Monthly Archives: October 2018

  • Thunder Road

    Jim Cummings (2018)

    Thunder Road, showing at the London Film Festival, begins with a funeral service and a eulogy delivered by the dead woman’s son.  We first see Jim Arnaud, dressed in his police officer’s uniform, near the entrance to the chapel.  He’s checking anxiously that a pink boombox, which doesn’t look as if it belongs to him, is in working order.  Once Jim comes to the front of the chapel to speak, he faces the camera and it stays on him almost continuously for the next ten minutes.  During this time, Jim rambles, dries briefly and starts crying whenever he recalls being ‘mean’ to his mother.   When he turns on the boombox – to play one of her favourite songs, Bruce Springsteen’s ‘Thunder Road’ – nothing happens.   So Jim describes to the gathering the song’s lyrics and what they meant to his mother.  He starts moving to the music he can hear in his head.

    I knew beforehand that Thunder Road was about a man who suffers a breakdown following the death of his mother.  Even allowing that this is the funeral of someone near and dear to him, the long opening sequence shows Jim emotionally out of control to an exceptional degree:  here is a man having something close to a breakdown before our eyes.  The impression is intensified because the camera doesn’t let us look away.  We see only a little reaction from others present, shocked though they must be by what they’re witnessing.  The impact of this introduction is unquestionable.  You wonder how the writer-director Jim Cummings, who also plays Jim, is going to take things forward.

    Jim and his wife Ros (Jocelyn DeBoer) are in the process of divorcing.  Their daughter Crystal (Kendal Farr), aged ten or eleven (and the owner of the pink boombox), has been spending time with each parent since they separated but her mother is applying for sole custody – even though Ros appears to have a drugs problem.  Jim demonstrates repeatedly that he has a problem of anger management.  He goes ballistic while doing his job, in an interview with Crystal’s class teacher (Macon Blair), even with an unfailingly kind fellow officer (Nican Robinson) – who, with his wife (Ammie Leonards), does his best to support Jim and relieve his isolation.   Neither of his siblings put in an appearance at the funeral.  When Jim briefly visits his sister Morgan (Chelsea Edmundson) and asks about her relationship with their mother, Morgan’s response suggests that she has always been as miserable as Jim is now.   He has lost a beloved parent, the custody battle, most of his inheritance (consumed in legal costs) and, as a result of his crazy outbursts, his job.  Until the very last moments of Thunder Road, the situation seems hopeless.  Jim Cummings, in short, details the unhappy context of the protagonist’s life and makes bad things happen to him but doesn’t really develop Jim as a character.  Cummings, rather, elaborates a personality – needy, volatile, self-centred, short on self-awareness – that’s evident in Jim’s behaviour in the chapel.

    Although it holds your attention, the story is thin and seems to have nothing new to say.  I came out almost puzzled as to why the film had been made.  Once I’d read a bit online about Thunder Road, things became clearer.  It’s based on a twelve-minute piece of the same name, which won the Grand Jury prize for best short film at Sundance in 2016.  Jim Cummings raised money through Kickstarter to develop the material into a feature.  Almost needless to say, the short consists entirely of Jim’s funeral eulogy.  (Cummings’s synopsis for Sundance was all of five words:  ‘Officer Arnaud loved his Mom’.)  The 2016 film (available on Vimeo) has three particularly striking features.  First, the camera’s zoom in towards Jim seems more gradual than in the longer version:  he doesn’t confront the viewer in the same way.   Second, the boombox misbehaves only momentarily:  the Springsteen track then plays and Jim sings and dances along to it.  Third, the mixture of sad and funny in the short is confounding:  in comparison, the feature film and the funeral episode within it are predominantly distressing and the occasional comic touches tend to derive from the grotesqueness of incidents.

    Because Jim’s performance of ‘Thunder Road’ at the funeral in the expanded film is relatively limited, Cummings seems to think he’s keeping plenty in reserve but that’s not so – and not only because the lack of accompanying music makes Jim’s song-and-dance act in the feature much weirder than in the short.  It’s understandable that Cummings doesn’t want to jettison the eulogy but, by retaining and beginning with it, he places his dramatic highlight first and renders much of what follows in this ninety-two-minute film essentially superfluous.  Jim’s subsequent outbursts count for less because of what the opening ten minutes have revealed about him.

