Monthly Archives: August 2016

  • Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams

    Gilbert Cates (1973)

    It may seem unfair to condemn a film for accuracy but Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams is credible in such a drab, superficial way – and, eventually, so unilluminating – that it deserves the criticism.  The original screenplay by Stewart Stern (who adapted Rebel Without a Cause and Rachel, Rachel for the screen) concerns Rita Walden (Joanne Woodward), an affluent, middle-aged New York housewife, at a crisis point in her comfortable, unsatisfying life.  Rita is married to Harry (Martin Balsam), an optician and a decent man, whom she has never loved.  Her daughter Anna (Dori Brenner) is married with a small child but Rita’s homosexual son Bobby (Ron Richards) has disappeared to Amsterdam indefinitely.  We first see Rita during her own nightmare, trapped in a plane that’s flying through a thunderstorm, getting into difficulty and about to crash.  In waking life, the pill-popping Rita is a handsome, somewhat hard-faced woman – anxious to fill up her time and her mind.  The first half hour of Gilbert Cates’s film concentrates on her day in the centre of New York City with her mother, Mrs Pritchett (she isn’t given a first name).  The two women have lunch (and some acid conversation) together before going to a movie.  (It’s Wild Strawberries – an inspired choice only in the sense that Bergman’s film is evidently one of the inspirations for Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams.)  As they cross a road on the way to the cinema, Mrs Pritchett (Sylvia Sidney) stops suddenly, gripped by a pain in her chest.  Once Wild Strawberries is underway, Rita doses off into reminiscence of her discovery of Bobby and a male ballet dancer making eyes at each other.  She comes to and witnesses her mother suffering a fatal heart attack in the seat next to her.

    Rita is depressed by her mother’s death:  first, because she’s unable to feel grief; second, because she has to face the prospect of selling the family farm and, as a result (so Rita sees it), relinquishing her nostalgically cherished childhood.  Her resistance to the sale is strongly opposed both by her sister (Tresa Hughes) and by Anna.  Harry takes Rita on a trip to Europe – a combined second honeymoon and convalescence – where she becomes suffocated by regret for her past and frustration at having squandered the best years of her life.  In a London tube station, hot and hemmed in among rush-hour commuters, she imagines that she sees her mother on an escalator:  Rita is overcome by irrational terror that, if she reaches the top of the escalator on which she herself is actually travelling, she too will die.  She lingers in London, vainly hoping that Bobby will contact her.  Eventually, she and Harry travel to Belgium and he returns to the site of the Siege of Bastogne, in which he fought in December 1944.  Memories of the deaths there of men as young as or younger than him remind Harry of the promise he made at Bastogne to cherish and put to good use all the life he was given after this reprieve.  As the film ends, the lonely, frightened Wardens realise that they need (and deserve) each other.  Rita faces up to the future by agreeing to sell the farm.  Her last line – the last line of the whole film – is, ‘When we’re old, I want a smaller apartment’.  Although Rita and Harry have sort of renewed their marriage vows, she remains without hope and can take refuge only in material comfort and conversation.

    Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams is a depressing and overrated film.  Reasonably bright viewers, observing fairly real characters like Rita and Harry, can be relied upon to enthuse that they know people ‘just like that’.  It’s also – although there’s no physical violence or bare flesh and hardly any bad language – shocking and even crude.  Sylvia Sidney certainly makes a memorable screen comeback but this is partly because her wrinkled, painted face contrasts so sharply with her fresh, youthful looks in movies of thirty or forty years ago and partly because her character dies a horrible death.  Sidney’s barnacle-encrusted voice works well for Mrs Pritchett’s charmless wisecracks but it’s the speed of her speech and the vitality of her movements that make a greater impression – and make sense of Rita’s stunned reflection on the evening of her mother’s death:  ‘Five hours ago we were arguing over a corn fritter’.  Rita’s immediate response to her mother’s death is accurate and affecting:  she can’t believe that her mother no longer feels or thinks; nor can we, because our recollections of her, like Rita’s, are of a babbling, bitchy, very alive old lady.  Because she dies of natural causes – in cinematic terms unspectacularly – it might be argued that Mrs Pritchett’s death is powerful thanks to the film-makers’ subtle restraint but I don’t think this is true.  The stab of pain she experiences in the street is, in retrospect, shockingly believable – Rita almost scolds her mother for worrying her and attributes the pain to indigestion.  The controversial corn fritter is overworked, though.  During lunch, the mother says, ‘One corn fritter won’t kill me’.  In a movie that was either squarer or more flamboyant than this one, the irony of such a line would be scorned; here, it passes for a bit of small talk that’s unthinkably, awfully right.   And shortly before the scary moment crossing the road Mrs Pritchett begins a sentence with an alarming shriek, as if in pain (which she isn’t – yet).

