Monthly Archives: January 2017

  • Mean Streets

    Martin Scorsese (1973)

    Martin Scorsese had made two feature films previously; the first of these, Who’s That Knocking At My Door (1967), shares with Mean Streets the same geographical and psychological terrain, and the same lead actor.  Both films take place in New York City and inside the head – and the guilty Catholic conscience – of an Italian-American local boy, played by Harvey Keitel.  (The intervening Boxcar Bertha is a lawbreaking-lovers-on-the-run story, set in the American South.)  Scorsese’s cinema of personal expression didn’t begin, then, with Mean Streets but his career as a big-time film-maker took off on the back of it – the movie seemed the right one with which to start my visits to BFI for their two-month Scorsese retrospective this January and February.  Mean Streets is an invaluable record of the locales and culture that fed the young Scorsese’s imagination; the perceived originality of this rough but highly dynamic piece of work excited many on its original release.  I understand and accept the film’s importance without feeling any such excitement or much engagement with it – beyond the vivid opening titles sequence, at any rate.  This isn’t just because of distance in time (I’d seen Mean Streets once before yesterday’s BFI outing but not in the 1970s).  I also feel distant from the drives of the main characters and the ‘street mentality’ which Scorsese, who co-wrote the screenplay with Mardik Martin, has summarised as ‘Somebody does something wrong, you’ve got break his head or you shoot him’.

    Keitel’s protagonist Charlie wants to be a good Catholic, to work his way up in the New York Mafia, and to reconcile his attachments to family and friends.  (These ambitions and loyalties conflict more sharply than they do for, say, some of the Corleone clan in the contemporary Godfather films.)  Charlie goes regularly to church and confession.  His Uncle Giovanni (Cesare Danova) is the local caporegime.  Johnny Boy (Robert De Niro), Charlie’s buddy from childhood, is a spectacularly loose cannon, deep in gambling debt.  Johnny is also the cousin of Teresa (Amy Robinson), with whom Charlie is having a secret affair.  It has to be secret from his family:  Teresa, who suffers from epilepsy, is described by Giovanni as ‘sick in the head’.  Charlie literally plays with fire (and metaphorically with hellfire):  when he sees a flame, he’s drawn to putting his hand in it.  Harvey Keitel expresses Charlie’s divided feelings convincingly and expressively:  it’s good to be reminded of his excellence in the roles that made his name – before his somehow strong-armed approach to characterisation set in (as in Blue Collar, for example).   As Johnny Boy, Robert De Niro is, both physically and emotionally, amazingly volatile – even though it’s impossible to see this performance for what it originally was.  There was so much to follow from De Niro in the years immediately ahead that viewers of my generation are liable, rather, to see a palimpsest.

    Mean Streets is firmly set in the guts of the city.  An incongruous sequence on a beach features the following dialogue between the hero and his girlfriend:

    Charlie: I hate the sun. Come on, let’s go inside, will ya?
    Teresa: What else do you hate?
    Charlie: I hate the ocean and I hate the beach and I hate the sun… and the grass and the trees and I hate heat! …
    Teresa: What do you like?
    Charlie: I like… spaghetti and clam sauce, mountains, Francis of Assisi, chicken with lemon and garlic, uhhh, and John Wayne.
    Teresa: There aren’t any, uh, mountains in Manhattan.
    Charlie: Tall buildings, same thing. And I like you.

    It’s often hard, and never more so than at this moment in the film, to resist seeing Charlie as Martin Scorsese’s alter ego.  Although there are plenty of outdoor scenes, rather few of them take place in the cold natural light of day.  At night the darkness of the streets is modified by car headlights and signage on buildings – and contiguous with the indoor settings Scorsese favours:  dusky, smoky subterranean bars and clubs; poky, Venetian-blinded bedrooms.   The headlong camera movement – especially in the bar-rooms, when fights break out (as they often do) – is giddying.  The pop soundtrack can reasonably be described as eclectic but girl groups – the Ronettes (‘Be My Baby’), the Marvelettes (‘Please Mr Postman’) and so on – are especially well represented.

