Monthly Archives: September 2017

  • The Shawshank Redemption

    Frank Darabont (1994)

    The Shawshank Redemption, adapted by Frank Darabont from a Stephen King novella, was something of a commercial phenomenon.  It was never a sleeper but the initial box-office returns were disappointing.  In 1995, however, video rental sales went through the roof; in later years, the film repeatedly drew large television audiences.  (Wikipedia and IMDB indicate earnings of more than $58m against a budget of $25m.)  Shawshank’s popular and critical reputation has also continued to grow.  It didn’t win any of the seven Oscars for which it was nominated but the statement on Wikipedia that it ‘is now considered to be one of the greatest films of the 1990s’ is by no means over the top.  This movie means a great deal to a great many.  According to a 2004 Guardian article by Mark Kermode, which BFI used as their programme note for this month’s screening:

    ‘One viewer described their tape of The Shawshank Redemption as “like a friend in the sitting-room, who talked to me and picked me up when I was down” ’.

    One of the film’s stars, Tim Robbins, is quoted in Kermode’s piece as follows:

    ‘… there isn’t a day when I’m not approached … by people who say how important that film is to them, who tell me that they’ve seen it 20, 30, 40 times, and who are just so … thankful.’

    It’s impossible to gainsay this kind of enthusiasm.  I find it more interesting than I found (most of) the movie to watch.

    Square and unsubtle, The Shawshank Redemption tells, at considerable length (142 minutes), an indomitability-of-the-human-spirit story that’s reasonably good, if not especially original.  The Shawshank State Penitentiary is a prison in Maine (a fictional one:  the actual filming location was the Ohio State Reformatory).  The protagonists, Andy Dufresne (Robbins) and Ellis ‘Red’ Redding (Morgan Freeman), are long-term inmates there.  The redemption of the title refers to how these two make good what seemed bound to be decades of futility.   Andy, sentenced to consecutive life sentences for the killing of his wife and her lover, keeps himself constructively busy.  He escapes, after some eighteen years in prison and painstakingly preparing his getaway during much of that time.  Red, also serving life for murder, spends forty years behind bars.  He finally comes to realise that his friendship with Andy redeems that time in Shawshank.

    Frank Darabont uses prison as a paradigm of privation and presents a life sentence as, in theory, a life wasted.  But he isn’t so preoccupied with metaphor to stint on the violent detail.  With the help of Roger Deakins’s fine, raw lighting of Shawshank, Darabont creates an oppressively bleak atmosphere.  (You appreciate the power of Deakins’s cinematography most in the rare sequences outside the prison.  Unhappy things occur in those too yet there’s an immediate sense of relief whenever the locale changes.)  The various assaults on Andy, by malignant staff as well as prisoners, are gruelling viewing.  This hyper-realistic strain of the film coexists with familiar generic elements – the characterisation of the main group of cons as a band of brothers, for example – but it leaves an impression on the audience.  The grimness makes the happy ending feel earned.

    There’s no denying that ending is strong and that The Shawshank Redemption is structurally clever.  Andy has got away; Red is left feeling glad for him but sorry for himself – ‘I just miss my friend’.  The screen goes dark and you think for a moment this may be the end of the film (to be honest, by this stage I hoped it was).  Far from it.  Red, by now too cynical to make the sincere plea for parole that has tried and failed before, gets it anyway.  The early stages of his life outside are a rerun of what happened to the elderly Brooks Hatten (James Whitmore) earlier in the story.  Released from Shawshank after half a century there, Brooks had become so institutionalised that he couldn’t function as a free man and took his own life.  Red stops short of following suit only in order to honour a promise he made to Andy in jail (and to the audience) – to journey, if he ever got the chance, to a particular hayfield near Buxton, Maine and retrieve something that Andy says he buried there under a stone.  Red finds the hayfield and, under a stone, money and a letter from Andy, inviting Red to join him in Zihuatanejo, Mexico.  Red violates his parole in order to accept the invitation.  He sets off for Mexico with new hope in his heart.  This might seem enough for an upbeat ending but Frank Darabont leaves nothing to chance (or imagination).  Red crosses the border in Texas and, suitcase in hand, arrives on a beach in Zihuatanejo.  Andy is there to meet and greet him.