    The death itself is wrenching:  Sylvia Sidney’s walnut face, with its poodle-like features, is shot in agonising close-up; the mother grips her daughter’s hands for support but the two women continue to argue until Mrs Pritchett loses consciousness.  I was relieved to tell myself at this point it’s only a film:  I didn’t like being reminded that I can’t conceive of nothingness after life and that I’m shocked by sudden death.  It’s a mark of the shallowness of most commercial cinema that a sequence like this can have such unusual impact but is manipulation of a relatively intelligence audience any more admirable than the string-pulling in movies like The Exorcist or The Towering Inferno?  I realise this sounds flippant but I think Mrs Pritchett’s death is too true to be good.  Rita called her mother a snow-queen and, according to her own daughter, is now one herself.   The loss of her mother makes Rita aware of her own coldness but also wakens the dormant emotional volcanoes of her life into sustained eruption:  she is reminded of her own mortality and of her lost youth too.

    Stewart Stern’s psychological insight is sacrificed in the name of moving the drama along in the graveside family argument at the mother’s funeral:  it’s falsely histrionic that tensions and jealousies between Rita and her sister that have simmered for many years should boil over so suddenly and completely.  Heartlessness and selfishness are evidently family traits:  as Rita wanders sadly around the farm Mrs Pritchett owned, other relatives discuss a selling price and remember the dead woman with what Dylan Thomas called ‘mule praises’.  This part of the film is remarkably lacking in originality:  it culminates in Rita’s own madeleine-tasting as she conjures up sunny, perfect memories of childhood by eating some well-preserved strawberry jam.  Stern’s dialogue, although it’s often skilful, tends to underline things too heavily.  During her heated exchange with her mother over lunch about declining service standards in American restaurants (and thickly-cut lemon slices in particular), Rita says, ‘I don’t believe this conversation’.  Anna castigates Rita for her addiction to the past in a forthright speech that’s well delivered by Dori Brenner – and well written until Anna caps her tirade by summarising it:  ‘You can’t bring back the past by eating a jar of 1940s jam!’  The film itself is being sold to the audience as a pre-packaged product – a kind of  psychoanalytical middle-age spread.

    I liked the previous Joanne Woodward-Stewart Stern collaboration, Rachel, Rachel (1968), even while realising that its supply of frustrated spinster neuroses – fear of being lesbian, fear of frigidity, phantom pregnancy etc – were too much for one film.  (The screenplay was adapted from a 1966 novel, A Jest of God, by Margaret Laurence.Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams is more ambitious in the sense that the protagonist isn’t likeable.  In order to be sympathetic, Rita Walden needs her lovelessness to be linked to a larger malaise:  Stern and Gilbert Cates don’t establish a link of this kind.   Still, Joanne Woodward’s portrait of Rita is intelligent and her technique is very pure:  the whining note in her voice is more effective because it’s used sparingly.  Another fine element of the performance is how Woodward turns on the waterworks (with increasing frequency as the film goes on) – in such a face-crumpling, self-pitying way that you feel vaguely sad but not particularly sorry for Rita.  Woodward won the Best Actress award from the New York Film Critics (for 1973) and the British Film Academy (for 1974) for her work in this film.  The American Academy passed her over (although she was nominated) – largely, I think, because they tend to resist giving lead actor Oscars for performances as seriously dislikeable people.  (Louise Fletcher, who won this year for One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, is the first Best Actress-ogress in a long time.)  And Rita is an uncomfortable character:  although she’s a shrew, she’s a self-critical shrew; although she’s hard, she’s also brittle.