    9 January 2017

  • A Monster Calls

    J A Bayona (2016)

    It begins with the boy protagonist, Conor O’Malley, having a nightmare – we soon find out it’s a recurring one.  Although the foundation of J A Bayona’s fantasy drama is anything but fantastic, it might well be described as a continuing nightmare:  a child struggles to cope with his mother’s terminal illness.  A Monster Calls is based on true stories in an unusual sense.  The author and activist Siobhan Dowd wasn’t herself a mother but this story is her brainchild.  Dowd died from cancer, aged forty-seven, in 2007.  She was denied the time she needed to bring her ideas to fruition as a novel but she had discussed them with her publisher, Walker Books.  After her death, Walker invited another author in their stable, Patrick Ness, to develop Dowd’s material, and his book A Monster Calls, with illustrations by Jim Kay, was published in 2011.  (The following year, both men won the Carnegie Medal and the Greenaway Medal for children’s or young adult fiction.)  The part of Conor in Bayona’s screen version of the novel is played by Lewis MacDougall, whose mother died from multiple sclerosis when he was eleven.

    A Monster Calls is set in present-day England but Conor’s bedroom in the house where he lives with his dying mother overlooks a time-honoured landscape of mortality – a church graveyard, sheltered by a yew tree.  Although the time at which the monster – a giant human shape, formed from the branches of the yew – repeatedly calls on Conor is shown on a digital clock with an LED display, the appointed hour is also traditional:  a few minutes after midnight.  The monster isn’t simply scary, however – at least, Conor isn’t scared by it.  The main purpose of its visits is to tell the boy three stories.  While these contain characters and events that wouldn’t be out of place in traditional fairytales, the message of the stories is that human beings, their motives and behaviour are more complicated, less morally black-and-white than Conor may have been led to believe.  Figures in the monster’s tales seem to correspond to people in the boy’s own life:  a witch not as black as she’s painted may be his grandmother; a parson, who unwisely prefers the apparently easy option, suggests Conor’s father.  The monster insists that, once he has told his three tales, Conor must, on pain of death, tell a true story of his own.  I was puzzled by the premise of the film, for which Patrick Ness wrote the screenplay, that Conor is a complete innocent.   Wouldn’t this twenty-first-century twelve-year-old already be familiar with moral complexity and troubling uncertainty – in both his own life and his cultural experience?  This is a boy whose parents have split up and whose father has started a new family on the other side of the Atlantic.  I admit that my knowledge of contemporary children’s fiction is negligible but if Disney Pictures are now encouraging young audiences to apprehend shades of grey and themes of loss – in movies like Maleficent, Cinderella and Inside Out – it seems a safe bet that tougher-minded, less commercially oriented writers for children will have gone before in doing so.

    J A Bayona’s two previous features were The Orphanage and The Impossible.   The Orphanage is a supernatural ghost-horror story, in which, as the title suggests, children who’ve lost parents feature strongly.   In The Impossible, the survival of a family – a woman, a man and their three sons – in the aftermath of the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 2004 hangs by a thread; the relationship of the mother and her eldest son is at the heart of this story (based on real events).  Bayona’s CV sounds tailor-made for A Monster Calls but the film suffers from a surfeit of gloomy style.  Jim Kay’s illustrations for the book are the inspiration for the movie’s beautiful and ingenious artwork, which appears in the form of animated illustrations to accompany the monster’s telling of his tales and as examples of the artistic talent Conor has inherited from his mother (we learn that she wanted to go to art college until the unplanned Conor came along).  These images connect with each other effectively.  They’re the visual highlights of A Monster Calls, despite unrelenting competition from collapsing buildings, imploding landscapes and other CGI manifestations of the psychic uproar the hero is battling with.  Óscar Faura’s lighting, indoors and out, is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of Conor’s fearful misery.  Even when he goes with his briefly visiting father to a funfair, the place is Stygian and deserted.  We accept the bleak outlook as the boy’s perspective, just as we accept his lack of school friends as an expression of his feelings of isolation, but the pervasive gloom limits the emotional range of the narrative:  there’s virtually no sense of a happier land from which Conor has been exiled.  Bayona should be grateful to the actors who suggest a more normal world and who thereby place Conor at a poignant, tantalising distance from it:  Toby Kebbell, as the affable, somehow useless father; and, especially, Ben Moor, who underplays skilfully and sensitively as a teacher at the boy’s school.

