Monthly Archives: June 2016

  • Then She Found Me

    Helen Hunt (2008)

    Helen Hunt is taking on a lot on her directing debut.  She’s not just in the main part – she’s in nearly every frame.  She can’t have spent too much time behind the camera and it shows – in the lack of rhythm of some scenes, and the frequency of mistimed lines.  Hunt’s career as a leading film actress stalled within a couple of years of her Oscar win for As Good As It Gets.  She can hardly be criticised for deciding that taking charge of as much as possible is the best way of sealing a starring role (she also co-produced and worked on the screenplay).  Hunt is ambitious too in her mutually exclusive aims of making a film that’s moving and harmless.  Whether the fault is with the original (a novel by Elinor Lipman) or the adaptation (by Alice Arlen and Victor Levin, with Hunt), the material is pretty thin and formulaic – but it’s treated as if it had layers and substance.

    Hunt plays April – thirty-nine years old, Jewish; she teaches young children and is desperate for a child of her own, to the point of obsession.   Adopted herself, she’s knotted up with frustrated dismay when family members suggest that adopting a child may be her best bet.  After less than a year of marriage, her mother’s boy husband Ben (Matthew Broderick) walks out.   In the course of the next few days, April’s adoptive mother dies.  She meets Frank (Colin Firth), a single father whose kids she teaches, and is strongly attracted to him.  Her biological mother Bernice (Bette Midler) – a daytime television celebrity – turns up out of the blue.  Within the next few weeks and just as she’s embarked on a relationship with Frank, April finds out that she’s pregnant – her husband’s parting shot.

    As an actress, Helen Hunt has a gift for creating believable, likeable characters – ‘ordinary people’ but without the condescension that phrase implies – and for giving emotionally nuanced inflections to otherwise undistinguished dialogue.    She does it again here; unfortunately, her reality has the effect of aggravating the problems she causes herself by taking the script too seriously.  Because she quickly makes April convincing as an individual, you expect her to get across what it must be like to have your life turned upside down this way in the space of a few days.  It’s an impossible task.  Hunt is such a pleasant actress that you feel bad for feeling disappointed in her but, as director, she has only herself to blame.

    Then She Found Me would work better if it was played in a quicker, lighter style that recognised the farcical quality of the plot’s incredibly rapid sequence of events.  The gallantry of April and Frank gets tiresome.  As usual, Firth tries but you can see the effort more than you can feel the charms he holds for April.  Much of the time, Firth makes his lines sound like lines; when he doesn’t, he suggests a man who’s rather alienating.  Bette Midler can’t help giving the film a comic lift but the director seems mesmerised by Midler’s verve as a performer – the camera gets as much as possible out of her trademark tiptoe-wiggle – and she seems uneasy.  Midler is eventually undone by the film’s relentless moral uplift.   You can just about believe in this woman for as long as she’s shown to be mendacious and selfish but you can’t believe the final happy family scene.  As she breathes in the fresh air of a decent life, her blurry how-did-I-get-here look suggests that it’s the actress rather than the character who can’t make sense of the nice new world she’s landed in.   Bernice’s demanding professional schedule is one of several elements in the film that come and go for the sake of convenience (the importance to April of her Jewishness and even her anxiety for a child are others).

    Then She Found Me is entertaining enough and hard to take offence at – except for its own determined inoffensiveness.   I found myself rooting for April’s husband, not just because Matthew Broderick gives the most successful performance in the film, but because he’s an ignoble character with no excuses.   Broderick is actually a year older than Hunt but looks younger than his forty-six years.  She’s so skinny that she looks older.  Their looks are an amusing expression of their characters – while April is prematurely careworn, Ben’s immaturity ranges from (just) post-pubertal to infantile.  (It’s not the sex he finds problematic in marriage; it’s the bits in between.)     Broderick is very funny.  Ben knows how despicable he is but, whenever he’s given a demonstration of his inadequacy, he literally looks to April to solve the problem.  When he, she and Frank go together to hospital for her ultrasound, Hunt and Firth emit heartfelt expressions of wonder at the images of the embryo on the screen – Broderick echoes them in an exquisitely half-hearted way.

