Daily Archives: Monday, November 26, 2018

  • The Guilty

    Den skyldige

    Gustav Möller (2018)

    The setting of Gustav Möller’s The Guilty is a police control room in Copenhagen.  Asger Holm (Jakob Cedergren) is on the evening shift there, answering emergency phone calls and initiating follow-up action to them.   It quite soon emerges that Asger is due to appear in court the next day regarding an incident that led to his suspension from normal police duties and assignment to the control room.  He takes a call from a woman, Iben (Jessica Dinnage), who seems to have been kidnapped by her estranged husband Michael (Johan Olsen).  They’re on the road, in his van; their two young children are still at home.  On Asger’s advice, Iben, as they converse, pretends to be talking to her six-year-old daughter so as not to arouse Michael’s suspicions.  After his shift has ended, Asger moves into an adjoining office, where he continues to makes calls, on a police phone and on his own.  When fellow police officers go to Ibn’s apartment, they find the other child, a baby boy, dead and apparently murdered.

    From a call he makes to his colleague Rashid (Omar Shargawi), we learn that Asger’s wife has recently left him and that Rashid will be giving evidence – false evidence – on his behalf in court.  The nature of the incident that caused Asger’s suspension isn’t revealed until a few minutes before the end of The Guilty.  His reactions to the other calls he takes express near-contempt for the callers – among them, a drug addict and a man who’s been robbed in a red light district.  This partly reflects Asger’s frustration with the demeaning job he’s currently doing.  It’s soon clear that he’s used to issuing orders.  In fact, he can’t stop doing so:  preoccupied with trying to help Iben, he exceeds his control room responsibilities.

    This Danish film takes place not only in a single interior location but also in virtually real time.  Its effectiveness as a drama depends greatly on these two features.   Of the four actors mentioned above, all except Jakob Cedergren are heard but never seen.  The Guilty, written by the director and Emil Nygaard Albertsen, isn’t a work of great imagination.  Though the plot is neatly constructed and worked out, it doesn’t come as a major surprise that Asger misunderstands Iben’s situation and, in trying to make things better, makes them worse.  But the film is absorbing, commendably compact (85 minutes) and fortified by a fine lead performance.   I saw The Guilty at Curzon Bloomsbury just an hour or so after watching Widows there.  The intentional and intelligent claustrophobia of Möller’s movie was welcome after a term of imprisonment with Steve McQueen’s protracted, explosive, tumid one.

    In a lukewarm review in the TLS, Adam Mars-Jones likens The Guilty to ‘a supercharged radio play rather than an authentically cinematic experience’.   It’s true that, as Mars-Jones also says, the sound design is one of the film’s chief assets but the visual simplicity and immobility have a pull of their own.  (A rare moment of dynamic movement is also a rare forced moment:  Asger, eventually realising his mistake, furiously throws office furniture around in a way that seems bound to attract the attention of colleagues in the adjoining control room but doesn’t.)  The Guilty is definitely a substantial screen experience.  Whether it would lose anything as a television rather than a cinema piece is more arguable but the ambience of a film theatre certainly sharpens awareness of the piece’s formal distinctiveness in a way that a living-room armchair seat would not.

    Mars-Jones describes Jakob Cedergren’s face as ‘blandly handsome’, which may largely explain why he found the film, in which that face is the dominant image, underwhelming.  I’d be surprised if many viewers see the main actor as Mars-Jones does.  Cedergren’s long, bony countenance has a deep-set belligerence that’s both interesting and intimidating.  It’s obviously crucial that he doesn’t reveal things too quickly and he’s very good at encouraging us to read his character in different ways.  Rightly so, because Asger’s motives are so mixed:  in his efforts to help Iben, he’s trying to do the right thing, to resume the proper police work he’s been prevented from doing and, it gradually becomes clear, somehow to atone for the incident that’s landed him in court.  It struck me as surprising that Asger was on duty on the eve of a morning court appearance but I didn’t find it hard to accept this is as dramatic necessity.  Besides, it’s increasingly easy to believe that his prolongation of the control room stint is partly a means of postponing what’s in the diary the next day.

