Monthly Archives: August 2016

  • Picnic at Hanging Rock

    Peter Weir (1975)

    In the first shot of Peter Weir’s The Last Wave (1977), a gnarled old Aborigine man is painting primitive-looking designs on the underside of a mass of jutting stone in the shadow of which he sits cross-legged.  ‘Hanging rock’, announced a smart-aleck voice in the cinema, referring to the director’s previous film.  Picnic at Hanging Rock is a beautifully composed but dramatically thin account of an Australian cause célèbre – the disappearance, without trace, of three pupils and one of their teachers on a girls’ school outing on St Valentine’s Day in the year 1900[1].  The real-life-unsolved-mystery of the story removes the need for Weir to explain the supernatural atmosphere he creates in which to shroud the vanishing – a combination of sound, editing rhythm and visual compositions that alternate between sunlit paradise and forbidding terra incognita.   (Some of these compositions bring to mind the paintings of Sidney Nolan.)   The girls, with their trance-like movement and diaphanous dresses, are so ethereal that disappearing into thin air seems a natural tendency of their physical condition.  The first part of Picnic at Hanging Rock is intriguing; after the trio and their teacher have dematerialised, the film runs down.  The ‘mystery’ begins to lose its grip – partly as one grows accustomed to Weir’s technique, partly too because the director seems to lose interest in the matter of what happened.  He pursues conventionally the investigations, public and private, into the disappearance and explores superficially the psychological effect of the affair on the major characters of the story.  The most interesting element of Picnic is its depiction of the schoolgirls (if not their teacher) as turn of the century ephemera, as representing a long-gone as well as a short-lived species of human life.

    While the girls picnic, Russell Boyd’s camera contemplates them in God’s-eye view long shot and describes the microscopic world around and beneath them.  Both perspectives suggest that the girls are a thin, decorative layer topping a much more substantial creation – implied in the pulsing variety of sounds and brought startlingly under one’s nose in a close-up of the ground, teeming with insect life.  The Gheorghe Zamfir panpipe music that Weir uses to score the picture send the mind way back, from the specific time and place that the sets and costumes precisely convey to ‘earlier and other creation’.  Hanging Rock itself, implacably and unthinkably old, reinforces the sense of more-things-in-heaven-and-earth than were dreamt of in the philosophy of a single-sex Australian boarding school in the twilight of the Victorian era.   The most memorable line in Cliff Grant’s script is triggered by the dry-as-dust maths mistress.  She reels off facts and figures about the enormous age of the rock and one of the girls replies:  ‘Just think:  it’s been waiting for millions of years for us to come’.  This may or may not be meant as a spuriously arrogant human reaction to evolution’s daunting timescale.  Either way, it expresses succinctly the collision of long-standing and transient forms of existence.  In The Last Wave, Peter Weir remains preoccupied with atmosphere, the hugeness of nature and the unconscious, the relative limits of the conscious mind.  Dreams figure prominently and restore you to a childish attitude towards the light of day – which takes away not only the dark but also the possibility of nightmares.

    [1970s]

    [1] Afternote:  These references to the factual basis of the film are wrong.  Picnic at Hanging Rock was adapted from a 1967 book by Joan Lindsay – a work of fiction, although Wikipedia notes as follows:

    ‘The novel … begins and ends with a pseudo-historical prologue and epilogue …. However, while the geological feature, Hanging Rock, and the several towns mentioned are actual places near Mount Macedon, the story is not completely [sic] true. Lindsay had [sic] done little to dispel the myth that the story is based on truth, in many interviews either refusing to confirm it was entirely fiction, or hinting that parts of the book were fictitious, and others were not. Valentine’s Day, 14 February 1900 was a Wednesday, not a Saturday as depicted in the story. All attempts by enthusiastic readers to find historical evidence of the event, characters, or even Appleyard College, have proved fruitless.’

  • Permission to Kill

    Cyril Frankel (1975)

    Adapted by Robin Estridge from his own novel, this is a stupid, dull international thriller – with ‘adult’ overtones.  A cool but basically terrified killer sets out to assassinate an exiled political leader, who’s attempting to return to his (unnamed) native land.  The would-be assassin is meant to display incredible flair and insight – he’s a cross between Che Guevara and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – but Bekim Fehmiu, who plays him, looks just ill and tired.  Dirk Bogarde is unappealingly expert in the main role.  (He says he made this film as light relief after Death in Venice and Liliana Cavani’s The Night Porter.)  Bogarde’s means of suggesting bitter, introspective seediness are so perfectly economical that he can make a character out of no more than a fastidious hand movement.  He’s so quietly, icily forbidding, however, that he isn’t convincing as someone who could fool five supposedly intelligent people into believing he’s an avuncular MI5 man.  Timothy Dalton continues to look like a promising actor:  you wish he could be given opportunities to deliver on the promise.  After Bogarde, Dalton is much better than anyone else in the cast but his role, as a cynical Foreign Office employee, is repellent:  the script sees this character, because he’s homosexual and posh, as the devil incarnate.  Dalton affects (with aplomb) sinister, ever-so-clipped diction to underline what lies behind his pretty boy looks.  (Like Mr Humphries in Are You Being Served?, Dalton’s character is ravenously unselective.  He talks ad nauseam about beefcake.)  The AA certificate is explained by Cyril Frankel’s throwing in a couple of nude scenes for one of the actresses (Nicole Calfan) and sniggering bad language – or the implication of bad language.  Desultorily attempting a crossword puzzle, Dalton tosses a clue to Bogarde:  ‘Paranoid policeman with delusions of grandeur.  Four letters – C-blank-blank-T ….’  (Clot?)  With Ava Gardner (atrocious) and Frederic Forrest, who plays a brashly heroic American journalist.  His character is established by his saying things like ‘The hell we did’ and ‘Let’s go!’   After the honourable exile’s eventual assassination at Vienna airport, Forrest is also required to ask, ‘What sort of people are we?’, and to burst into manly tears.

    [1970s]

Posts navigation