    The happy reunion and events leading up it are all the more enjoyable thanks to Thomas Newman’s melodious score (you wallow in its emotional uplift even as you realise how the music is working you) and to Morgan Freeman’s acting which, in the closing stages, has a sovereign simplicity and eloquence.  Though he’s awfully good throughout – and he and Tim Robbins work very well together – Freeman has a great deal of jail-spun wisdom to dispense in voiceover.  Stephen King’s novella Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption is only seventy-one pages long:  you sometimes feel Morgan Freeman must be reading it out in its entirety.  King wrote Ellis Redding as an Irish American:  Frank Darabont did well not only to cast Freeman in the role but to keep in Red’s reply, when asked why he’s called Red, ‘Maybe it’s because I’m Irish’.  It has to be said that not only is Red ethnically distinctive in Shawshank but that the wide range of vices and abuses in evidence there don’t extend to even a whisper of racism.

    As a young man keeping plenty to himself, Tim Robbins is convincing.  He gives Andy Dufresne a preppy look – he’s credible as someone who was a banker in his pre-captivity life.  Andy puts his professional knowhow to good use inside – initially as a desperate self-protective tactic, eventually as a means of ensuring he’s quids in after escaping.  He also then exposes the money laundering engaged in by the crooked, whited-sepulchre governor (Bob Gunton) and others – criminal activity that Andy’s financial nous has enabled.  (With the honourable exception of James Whitmore, the supporting cast isn’t up to much – their performances are strenuously one-dimensional.)  Andy takes over the running of the prison library from Brooks Hatten and, as the one middle-class inmate of Shawshank, is virtually the sole repository of culture and education.  This isn’t a great idea and results in two particularly corny parts of the narrative.  When the library receives as a donation a collection of records, Andy plays part of The Marriage of Figaro over the prison’s public address system.  He’s put in solitary as a result but not before Frank Darabont has shown the prisoners gathering en masse in the exercise yard to listen with rapt attention, their collective savage breast soothed by the charms of Mozart.  (This would have so much better if even one of the inmates had asked, ‘What is this fancy crap?’)  Then Andy coaches a new arrival, a burglar called Tommy Williams (Gil Bellows), to pass an exam.  The contact between them that this involves makes it all the more surprising that Tommy takes so long – ie as long as the plot requires – to ask Red what Andy’s doing time for.  It turns out Tommy was previously in jail with a man who confessed to the murders of which Andy was found guilty …

    Andy has always claimed he was innocent but so have his fellow prisoners:  as Red jokes, ‘Everyone in here’s innocent’ (Red himself admits to being a rare exception).   Even without taking this running gag literally, it makes you wonder about Frank Darabont’s attitude towards custodial sentences generally.  The rampant viciousness and corruption of the system – especially on the part of the staff who represent it – is enough to suggest that Darabont thinks prison is simply A Bad Thing (and the historical setting of the story – it begins in the late 1940s and ends in the late 1960s – seems beside the point).  If that’s the case, you then have to ask what difference it would have made if Andy Dufresne had been a double murderer:  wouldn’t his resourcefulness, his determination to make the best of his punishment, still be worthy of admiration?  In theory, perhaps; in practice, no.  It’s beyond reasonable doubt that, if Andy were guilty, many fewer people would be able to empathise with him.  The capacity of fans of The Shawshank Redemption to identify with its characters, to the amazing extent that lots of them seem to do, depends heavily on believing those characters are doing their existentialist best to rise above a predicament they don’t deserve.

