Daily Archives: Sunday, November 29, 2015

  • Bank Holiday

    Carol Reed (1938)

    The BFI programme note comprised an extract from a 2005 study of Carol Reed by Peter William Evans.  At the start of this extract, Evans describes Bank Holiday as ‘remarkable for its uncompromising attitude even in sexual matters towards female self-determination’ and quotes a description of the main character, a young nurse called Catherine, by another writer on film, Bruce Babington.  Catherine is, according to Babington, a woman ‘moving between two men, one of them prosaically embodying her own class restrictions, the other higher-classed and romantic’.  Catherine is about to spend the August Bank Holiday weekend with her boyfriend, Geoffrey, in the fictional seaside resort of Bexborough.  (Close to London, it could be Brighton or Southend; according to IMDB, the sea front sequences were shot in different towns although there’s no precise information about the filming locations.)  Catherine’s thoughts are elsewhere – back in London, where she has just witnessed the death in childbirth of a young woman called Ann Howard and broken the news to Ann’s husband, Stephen:  his reaction to his wife’s death is that he wants to see her body but not his newborn son.  By the end of Bank Holiday, the relationship between Catherine and Geoffrey has ended; she has dashed back to London midway through the weekend, convinced that Stephen Howard is on the point of suicide.  She is right.  Stephen is saved in the nick of time.  In the film’s final scene, he’s in a hospital bed, being cared for by Nurse Catherine.  According to Peter William Evans:

    ‘Catherine, the maternally defined nurse, but as yet childless spinster, is enchanted by the fantasy of the caring father-figure painted by Stephen’s wife [whom Catherine has been nursing for some time]. The mature man … is the nurse’s object of desire; his dying wife, the mother of his child, becomes the screen on which is projected her own maternal fantasy.  …’

    Evans sees in the film’s lighting scheme, in particular a shot of Catherine in her ‘snowy white uniform’, ‘an ironic portrayal of the darker forces that illuminate her fantasy’.  He refers to ‘Catherine’s pursuit of a lover who, in some senses, is … dead’.  Appraising the film’s ending, Evans concludes that:

    ‘The fantasy of romantic love, the ‘holiday’, turns out … to be no more than a desire for convention and all the constraints that social heavens allow.’

    John Oliver, the BFI curator who introduced the screening of Bank Holiday, commended it in much more straightforward terms – as a strong drama and a valuable slice of social history and ritual.   It’s possible that Oliver was tailoring his remarks for the audience in NFT1 – this was a free-for-seniors matinee (packed out) – but his well-organised, perceptive introduction was much more in tune with the film that I saw than was Evans’s interpretation.  The sexual themes are certainly, for the time, daring:  Geoff and Catherine intend to book into the Grand Hotel at Bexborough as a married couple (as Geoff goes up an escalator from the underground to the mainline train station in London, he keeps seeing posters for a film called ‘Sinners’); and Peter William Evans does well to highlight a moment in Bank Holiday when Catherine ‘in a swimming pool scene resists the controlling gaze of her insipid partner Geoff by refusing to dive into the water to stimulate even further his visual pleasure’.  (According to Wikipedia, the censor originally trimmed five minutes from Bank Holiday:  it would be interesting exactly which five minutes.)  But I don’t think either the screenplay – by Rodney Ackland (best known as the author of the play The Pink Room, which eventually became Absolute Hell), Roger Burford and Hans Wilhelm – or Carol Reed’s direction pins down the sexual-romantic implications of the story in the schematic way that Evans suggests.  Bank Holiday is all the more absorbing because some of these implications are inchoate in what’s on screen.