    While Rita isn’t black or white, Stewart Stern isn’t able to give the other characters shades of grey.  Harry, in particular, is condescendingly written.  In his lachrymose attack of self-awareness at Bastogne and the subsequent dialogues with his wife in their hotel room (two single beds of course), he’s a-little-man-doing-the-best-he-can.  When unloving, morbid Rita tells Harry he should leave her and/or have an affair, he asks, ‘Who with?’ and Rita’s reply is, ‘I’m not going to find her for you’.  Harry then launches into a sentimental monologue:  he has found the girl of his dreams and it’s Rita.  This is a shrewd piece of plotting and emotional manipulation (it clearly touched the sparse student audience I was one of):  in spite of Rita’s cynical reaction, it lays the ground for the eventual affirmation of the Wardens’ marriage.  Many people will feel this resolution is earned and avoids being slushy – thanks to the acerbic and angry exchanges that have gone before.  It’s remarkable how audiences can be seduced in this way – blinded to a film’s changing its tone at the eleventh hour for its own convenience.  Martin Balsam acts pleasantly and quietly and as an unselfish foil to Joanne Woodward:  it’s offensive that the actor’s own looks are being used to make the man he’s playing the incarnation of unsexy ordinariness.  (Harry is also a comical American-tourist-in-Britain on the side.)

    Dori Brenner’s Anna is just about sanity personified:  as she’s younger generation, she confirms the exclusively middle-aged nature of her mother’s disease.  Stern’s characterisation becomes really annoying in the case of the Wardens’ son.  I realise that we see Bobby’s homosexual unmasking through his mother’s horrified eyes but, as he never appears again, it’s impossible to put Rita’s nightmare-daydream in any context and it comes across as anti-homosexual.  The sequence is shot in monochrome; the ballet dancer Bobby is with is practising serpentine leg movements; the leering expression on the faces of both men is there to torture Rita.  I don’t understand what the emblematically queer dancer – a risibly obvious idea of a ‘typical’ homosexual – is doing in a supposedly realistic film.  Or is Rita melodramatically embroidering her memory of what she actually saw?

    Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams isn’t too visually ugly for a movie of its type.  (Domestic moral tracts are often thought by Hollywood to be made more sincere by slovenly production values and, especially, by watery photography.)  But although Gilbert Cates and Stewart Stern have things to say that are true they’ve little to say that’s of value.  The audience for a film like this will recognise the panic and emptiness that Rita feels and already knows there are no easy answers to such feelings.  Within mainstream American cinema, Stern is no doubt a relatively thoughtful writer and Cates an unusually tactful director (his previous film was I Never Sang for My Father (1970)). There are good lines and strong performances to take away from Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams but it’s a lowering experience:  it illustrates the stagnating, frightening consequences of having too much time – and time to think – without offering any new insights.  The structure is clever:  a lull before the storm which sparks problems the cumulative effect of which is overwhelming – then the gradual subsidence of the storm with rumbling, disconcerting reverberations echoing into the distance.  Perhaps this is a better piece of work than most ‘escapist’ movies but Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams makes you want to get out of the cinema as quickly as you can.

    [1976]

  • Sebastiane

    Derek Jarman, Paul Humfress (1976)

    Take 1

    Although Sebastian became a Christian saint, his religious belief is presented here as pantheistic – he has an almost physical obsession with spectacular nature.  The sunlit, dust-blown compositions, photographed by Peter Middleton, are beautiful, the sex scenes more sensitive than the ‘unashamed eroticism’-type blurb for Sebastiane leads you to expect.  In atmospheric terms, the film is a success.  You feel the power of the dizzying, irritating heat of the desert, where a group of Roman soldiers is exiled (by Diocletian), and the aimless, isolated tedium that underlies and nurtures the homosexuality on display.  Sebastiane is, however, hopeless as drama.  The scenes don’t build and become repetitive.  The editing is slack.  The dialogue is in Latin and some of the English subtitles remind you of stilted, schoolbook translations from the language.  There’s a matching woodenness to the line readings.  Most of the cast, unable to project much in the way of emotion, mug their way through.  Neil Kennedy at least has some excuse for doing so, as a queer-baiter with a vigorous line in lewd braggadocio.  As Sebastian, Leonardo Treviglio has a melancholy, quiet nobility.  The players also include Richard Warwick, Barney James and Lindsay Kemp, who appears in a prologue that is gorgeously decadent and superfluous to the main story.  The film’s title is the hero’s name in the vocative case (Sebastian, O Sebastian …).  You can’t help thinking that, in spite of his tireless abstinence, ‘Up Sebastian’ would suit better and sell more tickets.

