Monthly Archives: September 2021

  • Annette

    Leos Carax (2021)

    Good to be back at the Edinburgh Filmhouse – and typical of this well-run outfit that a warning about strobe effects appeared not as an inconspicuous notice in the foyer but on the screen, before Annette began.  I was grateful for that but, after a while, was averting my eyes from more than flashing lights.  Leos Carax’s new film contains numerous self-indulgent scenes that discriminating viewers may find upsetting.

    The first half of Annette charts the life and death of a love affair, between Henry McHenry (Adam Driver), a notoriously provocative stand-up comedian, and Ann Defrasnoux (Marion Cotillard), an admired opera singer.  The title character is their daughter, born soon after Henry and Ann marry – Annette is played by an animated wooden marionette.  Her parents’ relationship founders and an attempt to mend it, on a sailing trip together, ends disastrously.  One night, drunken Henry tries to force Ann to dance with him.  Struggling to resist, she falls overboard.  After Ann’s death, Annette mysteriously inherits her mother’s singing voice.  By now, Henry’s comedy career has collapsed.  He’s broke and reckons his infant-prodigy daughter could be a money-spinner.  In launching her as a concert and internet performer, Henry looks for help from Ann’s former colleague (Simon Helberg) – referred to only as the Accompanist although he was also Ann’s musical director, the orchestra conductor at her recitals, and wrote music for her.  The Accompanist is in two minds about Henry’s proposition.  He’s against child exploitation but he was in love with Ann and wants to hear her sing again through her daughter.  He joins forces with Henry and Annette quickly becomes a global superstar.  When the Accompanist intimates that he may have fathered the child, Henry murders him (another drowning).  Henry also decides suddenly to end Annette’s career:  in her farewell performance, she declines to sing but tells the worldwide audience of millions that ‘Daddy kills people’.  Henry goes to prison; a few years later, Annette visits him.  In the course of doing so, she metamorphoses from a puppet into a real girl (Devyn McDowell), who rejects her father’s attempts to reconcile with her.  Annette exits the cell, leaving abject Henry in the company of the discarded, now inanimate marionette.

    The action mostly takes place in present-day Los Angeles.  In the early scenes, Carax alternates between the two principals performing at different venues in the city.  He devotes much more screen time to Henry’s comedy than to Ann’s opera-singing – an imbalance that predicts the relative size of their roles in what follows – but most of what Henry utters from the stage he sings, and his audience sings back at him (hers is hardly seen or heard).  Carax, at the same time as he relegates Ann to second billing, makes clear that we’re in for quasi-opera.  Annette – a ‘musical psychological drama’, according to Wikipedia – is the brainchild of the brothers Ron and Russell Mael, aka Sparks, who wrote the music and (with Carax) the screenplay.  The Maels’ compositions aren’t songs exactly:  they mostly consist of a few phrases repeated – musically and verbally – over and over.  The ‘recitative’ is hardly in the class of Michel Legrand’s song score for The Umbrellas of Cherbourg.  A couple of the Maels’ tunes are earwormy but this is meagre musical fare for a 140-minute film whose dialogue is predominantly sung.

    Musical comedy or drama – on stage or screen, from grand opera to jukebox musical – is an essentially unrealistic form.  Annette goes well beyond conforming to that tradition.  It’s the latest addition to another, burgeoning cinematic genre:  pieces whose creators take the view that, because they’re not working in a naturalistic style, their narrative needn’t make sense at all.  For example, Henry’s stand-up success goes into reverse when he offends an audience but what did they expect?  They know he’s a shock-tactics merchant – that’s why they pay to see and lionise him.  The U-turn has to happen in order to send his fortunes into free fall.  That doesn’t make it any the less arbitrary.

    Plotlines and devices are used and dropped just as it suits Carax.  The police grill Henry about Ann’s death at sea; there’s no follow-up to this until Annette eventually – and implicitly – accuses him of ending her mother’s life as well as the Accompanist’s (whose disappearance has seemingly gone unnoticed).  Early on, Carax regularly inserts spoof TV show-business news reports on Henry and Ann – their wedding, the birth of Annette, rumours that Ann’s stellar success and Henry’s loss of popularity (shots of a ‘Sold Out’ notice outside one theatre, a ‘Cancelled’ notice outside another) are putting strains on the marriage.  Yet there’s no similar report of the sensational circumstances of Ann’s demise or that Henry is being questioned in connection with it.  The celeb gossip voiceover makes a brief return only when Annette becomes a star, when it sounds less excited than it should about such a phenomenon.  Not only does she sing like an angel, she can fly like one, too.