    The greater emotional connection between Hunt and Broderick than between her and Firth is the strongest element in the film because it threatens to subvert its wholesome progress.  (Imagine what Moonstruck would have been like if there’d been a spark between Cher and Danny Aiello but not between her and Nicolas Cage.   One of the things that made Moonstruck such a great romantic comedy was the real, very different friction with both the actors.)  April’s obstetrician, bizarrely, is played by Salman Rushdie.   This might have worked as a one-scene cameo.  It certainly doesn’t when Rushdie returns to announce that the foetus has died, then again to join embarrassedly in a silent prayer as April tries for artificial insemination.   With Ben Shenkman as April’s younger (non-adopted) brother.  The score by David Mansfield reinforces the film’s atmosphere of tentative hopefulness.

    25 September 2008

  • The Producers

    Susan Stroman (2005)

    This adaptation of Mel Brooks’s smash-hit stage musical – itself adapted from his 1968 picture – seemed to come and go quickly, without much attention.  Why?  The original film is widely regarded as a classic sick-joke comedy and its highlight is a big stage musical number so a screen musical remake might seem superfluous.  The stage show, which ran on Broadway from 2001 to 2004, was still on in the West End (where it opened in late 2004) when the film adaptation was released.   The material was always a satire of Broadway and it’s more thoroughly one in the stage musical version (thanks to most of the numbers); one dimension of the satire is lost if the audience isn’t actually sitting in a theatre, where they’re, in effect, part of the joke.    Perhaps the film, for all the prodigious energy of Nathan Lane in particular, isn’t technically frenetic enough for a decade in which the most admired screen musicals have been the hyper-edited Moulin Rouge! and Chicago.  Compared with these, The Producers looks relatively old-fashioned, although it’s a relief as well as a pleasure to see numbers performed uninterruptedly instead of being killed in the editing suite (death by a thousand cuts).  It’s hard to decide which, if any, of these factors were behind the film’s muted reception.  Whatever the explanation, I think this version of The Producers has been relatively overlooked.  It’s a very enjoyable and effective screen comedy musical (and much better than either Moulin Rouge! or Chicago).

    Most of the main contributors to the original Broadway production are reunited here – except that two marquee names (Uma Thurman and Will Ferrell) replace the actors from the stage show.   As on Broadway, Susan Stroman did the choreography as well as directing.   Stroman doesn’t appear to have rethought the production for the screen beyond what was necessary but this is one instance where I think that was the right decision.  The fact that most of the performances are scaled for a theatre not only strengthens the film as a record of an outstandingly successful stage show.  It also – because the people we’re watching on screen seem to be creatures of the theatre through and through – sharpens our awareness that The Producers is essentially about putting on a show and the varieties of pretence and fakery associated with that.  This element is reinforced by the mystery of when the film is set.  At one moment, the two main characters are walking in Central Park and a nurse pushing a pram, from the first half of the twentieth century, passes through the shot.  Not much later, there are Village People look-alikes among the gay retinue at the home of Roger De Bris, the prospective director of ‘Springtime for Hitler’.  It all goes to show that Broadway is a state of mind rather than a place in time.

