Monthly Archives: February 2016

  • Eve

    Joseph Losey (1962)

    I left my ticket at home so made a special return trip during the afternoon to collect it, then return to BFI.   The film was given an exemplary introduction by Clyde Jeavons, a film historian and archivist – audible, cogent, succinct.  Jeavons described how Losey’s producers, the Hakim brothers, had cut the piece to ribbons; and the restoration process which had made possible the print we were about to see.  Jeavons was evidently a passionate admirer of Eve (or Eva – in its original Italian title).  I thought he was likely to be pushing it when he claimed that Jeanne Moreau’s performance in the title role was her finest but his introduction made me look forward to the film and hope that my extra effort to get to see it would prove worthwhile.  From that point onwards, it was all downhill.  I thought several times about leaving and would have done if I’d set out with my ticket when I left for work that morning.   I’ve not thought much of Losey’s social message films that I’ve seen in recent weeks but this, his earliest ‘art’ film, is even worse

    Eve tells of the relationship between Tyvian Jones, a Welsh novelist (his Welshness is an important part of his PR) and a mercenary, promiscuous French woman by whom he’s obsessed and who exploits him ruthlessly.  During the opening sequence, the camera moves around the various beauties of Venice.  It comes to rest on statues of Adam and Eve and a voice on the soundtrack is quoting from Genesis (‘They were naked and were not ashamed’).  This imagery recurs throughout the film.  Since Eve is meant to signify more than the individual in the story, what is being said about the relationship between men and women?   That woman is a callous temptress (this Eve seems to have been not so much beguiled as possessed by the serpent)?  Evidently not:  Francesca, the other woman in Tyvian’s life, is innocent, loyal and exploited by him as much as by Eve.  If that raises doubts as to whether any general statement is being made (other than that Joseph Losey is misanthropic), the consistently humourless and portentous style of the film allay them.  And it seems to be assumed by the authors of the screenplay (Hugo Butler and Evan Jones, who adapted a novel by James Hadley Chase) that the relationship between Eve and Tyvian is symbolic:  there can’t be any other excuse for their not writing properly detailed individuals.

    In films such as Lift to the Scaffold, Moderato Cantabile, Jules et Jim and Bay of Angels, Jeanne Moreau creates characters which are utterly individual but, because of her expressive power, seem to be definitive and essential.   The reverse occurs here:  the conception may be obscurely archetypal but Eve, as an individual, is a blank. Although she’s still fascinating to watch, Moreau does things that come across as extraneous bits of business for the camera – as not really belonging to the woman she’s playing.  She runs her hands through her hair as she wakes, taps at her teeth and makes little moues to herself.  Some of her line readings, in English, sound as if she doesn’t quite get what she’s saying (especially her parting shot – ‘bloody Welshman’ – to Tyvian).  Stanley Baker seems like a bad actor throughout.  The fact that Tyvian is himself a bad actor doesn’t get Baker off the hook.  He makes this windbag sound as much a charlatan when Tyvian’s admitting he didn’t really work down the mines or write the book that’s made him internationally famous (his brother – who really was a miner – did) as when he’s pretending otherwise.  The bizarre implication seems to be that Tyvian couldn’t have written a best-selling book and been a fraud at the same time.  The book’s title – ‘L’étranger en enfer’ – certainly sounds like the work of a shameless fake.  Tyvian clearly has a verbal gift of some kind:  he talks in purple prose (describing his brother’s face as ‘Very white – like stone, the face of a carved angel’).  Most of the other people we see are members of one jet set or another (film people, casino habitués).   As Francesca (an actress), Virna Lisi is paradisally beautiful.  Giorgio Albertazzi is a jealous producer, James Villiers a camp screenwriter.

    Giorgio Albertazzi was X in Last Year at Marienbad.  As in the Resnais film, but to a much greater extent here, the physical settings contain architecture and artefacts that are emblems of high European culture and there’s a similar reliance on the audience’s thinking that, because the director is presenting images that contain objects of aesthetic distinction, he’s thereby creating a work of art.  The settings in Eve don’t seem to be linked to the themes or the people, though.  Losey doesn’t use them metaphorically – the way that Venice is used in Death in Venice or Don’t Look Now.  The visual glories of the city and of Rome, which also features in Eve, merely counterpoint the despicable people whom Losey places in them.   (It’s a wonder that humankind, being so vile, managed to create the paintings and buildings and designs that we see.)  Whereas Resnais’s contempt was implicit and he remained inscrutably objective about the people in Marienbad, Losey’s relative crudeness means that he shows his hand.  It appears that he’s encouraged most of his cast to express dislike of the people they’re playing (this is particularly the case with James Villiers); but, since they’re hollow, you don’t feel any more about this lot than you do about the moneyed undead in Marienbad.  Music is used in Eve in an essentially similar way.  The Billie Holiday songs don’t particularly connect to or interpret the story but they’re culturally impeccable.  (The only time I laughed was when Eve snatches a Holiday record from the turntable and smashes it – by this point I had some sympathy with her vandalism.)  According to Clyde Jeavons, the soundtrack also features Miles Davis.  The jazzy score by Michel Legrand feels irrelevant:  it seems to belong to a less lugubrious, more exuberantly trashy film.

