Daily Archives: Wednesday, February 17, 2016

  • Dad’s Army

    Oliver Parker (2016)

    Several BBC comedies of the 1960s and 1970s became feature films that were dismissed by critics but did well at the box office – Steptoe and Son well enough even to spawn a big-screen sequel.  Dad’s Army first became a movie at a relatively early stage of its television life:  filming took place in the late summer of 1970, shortly before the third of the nine TV series was broadcast, and the picture was released in March 1971.  In contrast, neither The Likely Lads nor Porridge returned to television screens after they’d become movies but this wasn’t because they’d failed as such.  Much of the cinema audience for all four of these sitcoms would have realised they were weak distortions of the TV originals but would have felt too that they were, in every sense, harmless.   And so it proved:  the movies are long forgotten but the place of these shows in the TV comedy pantheon is secure.  Because the BBC nowadays puts out an old episode of Dad’s Army what seems like every Saturday evening, it’s easy to take for granted.  The best thing that can be said about this new cinema version is that it makes you cherish the television original.  Henry Fitzherbert in the Express has it right:  ‘There really is no reason for the film to exist’.

    It was usual practice for a sitcom-turned-movie to find itself stranded in the great outdoors, and saddled with a plot that had thirty-minute legs but was required to do service for ninety.  Studio-based TV sitcoms naturally tended to take place indoors and the best ones made a virtue of this necessity:  the interiors reflected a claustrophobic element that was integral to the material.  Porridge is only the most obvious example.  The settings of Steptoe and Son and Fawlty Towers reinforced Harold Steptoe’s and Basil Fawlty’s sense of being trapped in lives of infuriating routine, and Dad’s Army comes into this category too.  Although the series used a relatively greater range of locations, the Walmington-on-Sea home guard is based primarily in the church hall.  That location is itself disputed territory, in a running battle with the vicar and the verger, but it is – to Captain Mainwaring’s occasionally voiced frustration – far removed from the World War II front line.

    The plot synopsis on Wikipedia suggests that the first Dad’s Army movie edged nervously away from this crucial premise in order to up the ‘action’ quota for the big screen.  Oliver Parker’s remake, with a screenplay by Hamish McColl, contradicts it extravagantly and inanely.  The new film is set in 1944:  Mainwaring’s men – and he particularly – foil a German plot to thwart the D-Day landings.  There’s a fight-them-on-the-beaches climax, involving a U-boat, gunshots, explosions and barely a hint of this being a spoof-action finale.  Before that, there’s a German spy to be unmasked.  The spy’s identity is revealed to the audience immediately.  She’s Rose Winters, a femme fatale posing as a journalist:  Rose claims to be writing, for the Lady magazine, a profile of the Walmington home guard.  Oliver Parker spends time (and money) on sequences that show the Nazi high command in Berlin in radio communication with Rose – as if ‘realism’ of this kind will help us suspend disbelief in the Germans’ belief there’s key British military intelligence to be gained from infiltrating Mainwaring’s platoon.

    Parker’s film features a strong line-up of actors – assembled, it seems from the piece in Radio Times the other week, through one of those casting snowball effects:  one biggish name hears that another has signed up, follows suit and attracts a third.  You’re aware that you’re watching talented people but even more aware that they’re the wrong people.   Playing a part made famous through a long-running TV show is very different from playing a character immortalised in a movie (although that’s problematic enough).  With something like Dad’s Army, it’s not simply a matter of Arthur Lowe et al having made an indelible impression: as the series continued, Jimmy Perry and David Croft clearly wrote scripts with the particular actors’ characterisations in mind.   The performances of the new cast are bound to be ultimately unsatisfying but the poor direction turns them into something worse and uncoordinated:  in some cases, semi-impersonations of the originals; in others, attempts to resist impersonation, which make little sense. The famous Dad’s Army catch phrases occur at regular intervals, as if for moral support to the cast.   The effect is increasingly desperate.

    Toby Jones is a fine comic actor, who shares with Arthur Lowe a natural eccentricity and the ability to make that eccentricity funny by playing straight.  Jones does some good comic business here, like choking on a piece of cake and struggling desperately to make nothing of it.  I liked the moment when Mainwaring was walking down a dark street, attempting in vain not to be seen:  two passers-by say, ‘Evening, Mainwaring’, and he says good evening back.  But Jones is too thoroughly an underdog; his speech rhythms, gentler than Lowe’s, tone down Mainwaring’s pomposity; and he doesn’t build up enough military pretension.  You’re especially aware of this when a deflated Mainwaring says, shortly before his climactic heroism, ‘I only wanted to do my bit’.  Only wanting to do his bit is the impression Toby Jones has given throughout.   Bill Nighy expresses Sergeant Wilson’s antipathy towards Mainwaring more blatantly than John Le Mesurier ever did.  Nighy’s playing is tenaciously coherent but he makes Wilson charmless.