    It was natural for Reed and the writers to want to keep the timeframe neat, moving from the beginning to the end of the August Bank Holiday.  Reed begins with an efficient, amusing montage of various types of worker downing tools, as midday strikes, presumably on the Saturday.  (The placards outside a newsagent’s, forecasting the weekend weather and warning of ‘storm clouds of war over Europe’, seem, in long retrospect, a predictive reminder that the bank holiday ritual the film goes on to describe was presumably interrupted for several years not long after Bank Holiday‘s release, in June 1938.)  Work doesn’t, of course, stop in the hospital where the chain-smoking Stephen Howard (John Lodge) waits anxiously outside a maternity ward; his wife Ann is about to have surgery to deliver her baby.  At first, you think that Stephen, as he suggests in his opening conversation with Catherine (Margaret Lockwood), is just like any nervous father-to-be.  There’s nothing in Catherine’s voice or face to suggest otherwise, when she talks either with Stephen or with Ann (Linden Travers) as she’s taken down to theatre.  The mood changes instantly in a brief exchange between Catherine and the surgeon who’ll be operating on Ann.  Catherine asks ‘what chance’ Ann has.  ‘Very little, I’m afraid,’ replies the surgeon (Felix Aylmer), before adding, ‘The baby should be all right’.  This is a startling suggestion that the loss of the mother, although somewhat regrettable, is of secondary importance to the survival of the child inside her.  It’s difficult to tell, watching a British film of the late 1930s more than seventy years on, whether the matter-of- fact tone of the surgeon’s prediction reflects contemporary dramatic convention or that maternal mortality rates in childbirth were much higher at the time.  I hadn’t known, until I googled the subject after seeing the film, that these mortality rates declined hardly at all during the first three decades of the twentieth century and were beginning to fall steeply only around the time that Bank Holiday appeared.  Even so, it seems that the mortality rate in this country during the 1930s was around 4% (expressed as 40 in every 1000) so the emotionless prognosis still seems odd.

    In any case, Ann Howard’s death in childbirth is a shocking event in Bank Holiday.   It and Stephen Howard’s grief cast a long shadow over the entire film.  Although the American John Lodge is a mechanical actor, he gives Stephen Howard a strange dignity; Lodge’s lack of meaningful facial expression in response to Ann’s death is effective because it chimes with the enormity of the catastrophe – looks as well as words fail Stephen.  And Catherine’s inability to stop thinking about him during her time in Bexborough works very well.  Margaret Lockwood expresses a convincing sense of distraction:  neither her companion Geoffrey (Hugh Williams) nor the audience can be sure of what exactly she’s thinking or feeling.  The steps leading up to Stephen’s attempted suicide and the attempt itself are conventionally melodramatic but they include some atmospheric moments:  Stephen walking listlessly in the London rain; Catherine, on the beach at Bexborough in darkness, seeming telepathically to see Stephen standing on a London bridge and also looking into water.   But Ann’s death really is too big a thing to happen as part of the film’s timeframe, when other elements of the story are treated realistically.  (It might have been easier to accept if the death had occurred several weeks beforehand and Reed had shown, in flashbacks, how the bereaved husband had remained on Catherine’s mind.)  Catherine’s closing words to Stephen in his hospital bed are jarring:  when Stephen says to her, ‘You’ve come back’, she replies, ‘Everybody comes back.  The holiday is over’.  Since ‘everybody’ clearly doesn’t include Ann Howard and Catherine has no reason to think that Stephen isn’t still distraught at the loss of his wife, her words are bizarrely insensitive.

    The writing, direction and playing of the scenes between Catherine and Geoffrey on their ill-fated weekend is excellent.  What’s especially true is the way the pair keep trying to keep things going, to ignore the increasingly evident futility of their romance:  she smiles to reassure him; he then tries to reinvigorate proceedings.  As Geoffrey, Hugh Williams strikes a perfect balance between callow charm and fatuousness.  The comedy elements in the Catherine-Geoffrey storyline – trying to book into the hotel as Mr and Mrs Smith, and so on – supply a bridge to the more explicitly comical characters and subplots, which involve a beauty pageant being held at the Grand, and a working-class Cockney couple, Arthur and May (Wally Patch and Kathleen Harrison), with their many kids in tow.  Although these elements are overshadowed by what Catherine has left behind in London, Carol Reed manages them well.  They’re underwritten, though.  Doreen (Rene Ray), aka Miss Fulham, and her old-maid-in-waiting sidekick Milly (Merle Tottenham) drink cocktails to show the self-regarding vamp Miss Mayfair (Jeanne Stuart) how sophisticated they are but there’s no payoff to their downing Benedictine as if it was lemonade.  Nor is there any explanation of how or why the put upon May suddenly stands up to her feckless pub crawler husband, although you’re glad that she does.  Kathleen Harrison is vigorously amusing in the part; I particularly liked the way May rummages in a bag for the kids’ bathing costumes, which she then chucks in their direction.