    Cummings makes use of the lyrics of ‘Thunder Road’ to devise a mildly upbeat ending to the feature.  The let’s-get-out-of-here thrust of the song[1] is reflected in Jim’s eventual escape from the small Texas town where the previous action has taken place.  Ros has died of a drugs overdose; Jim has Crystal with him.   In the final scene, they go to a theatre to watch a ballet – the art his mother loved and, for as long as she could, practised.  Crystal watches with interest the dancers on the stage.  Jim’s eyes fill with tears.   There’s a salving quality to this moment, for sure.  It comes as a relief after the load of trauma that’s gone before, though you still don’t hold out much hope for Jim Arnaud’s future.

    Jim Cummings’s future could be a different matter:

    ‘The 30-year-old writer-director-actor who won Sundance’s short film grand jury prize in 2016 seems to have found the holy grail for up-and-coming filmmakers:  steady work.  A former freelance line producer for College Humor in Los Angeles, Cummings recently transitioned into writing, directing and acting full time, and now has so many projects going simultaneous[l]y that it’s hard to believe he was as an unknown filmmaker just 18 months ago. …’

    This is from a piece that appeared on IndieWire even before Cummings had raised funds to make the longer Thunder Road, which has won prizes at a succession of American festivals during this year.   It’s probably helped Cummings that, in the interval between the two versions of his film, America has become Trumpland.  Owen Gleiberman, in his highly enthusiastic Variety review, praises the feature Thunder Road as ‘one of the first dramas to dig deep into America’s heartland crisis — the crush of the spirit that has emerged from a collapsing job market and drug addiction and the underlying loss of faith’.  It’s far from clear that this is what Cummings had in mind – he seems interested in Jim Arnaud as an extraordinary individual – but it’s not surprising the film is being seen in these terms.

    Cummings has written some acute dialogue and directs the cast well – especially the child who plays Crystal:  Kendal Farr moves between sullen and sensitive very naturally.  The closing credits begin with ‘written, directed and performed by Jim Cummings’, before moving on to the rest of the cast.  That ‘performed’ is significant:  it hints at both the extended sketch origins of the material and an aspect of Cummings’s acting.  He creates a physically convincing figure – as Owen Gleiberman says, Jim Arnaud is ‘trim and handsome, with a conservative haircut, but he has the kind of mustache that no one wears anymore’.  But I disagree with Gleiberman’s praise of Cummings’s displays of grief as deeply credible:  he always looks to be pretending to be upset (to such an extent that I wondered early on if Jim Arnaud was faking distress).  Cummings is at his best when Jim is relatively in control.  He shows good comic timing with lines that are ironic, either in intention or in effect.  Although I found Thunder Road unsatisfying and the lead’s playing patchy, I’m keen to see more from Jim Cummings – in front of or behind the camera.

    11 October 2018

    [1]  ‘Hey, what else can we do now?/Except roll down the window and let the wind blow back your hair/Well, the night’s busting open, these two lanes will take us anywhere/We got one last chance to make it real …’

  • Faces Places

    Visages Villages

    Agnès Varda and JR (2017)

    Agnès Varda is on screen for so much of this documentary, and is such a strong presence, that you almost forget while you’re watching Faces Places she’s behind the camera too.  Only on reflection do you start to appreciate the achievement of someone of Varda’s age – she celebrated her ninetieth birthday in May this year – putting this film together.  Her co-star and co-director, fifty-five years her junior, is JR, the self-styled ‘photograffeur‘ who has made his name fly-posting large monochrome photographic images in public places around the world, appropriating these in the manner of a graffiti artist.  Varda’s failing eyesight and the hugely magnifying form of JR’s work make for an apt pairing even before we experience the connection and increasing affection between them as they journey together through France, interviewing and photographing various communities and individuals.  They then enlarge the portraits taken for display, usually on buildings, where the people concerned live or work.  The film’s English title, although it sounds a little vague beside Visages Villages, is arguably more accurate in the sense that Varda’s and JR’s focus isn’t exclusively rural.

