Monthly Archives: November 2016

  • Kate Plays Christine

    Robert Greene (2016)

    Kate Plays Christine is formally more ingenious than the label ‘documentary’ might imply.  Kate is the actress Kate Lyn Sheil, Christine the journalist Christine Chubbuck, whom Sheil is to portray in a movie.  The actress researches her character by visiting places where Chubbuck spent time; she talks to various people who might offer helpful insights – a psychologist, a friend of the Chubbuck family, colleagues at WXLT-TV in the period leading up to Christine’s on-air suicide, as she read the news, in July 1974.  As she struggles to understand better who Christine Chubbuck was, Sheil examines her own personality and (as she sees them) limitations.  The talking heads include other members of the cast of the movie in which Sheil will play Chubbuck.  But just as Kate Lyn Sheil finds the ‘real’ Christine Chubbuck ever more elusive, so the reality of the film within Robert Greene’s film gradually recedes.  By the end, the movie in which Kate was to play Christine has virtually evaporated – if it ever existed at all, and that seems doubtful:  it’s an artifice through which to describe Chubbuck’s life and legacy, and to explore an actor’s struggles to achieve truthfulness in a biopic.

    Kate Lyn Sheil is new to me but she has 55 acting credits on IMDB.  Many of these are in obscure indie films though Sheil has appeared in the last couple of years in, among other things, the American House of Cards and Alex Ross Perry’s Listen Up Philip.  In Kate Plays Christine, she’s intelligently articulate but not very expressive:  she becomes progressively less engaging as a performer, if not as a personality in her own right.  It’s hard to know quite how intentional this is.  The effect of Sheil’s wan screen presence is to realise the distance that she feels separates her from Christine Chubbuck, and to focus interest on the latter – Robert Greene may well have aimed to achieve both these things.  Yet Sheil’s failure to convince goes beyond failing to convince herself that she can get inside Chubbuck’s head, and this made me uncomfortable.  When she visits a house where Chubbuck once lived or stands on the beach where a memorial service for her took place, we’re doubly removed from reality:  Sheil comes across as an actress pretending to be an actress trying to get close to the woman she’s playing.  Another effect of Sheil’s underpowered acting, if you’ve seen Christine (as I had two days previously), is to make you appreciate all the more Rachel Hall’s achievement in the lead role of Antonio Campos’s film.

    There’s an increasing, interesting imbalance in Robert Greene’s piece – between what feels like enervated contrivance and the impact of the mythology that’s grown up around Christine Chubbuck’s death.  Early on, Kate Lyn Sheil visits and talks with an elderly woman who’ll be making her Christine wig; later, Sheil goes swimming in the ocean wearing the wig, and it keeps coming off.  If this is meant as an illustration of how Christine keeps ‘getting away from’ the actress trying to inhabit her, it’s a daft one:  the wig, which never looks convincing even on dry land, seems almost certain to come off underwater.  The aforementioned beach scene on the site of Christine’s memorial service is accompanied by thunder and lightning.  While it’s perfectly possible that the brewing storm is a spectacular atmospheric coincidence, one suspects by this stage that Greene kept a close eye on weather forecasts before deciding when to shoot the sequence.  Watching footage of the real Christine Chubbuck on film is presented as a pivotal moment in Kate Lyn Sheil’s apprehension of Christine’s ‘otherness’:  we’re supposed to think Kate has never seen Christine before, even though at least one of the video clips of Chubbuck currently available on YouTube was posted there several years ago.

    This moment is also a letdown to the extent that the real Christine Chubbuck is hardly electrifying – not compared with Rebecca Hall, anyway.  Nevertheless, Kate Plays Christine conveys biographical information and theories about Chubbuck economically and effectively.  The psychologist whom Sheil meets suggests that Chubbuck resolved to attempt suicide in a way that expressed her deep personal anger through her chosen line of work.  This is plausible: it’s hard to ignore the shocking pun of the phrase ‘news bulletin’ in relation to her death.  It’s a subsequent meeting, between Sheil and two of the men working for WXLT-TV news at the time, that galvanises Robert Greene’s narrative.  The WXLT-TV video footage of the self-shooting has never become publicly available.  One of the two men featured here, although he says he knows that a recording still exists, points up the irony of its continuing concealment:  Christine Chubbuck obliged viewers to see something they’d never seen before and which has never been seen since.  This same witness is candid too about the morbid, ‘blood and guts’ hook of what Chubbuck did.  He forced this viewer to admit this was one of the things that drew him to see Greene’s film and Christine at the London Film Festival.