    Michael and Iben turn out to be heading to a psychiatric hospital in Elsinore – a location that, for a non-Danish viewer anyway, brings Hamlet unhelpfully, almost comically, to mind.  That’s hardly Gustav Möller’s fault, though, and he handles the closing stages splendidly.  Just when Asger thinks he’s responsible for another death, a voice on the other end of the phone tells him that Iben is safe and congratulates Asger on his good work.   In the film’s last scene, as he prepares to exit the control room area, he makes one more phone call – to whom we don’t know:  the call hasn’t been answered by the time the screen goes dark.  This concluding attempt to make contact makes emotional sense.  The events of the evening may have finished Asger’s career.  Yet the experience, including what he confesses to Iben, is also cathartic.  He leaves the office both more and less isolated than he was when the shift began.

    13 November 2018

  • Widows

    Steve McQueen (2018)

    In his Sight & Sound (October 2018) piece ‘The Class Ceiling’, Danny Leigh deplored the social narrowness of present-day British cinema, in terms of both the subject matter of films and the personnel making and appearing in them.  ‘As for working-class writers and directors with their own distinctive voice …,’ wrote Leigh, ‘well, let’s have a headcount.  Lynne Ramsay?  Yann Demange?  Steve McQueen?  All making films in America …’  In the case of Steve McQueen, whose last film was 12 Years a Slave five years ago, the real pity is that he’s taking advantage of the supposedly greater range of opportunities available across the Atlantic by making a movie like Widows.

    This is a reworking by McQueen and Gillian (Gone Girl) Flynn of the 1983 ITV drama serial of the same name, written by Lynda LaPlante, in which the wives of three professional criminals, whose husbands are killed in an armed robbery that goes wrong, decide to carry out the same heist themselves and do so successfully.  McQueen’s Widows is a shrewdly calculated package.  As Eric Kohn of IndieWire says (as a compliment), ‘The movie engages with topics as complex as sexism, police brutality, and interracial marriage, but it still delivers on the car chases and gunplay’.   The marketing of the film as feminist is fair enough, even though it’s hardly ground-breaking in that sense:  the plot is essentially unchanged from LaPlante’s thirty-five-year-old original.  Although one of the original TV widows was played by an actress of colour (Eva Mottley), the racial diversity of the film’s cast is a more substantial advance.  Fashionable inventions for the big-screen Widows include a corrupt political dynasty fighting to retain electoral power in the South Side district of Chicago where the action takes place.

    The character of the senior widow has been reshaped so that the audience can root for her to pull off the robbery safe in the knowledge that she’s also a cut above.  (The reshaping may also be designed to help keep Widows‘ feminist pretensions intact.)  In the TV version of Widows, Ann Mitchell’s East Ender Dolly Rawlins was a loyal, hard-as-nails criminal consort.  Her cinema counterpart Veronica Rawlings (Viola Davis) is in love with her armed-robber husband Harry (Liam Neeson) but says at one point, ‘I never thought I’d marry a white man and a criminal’, to reassure us that she’s well aware that both these things are infra dig.  Veronica’s background is in teaching.  When she meets the aged political boss Tom Mulligan (Robert Duvall), she reminds him they’ve met once before, when she was a teachers’ union representative.  Veronica eventually donates a large part of her share of the heist proceeds to endow a school library, to be named in memory of her late son, the innocent victim of a white police officer’s bullet.

    Steve McQueen exploits Viola Davis’s talents in an attempt to give his flashy film depth and even nobility.   The attempt is only partly successful.  McQueen means Veronica to be distinctive but Davis is incongruous.  Widows showcases her powerhouse emotionality (including the now trademark expression, as proof of intense feeling, not just of tears but of a snot stream too).  Davis’s authority, natural truthfulness and emotive strength as an actress are seductive for a while but counterproductive well before the film is over:  they expose its mechanics and priorities.  This is most apparent when Veronica finds out that Harry didn’t die in the robbery – that he’s still alive and in a relationship with another woman (Carrie Coon), whose baby is Harry’s child.  The impact Davis has made in earlier, less pivotal scenes draws attention to McQueen’s refusal to give this discovery the dramatic attention it needs – he’s not going to hold up the plot to dwell on character.  As a result, Davis conveys only that Veronica is upset:  she has no opportunity to describe the complex realisation that the man she loved and thought was dead is still alive, and that he has betrayed her.