    The film attaches some importance to social distinctions and the seaside pleasures associated with these.  There’s a funny scene in which a stage concert party performs their first show of the day to Arthur, an audience of one, who’s waiting for the pubs to open.  I wasn’t sure, therefore, if there was any good reason why Arthur and May and their family are among those in the Grand on the Sunday evening.   When Catherine gets a lift back to London with the Bexborough entertainments manager (Garry Marsh), who’s tried to make off with all the takings, their car is flagged down by the law en route.  Wilfrid Lawson delivers a superb cameo as the police sergeant who interviews the pair:  he asks questions of them with a weary calm, all the time determined to carry on eating his sandwich.

    Footnote

    Bank Holiday was preceded by a ten-minute documentary from 1964, Knees Up Mother Brown, made by Peter Smith, who introduced his film.  It describes a Darby and Joan club in Stepney and focuses on four women in their seventies who enjoy going there.  Although Smith clearly admires the club and means to celebrate those who attend it, the film is depressing.  You expect working-class women of this period to look much older than their years and they do – but they look more unhealthy than ancient.  There are clips from the club’s day trip to Southend.  The women go to the Kursaal and the images are accompanied by their voices on the soundtrack, including a conversation about where one of them is going to be buried.  The film ends suddenly and expressively:  the human figures disappear from the screen, leaving the amusement park empty.

    10 November 2014

  • Wendy and Lucy

    Kelly Reichardt (2008)

    Wendy and Lucy runs only 80 minutes but so little happens that there’s plenty of time to wonder whether there’s more to it than meets the eye and ear.  Wendy Carroll (Michelle Williams) is a young woman on her way to start a new life in Alaska, with her mongrel dog, Lucy.   Wendy has stopped off en route in a small town in Oregon and her car breaks down.  It’s never clear to what extent Wendy is alienated from either her family (in Indiana) or society in general but she’s low on funds.  When she’s arrested for shoplifting and detained for several hours in custody, Lucy, who was left tethered outside the grocery store where the thefts took place, disappears.   Most of the rest of the film is about Wendy’s search to find the dog.   I wondered whether Reichardt and Jonathan Raymond, with whom she co-wrote the screenplay (and who wrote the short story Train Choir on which it’s based), were making some kind of ironic comment on the road movie in general and Sean Penn’s Into the Wild in particular.   One of the saving graces of the road movie is that, however dire the film might be for the most part, there’s always the hope that it may improve as the traveller goes to different places and/or meets different people.

    This is true, to an extent, of Into the Wild – the story of a young man, propelled by big ideas, whose voyage to Alaska brings him into contact with exotic flora and fauna and takes him through successive spectacular landscapes.  Wendy and Lucy is a road movie that goes nowhere and the reasons for the taciturn Wendy’s planned journey north remain obscure.  The only animal life we see apart from Lucy (and other canines – as the camera pans across the runs in a dog pound, in an especially unhappy sequence) are some pigeons on a telegraph wire against a bright blue sky (the most striking shot in the film).  The streets of the town and railtrack and scrubland around it are prosaic and the place seems more sparsely populated than the Alaskan wilderness.  Later on, I started thinking that ‘Lucy’ was maybe a contemporary inflection of ‘Lassie’ – a lost dog story in a society that doesn’t permit a happy ending, where the dog’s owner has no home to which her pet can return.  (I think I may have been desperate by this stage:   Lucy, according to the cast list, is played by a dog called Lucy.)

    Because Kelly Reichardt’s style is drably minimalist and Wendy’s character and motivation remain unexplained, some critics seem ready to assume that the film is truthful and tough-minded.  I don’t think it’s either.  Seeing Wendy and Lucy so soon after The Class – which demonstrates triumphantly that you can use a documentary style to entertaining as well as psychologically penetrating effect – puts Reichardt’s film at a particularly acute disadvantage.  Even so, you’re prepared to sit through the nearly eventless minutiae that dominate the early scenes in anticipation of something gradually more substantial.  But the doubts as to how interested the director is in capturing reality – as distinct from devising scenes to lower your spirits – set in very soon.  Wendy, having discovered she’s got problems with her car, gets it pushed to the side of the street with the help of a friendly security guard, then takes Lucy’s things out of the boot to prepare the dog’s breakfast.  The big bag of dog food is virtually empty:  we’re supposed to believe that Wendy’s life revolves around Lucy but that she hadn’t noticed this before.  This prompts the shoplifting.  We’ve already seen Wendy working out how much money she has left and the total is $525 – it’s surprising that she would risk separation from Lucy for the sake of a few dollars.  (At the police station she ends up paying far more in a fine for the theft.)  Reichardt doesn’t give Wendy the chance, when she’s arrested, to protest that Lucy has to be looked after.  Wendy gets into the police car and it’s only as she’s being driven away from the store that she remarks, comfortably too late, that Lucy is still tied up there.   I had the sense with each of these moments that we were supposed to think that in-this-lousy-world the cards were stacked against Wendy.  (A more credible reaction is to think Wendy is alarmingly stupid and/or not so considerate a dog owner as we’d at first assumed.)  By the end of the film, I accepted that the cards really were stacked against Wendy – but that it was Kelly Reichardt who was stacking the deck.

