Monthly Archives: April 2018

  • Look Back in Anger

    Tony Richardson (1959)

    John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger is a notoriously verbose play.  A striking feature of the film version is that it’s several minutes in before we hear a word spoken.   The opening sequence takes place in a jazz club, where Jimmy Porter (Richard Burton) is playing a trumpet solo.  The camera follows Jimmy from the club, through the streets of the Midlands town he lives in, to the house where he and his wife Alison (Mary Ure) rent a flat.   He watches her sleep before getting into bed with her, and wakes next morning with Alison already up and about.  It’s only when Jimmy goes to rouse Cliff Lewis (Gary Raymond), whom we glimpsed at the jazz club and who lodges with the Porters, that conversation starts.  Though it’s certainly not the only highlight, this opening is arguably the best bit in the whole of Tony Richardson’s film.  It shows Jimmy absorbed in the music he’s playing and enjoying the applause he receives.  In the moments that follow, he comes down to earth definitely but not melodramatically.  Richardson, directing his first feature film, makes things too fancy on the approach to home:  Jimmy plays a few notes on his trumpet and a ghost trumpet answers in the deserted darkness.  But this only briefly interrupts the absorbing journey from the convivial, jam-packed club to the cramped, silent apartment.

    The film shifts as soon as Richard Burton starts talking.  In his mid-thirties, he was perhaps a little too old for the role (Kenneth Haigh was twenty-five when he played Jimmy in the 1956 stage production at the Royal Court) – but Burton’s refractory charisma serves him well.  It’s his extraordinary vocal instrument that’s the problem.  Although his effortless, rhythmical delivery of Osborne’s abundant invective is pleasurable, his voice is so richly sonorous and magnetic that it not only contradicts Jimmy’s (and Burton’s own) socially humble origins.  It’s also essentially wrong for a character driven to keep talking and shouting because he feels no one is listening.  A second shift – which also proves problematic throughout – occurs soon afterwards.  The whole play takes place in (to quote the text) ‘the Porters’ one-room flat in the Midlands’.  It’s one thing for Tony Richardson to start outside the flat and move back there; quite another for him then to keep opening out the action:  the jazz club again; pubs and cafés; the market square where Jimmy, with Cliff’s assistance, runs a confectionery stall; a hospital and a graveside; a railway station, where the climax takes place.  When Alison leaves Jimmy, there’s a brief sequence back at her parents’ home to emphasise her comfortable middle-class background.  It’s understandable that Richardson and Nigel Kneale (who gets a sole credit for the adapted screenplay:  Osborne is credited with ‘additional dialogue’) were nervous about the commercial implications of staying indoors but the narrative’s wanderlust has a diluting effect.  Plenty of people find Jimmy Porter, even in the theatre, a tiresome egocentric windbag but the play’s setting – Jimmy is stuck in the middle of contemporary England with nowhere else to go – reflects and makes sense of his furious claustrophobia.  On screen, with plenty of opportunities to get out of the flat, he’s a much less justified moaner.

    It follows from the opening out that the cast is much bigger than the play’s quintet of Jimmy, Alison, Cliff, Alison’s relic-of-empire father, Colonel Redfern, and her friend Helena.  The significant additions include a little-Hitler market inspector Hurst (Donald Pleasence), an Asian immigrant market trader Kapoor (S P Kapoor) and Ma Tanner (Edith Evans), a widow who gave Jimmy some financial help to set up his sweet stall.  (Ma Tanner is mentioned in the text of the play but doesn’t appear in it.)  Donald Pleasence unsurprisingly gives Hurst’s small-minded vileness a sinister edge.  The detail of characterisation that Edith Evans achieves is amazing, given how little material she has to work with, and her Ma Tanner is convincingly working-class – a remarkable achievement for an actress of Evans’s generation and theatrical cachet.  Yet although these three are individually convincing as characters, they’re designed to suggest that what drives Jimmy Porter’s (and John Osborne’s) splenetic tirades is straightforward socially conscious moral outrage; as such, they seem somehow peripheral.  When Ma Tanner greets her, Alison almost flinches from an embrace with a social inferior.  Kapoor’s career on the market place is doomed by the commercially anxious racism that pervades it.  Of course such prejudices fuel Jimmy’s anger but his disaffection is part of a more complex personality:  he may be a political radical but he’s a sentimental misogynist too.  Tony Richardson was able to satisfy his appetite for social critique more fully in his next three films – The Entertainer (1960), A Taste of Honey (1961) and The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (1962).  Here, alongside the additional characters, it’s reflected in minor, pat details like the respectable middle-aged woman eager to read salacious Sunday paper stories before she heads for church.