    The artful direction of Faces Places makes the pair’s travels seem continuously impromptu, even though more than one port of call turns out to be a return visit, for Varda at least.  The narrative progresses easily and as if spontaneously yet it’s satisfyingly shaped.  An affecting postscript illustrates this particularly well.  Though he may not be a mystery man to the same extent as Banksy, JR’s real name isn’t known and he always wears a hat and dark glasses.  The latter concealment frustrates Varda, who keeps urging JR to stop hiding.  She even shows him a bit of black-and-white footage she shot in the 1960s, in which Jean-Luc Godard, in an uncharacteristically light-hearted moment, is fooling about in costume and make-up but without his spectacles.  (In fact, Godard’s eyes were rarely as invisible behind his lenses as JR’s are.)  In the closing stages of their singular road movie, Varda and JR switch to a different form of transport.  As a surprise for JR (according to Varda), they take a train to visit Godard at his home in the Swiss town of Rolle.  They arrive at the appointed time but he’s not in – or not answering anyway.  To make matters worse, he has left Varda a cryptic note on the door, referring to a meeting many years ago with her and Jacques Demy.   She’s very distressed – not just by Godard’s ‘bad hospitality’ but by thoughts of her late husband too.  JR tries to cheer her up and briefly removes his shades.  The camera shows the somewhat blurred image that Varda actually sees but she’s grateful to JR for what he’s done.  This remarkable moment is the culmination of the film’s blend of happenstance and planning.   It has seemed inevitable for some time that JR will eventually expose his eyes to Varda.  Yet the circumstances in which this happens are convincingly accidental.

    I was apprehensive about Faces Places.  I’d seen the trailer what felt like many times and it got on my nerves:  the droll music; the madcap homage to Godard’s Bande à part, as JR pushes Varda through the Louvre in a wheelchair; the bits of blurb – ‘Agnès Varda and JR are a screen duo for the ages’, and so on.  Even Varda’s two-tone hair (white on top, dyed below – a kind of cappuccino effect) was starting to irritate.  It’s a great relief that nearly all the archness in the film seems to have been concentrated into the trailer.  Perhaps he publicity people know what they’re doing and this is what attracts plenty of people but the trailer is a travesty of the complete work (and Matthieu Chedid’s score is actually charming in small doses).  This begins with visual illustrations plus voiceover explanations of the ways in which the co-directors didn’t first meet.  Once they’ve got this joke out of their system and turn to the people they did meet, Faces Places is thoroughly absorbing.  The residents of a former mining village, a grizzled free spirit proud to show off his improvised home,  two goat farmers with contrasting approaches to animal welfare, a trio of dock workers and their wives – these are just a few of the large and various cast of characters.  When Varda and JR go to a coastal location (which naturally evokes The Beaches of Agnès), she recalls Guy Bourdin, a young man from the area:  long ago, she several times used Guy as a photographic model.   JR and his team attach to high rocks on the shore a blown-up version of one of these photographs.  The next morning, there’s no trace of the image, thanks to the work of the sea.

    The critic Amy Taubin has called Faces Places ‘a celebration of artisanal production (including cinema), worker solidarity, and the photographic arts in the face of mortality’.    Taubin’s accurate description hints at what I find saddening about JR’s work – or at least the examples of it in this film.   Imposing greatly enlarged human faces on the built or natural environment shares with graffiti a quality of I-was-here self-assertion.  That might be said, of course, to be the impulse for any creative act but these particular forms make the self-assertion more nakedly desperate.  Agnès Varda’s art, as a film documentarian, is quieter and more heartening.  (I’m not keen on the few pieces of her non-documentary work that I’ve seen.)   And her attitude towards her own mortality, as expressed in a conversation with JR, is appealingly straightforward.   She says she thinks about death a lot, doesn’t think she’s afraid of it, realises that may change when it’s imminent.  At present, she’s looking forward to it.  When JR asks why, she says, ‘Because that’ll be that’.  If Faces Places is her last film, it’s a fine envoi.

    4 October 2018

Posts navigation