, this is often beautiful, occasionally lustrous, but the film is visually challenging in some of the indoor sequences.  The dim interiors become part of the film’s pall.  Hamnet is exceptionally short of (intentional) humour.  With their brother dead and their father absent, Shakespeare’s elder daughter, Susanna (Bodhi Rae Breathnach), reads to Judith part of Sonnet 12 (‘When I do count the clock that tells the time’) – not a sunny sonnet but, when Judith asks her sister to read it again and Susanna says no because she’s already just read it three times, it’s an unusually believable, as well as funny, moment.  Earlier, the two girls and Hamnet, under Will’s supervision, perform for their mother a comical version of the witches’ opening number from Macbeth – again, chronologically unlikely (Hamlet was the earlier play) but still welcome, because the people on screen, for once, are enjoying themselves.  This is the only time that Shakespeare appears to find theatre work invigorating.  In London, when he’s not castigating his crap leading man, Will’s shivering in his attic garret.

    The film’s nearly relentless dolour put me in mind of lines not by Shakespeare but by his near-contemporary John Webster:

    ‘Of what is ‘t fools make such vain keeping?

    Sin their conception, their birth weeping,

    Their life a general mist of error,

    Their death a hideous storm of terror.’

    In poetry anthologies, those great lines on the shrouding of the Duchess of Malfi are sometimes headed ‘Dirge’ – and that’s a fair description of Hamnet, despite the outbreaks of crackpot modernisation along the way.  At the end of this threnodic film, you can understand why Agnes was under the impression her husband was working on a comedy.  Compared with Hamnet, Hamlet is light entertainment.

    11 January 2026

     

     

     

     

     

Posts navigation