Daily Archives: Thursday, December 3, 2015

  • Before the Revolution

    Prima della rivoluzione

    Bernardo Bertolucci (1964)

    Set in Parma in 1962, Before the Revolution is about a young bourgeois who’s intending to devote himself to the Communist cause but who finds distractions that change his mind – or rather deepen his ambivalence.  I came to the film knowing it was regarded as autobiographical (although not precisely so:  by 1962, Bertolucci had already made La commare secca) and that it had some connection with La chartreuse de Parme (the relationship between the two principals echoes the Stendhal novel and these characters are named for their literary inspirations).  With these assumptions in mind, I wasn’t sure, during the first half hour, if the film was ever going to develop a life of its own.  In the interview with Bertolucci used as the BFI programme note (Sally managed to get the last one of these – how do they manage to run out when it isn’t even a full house?), he’s quoted as saying that each of the main characters – not just his obvious alter ego Fabrizio – ‘is me’.  In the early stages, you get the impression that Bertolucci is interested primarily in having the people on the screen express his own thoughts.  He seems to be divvying up the moral and philosophical insights without giving the characters individual voices.

    What’s so remarkable about Before the Revolution is that, in spite of this, it gradually acquires a vital independence and psychological dynamism through the brilliance of the film-making.   An outstanding example:  halfway through, Bertolucci introduces the character of Puck, a wealthy landowner and friend of Gina, the aunt (some ten years older than him) with whom Fabrizio is having an affair.   Puck bemoans his failing fortunes; Fabrizio lays into the rich man for developing a social conscience only when his own financial security is under threat.  You think it’ll be impossible for this sequence to do anything more than make political points:  how can Puck’s words matter when it’s the first time we’ve seen him and he doesn’t yet mean anything to us as a character?   But the combination of images which Puck’s lament accompanies – the trees, the lake, everything on the estate that’s going to be lost – is so compelling that his words do have emotional heft.  What’s more, and in spite of what Fabrizio says to Puck, those images also connect with Fabrizio’s own commitment to living in the moment because each moment is transient.

    Pauline Kael confused the excitement of the twenty-three-year-old Bertolucci’s artistry with the character of Fabrizio when she wrote that the director (he also wrote the screenplay, with Gianni Amico) ‘captures what has rarely been seen on the screen – the extravagance and poetry of youthful ardor’.  Francesco Barilli as Fabrizio isn’t ardent but he is extremely convincing as this handsome, humourless young man who can’t make up his mind what he wants but is dogmatically censorious when it comes to putting other people right.  (Kael is much nearer the mark when she describes Fabrizio as ‘callowly doctrinaire’.)  And Barilli’s inchoate quality – the sense of possibility he embodies – is appealing, especially in his scenes with Gina.   (A quick Google search reveals that Barilli, just twenty when the film was made, hasn’t acted much but has had success as a writer, director and painter over the last forty years.  His uncle, Cecrope Barilli, also a painter, plays Puck.)  Already well known through her roles in Rocco and His Brothers and Accattone, Adriana Asti is undoubtedly the star presence.  Since she subsequently married Bertolucci (and is seven years his senior), it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the increasing concentration on Gina-Asti in Before the Revolution reflects a further autobiographical layer.

    Because Fabrizio is the central consciousness, it’s a little distracting – beguiling as Adriana Asti is – when the sophisticated but screwed up Gina takes over.  (She gets involved with her nephew while on a visit to Parma from Milan, where she now lives and works.)  Gina is, though, truly at the centre of the finest resonance in the film.   Dancing with Fabrizio in his family’s home, Gina then invites her younger nephew Enore (Guido Fanti) to partner her and he obliges with sheepish reluctance.  It’s a charming but charged moment:  as Fabrizio watches smilingly (and he rarely smiles), we get a sense that Gina, as she holds the younger brother, is aware of how young the other nephew, to whom she’s now sexually attracted, still is – of how part of her wants Fabrizio to be the boy she remembers and that Enore still is.   (While Fabrizio embraces the ephemerality of things, Gina tells him in one of their conversations that she prefers things to stay the same.)   The reprise is piercing when, in the final scene at Fabrizio’s wedding to Clelia (Cristina Pariset), Gina hugs the (once again embarrassed) Enore to console her, and can’t let him go.

    The title derives from Talleyrand’s remark – ‘He who did not live in the years before the [1789] Revolution cannot understand the sweetness of living’.  Bertolucci uses it as an epigraph at the start of the film but its more interesting use comes later, when  Fabrizio acknowledges that, for a sensibility like his, life will always be ‘before the revolution’.  The obstructions to complete political commitment come in the shape of sex, social and familial convention, and cinema – and these competing imperatives modify Fabrizio’s allegiance to any one of them.   The sexual education that Gina gives him precedes marriage to a lovely, innocuous young girl – just what his parents (Amelia Bordi and Domenico Alpi), against whom he means to rebel, wanted.   Fabrizio’s love of film depends on the mood he’s in:  he drifts into a picture house when his mind is on Gina (Une femme est une femme is showing) and emerges arm in arm with an exhaustingly wholehearted but likeably self-aware film bore (Gianni Amico?):  the latter predicts that Anna Karina will define their generation and reminds Fabrizio that life is impossible without Rossellini.    The climactic sequence at the opera – the opening night of a production of local hero Verdi’s Macbeth, which also sees the ending of Fabrizio’s affair with Gina ­– is thrilling.  It’s a superb orchestration of emotional, visual and musical movement.  Fabrizio is up in a box with Clelia and her mother (Ida Pellegri); his mother and grandmother (Iole Lunardi – an amazing face) are down in the stalls, and are joined there by Gina.  She and Fabrizio then leave their seats and he tracks her down in the theatre entrance while the opera is still going on.  (Opera’s at its best when it’s supplying dramatic context in a film drama …)

