Daily Archives: Saturday, July 4, 2015

  • Timbuktu

    Abderrahmane Sissako (2014)

    ‘From here to Timbuktu’ – or ‘Timbucktoo’, as I think it was once conventionally spelt in English.  For British people of my and earlier generations, Timbuktu primarily signifies a (any) far-off place.  The online Free Dictionary, which acknowledges thisat sense of the word, also summarises Timbuktu in geographical and historical terms, as follows:

    ‘A city of central Mali near the Niger River northeast of Bamako.  Founded in the 11th century by the Tuareg, it became a major trading center (primarily for gold and salt) and a center of Islamic learning by the 14th century.  Timbuktu was sacked in 1591 by invaders from Morocco and fell to the French in 1894.’

    Abderrahmane Sissako was born, in 1961, in Mauritania but spent most of the first twenty years of his life in Mali.  The story of his film Timbuktu, which Sissako wrote with Kessen Tall, was suggested by the occupation of Mali in 2012-13 by the militant Islamist group Ansar Dine (‘helpers of the [Islamic] faith’) and by a particular incident that occurred during that time, the stoning of an unmarried couple in Aguelhok, a rural commune of Mali.  One of Sissako’s many achievements in Timbuktu is to change utterly the traditional connotation of the place name.   A Timbuktu occupied by an Islamic State-type faction is many miles away from being a far-off place.

    In the film’s opening sequence, a gazelle is chased across desert by a jeep.  Shots are being fired from the vehicle, then a man’s voice says, ‘Don’t kill it – tire it’.  Target practice resumes with bullets hitting – in a startling percussion – an array of masks and statues, including that of a fertility goddess.  The symbolism is obvious but Sissako achieves in this prologue an economical and incisive illustration of the dual rupture of Timbuktu, through the destruction of long-standing culture and the advent of a new (IS supporters would, of course, see it as the restoration of a regrettably long-lost) puritanism.  Sissako dramatises – in ways that are sometimes funny, more often alarming – the co-existence of time-honoured ways of making a living, anachronistic dogma and modern preoccupations and technology.  One group of jihadists discusses the merits of international football players rather than Islamic imperatives.  Mobile phones are ubiquitous.  The central storyline is catalysed by a cow named GPS.  This is one of seven cattle owned by a herdsman called Kidane (Ibrahim Ahmed).  Amadou, a fisherman, has already warned Kidane’s foster-son, Issan (Mehdi A G Mohamed), who waters the animals, not to let them get too close to his nets.  When GPS accidentally damages these, Amadou kills the cow and, in the ensuing set-to between him and the equally enraged Kidane, Amadou is accidentally shot dead.  These deaths are a reminder that the human propensity for conflict and violence doesn’t need the tyranny of a perverted form of Islam in order to express itself but it’s Sharia law that defines Kidane’s punishment.  The combination of randomness and inevitability in Timbuktu is formidable.   The IS men walk round the streets, proclaiming through a megaphone one proscription after another:  in spite of the Koranic justifications they claim for these rules, there’s a strong sense of making-them-up-as-you-go-along.  The inevitable quality is an expression of both the rigid fundamentalism of the jihadists and the quiet conviction of Abderrahmane Sissako’s film-making.

    In his exploration of a world in which its playing is forbidden, Sissako makes aptly, subtly powerful use of instrumental music (by Amin Bouhafa).  One of Timbuktu’s most affecting moments comes during the lashing of a woman who has been caught singing to music, in the company of men who are not members of her family.   At first, it seems that the sounds the woman is making as she is lashed are simply screams of pain; then her cries are transmuted, defiantly and piercingly, into song – after all, IS does not proscribe singing a cappella.  This film is remarkable for its expressive soundtrack, and for metaphorical sound too.  We repeatedly hear the IS men hitting a brick wall – as when the local imam chides them for aggressively entering the mosque where he and others are at prayer and the jihadists are unable to argue, or when one of their number makes a phone call to his superior to report the playing of music and to check whether, since the music is in praise of Allah, it’s still illegal.