    Tom Courtenay showed last year, in 45 Years and in his surpassing performance in Unforgotten on television, that his screen acting is as good now as it’s ever been.  He’s surprisingly uncertain as Corporal Jones, although one of the few times I just about laughed was thanks to him:  Mainwaring interrupts Jones and Mrs Fox on the sofa where they claim to be deep in a jigsaw puzzle; Courtenay gets to his feet hurriedly from the sofa and explains, ‘We were just doing a bit of sky’.   Bill Paterson’s Frazer is weird.  He’s just benign and rather distinguished until, in a brief, late outburst of Carry On comedy, he reveals to the Germans what Scotsmen don’t wear under their kilts.  Although he plays Godfrey with finesse, Michael Gambon is too imposing for the role.   (A particularly inept example of Oliver Parker’s direction comes when Jones is camouflaged as a tree and the weak-bladdered Godfrey mistakes him for the real thing:  this is filmed in a way that makes it impossible to see how Godfrey could make the mistake.)   The capable, naturally humorous Daniel Mays is OK in the attenuated role of Walker.  Blake Harrison (The Inbetweeners) is hopeless as Pike – he seems to be sending up the character.

    The few pleasures of the new film include seeing cameos from the original Pike and the only other survivor of the original cast.  Ian Lavender has been amusingly elevated from private to the role of a brigadier.  Frank Williams, who’s now eighty-four, is still playing the vicar:  the effect is almost of a real person ‘as Himself’.  Martin Savage is disastrous as the ARP warden.  Bill Pertwee’s angry exchanges with Mainwaring in the television show always had a lovely, playground-name-calling quality:  Savage comes across as merely nasty.  The actresses in the TV Dad’s Army didn’t all make the same lasting impression as the actors.  Pamela Cundell’s Mrs Fox was by far the best of them but Alison Steadman, who now plays the role, is welcome proof that having a hard act to follow isn’t an insuperable obstacle.  Steadman’s saucy warmth, as well as being theatrically enjoyable, comes across as essentially truthful.  In contrast, Felicity Montagu as Mrs Mainwaring has no act to follow at all – and, to that extent, an open goal, which she misses.  It was a good running joke of the TV series that Mainwaring’s wife was a formidable presence in her husband’s life, in spite of never being seen.  The film succeeds in achieving the opposite.

    In a weedy subplot, most of the wives and girlfriends are members of a female home guard unit.  As if Mavis Pike would be seen dead in such a group … Hamish McColl is not Sally Wainwright yet Sarah Lancashire tries to play Mrs Pike naturalistically: the result is jarring.   Annette Crosbie and Julia Foster do pretty well as Godfrey’s sisters, worked up into a pair of mini-Miss Marples who identify the German spy long before the patronising men do.   As Rose Winters, Catherine Zeta-Jones’s star glamour is mildly funny at first – it makes Rose all the more incongruous in Walmington-on-Sea.  It’s hardly Zeta-Jones’s fault that she can’t find a stable tone as the film progresses: she’d probably have done better to play the character ‘Allo ‘Allo-style.  It says a lot that the final shot – in which the frame freezes on Catherine Zeta-Jones’s shapely backside and the words ‘The End’ appear on screen – is one of the wittier things in Dad’s Army 2016.

    11 February 2016

  • Footlight Parade

    Lloyd Bacon (1933)

    Footlight Parade was released by Warner Brothers just a few months after 42nd Street and the two films have several common features and contributors.  Both are putting-on-a-show musicals, with the main numbers coming not at regular intervals throughout but together in an extended finale.  Lloyd Bacon and Busby Berkeley are again in effect co-directors:  Bacon gets the sole directing credit but Berkeley is responsible for the musical numbers and, therefore, for virtually the whole of the last thirty minutes of the picture.  Ruby Keeler, Dick Powell and Guy Kibbee appear in each of the two movies, which both include songs by Harry Warren and Al Dubin.  Whereas that pair wrote the entire song score for 42nd Street, Sammy Fain and Irving Kahal are responsible for part – the weaker part – of Footlight Parade’s words and music.  The two Warren and Dubin efforts resonate with numbers in 42nd Street:  ‘Honeymoon Hotel’ corresponds thematically with ‘Shuffle Off to Buffalo’; the chords in ‘Shanghai Lil’ express the same sense of vividly inviting and amusing danger as the title song in 42nd Street.  (Again, it’s tantalising to hear the best tune being picked out on the piano during rehearsals for the show in preparation.)