    A great thing about Bertolucci is that he’s no less powerfully expressive when what’s on screen isn’t obviously exciting.  An early shot of an empty road and Fabrizio’s friend Agostino (Allen Midgette) cycling down it communicates an extraordinary sense of the calm and desolation of ennui.  (Agostino, who dies – drowns himself? – shortly afterwards, remains an opaque character, though.)  The handsome claustrophobia of the Parma town square, Gina’s walk to the station in the rain, with Fabrizio’s Communist mentor Cesare helping carry her luggage – these images have the texture of something remembered.  They may be built from the director’s personal memories but they feel so precisely real that they fuse with one’s own.   Bertolucci also has an acute understanding of what he can achieve by what he doesn’t show.  In the first half of Before the Revolution, the name of Cesare is frequently invoked by Fabrizio but the man is never seen.  This builds up our expectations and means that, when we do meet Cesare and he turns out to be honourable but also bespectacled, uncharismatic and faintly defeated (he’s well played by Morando Morandini), our slightly guilty feelings of anti-climax connect with Fabrizio’s inability to adopt Communism wholeheartedly.  At the end, as he and Clelia leave the church, we never quite see Fabrizio’s face, which is always obscured by the other wedding guests.  It’s as if he’s chickened out of being the man he might have been, effacing himself in the process.   The cinematographer was Aldo Scavardi and this early score by Ennio Morricone is one of his best, less obviously melodious but also less smoothly predictable than the music he’s best known for.  It was very frustrating that the subtitles didn’t supply translations of the several pop songs we hear playing or of a song sung to Gina by a young girl (Evelina Alpi).

    20 April 2011

  • Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead

    Sidney Lumet (2007)

    The title – which derives from an Irish saying (‘May you be in heaven a full half-hour before the devil knows you’re dead’) – is the best thing about it.   This was Sidney Lumet’s last film so it’s a pity it isn’t better, although it was well received by critics anyway.   Lumet’s admirers would have enjoyed the trademark gritty New York City settings but Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead is also characteristic in the relentless extremity of human predicament which it describes – with plenty of overacting to match.  These were persistent limitations of Lumet’s work.   I dozed during Richard Combs’s introduction to the BFI screening but I seem to think he concluded by saying, ‘Welcome to the world of evil’.  If so, the world of evil is a monochrome world:  the tone of Before the Devil is insistent and unvarying, and both the look of the movie and its soundtrack unnecessarily reinforce a point which you’ve got within the first fifteen minutes (of slightly more than two hours of running time).  The dark shadows of Ron Fortunato’s images are just about inescapable until the final white-out.  A couple of Carter Burwell’s chords recall the score for The Godfather part II but nothing else does:  the lack of variety makes the movie merely and tiresomely melodramatic.

    The narrative is fragmented according to the fashion of (much younger directors of) the decade in which Before the Devil was made.  The pivotal event is the robbery of the Hanson family’s jewellery store:  this is the brainchild of desperate elder son Andy Hanson and is so badly botched that his mother, who wasn’t meant to be working in the store at the time, gets killed.  Since nearly every scene – whether it takes place before, during or after the robbery – seems like the same scene, the non-linear complication of the story is pointless.  I don’t know if the film reflects the shape of the screenplay that Kelly Masterson wrote but Lumet’s sequencing does nothing to conceal the mechanically worked out ironies, deceptions and betrayals.  The Hansons never suggest a real family.   The cast, on paper, is most impressive.   Philip Seymour Hoffman is Andy and Ethan Hawke his younger brother Hank; Marisa Tomei is Andy’s wife and Hank’s mistress; Albert Finney is the Hanson paterfamilias and Rosemary Harris his unlucky wife; the likes of Michael Shannon and Amy Ryan feature in smaller roles.  I got the sense that nearly all of them had seen too many Sidney Lumet movies and knew their job was to keep emoting as intensely and for as long as they possibly could.  Hoffman and Tomei manage a few moments of relative light and shade – but relative only to Hawke and Finney, who don’t.  Shannon, although hardly at his best, is almost light relief as a character who wants money without, unlike the others, being morally tortured about it.  In retrospect, it’s pretty obvious what you’re in from the moment Hank goes to see his young daughter in her school play – King Lear, with a cast of what look like ten year olds.  It’s a bizarre choice of school play for such young children.  On the other hand, a family tragedy for those with a mental age of ten is one way of describing Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead.

    11 June 2013

     

     

Posts navigation