Monthly Archives: June 2017

  • Hello Destroyer

    Kevan Funk (2016)

    The Canadian writer-director Kevan Funk, whose first feature this is, makes his intentions clear from the start.  Hello Destroyer is set in British Columbia, in the world of ice hockey, minor league.  Tyson Burr has recently become a member of the Prince George Warriors.  In the opening sequences on the ice rink and in the dressing room afterwards, the hand-held camera is close in, stressing the physically uncompromising nature of the sport, the macho power play at work on the rink and off it.  The Warriors’ man of the match gets to wear and whoop around in a Native American headdress.  Tyson and the other rookies are pinned down by teammates to have their heads shaved in a hazing ritual.  The atmosphere is volatile, clamorous and threatening.  It seems Kevan Funk is all set to explore the pathology of male competitiveness and self-assertion.

    It’s no less obvious from the very start who the main character will be.  In the dressing room, Funk quickly focuses on Tyson (Jared Abrahamson) and catches his reactions to what’s going on, whereas the hyperactive camera blurs the features of his teammates.  We see immediately how competitive Tyson is.  His face registers disappointment when he’s not the first player singled out for praise by the team’s coach, Dale Milbury (Kurt Max Runte); the award of the headdress trophy to Harper (Shane Leydon) is enough to rouse Tyson to josh Harper about his excess weight.   In the scenes that follow,  though, Tyson keeps himself to himself, saying little either to the other Warriors or in the house where he and a teammate Cody (Maxwell Haynes) are lodging with Wendy and Bill Davis (Sara Canning and Ben Cotton) and their young son.  Perhaps, we think, Tyson, as a newcomer to professional sport, hasn’t yet learned how to balance imposing himself and playing on a team.  The rare scenes where he’s more voluble or there’s a sudden change of tone understandably stand out.  One night Tyson relaxes and confides to Cody at lights out his fear since childhood of the sound of silence.  Suited up to attend some kind of reception for the Warriors, Tyson is flummoxed trying to tie a tie; Wendy has to do it for him and the unspoken sexual charge between them is palpable.  (If Hello Destroyer had arrived on the scene sooner, this moment might even have merited a mention in Hannah McGill’s ‘Object Lesson’ on the movie tie in last month’s Sight & Sound.)   Jared Abrahamson draws the viewer in.  He has an expressive face.  His distinctive cracked voice repeatedly takes you by surprise.

    Once the pivotal event in Hello Destroyer occurs, however, the film dives.  Tyson is an ‘enforcer’[1] for the  Warriors.  Fired by Coach Milbury’s win-at-all-costs exhortations (‘This is why we burn and bleed – to achieve greatness’) and stung by criticism that he’s not aggressive enough, Tyson overcompensates by grievously injuring an opponent.  When Kyle Ridlowe (Brendan Byman) suffers bleeding on the brain as well as vertebral damage, Tyson is given an indefinite suspension from the Warriors and Bill Davis kicks him out.  Increasingly isolated, the young man returns to his home town and moves in with his parents.  Perhaps it’s possible – if so, it’s shocking – that an ice-hockey team’s management can make an individual player carry the can in such a case.  (Serious injuries in this quasi-blood sport can’t be that unusual.)  But the crude writing and direction make the callous ostracising and buck-passing incredible.  In the first twenty-four hours after the incident, Tyson doesn’t receive any news whatever from the Warriors.  (He discovers the extent of Ridlowe’s injuries from a television news report.)  Milbury assures Tyson the club have his best interests at heart, as the club’s lawyer reads a statement for him to sign, a statement which amounts to an admission of sole culpability.