    Lewis MacDougall is an inspired choice for Conor and not just because he gives a convincingly felt performance (I wasn’t aware of his own bereavement until after I’d seen the film).  MacDougall’s troubled, questioning face is right for someone forced to grow up before his time while his slight build reinforces Conor’s vulnerability.  Although he’s already at comprehensive school, Conor is bullied there by a trio whose leader (James Melville) stands head and shoulders above him. As Conor’s mother, Felicity Jones is particularly good at conveying Lizzie O’Malley’s selflessness in letting Conor express his fears without letting him see her own.  These reminders that a loving mother gives protection and comfort to her child, even when she’s in desperate need of both, are perhaps the most uncompromising element of the film.  In the role of Lizzie’s uptight mother, Sigourney Weaver is probably miscast and certainly uncertain – especially with an English accent.  In the scheme of the story, the grandmother verges on wicked stepmother – she’s set to replace Conor’s mother as the woman running the house he lives in.  Weaver’s imposing presence works in realising this idea (and chiming with the putative villainess of the monster’s first story).  But Conor’s complaint that his grandmother’s house is ‘full of old person’s stuff’ (she forbids him to touch any of it:  he trashes the place) draws attention to how wrong Weaver is in other ways.  I got the sense from the dialogue and the plotting that grandmother was meant to be an out-of-touch oldie – someone who’s forgotten what it was like to be a child and how to handle one.  Sigourney Weaver doesn’t suggest this at all.  (Even without make-up, she’s a very glamorous granny.)  Geraldine Chaplin’s cameo as Conor’s head teacher lasts only a minute or two but she’s a confusing presence, too.

    The monster is incarnated, through motion capture technology, and voiced by Liam Neeson.  I found him an underwhelming storyteller though this may be the fault less of Neeson than of the technical trickery that upstages him – and which, for me, detracted from the emotional power of A Monster Calls more generally.  There was sustained sniffling in the row behind me at the Richmond Odeon but tears came to my eyes only once, during Felicity Jones’s deathbed scene; and I knew they were caused by things that have happened in my own life which the scene reminded me of.   When Conor asks why his parents’ marriage failed, his father tries to explain and the boy says, smiling but ruefully aware, ‘So you didn’t live happily ever after?’  This may be a blatant feed line but it gets an interesting response:  ‘No, but that’s all right – most people just get messily ever after.  That’s life …’   It may be life but it isn’t death – it isn’t what Conor’s mother gets.  The  monster forces Conor to tell the truth of his feelings about his mother’s illness; when he does so, the effect is meant to be cathartic (as it conventionally is in screen dramas when the psychoanalyst gets to the bottom of the patient’s problems).  What the monster doesn’t do is prepare Conor to cope with his impending loss.  Although he assures Conor (BFG-style) that he’ll-always-be-there-for-him, the platitude doesn’t convince.  This unusual movie is in my head more today than it was when I came out from seeing it yesterday but that’s largely because I think the technique in A Monster Calls is ‘distract[ing] from distraction by distraction’.  I don’t feel it gets to grips with its awful subject – that, when a child’s much-loved parent receives a death sentence, it’s a case of a monster calling and refusing to go away.

    5 January 2017

Posts navigation