    One other nonsensical element deserves particular mention.  When they fall in love, Ann and Henry wander through a sunlit, paradisal landscape, intoning ‘We love each other so much’.  After Ann’s death, the Accompanist teaches this refrain to Annette.  He reveals – to Henry’s consternation – that he wrote it for Ann, the weedy lyrics conveying his and her feelings for one another.  This revelation also comes as a surprise to the film’s audience, who assumed ‘We love each other so much’ was – according to musical convention – a heightened expression of the singers’ emotions at the time.  By turning it into, instead, the creation of another character, are the makers of Annette daringly subverting genre expectations or just being careless?  Whichever it is, the effect is counterproductive.  Henry is enraged but the viewer can now only wonder where he thought the song came from when he was singing it with Ann.  (It’s not as if she launches into ‘We love each other …’ and Henry merely joins in, unaware that she’s alluding to her passion for another.)

    Adam Driver is becoming a highly versatile star and, on the evidence of Annette, game for anything – which is what impresses most about his work here.  Henry the stand-up dresses for the part.  He wears a hooded robe over boxer shorts – in both senses of the term.  His backstage warm-up suggests a fighter about to enter the ring – that’s how confrontational Henry is, and Driver’s onstage athletic contortions are quite something.  So that’s Adam, what about his Eve?  Ann is partial, and not just in the couple’s aforementioned Edenic surroundings, to crunching into a rosy red apple, though she never seems to get beyond the first bite.  Marion Cotillard wasn’t (according to Wikipedia) the first choice for Ann.  Rooney Mara was supposedly involved, then Michelle Williams.  I don’t know why they left the project but if they thought the role wasn’t up to much, they were right.  Cotillard is deft, charismatic and thoroughly underused (her opera voice is supplied by Catherine Trottman).  Simon Helberg’s previous movie appearance was five years ago, in Florence Foster Jenkins, where he also played the leading lady’s accompanist.  Helberg is somehow likeable in Annette, even though his character is a stupid concoction.  His last scene goes wrong, though.  When Henry starts threatening the Accompanist, shortly before drowning him, it makes no sense that, as he protests, Helberg moves towards the intimidating figure of Adam Driver.

    A sequence in which Ann watches women on a television screen claiming to be victims of Henry’s sexual abuse is revealed to be a dream but it’s still possible to discern a #MeToo thread – in the circumstances of Ann’s death, in the idea of a girl child taking on the voice of a silenced mother, in Annette’s eventual metamorphosis from marionette to flesh-and-blood-girl-with-agency.  When Henry takes to the stage, he’s announced as ‘the Ape of God’.  (He eats bananas, to complement Ann’s apples.)  After his wife has drowned, he develops an incriminating, beetroot-coloured mark on his right cheek that continues to grow.  There’s no doubting Annette is another Portrait of the Artist as a Bad Man yet its prevailing artful phoniness overshadows any political message that Carax and the Maels may have had in mind.  In the course of her first few years, Annette goes through nine puppet incarnations, all of them designed by Estelle Charlier and Romuald Collinet. The designs may be ingenious but the marionette child pays diminishing dividends – she’s a long-winded illustration of Henry’s treating the females in his life as ‘objects’, wanting to ‘manipulate’ them, etc.  The conception doesn’t add up anyway:  after all, the wooden puppet has agency enough to put her father behind bars (that’s assuming the Accompanist isn’t her father).

    In the prologue to Annette, Adam Driver, Marion Cotillard, Simon Helberg, the Maels and Devyn McDowell, who won’t be seen again until a few minutes before the end, walk towards camera.  Sort-of in character, sort-of as themselves, they chorus the opening number, ‘So May We Start’.  This meta opening isn’t complemented by the form of the film’s closing scene, which is probably its best.  It’s a relief in more ways than one when Annette grows out of her puppet form.  Devyn McDowell is a strong and, in this context, a refreshingly straightforward performer whose emotions feel honest.  Although this is damning with faint praise, the climactic sung exchange between Annette and Henry is more involving than any that’s gone before.   The silent ending, with the camera moving unobtrusively from Henry’s stricken face to the puppet on the cell floor, is surprisingly understated (and, to that extent, effective).   It should be said that Carax has the services of a brilliant cinematographer in Caroline Champetier (Of Gods and Men, Carax’s previous feature Holy Motors, The Innocents[1]), who has contrived for him many vividly arresting images.  I even laughed at one:  Carax cuts from the TV news about Henry and Ann’s plans to repair their marriage to their yacht, tossing in an angry sea against an ink-black sky.  But Champetier’s talents serve a futile exercise.

