Monthly Archives: March 2021

  • Spring Blossom

    Seize printemps

    Suzanne Lindon (2020)

    Oh for a C K Scott Moncrieff to turn French film titles into English … His versions of the volume names in A la recherche du temps perdu emulated Proust’s originals – especially Within a Budding Grove, imaginative but thoroughly true to the spirit of the French (A l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs).  Spring Blossom, on the other hand, is a tired tag for the story of a teenage girl’s first love.  It’s true Seize printemps, which closed this year’s Glasgow Film Festival, isn’t easily rendered as English idiom but even a literal translation (‘Sixteen Spring’) would have been preferable.  Because it’s trite, Spring Blossom has the incongruously musty ring of an older person’s nostalgic reflections on youthful experience.  Yet Suzanne Lindon, at the time the film was made, was only twenty – an extraordinary age at which to direct, as well as write and play the lead in, your first cinema feature.

    The sixteen-year-old protagonist, also called Suzanne, is a lycée student in Paris, where she lives with her parents (Frédéric Pierrot and Florence Viala) and elder sister (Rebecca Marder).  Suzanne isn’t socially isolated – in the first scene we see her drinking in a café with schoolmates – but she seems removed from the rest of the group and tends to spend her evenings at home, preparing for exams.  When, unusually, she goes to a party, she sits on the sidelines, disengaged.  After a couple of sips from a bottle of beer, she offers it to the girl beside her, remarking that beer is boring.  (Suzanne’s preferred drink is grenadine and lemonade.)  The same girl invites her to rate the boys at the party on a scale from 1 to 10.  Suzanne declares that rating people in this way is horrible idea.  She also says she’d give all the boys a 5.

    At this point in Spring Blossom, Suzanne has already taken notice of a thirtyish man glimpsed through a café window.  She sees him again, getting off a red scooter, close to the theatre which she passes every day en route to and from school.  She’s soon looking out for him and, when she discovers he’s appearing in a play at the theatre, sneaks into the auditorium to watch a rehearsal, unnoticed by the director (Dominique Besnehard) and the cast members.  The actor’s name is Raphaël, and he’s played by Arnaud Valois (120 Beats per Minute) – so a bit more than a 5 out of 10.  Next time she sees him outside the café, Suzanne sits down at a nearby table and a conversation between them starts.  It isn’t long before Raphaël too is trying grenadine and lemonade.  He enthuses but has to get back to the theatre and leaves most of his drink.  After he’s gone Suzanne starts to sip the remainder, through the straw in his glass.

    In time, Suzanne and Raphaël will appear in public together, hold each other and kiss but that’s as far as their relationship goes physically.  Spring Blossom is vivid proof that a passion taking place largely inside a character’s head can be as dramatically satisfying as a full-blown affair.  Lindon achieves this largely through funny, credible details, illustrating, for example, an infatuate’s need to keep the object of their affections both continuously in mind and a secret.  One morning, Raphaël has a problem with his scooter; on another early sighting of him, he’s at his café table eating bread covered in red conserve.  At home, Suzanne asks her nonplussed father questions about leaking engines and her mother for a strawberry jam tartine.  Her parents discuss going out for the evening.  She recommends (though to deaf ears) a theatre visit.

    After Raphaël has asked to see her again, Suzanne, as she walks home, breaks into a celebratory dance – the first and simplest of three choreographed sequences in Spring Blossom.  It’s remarkable how easily Lindon introduces these bursts of unrealism into her predominantly naturalistic narrative:  they function virtually as numbers in a musical – as expressions, that is, of the heightened emotions of the characters concerned.  (In an interview for the Glasgow Film Festival, Lindon told Allison Gardner, the Festival’s co-director, that the choreography was Pina Bausch-inspired.)  By the time that Suzanne and Raphaël perform a gravely elegant pas de deux on the stage of the deserted theatre, the formal novelty is wearing thin but the intervening duet is a real highlight.  Side by side at the café, they listen to a piece of music – she through his headphones, he from memory (the music is used as the overture to the play he’s in).  They stay seated, moving their heads, shoulders and hands in unison – a witty, lyrical expression of their rapport.

    Suzanne is clever, reads grown-up fiction (like Boris Vian’s J’irai cracher sur vos tombes) and is an emotional beginner.  But it’s she who  makes the romantic running, trying to be noticed by a man revealed to be nineteen years her senior.  Lindon seems well aware of the sensitive nature of her scenario:  at the theatre, Raphaël’s character in the play is called Erastes – a term applied in Ancient Greece to an older man in a sexual relationship with an adolescent boy.  The writer-director is doubtless aware too that Spring Blossom could nowadays be acceptable only as the work of a woman film-maker – perhaps only a young woman film-maker.