    Losey evidently regards people as more depraved if they have money even though he does nothing to suggest that money has corrupted them.  His condemnation of the high-livers here is feebly uninteresting compared with La dolce vita, which develops from a satire of the lifestyle it describes (the attractions of which Fellini lets you feel) into a melancholy description of the elusiveness of happiness, even for people who are affluent (and intelligent).  On the basis of Eve, Losey doesn’t in any way stand comparison with Antonioni either.   Although the cinematography by Gianni Di Venanzo (IMDB also mentions an uncredited Henri Decaë) is impressive, the visual scheme doesn’t seem core to Losey’s approach in the way it does in Antonioni:  as in Losey’s social message movies, there’s a load of dialogue.  The best thing that ever happened to him as a film-maker must have been his teaming up with Harold Pinter, whose sophistication did much to modulate Losey’s hectoring tendencies.

    24 June 2009

     

  • The Palm Beach Story

    Preston Sturges (1942)

    Over the opening credits, we watch what look like excerpts from the film to follow – at least, they feature Claudette Colbert and Joel McCrea, the two stars of the picture.  The clips describe troubled preparations for a wedding.  There are alternating shots of Colbert (a) in a bridal gown and (b) en deshabille, bound and gagged; a maid in attendance faints melodramatically and repeatedly.  McCrea changes from one suit into another: in the back of a car, he hurriedly buttons the waistcoat on his morning dress. Eventually, the couple makes it to the altar.  The sequence as a whole is suitably accompanied by the William Tell Overture with Mendelssohn Wedding March embellishments.  ‘And they lived happily after’, proclaims a legend on the screen.  A second legend asks, ‘Or did they?’ and is followed at high speed by succeeding year dates – 1937 to 1942 inclusive.  The camera comes to rest on a plaque, advertising a Park Avenue duplex apartment to let.  The plaque has the look of a memorial.  Inside the apartment building, an expensively-dressed, middle-aged woman (Esther Howard) and her much older husband (Robert Dudley) are being shown round by the building manager (Franklin Pangborn).  He explains – with some difficulty, since the elderly man is deaf – that the place isn’t looking at its best, thanks to the current tenants, who’ve fallen behind with the rent.  The camera moves upstairs to reveal Claudette Colbert – trying to hear what’s being said while also keeping out of sight.  It’s pretty clear who the defaulting tenants are.

    These are the first few, extraordinary minutes of The Palm Beach Story.  The matrimonial prologue is like nothing I’ve seen as an opener – it’s frantically amusing but, as you watch, baffling.  In contrast, the comedy in the duplex depends on something far from original – a character’s deafness.  Fifteen years after the first talking pictures, this must already have been a very familiar comic device.  Yet I can’t bring to mind a funnier hard-of-hearing routine – thanks to Preston Sturges’s dialogue, and its superb delivery by Robert Dudley, who’s crotchety but chipper, and Franklin Pangborn, who’s determinedly ingratiating.  Dudley’s character – the ‘Wienie King’ – made a fortune in sausages.  On his tour of the duplex, he bumps into Gerry Jeffers (Colbert) in the bathroom and promptly insists on bankrolling her – to pay off the rent owing, and more.  Gerry phones her inventor husband Tom (McCrea) to tell him the good news but he doesn’t want to be interrupted.  Tom’s deep in his latest abortive attempt to find $100,000 in sponsorship for the prototype of his scheme to build airports suspended above cities by wires.  When he returns home that evening, Gerry explains to her suspicious husband the Wienie King’s largesse.  She also proposes that she and Tom part company.  Gerry has expensive tastes.  She needs a husband whose wallet allows her to indulge them.

    Next morning, Gerry walks out on Tom and asks a cab driver where’s the best place to get a quickie divorce.  The driver reckons that ‘this time of year’ Palm Beach, Florida is a better bet than Reno, Nevada.  At Penn Station, Gerry boards a train which Tom, who doesn’t want her to leave, fails to get on.  He returns disconsolately to the duplex.  The Wienie King, a geriatric fairy godfather, turns up there again and gives Tom his air fare to join Gerry.  En route to Palm Beach, Gerry makes the acquaintance of a polite, mildly eccentric fellow (Rudy Vallée) who turns out to be John D Hackensacker III, one of America’s richest men.  He’s in the lower bunk in the sleeping car and Gerry the top one.  (He thinks it’s ‘not American’ to travel in a ‘state room’ – or to tip generously.)  On the way up to her bunk, she inadvertently steps on his face and breaks his spectacles but John D doesn’t mind.  By the time they’re in Florida, on his yacht, he’s fallen in love with Gerry.  His fabulous wealth is just what she’s looking for.  They head off to the luxurious home of his oft-married sister, Maud (Mary Astor), currently the Princess Centimillia.  The Princess spots, observing them from a distance, a ‘good-looking man … I haven’t seen before’.  This is Tom, newly arrived from New York.  Gerry can’t disguise the fact that they know each other but she passes Tom off as her brother.  The Princess insists that he come and stay too.