    At one point of finding Annette hard (and boring) to take, my mind went back to seeing François Ozon’s Frantz in the same cinema a few years ago – and to the woman who sat next to me but walked out before the feature got underway, so furious was she to discover (from me, in answer to her question) that Frantz was a foreign language film.  I wondered then what she’d expected, given the names of the picture, its director and the main actors.  I wondered now if, once bitten twice shy, she was steering clear of Annette.  That title could refer to a French person, Marion Cotillard might well be playing one, and what sort of a name is Leos Carax?  (An invented one:  he was born Alex Dupont.)  In fact, all the lyrics and nearly all the spoken words in this film are in English (there’s just a bit of French dialogue) but I hope the scandalised woman didn’t waste more than two hours of her life on Annette.

    Especially in view of what Carax seems to think of those who watch screens.  His voiceover at the start enjoins us, for the duration of the film to come, to keep inside whatever we may feel like expressing – his list includes, among other things, laughing, crying and farting.  The instruction suggests a jocular antipathy towards the audience.  There’s more of the same in the lampoon of the showbiz news reports and, less jocularly, in Henry’s fickle fans and the unthinking, worldwide worship of Annette.  These things seem to matter to the man behind the camera:  his musically and dramatically thin picture runs the risk of becoming primarily a condemnation of media hype and consumer appetites.  Members of the press and the public who are seduced by Annette run the risk of vindicating Leos Carax.

    8 September 2021

    [1]  The 2016 film also known as Agnus Dei.

  • The Man Who Sold His Skin

    ar-rajul allaḏī bāʿa ẓahrihu

    Kaouther Ben Hania (2020)

    Around fifteen years ago, a Swiss man called Tim Steiner agreed to be a human canvas for a new work by the Belgian controversialist artist Wim Delvoye.  The work, a tattoo that covers Steiner’s back, is described in a 2017 article on the BBC news website as ‘a Madonna crowned by a Mexican-style skull, with yellow rays emanating from her halo. … There are swooping swallows, red and blue roses, … at the base of Steiner’s back two Chinese-style koi fish, ridden by children, can be seen swimming past lotus flowers’.   The terms of Steiner’s contract stipulate that he sit topless in art galleries for a minimum of three shows annually.  The tattoo was still a work in progress when Steiner was first exhibited, in Zurich in 2006.  Since then, he’s appeared at various European venues, including the Louvre, as well as in China and Australia.  Delvoye’s work was sold in 2008 to Rik Reinking, a German art collector for 150,000 euros, of which Steiner received one third.  Reinking is thereby the contractual owner of part of Steiner.  When the latter dies, his back will be skinned and the skin framed permanently in Reinking’s collection.

    When he entered into this extraordinary agreement, Tim Steiner was the manager of a tattoo parlour and driven largely by a desire to help change perceptions of tattoo work.  ‘It’s the ultimate art form in my eyes,’ he told the BBC, ‘Tattooers are incredible artists who’ve never really been accepted in the contemporary art world’.  The protagonist and title character of The Man Who Sold His Skin, whose story is inspired by Tim Steiner’s, strikes a similar deal but from very different motives.  Soon after the start of the Syrian Civil War in 2011, Sam Ali (Yahya Mahayni) and his girlfriend Abeer (Dea Liane) are separated.  Sam flees the country for Lebanon;  in his absence, Abeer’s family arranges for her to marry what they consider a more suitable man – Ziad (Saad Lostan), a diplomat.  He’s posted to the Syrian embassy in Brussels, where Abeer finds work as a translator.  Sam is desperate to win her back but has neither the funds nor the paperwork to enter Belgium.  In Beirut, a chance meeting with Jeffrey Godefroi (Koen de Bouw), an internationally high-profile Belgian artist, gives Sam the chance to go to and get into Europe.  In exchange, Godefroi, who is pleased to describe himself as Mephistophelean, wants from Sam ‘not your soul but your back’.