    Back with his parents, Tyson shows no interest in keeping up to speed with the aftermath to the Ridlowe affair.  This is simply the result of Kevan Funk’s loss of interest in that side of the story, which he puts on ice (sorry) until Tyson is summoned to a preliminary court hearing that triggers the movie’s climax.  The hearing raises the possibility of criminal proceedings against Tyson.  He drives back to his parents and, outside the house, commits suicide.  He might as well have killed himself a screen hour earlier:  like its protagonist, the film really has nowhere to go once he’s suspended from the team. Having complained a few days ago about the determined gloom of The Levelling, I now feel I was unfair to Hope Dickson Leach, whose work is atmospherically supple beside Hello Destroyer.  Kevan Funk’s statement on the film’s website includes the following:

    ‘The culture of violence is maintained and sustained by passive societal approval in the form of indifference and ignorance, on a general level and among people in positions of power.  … Systemic issues such as these are commonly hierarchical, something that this film is interested in examining, as well as the circular cycle [sic] in which these sorts of enabling attitudes and behaviors are predicated upon [sic].’

    It’s hard to take that seriously but if he really did mean to examine such issues, Funk failed.  He merely piles up illustrations of misery – so determinedly that the effect is sometimes almost comical.

    Tyson gets part-time work in – guess where … a slaughterhouse.  When not surrounded by carcasses and mopping up blood, he helps his father break up the derelict house that once belonged to Tyson’s late grandparents.  Mr Burr (Paul McGillion) is coldly uncommunicative, except in a tirade that follows Tyson’s spending a night in the police cells: the father yells at length about the shame his sporting notoriety has brought on the family.  (The parents’ feelings would surely be more complex than straightforward shame.  In this small, ice-hockey-following community, wasn’t Tyson a local boy made good until his fall from grace?  Isn’t the awfulness of what’s happened compounded by disappointment?)  In spite of this, Tyson’s mother (Yvonne Vander Ploeg) seems kindly sympathetic towards her son.  Because she is, Funk minimises her time on screen.  Perhaps the most contrived piece of miserablism occurs when things appear briefly to be looking up for Tyson.  He makes the acquaintance of Eric (Joe Dion Buffalo), an affable man who invites him round for a beer.  Eric explains that his wife walked out on him but insists that you ‘gotta stay positive’.  You wonder why, therefore, when Tyson mentions the house-clearing job, Eric asks what Tyson’s grandfather died from.  (It’s not the natural question to ask in the circumstances:  the answer could well be advanced old age.)  You don’t wonder for long, though.  Eric asks the question so that (a) Tyson can reply throat cancer and (b) Eric can recall in detail the gruesome condition of a man with throat cancer in the bed next to him when (c) Eric spent months in hospital, as a young child, after an accident that put him in a coma.  A rare surprise of the film in its second half is that Tyson doesn’t top Eric in this me-too exchange with, ‘I’ve just put someone in a coma’.  This scene is the last we see of Eric.

    I know these strictures will cut no ice (sorry again) with cinéastes who consider film-making a matter of technique; credible character motivation and plot development – even when the story being told is set in a supposedly real world – as no more than means to the end of a visual and sonic composition.  Hello Destroyer does have a particular look but Funk’s limited style draws attention to itself and away from the meaning of his images.  Benjamin Loeb’s persistently dark cinematography ensures that plenty of those on screen remain literally obscure to the audience.  Even when the light is sufficient, Funk and Loeb sometimes show a person in the foreground in soft focus or present them from some way away, through half-open doors.  Funk’s camera pays more definite attention to a piece of dodgy plaster in a ceiling or a long crack in a wall – in other words, to things unequivocally bleak.  The soundtrack is somewhat more eloquent.  The explosions of noise – during, for example, Tyson’s bouts of lung-bursting physical exercise – are disturbing.  Tyson’s fear of how loud silence can be is in your head whenever things go quiet, even though he doesn’t appear to register unease at these moments – until, near the end, when Funk actually turns up the volume of the silence, into a disorienting buzz.

    I saw the film as part of the ‘Canada Now’ programme, showcasing ‘New Canadian Cinema in London’ at Curzon Soho.  The administration of the audience feedback questionnaires was excellent!  This isn’t something you can always say about special events at BFI, LFF etc but I’m sorry it’s the best I can say about the experience of Hello Destroyer.  I don’t quite get the title but the writer-director’s surname so perfectly reflects his film’s severely depressed mood that, had I stayed for the post-screening Q&A with him, I’d have been tempted to ask if Funk was a pseudonym.