    Viola Davis’s presence and effect in Widows brings to mind her award-winning performance on television in How to Get Away with Murder – a ‘show’ I found unwatchable for more than a couple of episodes because a show was so evidently all it amounted to.  Davis has spoken publicly of her determination, after The Help (2011), not to play any more maidservants.  This is understandable, to say the least, but I hope she’s not going to overcompensate by opting to play strong, independent women even when the role is poorly conceived and doesn’t suit her.

    The best supporting work in Widows comes from Elizabeth Debicki, Cynthia Erivo and Daniel Kaluuya.  Debicki is Alice, one of the other widows, who has turned to escort work to keep herself.  There’s a moment quite early on when Alice swaggers out of a shop, chomping a huge sandwich, that doesn’t bode well:  McQueen seems keen to present her as a kickass heroine cartoonishly – something which Debicki’s exceptional height makes it easier to do.  A lot of what follows in her portrait of Alice is more imaginatively droll.  Erivo, whose character and playing are agreeably straightforward, is Belle, a beautician who babysits for the other widow Linda (Michelle Rodriguez) and who joins the heist team as driver after Veronica’s loyal chauffeur (Garret Dillahunt) is murdered.  Kaluuya is Jatemme, the psychopathic brother and enforcer of the local crime boss (Brian Tyree Henry) who is running for political office against Tom Mulligan’s son Jack (Colin Farrell).  The role of Jatemme is thin but Kaluuya is witty even just standing in silent menace, as he’s required repeatedly to do.

    The dramatic shallowness of Widows is instanced by a showdown dialogue between the Mulligans – the physically frail but still unscrupulous oldster vs the shyster son-who’ll-never-be-the-bastard-his-father-was.  The upper hand in the argument switches back and forth with almost comical frequency:  Robert Duvall and Colin Farrell have a job to keep up.  More interesting – as an illustration of how the screenplay’s political savvy operates – is a sequence that, until it delivers its punchline, is tonally atypical of the film – that is, quiet.   Researching the site of the planned robbery, Linda finds out the name of the architect who designed the building and visits this woman’s home.  The architect’s husband (Philip Rayburn Smith) opens the door and lets Linda in (improbably, in the circumstances, but that’s beside the point).  It turns out the architect has recently died; when Linda makes it obvious she didn’t know this, the husband realises she’s not bona fide and gets angry – but not for long.  Within a few screen seconds, this meeting of widow and widower has the latter making a clumsy pass after Linda:  he is, after all, a white male.  The action is inexplicable in terms of the personality that Philip Rayburn Smith, in a skilful cameo, has already suggested.  It’s almost inevitable in view of the way Widows presses audience buttons.

    Crackerjack editing by Joe Walker ensures that the action sequences are properly dynamic.    Sean Bobbitt’s lighting sometimes gives the regularly violent proceedings an almost apocalyptic look, which may be meant to remind us that Steve McQueen is a cinema artist but is also partly responsible for the movie’s heavy, inflated feel.  McQueen chose the right man to write the score:  the combination of thudding high energy and portentousness, just what you expect from Hans Zimmer, is an accurate expression of the movie’s split personality.  But the ‘serious’ side of Zimmer’s music also contributes to the ponderous quality of Widows – which seems to go on much longer than the 128 minutes that it actually runs.   The film currently has a 91% ‘fresh’ rating on Rotten Tomatoes, where the capsule ‘Critics Consensus’ describes it as ‘a heist thriller that mixes popcorn entertainment with a message …’.  The fundamental message, beneath the politically cute one, is that the people who made the film think they know what makes box-office sense; yet although it’s already recouped nearly the whole of its $42m budget, the picture has not been the smash that the hype and the critical reception might have predicted.  It’s something of a relief, given the pretty sophisticated commercial planning behind Widows, that some viewers have decided to take their popcorn elsewhere.

    13 November 2018