    The relationship between Jimmy and Alison’s actress friend Helena (Claire Bloom) is the film’s most dramatically satisfying.  Through precise line readings and gestural detail, as well as her own porcelain beauty, Claire Bloom embodies the class difference between herself and Jimmy in ways that Mary Ure’s Alison doesn’t.  While she’s staying with the Porters before the pregnant Alison returns to her parents, Helena is as openly hostile to Jimmy as he is to her (though in a different register).  Claire Bloom gives occasional indications, subtly but incisively expressed, that Helena is strongly attracted to Jimmy.  Once they become lovers after Alison’s departure, we realise the feelings Helena was suppressing fortified her antipathy towards him.  Mary Ure’s odd, compelling presence contradicts Alison’s description of herself as a ‘conventional girl’.  Ure’s blonde hair, pale skin and light-coloured clothes (the film is in black and white), combined with her character’s lack of force, give Alison an almost zombified quality.  At the same time, Ure (the only member of the Royal Court cast in the film) has a tension that makes Jimmy’s reference to Alison’s ‘relaxation of spirit’ – during the final reconciliation scene between them – quite baffling.   It’s easy to believe in the physical attraction between Jimmy and Alison but not much more.

    Glen Byam Shaw, a famous name in 1950s theatre, plays Colonel Redfern rather too stiffly.  There are cameos from George Devine (a doctor), Nigel Davenport and Alfred Lynch (a couple of commercial travellers).  Alan Bates was Cliff Lewis in the original stage production:  in retrospect, it seems surprising the screen role went to an actor who didn’t go on to the major film career that Bates enjoyed.  Gary Raymond nevertheless gives a most appealing performance as Cliff, the young Welshman devoted to both Jimmy and Alison.  Raymond is emotionally fluid and makes Cliff’s boyish hero worship of Jimmy natural and touching.   It’s a pity Cliff’s on the receiving end of a couple of miscalculations on Tony Richardson’s part.  In the flat, Jimmy and Cliff indulge in, as well as horseplay, occasional pretend music-hall routines.  As part of Jimmy’s get-Helena campaign, he and Cliff gatecrash her play rehearsal at a local theatre – they take to the stage and do one of their double acts.  Cliff eventually gets embarrassed but it’s unbelievable that he would start to behave like this in public, even allowing that Jimmy calls the tune in their relationship.  When Alison has moved out and Helena taken her place, Cliff decides to return to Wales.  There are two farewell scenes between him and Jimmy – first in the flat then at the train station. Gary Raymond plays both scenes well but only one was needed.

    The final scene on the railways bridge between Jimmy and Alison, after Helena has taken her leave, is a miscalculation too.  Oswald Morris’s lighting makes the scene visually powerful but the couple’s lengthy heart-to-heart speechifying is artificial in this dark, cold, outdoor setting.  It’s doubtful, though, that the conclusion to Look Back in Anger could be made persuasive whatever the location.  The most telling part of this exchange in the film is a bit of dialogue that doesn’t appear in the play’s text.  As Jimmy and Alison discuss the baby she’s lost, Richard Burton laments, ‘It wasn’t my first loss’, and Mary Ure, in a good, strangled voice, replies, ‘It was mine!’   These three words have more impact than Alison’s more colourful and improbable exclamations during the finale (‘I want to be a lost cause!’).  The trouble is, the thoughtless self-pity from Jimmy that prompts Alison’s trenchant reply makes it all the less plausible that she would think of returning to him.

    3 April 2018

  • Isle of Dogs

    Wes Anderson (2018)

    There haven’t been too many negative reviews of Isle of Dogs but several of them have fretted over the film’s Orientalism.  With good reason – though I had other basic difficulties with Wes Anderson’s stop-motion animation feature (his second, following Fantastic Mr Fox (2009)).  Most of the dogs, though they’re mongrels, look alike and the actors voicing them sound alike.  The problem increases once Chief, a black-haired former stray, succumbs to a bath – to remove what turns out to be grime and restore his coat to the same whitish shade as the others.  Nutmeg, a pure breed ex-show dog, is distinctive, though the odd coupling of her and Chief doesn’t seem much of an advance on Disney’s Lady and the Tramp (1955).  Anderson favours head-on shots of the dogs’ faces, which aren’t very interesting – compared anyway with their bodies in movement in long shot.  The animals’ role in resolving matters to deliver an upbeat ending is disappointingly secondary to the humans’.