    [1970s]

    Take 2

    In 1975, Laura Mulvey, in her essay Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, coined the cinematic term ‘male gaze’.  At around the same time, Derek Jarman, with Paul Humfress, was making Sebastiane, in which the male directorial gaze is almost exclusively on other men, whose bodies are, more often than not, either nearly or completely naked.  Shortly before his death in 1994, Derek Jarman said that:

    Sebastian [sic] didn’t present homosexuality as a problem and this was what made it different from all the British films that had preceded it.  It was also homoerotic.  The film was historically important; no feature film had ventured here[1].’

    Jarman’s first point is disputable.  Homosexuality as such wasn’t a problem in, for example, Sunday Bloody Sunday (1971).  The problem in John Schlesinger’s film is that the younger man in the gay relationship is carelessly selfish and dividing his time between a male and a female lover.  Otherwise, it’s hard to disagree with Jarman’s retrospective judgment.

    Sebastiane is set in AD 303, at the start of the most sustained period of Christian persecution during the reign of the Roman emperor Diocletian.  Text on the screen at the start explains that numerous Christians have already been executed as punishment for setting fire to temples.  The specific date is somewhat misleading since the film-makers don’t feel bound by strict historical accuracy.  For example, it’s widely believed that Saint Sebastian actually died much earlier in Diocletian’s lengthy reign (c AD 288).  Jarman and Humfress are primarily concerned with dramatising the martyrdom of an enduring icon of both western art and gay mythology.

    Diocletian holds a great party to mark the twentieth year of his rule.  The occasion, which serves as a prologue to Sebastiane, is dominated by the performance of a group of male dancers, with Lindsay Kemp at its literal centre, encircled by members of his troupe.  Kemp wears a G-string, each of the other dancers a huge, multi-coloured phallus. While it doesn’t prefigure Sebastian’s torments and death by arrows (to which the following narrative leads up), the Kemp number is an adumbration of the sadomasochistic reverie and queer cornucopia to come.  The mega-phalluses encroach on the central figure.  The dance culminates in a mime of anal penetration that causes him agony and ecstasy.

    Immediately after the dance is over, Sebastian (Leonardo Treviglio), chief of the palace guard and a favourite of the emperor (Robert Medley), intervenes to defend a Christian accused of arson.  The angry Diocletian demotes Sebastian to the rank of private and banishes him to a remote coastal garrison (actually Sardinia).  Another of the group of nine soldiers stationed there, as he informs us at the end of the party at which he too is present, is Maximus (Neil Kennedy), a relative veteran in the military.   The rest of the film’s action takes place in this distant outpost of the Roman Empire, where the sandy terrain amounts to desert.  The hint that Max, as he’s known, will be the narrator of events isn’t followed up and reasonably so.  The images speak for themselves.

    It would be an oversimplification to describe the garrison life as gay.  The soldiers’ roughhousing is often on the cusp between homosocial and homosexual but Max, provocative in more ways than one, scorns effeminacy and repeatedly tells the others he can’t wait to get back to Rome and sex with female prostitutes – in particular, the notorious Mammea Morgana, who was glimpsed at the palace party.  The garrison’s senior officer Severus (Barney James) is strongly attracted to Sebastian.  The latter’s determined celibacy thwarts and intensifies Severus’s desire.  Sebastian’s pacifism, reflected in his refusal to continue military training, compounds Severus’s frustration and results in the protagonist’s abuse, torture and eventual murder.  The sweet-natured Justin (Richard Warwick) also loves Sebastian; in this case, the balance between platonic and sexual impulses is more ambiguous.  The only straightforward gay coupling is between two other soldiers, Adrian (Ken Hicks) and Anthony (Janusz Romanov), who are hardly characterised beyond their physical relationship.  The others in the group – Claudius (Donald Dunham), Julian (Daevid Finbar) and Marius (Stefano Massari) – are minor figures in the story.

    Jarman, Humfress and James Whaley (who worked with them on the screenplay and was one of the film’s producers) create a growing tension between the spiritual and quasi-sexual aspects of Sebastian’s faith, and his veneration of the Roman sun god Phoebus Apollo.  In an early sequence, the tension is filtered through Severus, who watches, covertly and avidly, as Sebastian washes his body at the start of a new day and his voiceover intones the ecstatic prayer:

    ‘Hail, God of the golden sun.  The heavens and earth are united in gold.  Comb your hair in the golden rays of light.  In your hands the roses of ecstasy burn.  The wheel turns full circle.  Cooled by breezes from the four quarters. the swallow has risen in the east.  The doors are open.  Your body, your naked body, initiated into the mysteries, steps forth.  That beauty that made all colours different comes forth into the world.  Hail, God of the golden fire.  Your beauty holds my heart captive.’