    Lindon’s age brings to mind a French literary predecessor, Françoise Sagan, who was only eighteen when her debut novel, Bonjour Tristesse, was published in 1954 (and an overnight sensation).  There are big dissimilarities between the two, however.  By the end of the book, Sagan’s seventeen-year-old heroine, Cécile, is precociously regretful – a frame of mind very different from Suzanne’s at the end of Spring Blossom.  Also different is the treatment of fathers.  Whereas Cécile’s is a heartless philanderer, Suzanne’s is loving and attentive; so too her mother but it’s the excellent Frédéric Pierrot’s portrait of the dad that holds your attention.  This droll, normally relaxed fellow gets concerned by his daughter’s increasingly puzzling behaviour.  She arrives in her parents’ bedroom at 2am; when her father asks what the matter is, Suzanne doesn’t seem to know.  Allison Gardner commented in their Festival interview on the positive characterisation of the parents, Suzanne Lindon replied that she wanted to express thanks for the upbringing she received from her own, famous father (Vincent Lindon) and mother (Sandrine Kiberlain).

    Lindon was even younger than Sagan – and a year younger than the film’s Suzanne – when she wrote this script.  At that age, you travel, between one year and the next, what seems a long way; by the time she made the film, Lindon may have felt far removed from her sixteen-year-old self (perhaps especially if the girls playing Suzanne’s school contemporaries really were their characters’ age).  For whatever reason – her inexperience as a screen actor (and director) could also explain it – she sometimes over-interprets Suzanne’s immaturity, her ‘difference’ from the other girls.  She has shadow movements like tugging at her ponytail; twiddling the straw in her glass of grenadine, she gazes into the middle distance, too determinedly distracted.  Lindon is a distinctive and charming performer, though, and very likeable.  Her gamine looks (the dark hair and firm jawline occasionally suggest the young Amélie Mauresmo) are complemented by a fine, toothy grin.

    The character of Raphaël is underwritten – I assume intentionally and I think effectively.  What compels a man like this, apparently well equipped to have his pick of romantic companions, to return the feelings of an eccentric teenager?  I didn’t know but didn’t mind.  Suzanne’s perspective dominates the film; Raphaël’s lack of definition allows him to be her ideal man – without any troubling qualities emerging to complicate the issue.  This only works, however, thanks to the soulful Arnaud Valois.  His Raphaël is an opaque but unarguably romantic presence, though Lindon leavens that impression with an amusing detail.  Raphaël always wears a suit and tie to the theatre.  They give him the look of a cool office worker rather than a bohemian fantasy.

    Spring Blossom’s regular supply of humour doesn’t detract from its emotive heft:  in combining the two, Lindon achieves quite a balancing act.  At the theatre, a melancholy Raphaël admits to fears of no longer knowing how to act; his director tells him he’s just tired.  After declining invitations from his fellow actors to go for a drink, Raphaël eventually joins them in the company of Suzanne, who finds herself on the receiving end of an anxiously egocentric, very funny monologue from the play’s set designer (Philippe Uchan).  The costuming of the principals at this gathering gives emblems of passion a light-hearted twist.  Suzanne wears a fluffy red cardigan over her customary white shirt, and a red scrunchie in her hair; Raphaël has swapped his trademark blue tie for a red one.  These wardrobe details reinforce the red motif in the story’s romantic trajectory – the scooter, the jam, the grenadine.

    They may show their true colour at the drinks party but Suzanne and Raphaël also know by now that their days together are numbered – unless their amour becomes one of a different kind, which it doesn’t.  Without explaining the end of the chaste affair, Lindon makes it make sense.  Suzanne breaks down in tears as she tells her mother that ‘I fell in love with an adult and he’s in love with me too’.  She soon gets over the upset, though.  In the closing sequence, she’s able to stop briefly outside the theatre, grin and walk on.  Spring Blossom is an exceptionally short feature – 73 minutes.  That brevity seems right for the tale of a relationship that comes and goes quickly (I hate to say like spring blossom, though that was clearly in the translator’s mind).  Even so, you feel it won’t quickly be forgotten by Suzanne.  And while it’s too soon to praise her namesake’s film debut as memorable, I won’t be surprised if it proves to be.