    16 June 2017

    [1] According to the online Free Dictionary, ‘An enforcer’s job is to deter and respond to dirty or violent play by the opposition.  When such play occurs, the enforcer is expected to respond aggressively by fighting or checking the offender’.

  • My Cousin Rachel (2017)

    Roger Michell (2017)

    The storyline is (according to Wikipedia) faithful to Daphne du Maurier’s novel, except that the title character now meets her death more spectacularly.  In the book and the film that quickly followed its publication in 1951, a footbridge over the sunken garden in construction on the Cornish estate that Rachel now owns gives way[1].  In Roger Michell’s adaptation, Rachel (Rachel Weisz), wearing a brilliant blue gown and riding a white horse, plunges with her mount from a dodgy cliff path to the seashore far below.  Not unexpectedly, this new film differs from its predecessor by including a bit of sex and exposed flesh, and a few swear words but Michell, who also wrote the screenplay, shows little interest in reworking du Maurier’s romantic melodrama more thoroughly than that.  He relies on visual clichés when it suits:  the pearls of a necklace scattering and skittering down a wooden staircase; chaotic rifling through a chest of drawers in a desperate search for incriminating evidence.  The mood of the film isn’t greatly varied; occasionally, this results in a pivotal moment  lacking the impact you feel it should have – for example, when Rachel reveals to the hero Philip Ashley (Sam Claflin) that his cousin Ambrose left a will, bequeathing everything to her but crucially unsigned).  The perils of the cliff path are prefigured in a sequence that is both clumsily placed and makes you wonder why the route isn’t more locally notorious than it turns out be.  It’s not clear why My Cousin Rachel has been remade at all, except that it’s sixty-five years now since the Hollywood version.  (There’ve been television, radio and stage adaptations in between.)  Roger Michell’s film lacks excitement as well as imaginative purpose but it is entertaining and well acted.

    Although Daphne du Maurier’s plot seems designed to ensure that Rachel’s every action has both a malicious and an innocent explanation so that the truth about her is finally elusive, I was, as with Henry Koster’s movie, left unconvinced by one or two aspects of this.  One theme that comes through more strongly in Michell’s version is the significance of the age difference between Rachel and Philip, who is besotted with her.  The casting helps for a start:  Rachel Weisz is sixteen years older than Sam Claflin whereas Richard Burton was only nine years Olivia de Havilland’s junior.  Here, Rachel gives the disparity of their ages as a reason she can’t marry Philip.  The Oedipal implication of their relationship comes through interestingly in Philip’s impatient determination for Rachel to inherit the family jewels, in particular the pearls last worn by his mother on her wedding day.  Philip was so young when his mother died that he has no memory of her.  In that sense, he’s in a wholly different position from du Maurier’s Max de Winter yet, when Rachel first wears the pearls, the appropriation of costume belonging to a dead woman who exerts influence beyond the grave echoes Rebecca.

    Rachel Weisz’s impenetrability (I sometimes think watching her:  this woman is evidently feeling something but what?) serves her very well here.   Weisz is convincingly ambiguous and enigmatic, as well as very beautiful.  Her portrait of Rachel is as successful as Olivia de Havilland’s was not.   Philip Ashley’s complete sexual inexperience is one of the more contrived features of Daphne du Maurier’s set-up but Sam Claflin does a good job of making Philip plausibly naïve.  Claflin isn’t the most fluid of actors but his hard work pays off.  His playing is always committed rather than compelling but he persuades you that Philip is in the grip of an obsession.  Holliday Grainger does well in the thankless role of Louise, the daughter of Philip’s godfather-guardian.  Louise’s love for the hero is unreciprocated for as long as Rachel lives:  even at the end, when she’s dead, an uneasy shadow of second-bestness hangs over Louise.  (She’s now Philip’s first bride yet she’s the second Mrs Ashley.)   Iain Glen is Louise’s father and Pierfranceso Favino is Rainaldi, Rachel’s hard-to-read Italian friend.  Given what he has to work with, Simon Russell Beale plays the Ashley family solicitor with an emotional precision and incision that are quite amazing.

    14 June 2017

    [1] See note on the 1952 film for further plot details.

Posts navigation