    Preston Sturges was famous for combining slapstick and verbal comedy.  Manny Farber was among his champions who preferred the former.  Farber’s December 1942 review of The Palm Beach Story includes the following:  ‘Very irritating is a latter-day failing of [Sturges], an unbounded delight in his ability to write witty dialogue, not one line of which he will forgo’.   The abundant dialogue is fine by me, provided that the performers are good, and temperamentally different, enough to give it variety – as they do here.  The charming savvy sparkle of Claudette Colbert’s Gerry articulates very satisfyingly with Joel McCrea’s humourless rectitude as Tom (a quality that has its own comic charm).  Mary Astor and Rudy Vallée are enjoyably complementary too.  It’s the slapstick I’m less keen on, although it’s fine in the early New York sequences here.  Thanks to McCrea’s athleticism and innate propriety, it’s amusing when Tom Jeffers is falling downstairs or losing his pyjama trousers.  I’m afraid I was bored, though, by one of the film’s most celebrated episodes.  A bunch of eccentric millionaires are travelling – with their dogs and guns, to a shooting holiday – on the same train that’s taking Gerry Jeffers to Palm Beach.  The ‘Ale and Quail Club’, as they’re called, get increasingly drunk and, in Manny Farber’s words, ‘lead yapping hounds through Pullmans in a privileged orgy of destruction’.  This goes on for a long time and it’s as tiresome as it sounds.  That goes even for the dogs.  In Florida, the Princess Centimillia is trying to get rid of Toto (Sig Arno), a house guest of uncertain nationality.  His pratfalls and funny-foreigner locutions made me want to see the back of him as much as Mary Astor did.

    The 1930s saw two famous plays in which a recently divorced couple eventually gets back together.  The former partners come to realise they had better conversation and sex with their ex than they’re going to have with the ex’s replacement.  Noel Coward’s Private Lives and Philip Barry’s The Philadelphia Story were theatre hits in, respectively, the first and last years of the decade.  Both were made into films the year after their original stage production and The Philadelphia Story, directed by George Cukor, was one of the most admired pictures of 1940.  The set-up of The Palm Beach Story naturally brings these romantic comedies to mind and Sturges’s film may even have been named for the Barry-Cukor screwball classic:  The Palm Beach Story was the title chosen after the Production Code office had rejected the candidly challenging ‘Is Marriage Necessary?’   Their counterparts in Private Lives and The Philadelphia Story are, however, very different from Tom and Gerry (are they named for the Hanna-Barbera cartoon duo, which made their screen debut in 1940?)  We don’t get the sense of this couple being drawn inexorably towards reunion.  Tom doesn’t want them to split up in the first place but that could because he’s a socially conventional chap.  There’s a mutual physical attraction, evident when – early then late on in the story – Gerry has trouble undoing her dress and has to ask Tom to help out.  The Jefferses don’t fall back in love, though, or even seem to enjoy each other’s company, except when they’re kissing.  And whereas Tracy Lord, the proud, demanding heroine of The Philadelphia Story, must be taught a lesson, Gerry Jeffers doesn’t renounce her adventuress ambitions.

    This lack of sentimentality generates considerable suspense.  Can Preston Sturges deliver an ending that’s neither a copout nor too downbeat?   He can.   When John D Hackensacker III agrees to invest in Tom’s airport-on-wires, Gerry finds her husband a more attractive proposition than he was before.  She and Tom admit their true relationship to John D and the Princess.  The lovestruck billionaire is still prepared to support Tom’s venture but he’s naturally disappointed – he had his heart set on Gerry.  She doesn’t by any chance have a sister?   Only a twin sister, she says.   The Princess liked the look of Tom too – he doesn’t have any brothers?   Only a twin brother, he replies.  Identical twins in both cases and we suddenly get the film’s overture.  Perhaps Tom and Gerry weren’t meant for each other and married the wrong twin back in 1937.  The Palm Beach Story ends with a shot of another wedding – or series of weddings:  John D Hackensacker III marries one Claudette Colbert and Joel McCrea the other; the second McCrea marries the Princess.  (There’s a seventh person in the line-up: the indomitable Toto.  This is the one time his presence makes you smile.)  Sexual attraction and money have combined to save the day for all concerned.  There’s a reprise of the opening legend ‘And they lived happily after’.  And of the follow-up question ‘Or did they?’ – things could still be the wrong way round for someone.  The visual trompe l’oeil of the three couples at the altar is a perfect illustration of the artificiality of Sturges’s happy ending but the surpassing satiric wit behind it is the real thing.  The couples’ curtain call is not just funny.  It’s elating.

    5 February 2016

Posts navigation