    In other words, the Tunisian writer-director Kaouther Ben Hania uses the Steiner-Delvoye compact to create a fusion of migrant-crisis critique and art-market satire, and a synergy between the two.  The tattoo on Sam Ali’s back, nothing like the one on Tim Steiner’s, takes the form of a Schengen Visa.  It’s visual confirmation of a person becoming a sale-room commodity as a means to political asylum and personal security.  A powerful image and idea but how will they work as drama?  Ben Hania’s compelling set-up brought to mind Nadine Labaki’s Capernaum (2018), in which a Lebanese street kid sues his parents for bringing him into the world.  (The two films also have in common the same excellent cinematographer, Christopher Aoun.)  Labaki’s concept was essentially symbolic.  She either couldn’t or chose not to translate it into dramatic reality:  the courtroom scenes, with the boy’s parents in the dock, didn’t result in a verdict.  The Man Who Sold His Skin is more successful in realising its chief themes.  The true story behind it must have helped Ben Hania shape the screenplay but she still had plenty of inventing to do.  The narrative isn’t wholly satisfying but it’s always absorbing.  It leads to a finale which, while not believable as hard fact, is emotionally persuasive – and relieving.

    Sam incurs the Assad regime’s displeasure by proposing marriage to Abeer in hyperbolic language.  ‘Let’s start a revolution of love!’ he calls out on a busy train, one of whose passengers reports him to the authorities.  After being held in custody, he’s allowed to escape and is smuggled by his sister (Nadjoua Zouhair) in the boot of her car out of their home city of Raqqa and into Lebanon.  He spends a year doing menial, poorly paid jobs in Beirut.  It’s while he’s at an art gallery, stealing food from a buffet laid on for the opening of an exhibition, that he first encounters Godefroi – and takes up his offer:  Sam is prepared to do almost anything to be reunited with Abeer in Belgium, even though he knows she’s now married.  He’s obviously deemed not good enough by Abeer’s family, particularly her money-and-status-conscious mother (Raoudha Baccouche), but it’s not made clear what his work in Syria was, or how he and Abeer got together.  Sam has no problem holding up his end of a conversation with Godefroi on Faustian matters – and in English (like much of the dialogue – there’s some Arabic and French, too).  Ben Hania, in order to stress how desperately exploitable her hero is, evades the matter of his agency for much of the film.

    Godefroi’s project is viable because ‘it’s easier to move goods internationally than to move people’.  You accept the force of this striking statement although The Man Who Sold His Skin may still leave you wondering how exactly the process works in Sam’s case.  It emerges eventually that he has been given a temporary Belgian visa but how did he obtain it – as a human being, as distinct from an objet d’art emblazoned with a Schengen Visa?  Sam is being handled by well-connected people in the megabucks international art market:  are we meant just to take it as read that money talks?  And once Sam is in Brussels – on display at one of the city’s Royal Museums of Fine Arts by day, holed up miserably in a luxury hotel outside working hours – Ben Hania sometimes sacrifices credibility for the sake of immediate impact.

    A sequence at the museum where Sam’s on show, and its aftermath, are especially shaky.  He tells Abeer in one of their online meetings that he’s employed in Brussels as assistant to an artist, without revealing the true nature of this work.  Abeer and Ziad happen to visit the gallery exhibiting Sam just as protesters against the exploitation of Syrian refugees are demonstrating there.  The gallery’s security consists of a lone man in a suit; in an earlier scene, he forbids Sam to speak to a group of kids on a school trip but he’s helpless to prevent either the demonstration or Ziad, after argy-bargy with Sam, from venting his anger on another art work, one less able to fight back.  Ziad’s startlingly undiplomatic behaviour has similarly improbable consequences:  Abeer asks Sam to use his influence to dissuade the museum from pressing charges against her husband; Sam is reasonably astonished by the request but he has a word with people in Godefroi’s team that seems to do the trick.  Although Ziad, in causing wilful damage to a valuable painting, presumably broke the law (in the presence of many witnesses), there’s no suggestion of police interest in what he’s done.  Sam has been attracting media attention but there’s no evidence either of press or television coverage of the fracas in the museum, which would surely lose Ziad his job.