    Nathan Lane (who looks a cross between David Jason and Paul Gascoigne) is a legendary Broadway performer.  His cinema credits are relatively few (apart from The Producers, he’s probably best known for doing voices in animated films like The Lion King and Stuart Little).  Since I may not ever see Lane on stage, I’m really grateful not just to have seen him on screen in The Producers but also to have been given, in effect, a record of his stage performance as the notoriously unsuccessful Broadway producer, Max Bialystock.   As he demonstrated again this year in Then She Found Me, Matthew Broderick is a brilliant comic actor; his performance as Leopold Bloom, the anxious accountant who becomes Bialystock’s sidekick in the ‘Springtime for Hitler’ project, is wonderfully well judged.  In terms of performance level, Broderick is – in relation to the indefatigable comic zest of Lane – prepared to play straight man most of the time.  The fact that Broderick’s Leo is so unconcealably neurotic means that he becomes a very funny straight man indeed.   In his scenes with Uma Thurman – as the Bialystock-Bloom team’s blonde bombshell secretary-receptionist-leading-lady Ulla Inga Hansen Benson Yansen Tallen Hallen Svaden Swanson (that’s her first name) – Broderick develops Bloom’s unprepossessing qualities into a winning romantic style.  The 1968 film got plenty of comic mileage out of the physical contrast between the avid bulk of Zero Mostel as Bialystock and the neurasthenic skinniness of Gene Wilder as Bloom.  Lane is a good deal heavier than Broderick but there’s not much height difference between them, which gives them an amusing look of partnership.

    Uma Thurman performs Ulla’s audition number (‘If You’ve Got It, Flaunt It’) spectacularly;  she’s really likeable in the role because she’s prepared to make her ravishing beauty part of the comedy (she looks Nordically super-healthy as well as very lovely).   In his first scenes as Franz Liebkind, the Nazi author of ‘Springtime for Hitler’, Will Ferrell is straining slightly to be as deeply mad as he needs to be.  He more than delivers in the sequence in which he interrupts the auditions for the Hitler role and storms to the stage to demonstrate how ‘Haben Sie gehört das deutsche Band?’ should really be sung (that is, in Broadway showstopping style).   Gary Beach is marvellous as the ‘the worst director in town’, Roger De Bris.   In the privacy of his own mansion, Roger is not merely a transvestite but palpably fulfilled when he’s wearing a gorgeous gown.    Roger Bart is Carmen Ghia, Roger’s hissingly bitchy ‘assistant’.   Bialystock’s retinue of geriatric angels, on whom he bestows sexual favours in exchange for continued financial support for his productions (and who supply a chorus on zimmer frames for ‘Along Came Bialy’), is headed by Eileen Essell as Hold Me-Touch Me.

    The Producers takes some time to warm up.  The early numbers lack parodistic edge so that the first half hour of the film has a puzzlingly gentle, almost wholesome quality.   But from ‘Keep It Gay’ (which ends in a conga in Roger’s mansion) onwards, the verve and wit of the songs (by Brooks and Thomas Meehan) pick up – to such an extent that, by the time of opening night, I was beginning to wonder whether ‘Springtime of Hitler’ itself might be upstaged.   In the event, it isn’t at all (John Barrowman, as a blond tenor stormtrooper, is a surprisingly strong contributor to the success of the number) – and is followed by ‘Heil Myself’, a magnificent parody (sung by Gary Beach as Hitler) of a Broadway I-was-nobody-but-now-I’m-somebody hymn of self-affirmation.   (Susan Stroman, it must be said, goes too far at this point in not cutting away from the numbers.  She omits Bialystock’s and Bloom’s dawning realisation that ‘Springtime for Hitler’ is not going to be the flop they were counting on it to be to make their fortune.)    As a film writer and director, Mel Brooks was often better as a gag man than at constructing stories or character.  The essential plot idea of The Producers was such a great one that it hardly seems to matter what happens once ‘Springtime for Hitler’ proves a hit – but my impression was that the plot was worked out more fully and satisfyingly here than in the original film.    The names of other Bialystock productions that appear on the screen are all trademark Brooks.  The flop before ‘Springtime’ is ‘Funny Boy’, a musical adaptation of Hamlet.  There’s a poster for ‘King Leer’ in Bialystock’s office.  At the end, we’re told that ‘Springtime’ was the forerunner of many other Bialystock and Bloom smashes, including ‘A Streetcar Named Morris’, ‘Katz’, ‘Maim’ and ‘Death of a Salesman on Ice’.

    30 December 2008

Posts navigation