    8 March 2021

     

  • First Cow

    Kelly Reichardt (2019)

    An early shot in Kelly Reichardt’s latest film shows a riverboat, the ‘Belle – – -‘ (I couldn’t make out the last three letters), which gradually crosses the screen.  The boat’s name and rate of progress are a taste of things to come.  First Cow, shown at this year’s Glasgow Film Festival, often looks beautiful.  It also moves very slowly indeed.  The action, if that’s the word, takes place in what was, before settlement and statehood, Oregon Country.   The time is the early nineteenth century, except for a prologue which, effectively, draws the viewer in.  In the present day, a young woman (Alia Shawkat) walks her dog in Oregon woodland.  The animal begins scratching at something just below the topsoil.  It’s a skull; the dog-walker investigates further and discovers two human skeletons side by side.  The camera stays on the same patch of ground.  Now a thirty-something man is gathering mushrooms there.  We’re no longer in the present day.  The forager is Otis Figowitz (John Magaro), known as Cookie because of his job, as a travelling chef for a fur trapping company.

    It’s soon clear that the bones to be discovered two centuries later will be those of Cookie and King-Lu (Orion Lee), a Chinese immigrant and the other main character.  When the pair first meets, King-Lu is hiding in the woods, having killed a Russian (in self-defence) and being hunted by the victim’s compatriots.  Cookie lets King-Lu sleep in his tent before the Chinese escapes early next morning across a river.  Reichardt never makes the identity of the skeletons explicitly clear but her closing image is of Cookie and King-Lu lying down to rest, side by side, in woodland, and unaware they’re being tracked by a gunman.  And that’s not all.  At the start, the taciturn, doleful Cookie is bullied by a band of trappers, who complain he’s not feeding them properly.  The thrust of the story to follow is that, even in a still primitive capitalist world, the odds are stacked against the likes of King-Lu and (especially) Cookie.  The meek shall inherit the earth only in the sense of ending up in it.

    What seems to be a couple of years after their first encounter, the protagonists bump into each other again, in a saloon bar.  King-Lu now lives in a woodland shack and invites Cookie back there.  The two men hit it off (in an understated way, of course) and summarise their personal histories and hopes.  The internationally travelled King-Lu wants to farm.  Cookie, who moved from his native Maryland in order to find work, would like to run his own bakery and, one day, a hotel in San Francisco.  King-Lu mentions the recent arrival in Oregon Country of its first cow, shipped from California (though breeding plans have been delayed:  a bull and calf accompanying the cow both died on the journey).  Its owner is an Englishman, referred to as the Chief Factor[1] (and not otherwise named), who also owns, again uniquely in the area, a large house with grounds.  Cookie, who once worked for a baker in Boston, reckons he could make a living if he had access to a cow.  He and King-Lu decide to sneak into the Factor’s property under cover of darkness to milk the animal.  They’re soon doing this regularly.  Cookie uses the stolen goods to make so-called ‘oily cakes’.

    These are soon selling like, well, hot cakes.  Customers inquire about the recipe but the baker and King-Lu keep their trade secret, mentioning only a ‘secret Chinese ingredient’.  Even as they rake in cash, one waits impatiently for the tide to turn.  It has to, not only because, as the savvier King-Lu points out, the window of commercial opportunity is narrow – their milch cow won’t be the only cow in town for long.  It’s also because Cookie, whenever he’s on screen, announces that things will go wrong (he looks as if he’s read the script).  King-Lu tempers his friend’s hotelier dream with realism but doesn’t need to:  John Magaro’s expression makes clear that Cookie has no more chance of making it in Frisco than Midnight Cowboy‘s principals had of sharing the good life in Florida.  Orion Lee’s emotionally suppler King-Lu is likeable but it’s only the lovely, light-brown cow that brings an occasional smile to Cookie’s face and gets him talking easily, as he sits milking her.

    The Chief Factor is much discussed before he actually appears; the fact that he’ll be played by Toby Jones adds to the sense of anticipation.  Jones reaches the screen 1:08:40 into the two-hour film and briefly gives it a shot in the arm.  When the Factor first tries one of the oily cakes it brings on almost a Proust’s madeleine moment.  ‘I taste London in this’, the Factor declares, waxing nostalgic about a bakery he once patronised in South Kensington.  He promptly commissions Cookie to bake a clafoutis for the forthcoming visit to his home of an army captain.  The latter’s scorn for unsophisticated frontier life riles the Englishman, who informs Cookie that ‘I mean to humiliate him’.  (Courtesy of the posh flan, though the fruit in it, faute de mieux, will be humble blueberries.)  The different notes struck by the Factor in his opening scene amount – in this film – to relative complexity of character and Toby Jones makes the most of the opportunity but it’s about the only one he has.  From this point on, the Factor is strictly a grandee manqué.  The declared intention to worst his guest backfires.  It’s the host who ends up looking silly.