    This man’s brief contribution upstages what’s meant to be the climax to proceedings, in which Kate Lyn Sheil repeatedly tries and fails to enact Christine’s suicide on camera.  Before she eventually ‘succeeds’, Sheil looks straight at us and summarises the issues that Kate Plays Christine has raised for her and which she feels, as an actress, she has failed to resolve.  Both the acted suicide and this moment of confrontation with the audience (and perhaps, from Sheil’s point of view, with Robert Greene) feel forced and are anti-climactic – but one thing Kate Lyn Sheil says in the finale is striking.  She tells us there’s no satisfying meaning to be found in Christine Chubbuck’s death – that Christine was just a sad individual.  It’s ironic that this is what one infers from watching Christine but that Kate Plays Christine, chiefly through what that WXLT-TV man had to say, hints at something more.

    12 October 2016

  • Christine

    Antonio Campos (2016)

    Christine Chubbuck was a TV news reporter, who, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, worked for a succession of regional news channels.  The last of these was WXLT-TV, based in Sarasota, Florida.  On 15 July 1974, Chubbuck was reading a morning news bulletin when a film reel – showing footage of a shooting incident in a local restaurant – jammed.   Chubbuck paused then said to camera:

    ‘In keeping with Channel 40’s policy of bringing you the latest in “blood and guts”, and in living color, you are going to see another first – attempted suicide.’

    She produced a gun from the bag she had under the desk and shot herself in the head.  She died in hospital fourteen hours later, a few weeks short of her thirtieth birthday.  More than four decades on, two films about Chubbuck have appeared almost simultaneously.  Both were screened for the first time in January 2016 at Sundance; both featured in the programme for this year’s London Film Festival[1].  Antonio Campos’s Christine is a biographical drama, with Rebecca Hall in the title role.  Robert Greene’s Kate Plays Christine is a documentary of sorts, in which the actress Kate Lyn Sheil prepares to portray Chubbuck in a screen dramatisation of her life and death.

    ‘If it bleeds, it leads’, is the journalistic motto of the WXLT-TV newsroom boss Mike Nelson (Tracy Letts) in Christine.  You might think Chubbuck’s television first – with the reinforcement of her ‘blood and guts’ comment – was intended partly as a statement about the queasy symbiosis between broadcast news media menus and the public appetites that they feed.  Chubbuck’s act is alleged to have inspired elements of, and the most famous line in, Paddy Chayefsky’s script for Network (1976), when the news anchor Howard Beale yells, ‘I’m mad as Hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!’  But I don’t think I’d heard of Christine Chubbuck before this year and I’m not sure how widely she’s regarded as some kind of moral exemplar, rather than as an unhappy and unlucky individual.  If she’s only the latter, is she a big enough subject for a biopic?  Antonio Campos and the screenwriter Craig Shilowich, while suggesting that aspects of her professional life contributed to Christine’s decision to end her life, barely pursue the idea that the manner of her death exposed shocking truths about the world in which she worked.   Her personal miseries entirely dominate the story.  I heard someone remark, as we came out of the LFF screening, ‘Well, she was obviously depressed’.  That sounds like a very limited and obvious message to carry away from a drama in which the protagonist commits suicide but it’s fair enough:  it isn’t clear what else Campos’s movie means to say.

    The last weeks of Chubbuck’s life coincided with the climax to Watergate (Richard Nixon resigned about three weeks after her death).  The film starts with a technical studio test, during which Christine pretends she’s conducting an interview with Nixon; near the end of the movie, a reference to his paranoia is made to imply that, in this respect at least, the President and Christine Chubbuck were somewhat kindred spirits.  Even so, you feel Watergate is, for Campos and Shilowich, little more than a handy suggestive motif.  The connections between the sexual politics of WXLT-TV and Christine’s personal life are more substantial.   The newsroom is largely a man’s world:  when the long-serving anchor George Ryan (Michael C Hall) gets a better job, at a station in Baltimore, the transfer package also includes his WXLT-TV colleague Andrea (Kim Shaw), described as ‘a little firecracker’.  Christine, on the other hand, has a forbidding, witchy look (images of the real Christine Chubbuck make clear that Rachel Hall’s Morticia hair, eyebrows and pallor are hardly an exaggeration).  She’s frightened and isolated – concerned about her gynaecological health, her inability to form relationships, her virginity.  There’s one sequence – perhaps the most memorable in Christine – in which the boundary between her private and public lives is blurred imaginatively.  As she prepares to leave the restaurant where she’s been dining alone, Christine approaches two other diners, a young man and woman.  ‘You seem very much in love’, she tells the politely puzzled couple.  Her tone is that of a professionally interested journalist.  What impels her towards their table is something more personally urgent:  Christine needs to know how on earth it’s possible to have this kind of easy intimacy.