    Sissako and his DoP, Sofian El Fani, also create images that are both beautiful and terrifying – not least the long-held, panoramic shot that describes the aftermath to the confrontation between Kidane and Amadou.  As Kidane walks away, we see the body of the stricken Amadou, a tiny object in the landscape, revive for a moment before dying.  In spite of the jihadists’ soccer conversation, the playing of football is also vetoed by IS:  a sequence in which teenage boys mime playing soccer – sans ball – has been widely and rightly praised.  As will be clear from the above, there are several episodes involving animals.  These images always capture the quality of movement and other characteristics of the particular species yet seem to comment too on the human situation in Sissako’s story.  The white-pink sand of the desert naturally and strikingly throws into relief the characters photographed against it but Sofian El Fani’s palette is a beguiling blend of vivid and muted tones.  The camera is always sensitive to texture too, in details like a woman’s long skirts trailing in the dust of a street.

    It’s not only the extreme and traumatic experiences of the people in Timbuktu that make it an engrossing human drama.  When Kidane and his wife, Satima (Toulou Kiki), drink tea together, before GPS’s trespass changes everything, the moment has an easy intimacy as well as, in retrospect, a tragic poignancy.  (It calls to mind, in both respects, the great sequence in The Seventh Seal, in which the knight pauses to eat and drink with a couple and their child.)  The cackling Zabou (Kettly Noel), although an arresting camera subject, is perhaps a relatively unoriginal crazy-seer figure but the acting throughout is strong.  The playing is natural but the cast shape their characters strongly enough to make them creatures of drama rather than of documentary.  The local jihadist leader Abdelkerim (Abel Jafri) is perhaps the most disturbing character in the story.  He seems foolish and clumsily uncertain in everything he does, except when he’s firing a machine gun – at a couple of sand dunes the shape of which suggests female forms.  Kidane’s daughter Toya (Layla Walet Mohamed) complains that Abdelkerim always hangs round her and her mother when their father is absent.  Timbuktu contains no ‘sex scenes’ as such yet one is always aware of frustrated sexual appetite as well as the misogyny of Islamic fundamentalism.  In a similar way, the world that Sissako describes is based in violence of various kinds yet acts of outright violence account for only a few of the film’s ninety-seven minutes.  (What there is has shocking impact.)  ‘Don’t kill it – tire it’:  those opening words echo throughout.  By the end of Timbuktu, people as well as animals have been, or are being, hunted down.   The moral eloquence and art-that-conceals-art authority of this film make most of what you see and hear at the current cinema seem feeble.

    29 May 2015

     

  • Australia

    Baz Luhrmann (2008)

    The title suggests a national epic; the visual scale and length of the film (165 minutes) endorse the sense of ambition; I decided that life was too short and left after an hour.  Baz Luhrmann doesn’t have the temperament for this kind of storytelling.  I loathed the overactive camera movement and editing of Moulin Rouge! but at least Luhrmann was able to communicate his passion for theatrical dazzle.   Australia has been in gestation for several years and it’s a pity Luhrmann couldn’t develop a more imaginatively structured script that might have married with his hyperkinetic approach.  He wrote the screenplay himself (although there are writing credits too for Stewart Beattie, Ronald Harwood and Richard Flanagan) and the first hour anyway seems thoroughly conventional, not to say old-fashioned.  From the word go, Luhrmann is impatient to cut to the chase.   He spends the first ten minutes or so switching between different characters, in various locations, who spout explanatory, scene-setting dialogue that the director clearly wants out of the way as quickly as possible.   I’ve no problem in principle with subverting the expected narrative rhythm of this sort of material (strange as it may seem to do this when it’s your own script) but the result is both deplorably scrappy as sentimental drama and visually incoherent.  Some of the pirouetting camera movements and God’s-eye views have nothing to do with the emotional meaning of the action down below.