    21 September 2017

  • Listen to Britain 2017

    Marcus Armitage, Alex Campbell, Ruth Grimberg, Catherine Harte, Michael Ho, Gareth Johnson, Amrou Al-Kadhi, Florence Kennard, Maia Krall Fry, Callum Rice, Hermione Russell, Theodore Tennant (2017)

    This year marks the seventy-fifth anniversary of Humphrey Jennings and Stewart McAllister’s famous documentary short Listen to Britain, a collage of sights and sounds of British life during World War Two.  To commemorate the anniversary, ‘BBC Four and BFI partnered to offer the next generation of filmmakers an exciting opportunity to capture the diversity of UK today’.   Applications were considered by a ‘panel of industry experts’ representing the partners and the production company Wingspan, which managed the project.  Each of the successful applicants received a grant of up to £5,000 to make a film no shorter than two minutes and no longer than ten.  The result is Listen to Britain 2017, a collection of twelve shorts, premiered at BFI on 19 September and to be screened on BBC Four on 24 September.

    The quotes above are from the BFI programme note, which also briefly summarised each of the twelve films.  Unusually for me, I read the note beforehand and I felt apprehensive.   In the event, the premiere was a very enjoyable occasion.   All twelve filmmakers were there and took a bow at the end.  I spotted in the audience several of the people who’d featured in the films although they were overshadowed by Eric, the canine title character of Florence Kennard’s piece, who followed in the tradition of The Artist‘s Uggie at the Oscars show by joining in the human curtain call.  Each one of the shorts was of interest; several were admirable.  That pre-screening apprehension wasn’t unjustified, though.  I still have reservation about Listen to Britain 2017 as a whole.

    The original Jennings and McAllister documentary runs only nineteen minutes.  Its picture of Britain in 1942 doesn’t, of course, pretend to be panoramic.  The war effort is embodied not just by men in uniform but also by the workforce on the home front.  There’s a strong musical emphasis.  Soldiers croon (and yodel) ‘Home on the Range’.  Flanagan and Allen lead a works singalong.  The pianist Myra Hess gives one of her lunchtime recitals at the National Gallery.  The perorative images are accompanied by ‘Rule Britannia’.  Listen to Britain is propaganda but politically partisan in only the broadest sense:  the film describes a country whose various citizens are united in a common purpose.  In 2017 the phrase ‘diversity of UK today’ has a more specific and political meaning than it did in 1942.  Collectively, the ingredients of Listen to Britain 2017 (a small mercy that it’s not called ‘Listen to UK 2017’) strongly suggest the ‘panel of industry experts’ had a checklist of themes to be covered: immigrant and refugee experience, misogynist abuse online, perceived disability, post-industrial anomie, etc.

    Brexit casts a long and dismal shadow over the new film:  the June 2016 referendum and its aftermath have exposed a disunited kingdom, a place very different from the one that Jennings and McAllister presented.  Yet there’s little sense of different, disputing voices among the contributors to Listen to Britain 2017.  This makes it more palatable for its assumed audience (the likes of me, anyway) and perhaps there weren’t any reactionary applicants for BFI-BBC Four funding.  The narrowness of the political viewpoints reflected in the film is nagging, nevertheless.  This is a limited picture of what people in this country think today.  (More careful listening to Britain might have avoided Brexit in the first place.)   It’s becoming increasingly clear that loss of belief in old political certainties is conducive to the growth of identity politics – but Listen to Britain 2017 illustrates this only through examples of what the people behind it see as the right sort of identity politics.  The prevailing spirit of the compendium is expressed in the words of one of the young people who appears in Amrou Al-Kadhi’s CLASH:  ‘What’s great about Britain is that queerness and Muslims are really integrated and that’s what I feel part of’.

    Notes on each of the twelve films, in the order in which they were screened:

    Accents Speak Louder Than Words (Catherine Harte):  A good title.  Kasha came to Britain from Poland twenty-seven years ago.  In recent years, she has suffered from ‘accent discrimination’.  While proud of her Polish origins, she now feels compelled to disguise them and signs up for elocution classes.  Her prospective voice coach is horrified by this and uncertain whether they should proceed but Kasha insists she wants to.  It’s a dismaying story – one that needs a ‘before’ and ‘after’ structure in order to realise its theme more fully.  You’d like to hear how Kasha sounds at the end of the elocution course and what she feels she’s lost in addition to her natural accent.  Anti-Polish prejudice is very – and misleadingly – localised:  according to Kasha, things were fine when she lived in London, then in Yorkshire:  her problems started only when she moved to the Thanet area of Kent.