    A similar blend of reverence and rapture informs Sebastian’s words when he worships alone and unobserved by others.  In a later scene, by order of Severus, he is staked to the ground, in burning heat.  In spite of Justin’s attempts to ease his suffering, Sebastian remains focused on his God:  ‘I love him.  He is beautiful.  More beautiful than Adonis.  He takes me in his arms and caresses my bleeding body’.  When Justin tries to shield him from the powerful sun, Sebastian jerks his head back into it:  solar heat and light are at once punishing and intoxicating.

    This distressing scene complements an earlier, serene one in which Sebastian and Justin swim out to rocks.  They relax there, telling each other what they can hear in a shell that Justin brings up from the sea.  Water is an element both spiritually and sexually liberating, as well as physically cleansing.  As such, it’s essential to the film’s themes and imagery – in the seashell idyll, in Sebastian’s ablutions, in the love-making of Adrian and Anthony as the soldiers bathe outdoors, in a similarly extended bathhouse sequence.  Each of these episodes is visually sophisticated to a quite remarkable degree for a film made on such a tiny budget (around £25,000 at the time).  Sebastiane is also extraordinary to listen to – the only feature film I know with dialogue in Latin (James Welch did the translation of the English script) and, since the soldiers do most of the talking, ‘dog Latin’ at that.  The harsh, guttural sounds are unexpected to anyone for whom spoken Latin connotes church Latin.

    Although the language of the dialogue makes it easier to accept its delivery as somehow unnatural, this isn’t enough to conceal the limitations of some of the cast.  At the time, Richard Warwick was the only well-known name among them:  he’d had plenty of film work, most notably a leading role in Lindsay Anderson’s If … (1968), and was a familiar face on British television.  Other than the lead actor’s, Warwick’s is the only playing in Sebastiane that could be described as nuanced.  Even allowing that Jarman and Humfress don’t place a high priority on nuance, some of the acting is as coarse as the Roman soldiers’ humour.  (There’s a great deal of profane laughter, much of it effortful.)  Neil Kennedy’s ribald energy makes Max relatively entertaining:  he and Barney James went on to play supporting roles in Jarman’s next feature, Jubilee (1978), but not much afterwards.  (By the way, a few of the outfits and hairdos among Diocletian’s party guests also anticipate Jubilee.)  Some of the minor players in Sebastiane still have it as their only credit on IMDB.

    This isn’t the case with Leonardo Treviglio who, until a decade or so ago, worked fairly regularly, often on Italian television, though rarely, it seems, in big roles.  Perhaps, like Richard Warwick, Treviglio has a built-in advantage in Sebastiane in playing a relatively complex character but he’s certainly the star of the show.  He conveys a gentle, submissive quality but there’s a toughness in his features too – it’s an ideal combination for a martyr in the making.  Regardless of their acting abilities, most of the cast must have got the job because their bodies were fit for purpose.  And regardless of the viewer’s sexual orientation, s/he can hardly fail to admire the physical beauty to which the camera gives rapt attention.  Watching these young men at this distance in time is affecting.  At least one of them, Richard Warwick, is dead (like Derek Jarman, from AIDS, in the 1990s, in only his early fifties).  The surviving performers must now be in or approaching their seventies.

    BFI curator William Fowler’s introduction to this screening in NFT2 was rambling and ill-prepared but he was right enough that it seems a wonder Sebastiane received a BBFC certificate back in 1976.  Fowler mentioned the film’s successful run at the Gate Cinema in Notting Hill.  The breadth of theatrical release is even more remarkable:  when I saw Sebastiane in the late seventies, it must have been at the Odeon or the ABC in York.   The remnants of the notes I made then are rather shaming in light of this second viewing: their facile sarcasm does the film a serious injustice.  But if I overhaul what I wrote at the time, it rather defeats the object of the ‘Take 1-Take 2’ exercise …

    29 August 2018

    [1]  Quoted in Michael O’Pray’s Derek Jarman: Dreams of England (BFI, 1996).

     

Posts navigation