    The story – by Anderson, his regular collaborators Roman Coppola and Jason Schwartzman, and Kunichi Nomura – is set twenty years in the future in Japan, where a dog flu virus has spread through the canine population.  Kobayashi, the authoritarian mayor of the (fictional) city of Megasaki, banishes the species to a virtual penal colony – Trash Island.  The first exile there is Spots, a dog belonging to Atari, the mayor’s orphaned nephew and ward.  Atari runs away from home, steals a plane and flies it to Trash Island, in search of Spots.  The set-up seems to announce an action-adventure with, since Wes Anderson is in charge, a strong comedy element.  As a succession of plot events and lines in the script, Isle of Dogs is indeed a comic adventure but this isn’t quite what the audience experiencesWhat actually follows is a continuous display of intricate design for your eyes and the hum of droll, under-differentiated voices in your ears.  The effect is pleasant and mildly soporific.

    The landscape of Trash Island makes for a mostly more muted palette than is usual in the world of Wes Anderson.  As hinted at in the long-winded trailer, the narrative is overcomplicated; the director’s trademark fanatical attention to decorative detail further distracts (and detracts) from the storyline.  That wasn’t a problem with Fantastic Mr Fox – an altogether more truly animated piece of work.  George Clooney’s brilliant characterisation of the title character in the earlier film would be a tough act for anyone to follow.  Although Bryan Cranston is fine as Chief, his and other male voices deliver their lines in tones that exude the knowing cool of the project – perhaps part of why it’s so hard to tell them apart.  The other four dogs who, along with Chief, help Atari finds Liev Schreiber’s Spots, are Bob Balaban, Jeff Goldblum, Bill Murray and Edward Norton.  The fewer female voices are more individual, though it says a lot – and a lot for her – that Frances McDormand comes through the most satisfyingly in the nearly characterless role of the interpreter of Mayor Kobayashi’s Japanese into English.  A familiar-sounding Scarlett Johansson is Nutmeg.  An uncharacteristically overexcited Greta Gerwig is the American exchange student Tracy, who eventually saves the day and pairs up with Atari.

    A couple of phrases in the previous two sentences hint at the cultural tourism and WASP saviour controversies around Isle of Dogs.  The credits appear in English and Japanese.  For Western viewers, the latter characters merely contribute to a visually pleasing pattern.  (Perhaps vice versa for Far Eastern viewers but they’re hardly the main target audience.)   While the dogs’ ‘barks have been rendered into English throughout’, much of the conversation of the Japanese humans goes untranslated – relegating it to minor mumbo-jumbo.  It might be less of an issue if Anderson was consistent on this front but, of course, he can’t be, given the significance of the mayor’s pronouncements.   It’s queasy that Anderson doubly exoticises the story’s dystopia – grating that the exchange-student-cum-cub-journalist from Ohio not only sorts things out but has to rouse the Megasaki natives into action.

    Alison Willmore sums things up admirably in a recent BuzzFeed piece[1]:

    ‘… there’s no overt malicious intent to Isle of Dogs‘ cultural tourism, but it’s marked by a hodgepodge of references that an American like Anderson might cough up if pressed to free associate about Japan — taiko drummers, anime, Hokusai, sumo, kabuki, haiku, cherry blossoms, and a mushroom cloud (!). … This all has more to do with the… insides of Anderson’s brain than it does any actual place.  It’s Japan purely as an aesthetic — and another piece of art that treats the East not as a living, breathing half of the planet but as a mirror for the Western imagination. … [In] the wake of Isle of Dogs’ opening weekend, there were multiple headlines wondering whether the film was an act of appropriation or homage.  But the question is rhetorical — the two aren’t mutually exclusive, and the former is not automatically off the table just because the creator’s intent was the latter.’

    It’s been evident virtually throughout his cinema career how much canines matter to Wes Anderson.   His latest title is a homophone for ‘I Love Dogs’ and is no doubt made, as Alison Willmore suggests, with affection for Japan as well as for his favourite animals.  But it’s made with heedless self-indulgence too – and the worst of both worlds that Anderson stimulates more moral discomfort in retrospect than exciting fun while you’re watching the film.  In recent weeks, Curzon cinemas have been running an excellent turn-off-your-mobile-phones piece featuring Chief (the black scruff version) and the voice of Bryan Cranston.  This repeatedly made me laugh more than the whole 101 minutes of the actual Isle of Dogs managed to do.

    2 April 2018

    [1] http://tinyurl.com/y7xt9kdl

     

Posts navigation