    Listen to Bridgeton (Callum Rice):  An even better title – echoing that of the original film, specifying the location of this one, hinting at the imaginative use of sound in Callum Rice’s piece.  Bridgeton is an area of Glasgow that houses the city’s last remaining corporation bus garage – huge, crepuscular and nearly deserted.  Rice shows the work of restoring old vehicles there.  The voices of those involved in this are heard throughout; their faces are unseen or half-glimpsed.  The locale is richly expressive: it hints at larger currents of industrial and technological change; the antique look of the buses gives them a nostalgic quality.  The place is almost but not quite a ghost town in itself.  The images here are real and specific rather than worked-up illustrations of the words on the soundtrack.  That soundtrack is a dialogue of human and mechanical: each vehicle has its peculiar acoustic – in effect, its voice.  In the climax to the film, the human voices refer to difficulties they’ve encountered in their own lives – with drug addiction, for example – and begun to overcome:  the repair work on screen acquires a double meaning.  The overall sense of something lost being worked on – patiently, nocturnally – and recovered is strong.  The convergence of social and personal themes is finely judged by Callum Rice.  Listen to Bridgeton is the outstanding film in this collection.

    Maesteg (Theodore Tennant):  Maesteg is a town in Glamorgan.  Theodore Tennant’s film focuses on Stumpy, a local taxi driver, and on the death of coal-mining in the area.  The leading man and his fares are entertaining company but the characterisation of the place as a waste land (a ‘shit hole’, according to Stumpy) now that the mine has closed is, by now, too familiar.  There’s a lack of fresh insights into the struggle of coming to terms with the change and decay that places like Maesteg have undergone.  The resonance between the themes of Listen to Bridgeton and Maesteg may explain their proximity in the sequence but this shows the latter to particular disadvantage.

    Eric (Florence Kennard):  a day in the life of a therapy dog.  Eric, a border collie, does his rounds:  a centre for people with learning disabilities; a youngish woman still in the early stages of recovery after a serious stroke; a care home for the elderly.  The dog leaves everyone he meets feeling better for the experience:  when he first arrives at the centre, he marches into a group who are working together on a jigsaw and stands on his hind legs as if to join in.   Eric’s work is a beguiling mixture of altruism and self-gratification:  people pat and fuss him, sometimes heavy-handedly, without his turning a hair; he also gets plenty of food treats.  Florence Kennard shoots part of the film from a dog’s-eye point of view.   Eric supplied further entertainment even before he finally joined Kennard and other filmmakers on the stage.  There was audience applause at the end of each of the twelve films, usually accompanied by barking from the back of NFT1.

    India Hope: Portrait of the Artist (Hermione Russell):  The first of two family portraits (and of two shorter, five-minute elements).  India Hope Russell, sister of the filmmaker, writes poetry, paints, sings.  We see and hear examples of her work; and listen to this articulate young woman, who has Down syndrome, reflect on how people perceive her and how she sees herself.  The piece is appealing and inspiring.  Whether it reflects a broadly representative experience is more arguable.

    That Yorkshire Sound (Marcus Armitage):  The other shorter film, for understandable reasons.  It’s an animated piece:  Marcus Armitage’s pictures illustrate the accompanying soundtrack of Yorkshire life.  Not all of the latter seems particular to a single part of the country but Armitage’s art work is excitingly inventive and dynamic.

    Silent Roars (Maia Krall Fry):  Four young women who use the internet to promote their respective areas of activism – and who are on the receiving end of online abuse and threats as a result.   These ‘influencers’ aim to increase public awareness of climate change, bird life, sustainable clothing and … personal identity may be the simplest way to describe it.  Three of the four are unproblematic in terms both of their area of interest and the personality they present on screen.  The eco-activist and the ornithologist are personally engaging; Maia Krall Fry’s images of the former, a slight girl, standing among glaciers, are remarkable.  The fourth subject is a transgender woman who posts images of herself online; one of her main intentions, she says, is to ‘reclaim my body’.  Her cause is idiosyncratic and, unlike the other three, egocentric.  It’s deplorable that she receives abuse.  It’s worth noting that she describes the images she uses as ‘provocative’, without explaining what she’s looking to provoke.