    Yet Ben Hania illustrates the ironies of the hero’s situation succinctly and effectively.  His servitude in Western Europe may be soul-destroying but at least Sam is relatively safe there:  he discovers in a distressing FaceTime with his mother (Darina Al Joundi) that she can no longer walk, the result of injuries sustained in a bomb attack in Raqqa.  Later on, when Sam’s actions lead to his arrest in Brussels, he breathes more easily behind bars than he ever seemed to do in his five-star hotel room.  Ben Hania’s satirical blows often land on target – as when, to Godefroi’s consternation, a large pimple develops on Sam’s back.  The offending, devaluing object has to be removed surgically:  the close-up popping of the pimple is gruesome watching.  During Sam’s absence from the gallery, a notice of apology explains that ‘this work is being restored’.

    What happens in the film’s climax is increasingly extraordinary but a combination of rapid plot twists and emotional momentum makes all this easier to accept than the smaller-scale implausibility of Ziad’s eruption in the museum and surrounding events.  At a plush auction house, Sam sits on stage, a lot for sale.  On completion of the bidding, he goes berserk, runs yelling from the stage into the aisle between the rows of seats and takes out of his trousers what may be a detonator.  The terrified assembly heads for the exits:  it’s a mark of how strongly Ben Hania has built up antipathy to the forces confronting Sam that, while you wouldn’t want to see them blown up by a suicide bomber, it’s pleasing to witness their humiliating, well-heeled panic.  Now things start to work in Sam’s favour.  Claiming to speak only his mother tongue, he’s interviewed in a jail cell with the help of a translator who turns out to be Abeer:  the francophone official with them is oblivious to her informing the prisoner that she has left her husband.  When he appears in court, Sam is cleared of any law-breaking beyond remaining in Belgium beyond his visa’s expiry date.  He’s promptly returned to Syria – and a kind of liberty.

    By this stage, the shrewdly subversive Jeffrey Godefroi is on Sam’s side.  It must be Godefroi who’s responsible for the standout legerdemain in the closing stages of The Man Who Sold His Skin.  Shortly after Sam’s repatriation, a video appears online that shows him being executed.  It’s a fake:  in the final sequence, Sam is revealed to be alive and well, and living with Abeer and his pet cat, which hasn’t been seen since the film’s opening scene, when Sam was woken in the night and arrested, thanks to his intemperate marriage proposal.  The household appears to be living a sequestered life but Sam, in a video call with Godefroi, describes himself as a free man who ‘was always a free man’.  It’s anyone’s guess at what stage Godefroi starts to help rather than commodify the protagonist, or how secure or otherwise Sam really is in his new habitat.  But Kaouther Ben Hania, against huge odds, contrives to deliver something approaching a feelgood ending.

    The Man Who Sold His Skin was nominated for Best International Film at this year’s Oscars.  It’s one more addition to the list of films that would have deserved the award than the actual winner, Another Round.  That list includes, as well as fellow nominees Collective and Quo Vadis, Aida?, Dear Comrades! (which only made the ‘short list’ of fifteen), Charlatan (which didn’t even make that) and Minari (ineligible for consideration, even though most of the dialogue is Korean).  I expect the list will lengthen further as I get round to more of the other possibilities.  (Any regular readers of these notes will know that Another Round is a persisting bee in my bonnet.)

    Yahya Mahayni gives a fine performance in the lead role.  He creates a character that is thoroughly convincing even when the events involving Sam are not.  Mahayni isn’t tall, which helps reinforce the little-guy-up-against-it dimension of the story; he’s also muscular and strong-jawed, which is right for Sam’s resilience.  Most of the supporting performances aren’t so satisfying.  While it’s never hard to believe that Sam is besotted with the beautiful Abeer, Dea Liane doesn’t do enough (or Ben Hania doesn’t give her the material needed) to suggest that Abeer is equally committed to Sam.  Saad Lostan is excessively dislikeable in the admittedly thankless role of Ziad.  The playing of the best-known European actors – Koen de Bouw as Godefroi and Monica Bellucci as his gallerist – is a bit too deliberate.  Ben Hania has de Bouw wear black eyeliner to stress Godefroi’s diabolical aspect:  since the actor already has dark eyes that magnetise the camera, the effect is too much.  This isn’t a criticism that can be levelled, however, at Wim Delvoye, whose work inspired the film and who makes a cameo appearance as an insurance man.  His face is almost fascinatingly nondescript.   There’s a matching soullessness in Delvoye’s voice as his character summarises what kind of death Sam Ali will need to die in order for his owners’ insurance policy to pay out.

    4 September 2021

Posts navigation