    Few other scenes in Christine compare although one or two turn out better in the event than in the conception.  George persuades Christine to go out for the evening:  after dinner, he takes her along to a meeting of the transactional analysis therapy group he regularly attends.  It’s an improbable climax to a date, comically reminiscent of the ‘Rhythm of Life’ sequence in Sweet Charity and used for some facile satire of the therapy group and of George’s self-serving moral compass.  The stated principles of transactional analysis – manage your expectations in order to manage your life – run counter to what George said in his cups to Christine at a Fourth of July party, and to the news of his promotion, which he breaks to her as he drops her off at the end of their evening out.  Even so, the exchange of questions between Christine and one of the regulars at the therapy group gets over powerfully the heroine’s preoccupations and the impasse in which she finds herself.   Straight after her outing with George, Christine visits Bob Andersen (John Cullum), who owns WXLT-TV and other stations, and begs him to send her to Baltimore too (he tells that Andrea is already on the ticket).  I may have misunderstood but I found this episode confusingly staged.  It seems George has dropped Christine off right outside Andersen’s place without her asking him to do so; then it appears she’s in such disarray that she knocks on the front door without knowing who lives inside.

    With her increasingly stiff carriage and formidable internal force, Rebecca Hall does extraordinary work as Christine.  The difficulty with the performance is that the thin script and sketchy. direction of Christine make it too much of a showcase.  Christine’s mother Peg (J Smith-Cameron) is worried the mental illness from which her daughter suffered a few years back ‘in Boston’ (it gets to sound a bit like Chinatown) is returning.  Hall makes Christine’s psychological problems so salient that her behaviour, particularly in her exchanges with her boss, does seem unreasonable – and it’s therefore hard to see her as a victim of male chauvinism.  The most poignant moments of Rebecca Hall’s portrait come when Christine appears normal enough for people not to realise how far away she is from feeling it.  The contrasts between Christine and the pliant, sexually relaxed and active Peg, with whom she shares her home, are nothing if not obvious.  In her first scene, as Peg waits in a café for her daughter to arrive, J Smith-Cameron looks as if she’s getting ready to start acting.  This is likely the result of inattentive editing on Antonio Campos’s part rather than the fault of Smith-Cameron:  something similar happens at the Fourth of July party when Michael C Hall seems to be winding up for a prepared big moment.  Both these actors are physically convincing, however, and increasingly persuasive.

    As in Wiener-Dog, Tracy Letts makes a two-dimensional character one-dimensional but Maria Dizzia is good as Jean Reed, who also works at WXLT-TV and who tries unavailingly to befriend Christine.  When Jean’s feeling unhappy, she tells Christine, she eats ice cream and listens to cheerful songs – the kind of remark that immediately strikes you as likely to come in useful at a later stage, as this one does.  Antonio Campos’s choice of contemporary songs for the soundtrack is mostly appropriate without being jarringly so (‘Rock Your Baby’, ‘Annie’s Song’, ‘Everything I Own,’ ‘Love is All Around’) but he goes off-key in the sequence that leads into the film’s closing titles.  After Christine’s death, Jean comes back to her apartment and gets some ice cream from the freezer.  She turns on the television and switches channels to avoid news of Christine:  we hear the theme song from The Mary Tyler Moore Show (‘You’re Gonna Make It After All’).  This was the first American sitcom to feature as the central character an unmarried, independent professional woman – Mary Richards, who works at a Minneapolis TV news station.  As if that wasn’t enough, we also hear the standard voiceover ‘This show was recorded in front of a live audience.’  The ironic aptness is not only crude but unconvincing in relation to the sensitive Jean Reed, who would have been aware of and oppressed by it.  She would have switched channels again.

    10 October 2016

    [1] The screenings of Christine and Kate Plays Christine that I went to were both at the Vue Cinema in Leicester Square, where I experienced what is nowadays, for me, a very rare difficulty.  The dialogue was super-audible – resoundingly, almost oppressively so early on in Christine (and to a lesser extent in Kate Plays Christine).  I so often complain about the reverse problem that I felt bad resenting this.  I got used to it after a while but Vue does seem to have an unusually powerful sound system …

Posts navigation