    Several of the select band of people that Wendy meets are not unpleasant:   the increasingly benign security guard (Wally Dalton), who lends her his mobile phone to make calls to the dog pound, and eventually gives her $15; the garage mechanic (Will Patton), who seems to offer her as reasonable a deal as he can for repairing and, when it proves to be a lost cause, disposing of her car; the affable, sympathetic woman at the pound (Ayanna Berkshire).  The store manager (John Breen) seems to decide to press charges only at the insistence of the shelf stocker (Michael Brophy) – and even he seems spurred more by the prospect of enlivening a dull day than by censorious malice.   The one signal exception is a man (just about invisible to me in the darkness in which the scene was shot) who comes across Wendy when she’s sleeping in woodland, in the hope that Lucy will seek her out there.   It seems probable – though it’s by no means clear – that this man rapes Wendy; she’s traumatised by their meeting, at any rate, but this aftermath is rapidly overtaken by the news that Lucy has been found and whatever happened in the wood isn’t referred to again.   But other people, whether nice or nasty, don’t seem to affect Wendy, who is so closed off that she comes over as almost pathologically unreachable (and occasionally ESN).

    Michelle Williams, looking almost prepubertal, has her best moments when she suggests the force of Wendy’s impacted, unaccountable hostility.  When Lucy disappears and Wendy is calling for her, she sounds angry with the dog rather than anxious about her (or angry with herself); when the security guard first offers his mobile, Williams shows you how much it takes Wendy to say thank you.   But this still doesn’t tell us enough.  In Brokeback Mountain, Michelle Williams was more expressive in that one moment when her character saw her husband kissing another man and she seemed physically to shrink than she is in the whole of Wendy and Lucy.  I’m all for directors and writers deciding that crude expository dialogue is not the way to develop and describe character but the aspiration towards something more challenging is futile if, as a result, next to nothing comes through.   The effect of all this – especially since Wendy’s character quite dominates proceedings – is to make the difficulties of her life seem to derive from individual psychological problems rather than reflect some kind of societal malaise.

    Kelly Reichardt’s minimalism is of a kind that makes almost any event or conventional expression look exaggerated and unconvincing.  In her first scenes, Michelle Williams is so meticulously downbeat that, when she has eye contact with the shelf stocker in the grocery as she picks up an apple, thinks twice and replaces it in the stand, she looks to be flashing her shoplifting intentions in neon lights.  (Wendy is the only person in the store so the stocker can focus his undivided suspicious attention on her.)   A real irony of Wendy and Lucy is that what keeps the audience interested is, I think, what keeps an audience interested in a old-style tearjerker lost-dog picture.  In spite of the fact that the human protagonist here is opaque and somewhat alienating, we want to know that her dog is safe and well; in fact, because we can’t care that much about Wendy, that’s all we want to know.

    When Wendy and Lucy are reunited, Reichardt certainly succeeds in not making the moment heartwarming.  This is not only because you know that in the film’s universe there’s no possibility of happiness; it’s also because Lucy, although she seems a lovely dog, behaves as if she knows she’s in an indie picture rather than Hollywood.  This has to be a motion picture first:  a lost dog, back with her owner, exhibits muted, almost ambivalent affection.   It isn’t heartbreaking when Wendy decides that Lucy will be better off staying in the foster home to where she’s been tracked down:  this was the only moment at which I thought Wendy had had a sensible idea.  The last that we see of her is jumping onto a halting freight train with her remaining possessions in two bags:  the director appears to see her disappearing into the anonymous poverty of so many others in modern America.  But Kelly Reichardt pays the price here for her protagonist’s opacity (as well as for the visual cliché of someone in dire straits hitching a ride on a freight train – the depressive side of the same coin as riding off into the sunset).  I came out thinking that at least Lucy could look forward to a relatively stable and comfortable future.  That didn’t seem an altogether unhappy ending.

    14 March 2009

Posts navigation