    The episode on the Factor’s property is striking thanks largely to his household’s diversity.  He’s married to a Native American (Lily Gladstone) whose extended family, including her father (Gary Farmer), also lives in the house.  She’s on screen for only a few minutes but Lily Gladstone, who made a strong impression in a larger role in Reichardt’s previous (and much better) film, Certain Women (2016), is a remarkable presence.  The Factor’s wife, a handsome woman and modestly gracious hostess, wears a gown that contradicts her ethnicity, and the traditional tribal costume of her relatives:  her fancy dress might almost be fancy dress.  Her husband means to keep it that way, and to assert his Eurocentric credentials when he asks the visiting captain (Scott Shepherd), recently in France, about latest Paris fashions and ‘couleurs du jour’.  Showing off his cow, the Factor details her fancy European pedigree (part Alderney, part Froment du Léon).  The captain is duly impressed by the clafoutis but the Factor, as he offers his guest cream for his tea, admits his cow produces barely any milk.  The puzzle as to why is solved that night, when the intruders’ milking routine is disturbed.  The superior captain is on hand to witness the Factor’s mortifying discovery.

    The remainder of the story consists largely of Cookie and King-Lu’s trying to avoid retribution for stealing the milk and humiliating the local bigwig.  It comes as almost a relief when, for a few screen minutes, the main characters are literally on the run from the Factor’s men (led by Ewan Bremner) but the pursuit, more often, seems hardly more energetic than what’s gone before.  First Cow has been admired as, among other things, a ‘neo-western’.  This viewer is poorly qualified to say what a western, neo- or otherwise, should be but even I felt starved of incident.  Experts may disagree but Reichardt’s recreation of the time and place struck me as scrupulously realistic – in, for example, a scene in a market place, with vendors of different nationalities, and the sequence in the saloon where Cookie and King-Lu meet up again.  But this recreation seems to be the limit of the film’s invention.  It provides a context not for action but for a mood of persisting pessimism.  This is sometimes jarringly expressed, as when King-Lu sententiously quotes the overheard conversation between the Chief Factor and the captain, telling Cookie, ‘There are no Empire silhouettes or couleurs du jour for us’.

    Reichardt wrote the screenplay with Jon Raymond, author of scripts for other films she’s made and of the 2004 novel, The Half-Life, on which this was one is based.  (Perhaps it’s not surprising the title was changed – not that First Cow screams box office but at least it’s a fair description of the subject.)  First Cow has been widely praised, with (to date) 161 positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes from a total of 169.  Simply because the pair seldom agree, it’s worth noting that the few naysayers include Richard Brody and Armond White but the summary comments of two other green-splodge dissenters are especially pertinent.  Charles Solomon (Filmweek – KPCC-NPR Los Angeles) complains that he ‘could not make out much of the dialogue and a lot of [the film] is so under-lit’.  Louisa Moore (Screen Zealots) is ‘shocked First Cow has found its place atop so many “best of the year” lists, which is precisely why people generally don’t trust film critics’.  Moore’s review appeared on the last day of last year; she was probably, and reasonably, reeling from the recent news that the New York Film Critics Circle had declared First Cow the best film of 2020[2]!   When Solomon complains about under-lighting, he may mean darkness.  Christopher Blauvelt’s lighting seemed to me masterly in daytime sequences, particularly the woodland ones, but there’s no denying that a big chunk of the film – the first meeting of Cookie and King-Lu, their visits to the Factor’s estate – happens at night.  I watched the film online with subtitles:  without them, I, like Solomon, wouldn’t have heard much at all.

    Reichardt’s film features various birds and beasts in addition to the title character and the canine excavator at the start.  At one point a mongrel dog runs into shot and stands on its hind legs, tail wagging, to sniff round a basket of oily cakes.  It then turns and looks into the camera, as if asking, ‘Was that OK or do you want another take?’   This mutt’s cheerful histrionics made a refreshing change from the meticulously downbeat human acting, of John Magaro in particular.  I keep having to stop myself calling the movie Poor Cow arguably a more appropriate name in this case than it was for Ken Loach’s 1967 drama (which is, in several ways, one of his more cheerful pieces).  Confirmation in a film’s closing titles that animal action was monitored by American Humane is always welcome.  But the tedium of First Cow, with its snail’s-pace storytelling and drab theme, is pervasive.  I was left wanting assurance that no animals were bored in the making of this picture.

    6 March 2021

    [1] According to Wikipedia, factors, in the period in question, were ‘mercantile intermediaries whose main functions were warehousing and selling consigned goods, accounting to principals for the proceeds, guaranteeing buyers’ credit, and sometimes making cash advances to principals prior to the actual sale of the goods. Their services were of particular value in foreign trade, and factors became important figures in the great period of colonial exploration and development’.

    [2] First Cow premiered at the 2019 Telluride Festival, hence its IMDb year date, but wasn’t released theatrically in the US until early March 2020.

Posts navigation