    A main strength of 42nd Street is the fusion of musical comedy with a sense of the dramatic reality of performers fighting to survive during the Great Depression.  Economic realities are essential to the plot of Footlight Parade too but the film is more concerned with the commercial challenges faced by musical theatre once talking pictures were established, as well as the looming threat of enforcement of the Motion Picture Production Code.  The live entertainments in Footlight Parade are musical prologues presented on the stage of movie theatres ahead of the main screen feature:  I assumed these prologues were therefore subject to the same pressure of encroaching censorship as the films they introduced.  The intersection of stage and screen is essential to the fabric of Footlight Parade.  The climactic numbers here, as in 42nd Street, are supposedly part of a live show but their spectacularism means they couldn’t possibly be staged in a theatre.  That paradox is apt, given the storyline.  It’s also inherently ironic, of course, that the medium of film is being used to dramatise the predicament of the makers of Broadway musicals confronted with the might of Hollywood.

    One of the scenarists of 42nd Street, James Seymour, wrote Footlight Parade with Manuel Seff but the plotting is primitive and bitty and Lloyd Bacon’s direction isn’t either as penetrating or as tidy as in the earlier film.  Footlight Parade is still very entertaining, though.  The plethora of risqué  lines, dubious relationships and skimpy costumes lend the film a before-it’s-too-late quality that’s as close as it gets to the sustained urgency of 42nd Street.  Sally and I both had a cherished memory of James Cagney, dressed as a sailor, singing and dancing on a bar to ‘Shanghai Lil’, and of the camera moving along the row of social and racial stereotypes propping up the bar, each of whom has a comment or a query about the song’s elusive title character (‘Say, who the heck is Shanghai Lil?’ and so on).  In fact, these great highlights are embedded in an elaborate and extended number, with sailors brawling and other militia marching, which has a somewhat diluting effect.  ‘Honeymoon Hotel’ has witty lyrics and is amusingly done, although there’s rather too much of Billy Barty, the famous midget actor, as a baby (Barty was nine years old at the time).  ‘By a Waterfall’, which comes between ‘Honeymoon Hotel’ and ‘Shanghai Lil’ in the finale, is essence of Busby Berkeley but, with its meagre tune endlessly repeated, it grows tedious as the human bodies inevitably disappear into ingenious, dehumanised patterns.   The cat number (‘Sittin’ On a Backyard Fence’), including Billy Barty as a mouse, is enjoyably naff – although I wasn’t keen on the way the real cat in the company was handled at one point.

    Footlight Parade is famous for providing James Cagney with his second best-known musical role after Yankee Doodle Dandy.  As Chester Kent, the driven creator of musical prologues, Cagney sings well and his stylised hoofing is elating but he’s not merely a song-and-dance-man here:  the film’s reliance on his abilities as an actor can hardly be overstated.  Cagney’s dynamism and command provide Footlight Parade with its heart – his lack of height gives him an underdog quality which is right for the up-against-it Chester and which makes you root for him.  Joan Blondell, as Chester’s smart and loyal secretary Nan, is a fine partner for Cagney.  Nan knows from the start she’s in love with Chester; it takes him the whole film to realise that he reciprocates.  Blondell is especially good at telling the audience, through her truthfulness and comic timing, yet not quite telling her boss her feelings for him.  Cagney reacts to Nan’s more significant remarks with a brilliant mixture of alertness and cluelessness:  he gets that she means something but, until the closing stages, can’t work out what exactly.  Chester’s short-lived fling with Nan’s no-better-than-she-should-be ‘friend’ Vivian isn’t up to much since Claire Dodd doesn’t suggest a gold-digger pretending to be classy; she just seems vacuously grand.

    When Ruby Keeler, as Bea, a dancer-turned-secretary, takes off her specs, has her hair done and reverts to dancing, she doesn’t become glamorous so much as a different person; as in 42nd Street, Keeler can’t hold a characterisation.  Still, Bea’s prickly exchanges that blossom into romance with Dick Powell’s Scotty are agreeable enough and Powell is likeable, especially in the ‘Honeymoon Hotel’ number.  Even allowing for the mediocre script, some of the comic support is laboured but Hugh Herbert is fairly funny as a dim-witted censor and Frank McHugh, who plays the hypochondriacal dance director Francis, has a good bit when Chester gets Francis to sing (as he smokes a cigar) a love duet with Dick Powell – in order to show the chorus girls, about to audition to sing with Scotty, how it’s done.  James Cagney makes you laugh when he dismisses an alarmingly bel canto candidate for this number.  She indignantly tells him that she’s sung for crowned heads.  ‘You’ve laid yourself open for a crack there’, replies Chester Kane.  ‘But we’ll let it go …’

    21 July 2014

     

     

     

     

Posts navigation