    Luhrmann’s muse Nicole Kidman is the bossy English aristocrat, Lady Sarah Ashley, who travels to Australia in 1939 to Faraway Downs, a cattle station owned by her husband (I wasn’t sure when he’d been murdered but it was shortly after the action was underway, if not before).  Faraway Downs is the only cattle station in the Northern Territory not owned by the cattle baron ‘King’ Carney (Bryan Brown).  Lady Ashley reluctantly joins forces with an independent cattle drover (Hugh Jackman) – a new man with no name:  he’s simply known as ‘Drover’ – to thwart a plot by Carney and his baddie henchmen to take the land.  Eventually (in 1942 and after I’d left the cinema), they face the bombing of Darwin by Japanese forces.   There’s also a strong Aboriginal element in the story.  The opening credits tell us about the ‘stolen generations’ of Aborigine children (removed from their families by Australian national and state government agencies).  The childless Lady Ashley’s relationship with a young Aborigine boy Nullah (Brandon Walters) is central to the story and David Gulpilil plays ‘King George’, an Aboriginal elder with magical powers.

    Most of what I saw came across as a kind of rip-off of Out of Africa played at Keystone Cops speed (and with acting in the smaller parts to match).   Nicole Kidman’s interpretation of Lady Ashley is, in the early stages, almost comically shallow and broad.  I think I started to be more sympathetic towards her only because I felt sorry for the actress having to undergo obligatory scenes of a woman-who’s-too-smart-for-her-own-good fetching up in a man’s world and finding it quickly beyond her control.   (When she arrives, Lady Ashley’s suitcases fly open and her lingerie is handed around among the brawling clientele of a desert bar.   She indulges in overdone exclamations of enraptured delight at kangaroos jumping along beside Drover’s truck – until the Aborigines on board shoot one of the animals.)  Perhaps because she seems to have approached the role as a caricature, Kidman actually has more characterisation than she had in, say, Cold Mountain or The Golden Compass but it’s still beyond me why she’s reckoned to be a major actress.  She seems to be gathering a good deal of praise for the scene in which she awkwardly tries to sing ‘Somewhere Over the Rainbow’ to Nullah, which I found practised and false.   Hugh Jackman (whom I’d not seen before) looks, with his comically overdeveloped musculature, a cartoon Aussie beaut, which fits all too obviously with the conception of Drover.  Kidman’s doing a funny voice has a weirdly infectious effect so that, in the early stages, I had the sense that Jackman too was putting on an accent.   I got to like him more as the hour wore on – narrowing his eyes to register emotion is a predictable device but there’s an intelligence behind the eyes.  Having Jackman in this role is, nevertheless, unimaginative casting (particularly if Wikipedia is to be believed that Russell Crowe and Heath Ledger were being lined up for the part of Drover at earlier stages of the film’s development).

    After the spectacle of the cattle stampede, which brings about the death of the alcohol-sodden station master Kipling Flynn (Jack Thompson), Lady Ashley, Drover and Nullah drink a toast in Flynn’s memory – with an Asian-looking man whose presence in the team I couldn’t fathom.   Drover downs his rum effortlessly;   Lady Ashley splutters on hers, as does the Asian (she’s a woman and he’s a foreigner, after all).  They both then hold out their glasses for more.  Cut to a kangaroo inspecting an empty rum bottle.  Then an inebriated Lady Ashley asks Drover to dance; and, of course, because he’s a he-man, he’s embarrassed and has two left feet.  It was at this point that I gave up and took my leave.  It’s seven years since Moulin Rouge! was released.  Baz Luhrmann has subsequently directed in the theatre but his only other work for the screen since 2001 seems to have been the famous commercial for Chanel No 5 (with Kidman).   Australia is only his fourth cinema feature during the last 16 years.   Although I thought it was overdone, I could see why Strictly Ballroom, his debut (in 1992), was such a hit.  His Romeo + Juliet was a clever and inventive take not only on the original material but on elements of West Side StoryMoulin Rouge!, although its frenetic, fragmented style deprived the audience of some of the pleasures of a good screen musical, took the genre in a potentially new direction by using a virtually jukebox selection of songs for the score.   Australia has clearly been a labour of love for Luhrmann.   It’s to be hoped that he’s now got it out of his system and will return to making films which give him more scope for expressing himself.

    29 December 2008

Posts navigation