    Voices of Britain (Alex Campbell):  Less focused and less imaginative than some of the other films but the former shortcoming is refreshing in this company.  Alex Campbell puts together a variety of voices – people of different ages and accents – with images that sometimes feel vague and contrived, lacking a life of their own.  The voices, though, are worth listening to, even if the message of the piece – ‘our similarities outweigh our differences’, according to the BFI programme note – seems an anxious assertion rather than an inference to be drawn from the material Campbell has put together.  The reference in one of the voiceovers to the Manchester Arena terrorist attack brings home how very recently these films have been made.

    Learning to Swim (Ruth Grimberg):  In a green and pleasant part of Surrey, a middle-aged, middle-class woman, whose accent (!) suggests she’s originally Scandinavian, is one of a group of local residents offering accommodation to newly-arrived refugees.  A young Syrian man is the woman’s current guest.  Her teenage son is teaching him to swim in the family’s own pool – a nice illustration of how the other half lives.  The aquatic metaphor is obvious but effective, not least in bringing soberingly to mind what’s happened to many refugees at sea off the European mainland.  The two principals, especially the young refugee, are likeable.  The piece appears to have been filmed shortly before, having got a job with an IT outfit, he moved away to London.  Ruth Grimberg’s contribution, like Catherine Harte’s, leaves you wanting to know how the immigrant is faring now.

    In Other Words (Gareth Johnson):  The visual-audio marriage here is highly specific.  Three young non-white Londoners recite – with passion – their poetry, words that illustrate their continuing struggles with mental ill health and other social challenges.  Shots of a building suggest it’s the meeting place of a larger poets’ group.  If so, it’s not clear if the ethnicity of the group overall is broader than the trio of featured poets suggests.

    CLASH (Amrou Al-Kadhi):  Watching Victoria and Abdul the previous day should have guaranteed strong sympathy with Amrou Al-Kadhi’s critique of ‘the national obsession with period dramas and … [their] failure to reflect modern diversity’ (BFI note again) – but didn’t.  The racism and love of hierarchy implicit in the largely fake nostalgia that such dramas often indulge are indeed disturbing but CLASH is too predominantly a moan:  Al-Kadhi would have done better to ask each of his interviewees how to deal with the problem – short of banning period dramas from British screens (ie censorship).  Perhaps a solution is implied in a sequence that sees the BME and/or LGBT contributors run around in flouncy costumes – or perhaps this is the film is just having a larf.  That’s what plenty of the BFI audience did at this point, as they did during the sarcastic plum-in-mouth opening voiceover (read by Tim McInnerny – the only well-known name involved in any of these twelve films?)   The underlying, self-centred premise of CLASH – there’s no justification for film or television that ‘doesn’t speak to me’ – is dispiriting.

    From HK to MK (Michael Ho):  The second family portrait – this time of the filmmaker’s father – makes for a quietly incisive last chapter.  Gabriel Ho came from Hong Kong to England as a student in the late 1960s.  He married an English girl and they set up home in the (then brand new) new town of Milton Keynes, where Gabriel continued to work as a dentist until his recent retirement.  Michael Ho’s voiceover narrative is affectionate and pedestrian – a curiously winning blend.  His father makes the humorous and persuasive point that, in the early days of Milton Keynes, the place’s population as a whole was, to a greater or lesser extent, a band of outsiders.  A visit a few years ago to relatives in Hong Kong awakened Gabriel’s awareness of his Chinese roots.  He’s an interesting complement to Kasha, whose story opened Listen to Britain 2017.  This is a man who’s enjoyed a professionally successful and personally fulfilling life in Britain – but who’s been surprised to discover, half a century on, that he’s also a little homesick.

    19 September 2017

     

Posts navigation